SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
October, 27 2009, 08:57am EDT
Contact:
510.251.1856 or Toll-free 888.929.4367 *,info@safeaccessnow.org
Congressional Medical Marijuana Bill Lifts Ban on Evidence in Federal Court
WASHINGTON
U.S. Representative Sam Farr (D-CA) and
more than twenty original bipartisan co-sponsors introduced legislation
today that
would
allow defendants in medical marijuana cases the ability to use medical
evidence at trial, a right not currently afforded them. Because of a
June 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Gonzales v. Raich, the
government has the discretion to enforce federal marijuana laws even in
medical marijuana states. The Raich ruling also allows federal
prosecutors to exclude evidence of medical use or state law compliance
in federal trials, all but guaranteeing convictions of medical
marijuana patients and providers.
Last week, the U.S. Attorney General issued guidelines to federal
prosecutors discouraging them from prosecuting cases in which patients
and providers are "in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing
state laws." Unfortunately, the
guidelines neither direct U.S. Attorneys to abandon the more than
two-dozen pending federal medical marijuana cases, nor allow defendants
the ability to use medical evidence to exonerate themselves. "This is a
common sense bill that will help stop the waste of law enforcement and
judicial resources that have been spent prosecuting individuals who are
following state law," Rep. Farr said on Tuesday. "We need strict drug
laws, but we also need to apply a little common sense to how they're
enforced. This legislation is about treating defendants in cases
involving medical marijuana fairly, plain and simple."
During the Bush Administration, more than a hundred federal cases were
prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys against medical marijuana patients and
providers who were prevented from using medical evidence at trial.
Because of an inability to properly defend themselves, scores of people
have been convicted and have received sentences of up to 20 years in
federal prison. While the Justice Department guidelines may result in
fewer federal prosecutions, they are unlikely to assist defendants
currently
being prosecuted. Underscoring the need for the "Truth in Trials" Act,
San Diego U.S. Attorney Karen Hewitt, a Bush appointee, recently
responded to the guidelines by claiming she still does not have to
prove a violation of state law before prosecuting someone under federal
law.
"The 'Truth in Trials' Act will restore the balance of justice and
bring fundamental fairness to federal
medical marijuana trials," said Caren Woodson, Government Affairs
Director with Americans for Safe Access, the legislation's endorser.
"This legislation complements the recent Justice Department
guidelines for federal prosecutors and is now more necessary than ever."
Routinely, federal prosecutors seek long prison
sentences in medical marijuana cases. Charles C. Lynch, a locally
licensed medical marijuana dispensary operator from Morro Bay,
California who had the support of his City Council and local Chamber of
Commerce, was prosecuted and
convicted under the Bush Administration. Although Lynch was accused by
the federal government of violating state law, he could not use
evidence of his compliance with state law at trial. "I was denied an
affirmative defense despite my strict adherence to local and state
medical marijuana laws," said Lynch. "Passage of this bill will allow
jurors to hear the entire story." Lynch is currently released on bail
pending his appeal.
The "Truth in Trials" bill has been introduced by Congress in past
sessions, but is especially relevant now that the Obama Administration
has changed federal policy on medical marijuana. At the time of
introduction, the "Truth in Trials" bill had been endorsed by a diverse
group of more than three-dozen advocacy, health, and legal
organizations, including Americans for Safe Access (ASA), American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National
Association of People With AIDS (NAPWA), National Minority AIDS Council
(NMAC), and
AIDS Action Council. The "Truth in Trials" bill is likely to be
referred to the House
Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security. A
companion bill has yet to be introduced in the U.S.
Senate.
Contact ASA at 510-681-6361 to coordinate
interviews with current federal defendants and those convicted without
a defense
For further information:
"Truth in Trials" legislation introduced today:
https://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Truth_in_Trials_Act.pdf
Congressional cosponsors of "Truth in Trials" Act:
https://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/article.php?id=5825
More information on the "Truth in Trials" Act:
https://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/section.php?id=354
Americans for Safe Access is the nation's largest organization of patients, medical professionals, scientists and concerned citizens promoting safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic use and research.
LATEST NEWS
'Holding The Line': Municipal Workers' Strike Enters Second Week as Philly Refuses to Pay Living Wage
"We got people that work and repair the water mains and can't afford their water bill," said union leader Greg Boulware last week. "I don't want to be rich. We just want comfort inside the city that we serve daily."
Jul 07, 2025
Philadelphia's largest municipal workers' strike in over 40 years is entering its second week after negotiations with the city broke down this weekend.
Over 9,000 sanitation workers, 911 dispatchers, water services workers, crossing guards, and other city employees walked off the job last week, demanding that the city increase their salary enough to meet the rising cost of living.
But even with trash piling up on the streets and other city services understaffed, Mayor Cherelle Parker (D) would not agree to the demands made by AFSCME District Council 33, Philadelphia's largest blue-collar union.
Parker has offered a pay increase of 8.75% over the next three years, which she described as historic.
But DC 33 president Greg Boulware said that's far too little for municipal workers, many of whom are among the city's "working poor," to survive.
"It's not like as if our members are making $80,000, $90,000 a year," Boulware said. "A 2% increase on those would be significantly higher than it would be on somebody making $40,000-$45,000 a year. So, her math truly is not mathing, and you're clearly not paying attention to the working people that are going on in this city."
The average municipal worker in Philadelphia makes around $46,000, which is $15,000 less than the median income in the city and less than half of what a single adult needs to live comfortably, according to a study by SmartAsset.
"We got people that work and repair the water mains and can't afford their water bill," Boulware said at a rally last week. "We got people that repair the runways at the airport and can't afford a plane ticket. I don't want to be rich. We just want a comfort inside the city that we serve daily."
The union initially asked for an 8% raise for the next four years, which the city dismissed. This weekend, they pared their proposal down to 5%, but the city still did not budge.
Parker has insisted that her smaller proposed increases are merely what is "fiscally responsible," and that the city cannot afford to offer more.
The union has disputed this, pointing out that Parker herself is budgeted to receive a 9% increase to her salary of more than $240,000. That increase alone is nearly half the current salary that the average DC 33 member makes in a year.
As of Monday, negotiations have stalled, with no clear end in sight. With a throng of picketers behind him, Boulware told NBC 10, a local affiliate, that the union was working on a third proposal, and that negotiations may resume Tuesday. But he seemed to expect more obstinacy from the city.
"We've been there to be able to sit and meet and negotiate," he said. "It doesn't seem like the city quite honestly wants to entertain any of the questions that we have about things and actually have a true dialogue... That's how you negotiate and that's not truly what's been going on."
Despite the city's refusal to budge, momentum around the strike has continued to grow. On Friday, rapper LL Cool J dropped out of a 4th of July festival in the city, saying, "There is absolutely no way I can perform across a picket line."
Other AFSCME councils around Pennsylvania have joined pickets in solidarity. This includes Philadelphia's Council 47, which represents thousands of "white collar" city workers.
With mounds of trash accumulating on streets, sometimes becoming as "tall as people," the environmental activists with the Sunrise Movement have also joined in the effort to pressure the city. On Monday, activists hauled bags of trash into the lobby of City Hall, labeled with the words "Meet DC 33 Demands" written in yellow tape.
AFSCME, meanwhile, has stated its resolve to fight on as the strike has gained national attention.
"City workers are holding the line until they get a FAIR contract with the wages and benefits they deserve," the national union's account wrote on X Monday. "One day longer, one day stronger, no matter what it takes."
Keep ReadingShow Less
LA Residents Hurl Profane Insults at Border Patrol After Agents Sweep Local Park
"You are not helping by snatching people!" yelled one local woman.
Jul 07, 2025
Los Angeles residents lobbed profane insults at U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents on Monday after they swept through the city's MacArthur Park.
Los Angeles-based news station KTLA reports that masked, heavily-armed federal agents were in the park as "part of an apparent immigration raid" although exact details about the operation are not known as of this writing. A video taken on the scene by Mel Buer, an independent labor journalist in the California city and posted on social media website Bluesky showed many agents riding through the park on horseback.
Border patrol walking McArthur park here in LA
[image or embed]
— Mel Buer (@melbuer.bsky.social) July 7, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) reacted angrily after seeing reports of the agents—some of whom had visible Border Protection patches—in the park and she went to the area to tell them to cease their operations.
"Minutes before, there were more than 20 kids playing—then, the MILITARY comes through," Bass wrote in a post on the social media website X. "The SECOND I heard about this, I went to the park to speak to the person in charge to tell them it needed to end NOW. Absolutely outrageous."
Additional videos posted on Bluesky by Buer showed angry Los Angeles residents following the agents as they drove slowly down the street away from the park while pelting them with verbal abuse.
"Get the fuck out of here!" one male resident can be heard shouting at the agents.
"You guys are a bunch of pussies!" yelled another.
Shortly after this, a woman can be heard scolding the agents: "You are not helping by snatching people!"
After Bass spoke with what I assume is a DHS rep, they packed shit up and headed out. The whole neighborhood turned out to chase them out of the park. Some fruit was thrown, alot of yelling
[image or embed]
— Mel Buer (@melbuer.bsky.social) July 7, 2025 at 2:29 PM
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, condemned the federal operations in Los Angeles shortly after they occurred.
"The actions of [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] and CBP during the raids in Los Angeles are not about safety or justice—they're about meeting enforcement quotas and striking fear in communities," he wrote on Bluesky. "We've filed a brief supporting a challenge to ICE and CBP's unlawful practices. We won't back down and we won't be silent."
Los Angeles has become a focal point in the Trump administration's mass deportation operations. President Donald Trump last month deployed the National Guard to the city after some protests against ICE operations there turned violent.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Top Medical Organizations Warn RFK Jr. Putting American Kids 'At Grave and Immediate Risk'
"Truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary... he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies," stated a new lawsuit.
Jul 07, 2025
Six major medical organizations on Monday filed a lawsuit against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. alleging he is putting American children at "grave and immediate risk" because of his policy on vaccines.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit—including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine—charged that Kennedy earlier this year made a "baseless and uninformed policy decision" when he removed vaccinations against Covid-19 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) official immunization schedule for "healthy" children and pregnant women.
The organizations emphasized that unless Kennedy's decision is reversed, "all children remain at grave and immediate risk of contracting a preventable disease" and further warned that it "exposes... vulnerable populations to a serious disease with potentially irreversible long-term effects and, in some cases, death."
The plaintiffs further charged that Kennedy's directive removing the Covid-19 vaccines from the immunization schedule was "but one example of the secretary's agenda to dismantle the longstanding... science- and evidence-based vaccine infrastructure that has prevented the deaths of untold millions of Americans."
The complaint then documented Kennedy's long history of statements and articles that have peddled false claims about the safety of vaccinations and pointed to his mass dismissals of staff at HHS and his appointment of likeminded vaccine critics to argue that "it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies."
Given this, the plaintiffs argued that Kennedy's decision to remove the Covid-19 vaccine from immunization schedules was "arbitrary and capricious" based on what they described as "vast and irrefutable evidence," including congressional testimony delivered by Kennedy in which he acknowledged that people shouldn't "be taking medical advice from me"; that Kennedy's directive directly contradicted an article published by the Food and Drug Administration days earlier stating that pregnancy was a condition that "increased a person's risk of severe Covid-19"; and that Kennedy did not identify specific recommendations from professional staff that he used as justification to restrict the availability of the vaccine.
Should courts find that Kennedy's decision was "arbitrary and capricious" as alleged by the plaintiffs, they would have the power to enjoin the policy under the Administrative Procedures Act, which was also employed recently to halt planned mass layoffs at HHS. The medical organizations urged courts to declare Kennedy's policy change "unlawful" and demanded "the restoration of the Covid vaccine recommendations for pregnant women and healthy children ages six months to 17 years" of age.
The medical organizations' lawsuit against Kennedy's vaccination policy comes at a time when infections of measles in the United States have hit a level not seen in more than three decades. The Washington Post, citing data from Johns Hopkins University, reported on Monday that there have been at least 1,277 confirmed cases of measles so far in the U.S. this year and the paper noted that this development "marks a public health reversal in defeating a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable disease as the anti-vaccine movement gains strength."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular