May, 26 2009, 01:36pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514,Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547
California Supreme Court Takes Step Back from Equality
Nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights group responds to court ruling
SAN FRANCISCO
The
Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, responded to the
California Supreme Court's split 6-1decision today ruling that
Proposition 8, the narrowly approved measure which eliminated the right
of same-sex couples to marry, is valid. As a result of the court's decision in Strauss v. Horton,
California becomes the first state in the nation to strip away marriage
rights for same-sex couples. As same-sex couples and allies from
across the country react to the news, HRC is releasing an online,
YouTube video set to the song "I Won't Back Down": www.HRC.org/California.
Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, responded to the
California Supreme Court's split 6-1decision today ruling that
Proposition 8, the narrowly approved measure which eliminated the right
of same-sex couples to marry, is valid. As a result of the court's decision in Strauss v. Horton,
California becomes the first state in the nation to strip away marriage
rights for same-sex couples. As same-sex couples and allies from
across the country react to the news, HRC is releasing an online,
YouTube video set to the song "I Won't Back Down": www.HRC.org/California.
"Today's
ruling is a huge blow to Americans everywhere who care about equality.
The court has allowed a bare majority of voters to write same-sex
couples out of basic constitutional protections,"
said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "This ruling is
painful, but it represents a temporary setback. There will be a
groundswell to restore marriage equality in our nation's largest state,
and HRC will not give up until marriage equality is restored in
California."
ruling is a huge blow to Americans everywhere who care about equality.
The court has allowed a bare majority of voters to write same-sex
couples out of basic constitutional protections,"
said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "This ruling is
painful, but it represents a temporary setback. There will be a
groundswell to restore marriage equality in our nation's largest state,
and HRC will not give up until marriage equality is restored in
California."
One
significant effort already underway is a strategic partnership between
HRC and California Faith for Equality (CFE), a statewide group
established to educate, support and mobilize faith communities on LGBT
equality. The partnership joins CFE and its 6,000 supporting faith
leaders with both HRC's Religion and Faith Program expertise as well as
HRC's National Field Department to broaden, diversify and deepen
religious support for marriage equality in California.
significant effort already underway is a strategic partnership between
HRC and California Faith for Equality (CFE), a statewide group
established to educate, support and mobilize faith communities on LGBT
equality. The partnership joins CFE and its 6,000 supporting faith
leaders with both HRC's Religion and Faith Program expertise as well as
HRC's National Field Department to broaden, diversify and deepen
religious support for marriage equality in California.
"This
ruling couldn't be more out of step with what's happening across the
country," said Solmonese, pointing to recent marriage victories in
Iowa, Vermont and Maine. "We have no choice but to return this basic
question of fairness for the estimated 1 million LGBT Californians back
to the voters."
ruling couldn't be more out of step with what's happening across the
country," said Solmonese, pointing to recent marriage victories in
Iowa, Vermont and Maine. "We have no choice but to return this basic
question of fairness for the estimated 1 million LGBT Californians back
to the voters."
"While
we are relieved that the 18,000 couples who married before the Prop 8
vote will still have valid marriages, it does not in any way remove the
sting of this ruling," added Solmonese.
we are relieved that the 18,000 couples who married before the Prop 8
vote will still have valid marriages, it does not in any way remove the
sting of this ruling," added Solmonese.
Over
the past decade, public acceptance of marriage equality for same-sex
couples has changed dramatically. For the first time, more Americans
say they support marriage for same-sex couples (49%) than oppose it
(46%), according to the latest Washington Post/ABC poll released in
late April.
the past decade, public acceptance of marriage equality for same-sex
couples has changed dramatically. For the first time, more Americans
say they support marriage for same-sex couples (49%) than oppose it
(46%), according to the latest Washington Post/ABC poll released in
late April.
WHERE MARRIAGE STANDS TODAY:
Twelve
states plus Washington, D.C. have laws providing at least some form of
state-level relationship recognition for same-sex couples.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont (as of September 1, 2009),
and Maine (as of mid-September 2009, pending possible repeal effort)
recognize marriage for same-sex couples under state law. Five
states--California, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington
(as of July 26, 2009, pending possible repeal effort)--plus Washington,
D.C. provide same-sex couples with access to the state level benefits
and responsibilities of marriage, through either civil unions or
domestic partnerships.
states plus Washington, D.C. have laws providing at least some form of
state-level relationship recognition for same-sex couples.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont (as of September 1, 2009),
and Maine (as of mid-September 2009, pending possible repeal effort)
recognize marriage for same-sex couples under state law. Five
states--California, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington
(as of July 26, 2009, pending possible repeal effort)--plus Washington,
D.C. provide same-sex couples with access to the state level benefits
and responsibilities of marriage, through either civil unions or
domestic partnerships.
