September, 24 2009, 11:53am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jon Slater (UK) +44 7876 476403, jslater@oxfam.org.uk
Helen Da Silva (US) +1 617-728-2409, hdasilva@oxfamamerica.org
100 People Every Minute Pushed Into Poverty by Economic Crisis
LONDON
The G20 should take urgent
action to protect poor countries from economic crisis that is forcing
100 people-a-minute into poverty, Oxfam said today.
Developing countries across the globe are struggling to respond to
the global recession that continues to slash incomes, destroy jobs and
has helped push the total number of hungry people in the world above 1
billion. The economic crisis arrived as poor countries were already
struggling to cope high food prices and floods, droughts and food
shortages linked to climate change.
Oxfam analysis of economic data has discovered that governments in
Sub-Saharan Africa will be $70bn worse off this year as a result of the
global slump and unlike rich countries they cannot borrow their way out
of trouble. Without outside help governments will find it increasingly
difficult to respond to the climate, food and economic crises and to
avoid cutting spending on schools, clinics and other anti-poverty
programs.
Max Lawson, Oxfam senior policy adviser, said: "Green shoots of
economic recovery have not reached the poorest countries which are now
suffering severely in the global downturn.
"In the time it takes G20 leaders to tuck into dinner tonight
thousands more people will be pushed into poverty and forced to survive
on less than $1.25-a-day.
"But despite feeding their own economies a much needed stimulus, the
G20 has not yet provided even half the $50bn bailout it promised poor
countries in April."
Oxfam is calling for a $290bn package of measures to ease
the burden on developing countries without hitting ordinary taxpayers. The package includes a 'Tobin tax' on currency transactions, a debt moratorium and a crackdown on tax havens.
Lawson said: "Existing aid levels are not enough to protect the
status quo let never mind reduce poverty in the face of the economic
crisis, climate change and rising food prices.
"The G20 has the chance to change the bad habits of the past and
come up with new solutions to the problems facing poor people. A
currency transaction levy on the banks that helped cause the global
slump could bring in $50bn to help those suffering in a crisis they did
nothing to cause. It is time bankers paid a bonus to the world's poor."
Oxfam is also calling on G20 leaders to fulfil a promise made by
President Obama in July to deliver new funds to help poor countries
cope with climate change. This funding is vital to break the deadlock
in climate change negotiations leading up to the make-or-break UN
Summit in Copenhagen in December. Oxfam calculates that $50bn-a-year is
needed to help poor countries cope with climate change and another
$100bn is needed to help them control their emissions.
David Waskow, Oxfam climate adviser, said: "The clock is ticking on
the chances of a fair deal to prevent misery for millions at risk from
climate change. It is time for G20 leaders to stand up and deliver the
money needed to protect poor people."
Notes to editors
People falling into poverty:
- The World Bank estimates that 50 million more people will
be pushed into poverty, equivalent to almost 100 during every minute of
2009. - The UN estimates the figure could be as high as 100 million.
How Oxfam's proposed $290bn package breaks down
Implement a Currency Transaction Tax (CTT) of at least 0.005% on international currency transactions.
It is estimated that such a tax could generate a minimum of $30 billion
per year if applied to the four major international reserve currencies
(US Dollar, Yen, Euro and British Pound). If more currencies were
included, this figure could increase as high as $50bn. A slightly higher rate could also provide more resources for government spending in rich countries facing cuts in services.
Transfer half of rich countries' new Special Drawing Rights allocations.
Agree that at a minimum all the G8 and other major donor countries will
transfer half of their allotted new allocations of IMF Special Drawing
Rights (SDRs) to Low Income Countries. SDRs are a form of IMF quasi
currency distributed to member countries. The April G20 agreed to
create $285 billion worth of SDRs, and rich nations will receive $177
billion of this amount. Oxfam is calling for half of this, $89 billion, to be transferred to the poorest countries.
Deal with tax havens. Put in place a multilateral
agreement for the automatic exchange of full tax information and
require country-by-country reporting of subsidiaries, sales and profits
by multinational corporations, to help developing countries recoup lost
tax revenue. This could result in a further US$160 billion for poor
countries, and at the same time would enable rich countries to recover
their lost tax revenues. The current OECD initiative on tax havens,
supported by the G20, relies on bilateral agreements between countries.
To date no developing country has signed a bilateral agreement with a tax haven.
A debt moratorium. Oxfam is asking debt repayment
for low-income countries should be cancelled during 2010. They should
also not incur additional interest on the debts during this period.
This would give these countries approximately $10 billion (total
external debt service for LICs in 2007 - the last year with available
data - was $9.7bn) which they could instead invest in much-needed
services and economic stimulus in their countries. This should be an interim step towards full debt cancellation for all low-income countries that need it.
President Obama's climate promise. Speaking at the
G8 summit in Italy in July, President Obama said: "...we agreed to
substantially increase financial resources to help developing
nations... We've asked the G20 finance ministers to take up the
climate financing issues and report back to us at the G20 meeting in
Pittsburgh in the fall."
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
Oxfam Says Russian Use of Chemical Weapons in Ukraine Would Be 'Egregious Violation of International law'
"The increasing erosion of the rule of law is deeply concerning," said an Oxfam campaigns manager.
Jul 07, 2025
Anti-poverty organization Oxfam on Monday expressed grave concern over reports that Russia has been increasingly deploying chemical weapons in Ukraine.
The Associated Press reported late last week that two Dutch intelligence agencies are claiming that Russia has been ramping up its use of chemical weapons in its war against Ukraine. Among the chemical weapons allegedly being deployed by Russia are chloropicrin, a banned poison gas that was used by European powers during World War I, and CS gas, which is typically used as a riot control agent.
Sarah Redd, Oxfam's advocacy and campaigns manager in Ukraine, called reports of banned chemical weapons use deeply troubling and called for a full investigation into the matter.
"Oxfam is appalled at the recent intensification of violence against civilians in Ukraine, especially the reports of Russia's use of chemical weapons, which would be an egregious violation of international law," she said. "The increasing erosion of the rule of law is deeply concerning. Such laws were put in place to prevent humanity from sliding back into a darker chapter of history. Oxfam calls for an immediate and independent international investigation into these allegations and to hold those responsible to account."
Russia is a signatory of the Chemical Weapons Convention, a treaty first drafted and enacted in the 1990s that bars the use of both chloropicrin and CS gas in war. This makes Russia subject to potential investigations carried out by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, although such an investigation can only take place if requested by member states.
Ukraine has claimed that Russia has carried out more than 9,000 chemical weapons attacks ever since it launched its invasion of the country more than three years ago. During the 2024 election campaign, President Donald Trump claimed that he could bring an end to the Ukraine-Russia war within a single day although so far fighting between the two nations has only intensified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Indefensible': Trump Budget Law Subsidizes Private Jet Owners While Taking Healthcare From Millions
A provision of the budget law that President Donald Trump signed last week will leave taxpayers to "pick up the tab for the private jet industry and billionaire high flyers."
Jul 07, 2025
The Republican budget measure that U.S. President Donald Trump signed into law late last week contains a provision that analysts say will allow private jet owners to write off the full cost of their aircraft in the first year of purchase, a boon to the ultra-rich that comes as millions of people are set to lose healthcare under the same legislation.
FlyUSA, a private aviation provider, gushed in a blog post that with final passage of the unpopular budget reconciliation package, "business jet ownership has never looked more fiscally attractive or more fun to explain to your accountant."
The law, crafted by congressional Republicans and approved with only GOP support, permanently restores a major corporate tax break known as 100% bonus depreciation, which allows businesses to deduct the costs of certain assets in the first year of purchase rather than writing them off over time.
Forbes noted that the bonus depreciation policy "applies to a slew of qualified, physical business expenses which depreciate over time, such as machinery and company cars, but the policy is often associated with big-ticket luxury items, such as private aircraft, and its institution last decade led to a boom in jet sales."
"Trump and congressional Republicans have certainly delivered for the billionaire class."
Chuck Collins, director of the Program on Inequality at the Institute for Policy Studies, called bonus depreciation "a massive tax break for billionaires and centi-millionaires that use the most polluting form of transportation on the planet."
"A corporation purchasing a $50 million private jet could potentially deduct the entire $50 million from their taxes in the year of the purchase, rather than spreading the deduction over many years," Collins wrote. "This amounts to a massive taxpayer subsidy, as ordinary taxpayers pick up the tab for the private jet industry and billionaire high flyers."
"Subsidizing more private jets on a warming planet is reckless and indefensible," he added.
The National Business Aviation Association, a lobbying group for the private aviation industry, celebrated passage of the Republican legislation, specifically welcoming the bonus depreciation policy as "effective for incentivizing aircraft purchase." (The Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy argues that "depreciation tax breaks have never been shown to encourage more capital investment.")
Meanwhile, communities across the United States are bracing for the law's deep cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance, which are expected to impose damaging strains on state budgets and strip food benefits and health coverage from millions of low-income Americans.
"Trump and congressional Republicans have certainly delivered for the billionaire class," said Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen. "This is certainly one of the cruelest bills in American history, backtracking on the country's painfully slow history of expanding healthcare coverage and, equally remarkably, taking food away from the hungry."
"That's a lot of needless suffering just to make the richest Americans richer," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'These Deaths Are on Trump's Hands': Texas Flooding Spotlights Assault on Climate Science
"The Trump regime is gutting scientific research into climate and atmospheric science for political reasons, at the very time we need a much better understanding of it," said one environmentalist. "This is so reckless and dangerous."
Jul 07, 2025
Deadly flooding caused by torrential rain in central Texas late last week called attention to U.S. President Donald Trump's full-scale assault on the climate research and monitoring agencies tasked with studying and predicting such weather catastrophes, as well as his ongoing attacks on disaster preparedness and relief.
Though local National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters did issue warnings in the lead-up to Friday's flooding—which killed at least 82 people, including dozens of children—key roles were reportedly vacant ahead of the downpour, prompting scrutiny of the Trump administration's mass firings and budget cuts, in addition to years of neglect and failures by Republicans at the state level.
Asked whether he believes the federal government should hire back terminated meteorologists in the wake of the Texas flooding, Trump responded in the negative and falsely claimed that "very talented people" at NWS "didn't see" the disaster coming.
"This is an absolute lie," replied meteorologist and climate journalist Eric Holthaus. "Worse, this is the person responsible for making those kids less safe and he's trying to deny the damage he caused."
Holthaus wrote Sunday that Trump's staffing cuts "have particularly hit the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Environmental Modeling Center, which aims to improve the skill of these types of difficult forecasts."
"Though it's unclear to what extent staffing shortages across the NWS complicated the advance notice that local officials had of an impending flooding disaster," he added, "it's clear that this was a complex, compound tragedy of a type that climate warming is making more frequent."
"Republicans have fired meteorologists, cut emergency disaster aid, and given an extra $18 billion to the fossil fuel corporations causing this crisis."
Under the guise of "government efficiency," the Trump administration has taken an axe to staff at federal climate agencies and is trying to go even further with its budget for the coming fiscal year. The Washington Post noted Sunday that "a budget document the Trump administration recently submitted to Congress calls for zeroing out climate research funding for 2026, something officials had hinted at in previous proposals but is now in lawmakers' hands."
"But even just the specter of President Donald Trump's budget proposals has prompted scientists to limit research activities in advance of further cuts," the Post noted. "Trump's efforts to freeze climate research spending and slash the government's scientific workforce have for months prompted warnings of rippling consequences in years ahead. For many climate scientists, the consequences are already here."
Since the start of his second term, Trump has dismissed the hundreds of scientists and experts who were working on the National Climate Assessment, moved to slash NOAA's workforce, and announced a halt to climate disaster tracking, among other changes—all while working to accelerate fossil fuel extraction and use that is supercharging extreme weather events. One NOAA veteran warned that Trump's cuts could drag the agency back to "the technical and proficiency levels we had in the 1950s."
"The Trump regime is gutting scientific research into climate and atmospheric science for political reasons, at the very time we need a much better understanding of it," environmentalist Stephen Barlow wrote on social media on Sunday. "This is so reckless and dangerous, which is why I suggest we call these tragedies Trump events."
Aru Shiney-Ajay, executive director of the Sunrise Movement, said over the weekend that "Republicans have fired meteorologists, cut emergency disaster aid, and given an extra $18 billion to the fossil fuel corporations causing this crisis."
"These deaths are on Trump's hands," she added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular