SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Lea
Radick,
Communications Officer, USCBL, Phone: +1Â (301)Â 891-3002,
E-mail: lradick@handicap‑
Zach
Hudson,
Coordinator, USCBL, Phone: +1Â (917)Â 860-1883,
E-mail: zhudson@handicap‑
In a statement Tuesday, the head of the U.S. delegation to the
Second Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty informed participants that the Obama
administration has begun a comprehensive landmine policy review. In the
statement, the U.S. representative said, "The Administration's decision to
attend this Review Conference is the result of an on-going comprehensive review
of U.S. landmine policy initiated at the direction of President Obama."
In a statement Tuesday, the head of the U.S. delegation to the
Second Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty informed participants that the Obama
administration has begun a comprehensive landmine policy review. In the
statement, the U.S. representative said, "The Administration's decision to
attend this Review Conference is the result of an on-going comprehensive review
of U.S. landmine policy initiated at the direction of President Obama."
The
statement represents a reversal of the position first outlined by Department of
State spokesperson Ian Kelly in response to a reporter's question during a
briefing last Tuesday, November 24. Kelly's original announcement was followed
by a fierce outcry from civil society, non-governmental organizations and the
international community. The United States Campaign to Ban Landmines (USCBL);
its parent organization, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL);
and Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Jim McGovern all delivered harsh
criticism of the policy position. These censures, along with others, have
continued throughout the Second Review Conference, which opened in Cartagena
this week.
In
reaction to the administration's initial statement that it would not join the
Mine Ban Treaty, Senator Leahy said on the Senate floor Tuesday morning [1
December], "By announcing our intention to join the treaty in Cartagena, this
Administration would have signaled to the rest of the world that the United
States is finally showing the leadership that has been wanting on these
indiscriminate weapons that maim and kill thousands of innocent people every
year...The Administration's approach to this issue up until this past weekend has
been cursory, half-hearted, and deeply disappointing to those of us who
expected a serious, thorough reexamination of this issue. One would hope that
an Administration that portrays itself as a global leader on issues of
humanitarian law and arms control recognizes this is an opportunity."
With
the U.S. announcement in Cartagena of a new corrected position, the USCBL is
guardedly hopeful that progress toward accession to the treaty can once again
resume.
"We're
glad they're here, and that they have formally announced a landmine policy
review. That's a good first step," said Zach Hudson, coordinator of the USCBL.
"Now we need to hear how this review will be conducted. We want to hear about a
structured timeline with a reasonable end date. We want assurances that the
process will also include voices of NATO allies, legislators and the NGO
community that has been working in the trenches on this issue for the past few
decades."
The
USCBL believes that the old arguments used by the U.S. to defer joining the
treaty in 1997 are no longer relevant. Some U.S. officials have cited the
conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq as reasons for not joining. However, both of
these countries are States Parties to the treaty, and as parties have not only
banned antipersonnel landmines, but are also prohibited from assisting the
United States in any way with use of landmines. The U.S. is also already in de
facto compliance with most of the treaty's provisions. Despite not being a
signatory, the U.S. has not used antipersonnel mines since 1991, has not
exported them since 1992 and has not produced them since 1997.
"We
want to believe the administration will conduct this review with an openness to
joining the treaty," said Steve Goose, the director of the Arms Division at
Human Rights Watch and ICBL spokesperson. "After last week's announcement, we
want to be sure this policy reversal is not just going through the motions to
correct a process that rightly angered many civil society organizations and
U.S. legislators. This is a fresh start, and we are looking forward to closely
collaborating in the review process."
The
United States is currently one of only 39 countries that have not yet joined
the treaty. In the Western Hemisphere, only the U.S and Cuba are non-signatories.
Every other member of NATO except Poland (which has already signed and will
ratify in 2012) are also States Parties to the treaty. While being one of the
first governments to call for the eventual elimination of landmines in the
mid-1990s, the U.S. did not sign the treaty when it opened for signature in
1997. Instead, President Clinton set 2006 as the goal for the United States to
join. President Bush reversed this decision in 2004.
The
U.S. announcement was made during the historic "Cartagena Summit on a Mine Free
World," the Second Mine Ban Treaty Review Conference, taking place November
29-December 4. More than 1,000 people and 120 governments are participating in
this five-year review conference, including dozens of foreign ministers and defense
ministers. The U.S. is attending the conference as an observer.
The United States Campaign to Ban Landmines is a coalition of non-governmental organizations working to ensure that the U.S. comprehensively prohibits antipersonnel mines--by banning their use in Korea--and joins the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, as more than 160 nations have done. It is the national affiliate of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), founded in New York in 1992 and recipient of the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate together with former ICBL coordinator Ms. Jody Williams of Vermont. We also call for sustained U.S. government financial support for mine clearance and victim assistance.
"Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over," said one organizer.
Campaigners who last month celebrated the success of their effort to place an abortion rights referendum on November ballots in Missouri faced uncertainty about the ballot initiative Friday night, after a judge ruled that organizers had made an error on their petitions that rendered the measure invalid.
Judge Christopher Limbaugh of Cole County Circuit Court sided with pro-forced pregnancy lawmakers and activists who had argued that Missourians for Constitutional Freedom had not sufficiently explained the ramifications of the Right to Reproductive Freedom initiative, or Amendment 3, which would overturn the state's near-total abortion ban.
The state constitution has a requirement that initiative petitions include "an enacting clause and the full text of the measure," and clarify the laws or sections of the constitution that would be repealed if the amendment were passed.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom included the full text of the measure on their petitions, which were signed by more than 380,000 residents—more than twice the number of signatures needed to place the question on ballots.
Opponents claimed, though, that organizers did not explain to signatories the meaning of "a person's fundamental right to reproductive freedom."
Limbaugh accused the group of a "blatant violation" of the constitution.
Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for the group, said it "remains unwavering in [its] mission to ensure Missourians have the right to vote on reproductive freedom on November 5."
"The court's decision to block Amendment 3 from appearing on the ballot is a profound injustice to the initiative petition process and undermines the rights of the... 380,000 Missourians who signed our petition," said Sweet. "Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over."
Limbaugh said he would wait until Tuesday, when the state is set to print ballots, to formally issue an injunction instructing the secretary of state to remove the question.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom said it plans to appeal to a higher court, but if the court declines to act, the question would be struck from ballots.
As the case plays out in the coming days, said Missouri state Rep. Eric Woods (D-18), "it's a good time for a reminder that Missouri's current extreme abortion ban has ZERO exceptions for rape or incest. And Missouri Republicans are hell bent on keeping it that way."
The ruling came weeks after the Arkansas Supreme Court disqualified an abortion rights amendment from appearing on November ballots, saying organizers had failed to correctly submit paperwork verifying that paid canvassers had been properly trained.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Thousands of people gathered at London's Picadilly Circus Saturday for the city's latest march against Israel's bombardment of Gaza and the United Kingdom's continued support for the Israel Defense Forces, following what organizers called "a major victory in defense of the democratic right to protest."
The Metropolitan Police on Friday dropped its restrictions on the march, which was the first pro-Palestinian protest since last October to proceed to the Israeli embassy in London.
The police had attempted to stop campaigners from gathering before 2:30 pm, conflicting with plans to begin the rally preceding the march at noon.
"They never provided any convincing explanation or evidence for this delay, and it has caused enormous, unnecessary difficulty to the organization of a large-scale demonstration," Ben Jamal, who leads the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, one of the groups organizing the march, toldMiddle East Eye on Friday.
"It has unfortunately been part of a pattern of obstruction, delay, and lack of communication on the part of the Met which we will press them to review and reflect on for future demonstrations," he added. "For tomorrow, we call on our supporters to turn out in their hundreds of thousands to show we will not be deterred from seeking an end to Israel's genocide and justice for Palestine!"
Jamal said the police "saw sense and abandoned their unjustified and impractical attempt to delay the start of the march by two hours on Saturday," allowing the march to begin at 1:30 pm.
During previous marches in which hundreds of thousands of people have demonstrated in solidarity with Palestinians since last October, police have blocked off the area surrounding the Israeli embassy in Kensington, threatening anyone who protested in the vicinity with arrest.
Marching to the embassy, demonstrators made a "renewed call to end the ongoing genocide in Gaza" and demanded an "immediate and full cessation of arms supplies to Israel."
Earlier this week, the U.K. government announced it was suspending approximately 30 of its 350 arms export licenses for Israel, saying that "there does exist a clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law."
Human rights advocates, medical professionals working in Gaza, and legal experts have for months demanded that Israel's top international funders, including the U.S. and U.K., stop providing military aid as Israel has blocked humanitarian aid from reaching Gaza and waged attacks on civilian infrastructure, killing more than 40,000 people.
The country has also been accused of carrying out genocide in a case led by South Africa at the International Court of Justice; the court has ordered Israel to end its blockade on humanitarian aid and to prevent genocide in Gaza.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
As Londoners marched on Saturday, the Gaza Health Ministry announced that at least 61 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli forces in the last two days. Four people were killed in a strike on Halimah al-Saadiyah school in Jabaliya, where displaced Palestinians have been sheltering, and three were killed in a bombing at Amr Ibn al-As school in Gaza City.
Media outlets in Palestine reported that a baby named Yaqeen al-Astal had become the 37th child in Gaza to die of malnutrition since Israel began its near-total aid blockade.
International outrage also grew on Saturday regarding the killing of a Turkish American activist, Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, in the West Bank on Friday. Local media and eyewitnesses said Eygi had been deliberately shot in the head by Israeli forces at a protest over the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements.
The U.S. called on Israel to investigate the killing on Friday, but Eygi's family said in a statement that such a probe would not be "adequate."
"We call on President [Joe] Biden, Vice President [Kamala] Harris, and Secretary of State [Antony] Blinken to order an independent investigation into the unlawful killing of a U.S. citizen and to ensure full accountability for the guilty parties," said the family.
Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for the United Nations, called for "a full investigation of the circumstances" and said that "people should be held accountable. And again, civilians must be protected at all times."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," said Democratic leaders, "the odds of a shutdown go way up."
Leading U.S. Senate Democrats on Friday accused House Republicans of "wasting precious time catering to the hard MAGA right" as House Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled a stopgap funding bill tied to a proposal that would require proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
The proposal—the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act—has been pushed by Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump and was passed by the House in July, with five Democrats joining the GOP in supporting the bill.
Non-citizens are already barred from voting in federal elections. With about 21.3 million eligible voters reporting in a recent survey that they would not be able to quickly access their birth certificate, passport, naturalization certificate, or certificate of citizenship in order to prove their status, critics say the proposal is a clear attempt to stop people of color and young Americans from taking part in elections.
Johnson proposed including the legislation in a stopgap bill, or a continuing resolution, that would keep the government running roughly at current spending levels through March 28—a move that would postpone major spending negotiations until after the next president takes office.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said that "avoiding a government shutdown requires bipartisanship, not a bill drawn up by one party," and alluded to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) attempt last September to ram a spending bill through with immigration and border policy changes in order to avert a government shutdown.
"Speaker Johnson is making the same mistake as former Speaker McCarthy did a year ago," said Schumer and Murray in a statement. "The House Republican funding proposal is an ominous case of déjà vu."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," they added, "the odds of a shutdown go way up, and Americans will know that the responsibility of a shutdown will be on the House Republicans' hands."
Johnson is expected to bring the bill to the House floor on Wednesday after lawmakers return from summer recess. Congress has a September 30 deadline to make changes to the spending bill in order to avoid a partial government shutdown on October 1.
The House speaker called the proposal "a critically important step" toward funding the government and ensuring "that only American citizens can decide American elections"—prompting one critic to accuse Johnson of pushing a "manufactured" issue.
"Anyone who reads the SAVE Act understands it is a bad bill," said attorney Heath Hixson, "a poorly worded unfunded mandate that'll lead to voter suppression and racist outcomes."