Hawaii
provides same-sex couples with limited rights and benefits. New York
recognizes marriages by same-sex couples validly entered into outside
of New York. Legislatures in New Hampshire and New York are
considering marriage legislation that would permit same-sex couples to
marry in those states, and the D.C. Council has passed legislation that
would recognize marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in
other jurisdictions (that legislation is going through a Congressional
review period).
provides same-sex couples with limited rights and benefits. New York
recognizes marriages by same-sex couples validly entered into outside
of New York. Legislatures in New Hampshire and New York are
considering marriage legislation that would permit same-sex couples to
marry in those states, and the D.C. Council has passed legislation that
would recognize marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in
other jurisdictions (that legislation is going through a Congressional
review period).
IMPORTANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
For an electronic map showing where marriage equality stands in the states, please visit: www.HRC.org/State_Laws.
For a summary of the history of the case and for a comprehensive listing of HRC's work in California on Proposition 8, please visit:www.HRC.org/California.
A breakdown of the ruling and interpretation by the HRC legal team will be available shortly on HRCBackStory.org: https://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/05/prop-8-decision-analysisprop-8-decision-analysis/
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
Bernie Sanders Says Defeating Oligarchy Now Most Urgent Issue
"My friends, you don’t have to be a PhD in political science to understand that this is not democracy. This is not one person, one vote. This is not all of us coming together to decide our future. This is oligarchy."
Dec 14, 2024
Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont is escalating his fight against the U.S. oligarchy with a new campaign directed at the nation's wealthiest individuals—including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg—who he says are key culprits in a global race to the bottom that is stripping people worldwide of political agency while impoverishing billions so that the rich can amass increasingly obscene levels of wealth.
Announcing a new series that will detail how "billionaire oligarchs" in the U.S. "manipulate the global economy, purchase our elections, avoid paying taxes, and increasingly control our government," Sanders said in a Friday night video address that it makes him laugh when mainstream pundits talk openly about the nefarious oligarchic structures in other places, but refuse to acknowledge the issue in domestic terms.
"Strangely enough, the term 'oligarchy' is very rarely used to describe what's happening in the United States or in fact, what's happening around the world," said Sanders. "But guess what? Oligarchy is a global phenomenon, and it is headquartered right here in the United States."
Bernie Sanders talks about the oligarchy
While rarely discussed in the corporate press or by most elected officials, argues Sanders, the reality is that a "small number of incredibly wealthy billionaires own and control much of the global economy. Period. End of discussion. And increasingly they own and control our government through a corrupt campaign finance system."
Since the the victory of President-elect Donald Trump in November, Sanders has been increasingly outspoken about his frustrations over the failure of the Democratic Party to adequately confront the contradictions presented by a party that purports to represent the interests of the working class yet remains so beholden to corporate interests and the wealthy that lavish it with campaign contributions.
In a missive to supporters last month, Sanders bemoaned how "just 150 billionaire families spent nearly $2 billion to get their candidates elected" in this year's elections, which included giving to both major political parties. Such a reality, he said, must be challenged.
As part of his new effort announced Friday, Sanders' office said the two-time Democratic presidential candidate would be hosting a series of discussions with the leading experts on various topics related to the form and function of U.S. oligarchy and expose the incoming Trump administration's "ties to the billionaire class," including their efforts to further erode democracy, gut regulations, enrich themselves, and undermine the common good.
"In my view," said Sanders, "this issue of oligarchy is the most important issue facing our country and world because it touches on everything else." He said the climate crisis, healthcare, worker protections, and the fight against poverty are all adversely effected by the power of the wealthy elites who control the economy and the political sphere.
"My friends, you don’t have to be a PhD in political science to understand that this is not democracy," he said. "This is not one person, one vote. This is not all of us coming together to decide our future. This is oligarchy."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Make Polio Great Again': Alarm Over RFK Jr. Lawyer Who Targeted Vaccine
"So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is," said one critic.
Dec 13, 2024
Public health advocates, federal lawmakers, and other critics responded with alarm to The New York Timesreporting on Friday that an attorney helping Robert F. Kennedy Jr. select officials for the next Trump administration tried to get the U.S. regulators to revoke approval of the polio vaccine in 2022.
"The United States has been a leader in the global fight to eradicate polio, which is poised to become only the second disease in history to be eliminated from the face of the earth after smallpox," said Liza Barrie, Public Citizen's campaign director for global vaccines access. "Undermining polio vaccination efforts now risks reversing decades of progress and unraveling one of the greatest public health achievements of all time."
Public Citizen is among various organizations that have criticized President-elect Donald Trump's choice of Kennedy to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, with the watchdog's co-president, Robert Weissman, saying that "he shouldn't be allowed in the building... let alone be placed in charge of the nation's public health agency."
Although Kennedy's nomination requires Senate confirmation, he is already speaking with candidates for top health positions, with help from Aaron Siri, an attorney who represented RFK Jr. during his own presidential campaign, the Times reported. Siri also represents the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) in petitions asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "to withdraw or suspend approval of vaccines not only for polio, but also for hepatitis B."
According to the newspaper:
Mr. Siri is also representing ICAN in petitioning the FDA to "pause distribution" of 13 other vaccines, including combination products that cover tetanus, diphtheria, polio, and hepatitis A, until their makers disclose details about aluminum, an ingredient researchers have associated with a small increase in asthma cases.
Mr. Siri declined to be interviewed, but said all of his petitions were filed on behalf of clients. Katie Miller, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kennedy, said Mr. Siri has been advising Mr. Kennedy but has not discussed his petitions with any of the health nominees. She added, "Mr. Kennedy has long said that he wants transparency in vaccines and to give people choice."
After the article was published, Siri called it a "typical NYT hit piece plainly written by those lacking basic reading and thinking skills," and posted a series of responses on social media. He wrote in part that "ICAN's petition to the FDA seeks to revoke a particular polio vaccine, IPOL, and only for infants and children and only until a proper trial is conducted, because IPOL was licensed in 1990 by Sanofi based on pediatric trials that, according to FDA, reviewed safety for only three days after injection."
The Times pointed out that experts consider placebo-controlled trials that would deny some children polio shots unethical, because "you're substituting a theoretical risk for a real risk," as Dr. Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, explained. "The real risks are the diseases."
Ayman Chit, head of vaccines for North America at Sanofi, told the newspaper that development of the vaccine began in 1977, over 280 million people worldwide have received it, and there have been more than 300 studies, some with up to six months of follow-up.
Trump, who is less than six weeks out from returning to office, has sent mixed messages on vaccines in recent interviews.
Asked about RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine record during a Time "Person of the Year" interview published Thursday, the president-elect said that "we're going to be able to do very serious testing" and certain vaccines could be made unavailable "if I think it's dangerous."
Trump toldNBC News last weekend: "Hey, look, I'm not against vaccines. The polio vaccine is the greatest thing. If somebody told me to get rid of the polio vaccine, they're going to have to work real hard to convince me. I think vaccines are—certain vaccines—are incredible. But maybe some aren't. And if they aren't, we have to find out."
Both comments generated concern—like the Friday reporting in the Times, which University of Alabama law professor and MSNBC columnist Joyce White Vance called "absolutely terrifying."
She was far from alone. HuffPost senior front page editor Philip Lewis said that "this is just so dangerous and ridiculous" while Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan declared, "We are so—and I use this word advisedly—fucked."
Ryan Cooper, managing editor at The American Prospect, warned that "they want your kids dead."
Author and musician Mikel Jollett similarly said, "So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is."
Multiple critics altered Trump's campaign slogan to "Make Polio Great Again."
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) responded with a video on social media:
Without naming anyone, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a polio survivor, put out a lengthy statement on Friday.
"The polio vaccine has saved millions of lives and held out the promise of eradicating a terrible disease. Efforts to undermine public confidence in proven cures are not just uninformed—they're dangerous," he said in part. "Anyone seeking the Senate's consent to serve in the incoming administration would do well to steer clear of even the appearance of association with such efforts."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Pardon of 'Kids-for-Cash' Judge Michael Conahan Sparks Outrage
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," said one of the disgraced judge's victims.
Dec 13, 2024
Victims of a scheme in which a pair of Pennsylvania judges conspired to funnel thousands of children into private detention centers in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks expressed outrage following U.S. President Joe Biden's Thursday commutation of one of the men's sentences.
In 2010, former Luzerne County Judge Michael Conahan pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges and was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison after he and co-conspirator Mark Ciavarella shut down a county-run juvenile detention facility and then took nearly $3 million in payments from the builder and co-owner of for-profit lockups, into which the judges sent children as young as 8 years old.
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," Amanda Lorah—who was sentenced by Conahan to five years of juvenile detention over a high school fight—toldWBRE.
Sandy Fonzo, whose son killed himself after being sentenced to juvenile detention, said in a statement: "I am shocked and I am hurt. Conahan's actions destroyed families, including mine, and my son's death is a tragic reminder of the consequences of his abuse of power."
"This pardon feels like an injustice for all of us who still suffer," Fonzo added. "Right now I am processing and doing the best I can to cope with the pain that this has brought back."
Many of Conahan's victims were first-time or low-level offenders. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court would later throw out thousands of cases adjudicated by the Conahan and Ciaverella, the latter of whom is serving a 28-year sentence for his role in the scheme.
Conahan—who is 72 and had been under house arrest since being transferred from prison during the Covid-19 pandemic—was one of around 1,500 people who received commutations or pardons from Biden on Thursday. While the sweeping move was welcomed by criminal justice reform advocates, many also decried the president's decision to not grant clemency to any of the 40 men with federal death sentences.
Others have called on Biden—who earlier this month pardoned his son Hunter Biden after promising he wouldn't—to grant clemency to people including Indigenous activist Leonard Peltier and environmental lawyer Steven Donziger.
"There's never going to be any closure for us."
"So he wants to talk about Conahan and everybody else, but what is Joe Biden doing for all of these kids who absolutely got nothing, and almost no justice in this whole thing that happened?" said Lorah. "So it's nothing for us, but it seems that Conahan is just getting a slap on the wrist every which way he possibly could still today."
"There's never going to be any closure for us," she added. "There's never going to be, somehow, some way, these two men are always going to pop up, but now, when you think about the president of the United States letting him get away with this, who even wants to live in this country at this point? I'm totally shocked, I can't believe this."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular