July, 21 2009, 01:47pm EDT
As Congress Debates Transportation Bill, New Study on Port Trucking Shows Need For New Regulations For Clean Air, Worker Safety, And Economic Stability
WASHINGTON
As the United States Congress considers the Surface Transportation
Authorization Act of 2009, which aims to establish national regulatory
reforms for American ground transportation, a newly published study
details the widespread failures of port trucking deregulation. Port Trucking Down the Low Road: A Sad Story of Deregulation,
published by Demos, a national public policy research center,
chronicles the industry's downslide since the Federal Motor Carrier Act
of 1980.
The report's release arrives on the eve of the Oakland Port
Commission1s vote on a resolution calling on Congress to modernize
transportation policy so that America's Port Commissions have the legal
authority to set and enforce trucking industry standards to make goods
movement sustainable for local communities and workers. The resolution
aims to allow ports to emulate the success of the LA Clean Trucks
Program, which has already reduced diesel emissions by removing
thousands of dirty trucks from service, replacing them with
clean-burning and alternative fuel vehicles.
Port Trucking Down the Low Road, authored for Demos' Project on Regulation
by David Bensman, Professor of Labor Studies and Employer Relations at
Rutgers University, provides vast evidence of the dangerous
consequences of port trucking deregulation, highlighting the need for
broad industry reform and a new set of regulatory protections for
workers, the environment, public health and the economy.
"Port trucking carries 80 percent of shipping containers
between ports, warehouses and distribution centers. It is an essential
cog in the global trade system that, because of deregulation, now
suffers from excessive and destructive competition that has taken its
toll," said Bensman. "Because of deregulation, the national freight
moving industry is broken: Highway travel is more hazardous,
contributes to our environmental crisis, degrades the quality of port
truck driver jobs, shifts enormous costs onto the public, and creates,
overall, a highly inefficient logistics and goods movement system."
Robert Kuttner, a Distinguished Fellow at Demos who also directs the Demos Project on Regulation stated,
"With public support from members of the U.S. Congress,
coalitions of trade unionists, community groups, environmentalists, and
progressive local mayors have reached consensus on viable solutions and
are taking steps to reduce emissions in ports throughout the country.
Because ports play a central role in implementing national security
goals and trucking deregulation was legislated nationally, fully
reversing three decades of damage will require an act of Congress."
Key findings of the report include:
- Highway travel has become more hazardous since port trucking
deregulation: 77.8 percent of New Jersey port truck drivers reported
receiving an unsafe chassis in the last 12 months; on average, 40
percent of containers at Miami's port were overweight in 2006, and in
some weeks that figure reached 70 percent. - The port trucking system has not kept pace with advances in clean
truck technologies, creating an increasing environmental crisis: Diesel
emissions, especially from older trucks, cause significant harmful
health impacts, releasing particles into the air that are carcinogenic
and dangerous to the environment and the health of nearby residents. - The quality of jobs for port truck drivers has decreased
substantially: Drivers are on the job five days a week, from 10 to 12
hours a day, earning an average annual income of $28,000 in 2008. As
"independent contractors", they do not receive health care or any
contributions to a retirement fund and are responsible for all
collateral maintenance, taxes, insurance and other costs. - Deregulation has shifted significant costs to the public, costs
previously shouldered by the shipping industry: Diesel emissions cause
significant harmful health impacts, estimated by one study to cost the
state of California $20 billion annually. More than 25 percent of New
Jersey port drivers surveyed rely on public clinics or emergency rooms
for health care. - The goods movement system in the U.S. has become increasingly
inefficient. Business logistics expenses for the port trucking industry
increased for a fourth straight year in 2007, by $91 billion over the
2006 total. The system does not incentivize warehouse companies to
build facilities closer to ports or distribution centers, and a poor
communications infrastructure hinders incoming and outgoing container
movement. - The failure of the deregulated port trucking system has also been
recognized by three separate North American port agencies that have
taken some action to mitigate the problems caused by the Federal Motor
Carrier Act of 1980.
Port Trucking Down the Low Road includes a series of reforms and policy recommendations, including:
- Improve quality of trucking jobs by cracking down on employer abuse
of misclassifying port truck drivers as independent contractors in
order to avoid compliance with employment laws; - Improve air quality and reduce public health hazards and associated
costs by establishing stricter federal diesel emission standards; - Protect the driving public by enforcing highway safety standards,
including weight restrictions and the new 2008 chassis standards for
container trucks.
"As Bensman demonstrates, re-regulating the terms of port
trucking could reverse the vicious circle. Raising standards and
certifying only carriers that met them could turn the drivers back into
regular employees and create incentives for carriers to modernize their
equipment," said Kuttner.
David Bensman added that "as Congress and the Obama Administration
debate the timing and contours of updating our nation's laws and
policies governing goods movement, this new study identifies key areas
in desperate need of regulatory reform to ensure we create a modern,
efficient, sustainable, and equitable freight transportation system for
the 21st century."
Demos is a think tank that powers the movement for a just, inclusive, multiracial democracy. Through cutting-edge policy research, inspiring litigation, and deep relationships with grassroots organizations, Demos champions solutions that will create a democracy and economy rooted in racial equity.
LATEST NEWS
'This Is What We're Funding': At Least 50 Children Killed in Israeli Strikes on Jabalia
"Civilians and civilian structures... must always be protected in accordance with international humanitarian law," said the head of UNICEF. "Yet these principles are being flouted over and over again."
Nov 03, 2024
The United Nations children's agency on Saturday condemned the Israel Defense Forces' "indiscriminate strikes on civilians in the Gaza Strip" after at least 50 children were reportedly among those killed in attacks on Jabalia refugee camp in the northern part of the enclave.
Northern Gaza has been under siege since early October, when Israel resumed its attacks there, claiming it was targeting Hamas militants.
The current situation in northern Gaza has been called "apocalyptic" by leading humanitarian groups in recent days, with women and children making up the majority of the hundreds of people killed, and Israel imposing a near-total blockade on humanitarian aid.
Now, said Catherine Russell, executive director of the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF), "the entire Palestinian population in North Gaza, especially children, is at imminent risk of dying from disease, famine, and the ongoing bombardments."
In addition to the attacks on residential buildings this weekend in Jabalia, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that an attack on a healthcare center in Gaza City injured at least six people, including four children. The facility was participating in a polio vaccination drive, the second round of inoculations for children across Gaza.
"The Sheikh Radwan primary healthcare center in northern Gaza was struck today while parents were bringing their children to [get] the life-saving polio vaccination in an area where a humanitarian pause was agreed to allow vaccination to proceed," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said. "These vital humanitarian-area-specific pauses must be absolutely respected. Ceasefire!"
Russell said the vehicle of a UNICEF staffer who was working on the vaccination campaign was attacked by "what we believe to be a quadcopter while driving through Jabalia—Elnazla."
The staff member was not injured, but Russell said "the attacks on Jabalia, the vaccination clinic, and the UNICEF staff member are yet further examples of the grave consequences of the indiscriminate strikes on civilians in the Gaza Strip."
"Civilians and civilian structures, including residential buildings, as well as humanitarian workers and their vehicles, must always be protected in accordance with international humanitarian law," said Russell. "Yet these principles are being flouted over and over again, leaving tens of thousands of children killed, injured, and deprived of essential services needed for survival."
The Gaza Health Ministry reports that at least 43,341 people have been killed in Gaza and at least 102,105 have been injured since Israel began its assault on the enclave more than a year ago in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack. Women and children make up most of those killed, even as Israel and the United States, the largest international supporter of the IDF, have insisted the military is targeting Hamas.
"How can this inhumane situation be tolerated by the Biden-Harris administration?" asked Nina Lahoud, who has served as a special adviser and peacekeeping officer at the U.N., after the death toll among children in Jabalia over the weekend was reported. "How many more Palestinian kids need to die to take urgent action?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
'It's the Abortion Ban': Final Iowa Poll Shows Harris Leading Trump 47-44
Rights advocates were energized by the "gold standard" poll results, but called on progressives to continue working to turn out voters.
Nov 03, 2024
Political observers expressed shock Saturday evening as the Des Moines Register released its final poll before Election Day showing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris leading Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump by three points.
Harris was supported by 47% of respondents compared to 44% who backed Trump.
The newspaper's poll, conducted by pollster J. Ann Selzer, is widely regarded as the "gold standard" survey of voters in the state and has been recognized as "predicting" numerous election results in Iowa and giving a potential preview of how candidates could fare in other Midwestern states with similar demographics.
Progressive advocates cautioned against placing too much faith in a single poll—even a widely respected one—and urged Harris supporters to continue canvassing, phone-banking, and taking action to defeat Trump and the far-right MAGA movement.
But the unexpected result in a state that hasn't been considered a swing state in this election, and was widely assumed to be a Trump-supporting state, led political observers to look closely at the poll, which showed significant shifts toward Harris among women.
Women aged 65 and older supported Harris over Trump, 63% to 28%, in the poll. Women who identify as political independents also backed her, 57% to 29%.
Overall, women in the state are backing Harris in the poll by a margin of 20 points, according to the survey.
Lyz Lenz, a journalist based in Iowa, said she believed the poll could be linked to one major change in Iowa since the last presidential election: the six-week abortion ban that took effect in July, banning abortion care after fetal cardiac activity can be detected. Similar abortion bans have been blamed for at least four deaths of pregnant women in Texas and Georgia.
"It's the abortion ban," said Lenz. "Women are furious."
Daniel Nichanian, editor-in-chief and founder of the digital magazine Bolts, said the result could preview losses for state Supreme Court justices who have upheld abortion bans in a number of states, including Iowa.
In 10 states this year, voters will make their voices heard on ballot initiatives regarding the right to abortion care. In traditionally red states including Kansas and Kentucky since Roe was overturned, people have voted to protect the right to obtain an abortion.
"It's the Dobbs election," said Helaine Olen of the American Economic Liberties Project. "The Iowa poll is just the latest proof."
Selzer herself told the BBC that many respondents talked about abortion rights.
"The people who say they're supporting Kamala Harris, the issue they say they're thinking about most is democracy, about half of them saying that's the most important thing," she said. "But then half of that, about 25% roughly, say abortion. And Iowa has one of the strictest abortion laws in place... and that may well have played a part in this."
Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, said it would be "foolish to dismiss [Selzer's] poll," but cautioned election watchers against abandoning "all of [their] prior views about the state of the race."
Dan Pfeiffer, a former adviser to President Barack Obama and co-host of "Pod Save America," said one possible interpretation among several is that "Harris isn't really winning Iowa but the poll is capturing late-stage momentum that bodes well for Wisconsin, Michigan, [and] Pennsylvania."
Advocacy group Indivisible on Sunday morning advised supporters to "send this Iowa poll to all your group chats. Then, sign up to talk to some voters. With your help, we're going to win this thing in two days."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Terrifying' Ad Shows Deadly Impact of GOP Abortion Bans
The ad was released as Americans learn of a growing number of women who have died because doctors would not provide standard miscarriage and abortion care under state abortion bans.
Nov 03, 2024
"Dr. Davis, what do I do?" asks a man frantically, kneeling near his partner as she writhes in pain on the floor.
"John, she needs an abortion, or she's going to die from the pregnancy," answers the doctor over the phone.
But a Republican congressman suddenly appears and tells the man, "That's not happening," explaining that abortion care is now banned because the GOP is in control of the government.
The scenario plays out in the latest ad from Progress Action Fund, a Democratic political action committee that's produced a number of viral videos focusing on how Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's policies and those outlined in the right-wing agenda Project 2025 would impact both men and women's ability to make private decisions.
In the ad, the Republican lawmaker tells the man, "I won the last election, so it's my decision" whether the woman is able to receive the standard care needed to end her pregnancy.
"Don't worry, you can still have children," he tells the man. "Just not with her."
Watch:
The ad went viral on social media late Saturday, the day after ProPublica reported on Nevaeh Crain, an 18-year-old in Texas who died last year at six months pregnant, when she was diagnosed with sepsis—a fast-moving and potentially deadly condition that can result from an infection.
Because of Texas' six-week abortion ban, which threatens doctors with prison time if they terminate a pregnancy before a fetal heartbeat has stopped, Crain made three emergency room visits and was required to have multiple ultrasounds as she became increasingly ill. By the time doctors confirmed "fetal demise," Crain's organs had begun failing. She died hours later.
The investigative outlet has also reported on the deaths of another woman in Texas—Josseli Barnica—and two women in Georgia, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller—from state abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.
"This is a healthcare crisis and Donald Trump is the architect of this crisis," said Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, after the two Georgia women's deaths came to light in September.
Abortion bans and restrictions like those in Texas now exist in 21 states. Both Trump and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) have expressed support for a nationwide ban on abortion care—a position from which they have both attempted to distance themselves as polls have increasingly shown a majority of voters support access to abortion care.
Other viral ads by Progress Action Fund have been more risqué and have even used absurdist humor to warn voters about Project 2025's proposal to ban pornography and emergency contraception.
With two days to go until Election Day, the "terrifying but important" ad released Saturday shows that "MAGA abortion bans are killing our wives, mothers, sisters, and daughters," said nonprofit progressive advocacy group DemCast.
"They're willing to risk your wife's heartbeat," said Eleven Films, a progressive film production company. "Are you?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular