SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
May, 26 2009, 01:36pm EDT
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514,Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547
California Supreme Court Takes Step Back from Equality
Nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights group responds to court ruling
SAN FRANCISCO
The
Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, responded to the
California Supreme Court's split 6-1decision today ruling that
Proposition 8, the narrowly approved measure which eliminated the right
of same-sex couples to marry, is valid. As a result of the court's decision in Strauss v. Horton,
California becomes the first state in the nation to strip away marriage
rights for same-sex couples. As same-sex couples and allies from
across the country react to the news, HRC is releasing an online,
YouTube video set to the song "I Won't Back Down": www.HRC.org/California.
Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, responded to the
California Supreme Court's split 6-1decision today ruling that
Proposition 8, the narrowly approved measure which eliminated the right
of same-sex couples to marry, is valid. As a result of the court's decision in Strauss v. Horton,
California becomes the first state in the nation to strip away marriage
rights for same-sex couples. As same-sex couples and allies from
across the country react to the news, HRC is releasing an online,
YouTube video set to the song "I Won't Back Down": www.HRC.org/California.
"Today's
ruling is a huge blow to Americans everywhere who care about equality.
The court has allowed a bare majority of voters to write same-sex
couples out of basic constitutional protections,"
said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "This ruling is
painful, but it represents a temporary setback. There will be a
groundswell to restore marriage equality in our nation's largest state,
and HRC will not give up until marriage equality is restored in
California."
ruling is a huge blow to Americans everywhere who care about equality.
The court has allowed a bare majority of voters to write same-sex
couples out of basic constitutional protections,"
said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "This ruling is
painful, but it represents a temporary setback. There will be a
groundswell to restore marriage equality in our nation's largest state,
and HRC will not give up until marriage equality is restored in
California."
One
significant effort already underway is a strategic partnership between
HRC and California Faith for Equality (CFE), a statewide group
established to educate, support and mobilize faith communities on LGBT
equality. The partnership joins CFE and its 6,000 supporting faith
leaders with both HRC's Religion and Faith Program expertise as well as
HRC's National Field Department to broaden, diversify and deepen
religious support for marriage equality in California.
significant effort already underway is a strategic partnership between
HRC and California Faith for Equality (CFE), a statewide group
established to educate, support and mobilize faith communities on LGBT
equality. The partnership joins CFE and its 6,000 supporting faith
leaders with both HRC's Religion and Faith Program expertise as well as
HRC's National Field Department to broaden, diversify and deepen
religious support for marriage equality in California.
"This
ruling couldn't be more out of step with what's happening across the
country," said Solmonese, pointing to recent marriage victories in
Iowa, Vermont and Maine. "We have no choice but to return this basic
question of fairness for the estimated 1 million LGBT Californians back
to the voters."
ruling couldn't be more out of step with what's happening across the
country," said Solmonese, pointing to recent marriage victories in
Iowa, Vermont and Maine. "We have no choice but to return this basic
question of fairness for the estimated 1 million LGBT Californians back
to the voters."
"While
we are relieved that the 18,000 couples who married before the Prop 8
vote will still have valid marriages, it does not in any way remove the
sting of this ruling," added Solmonese.
we are relieved that the 18,000 couples who married before the Prop 8
vote will still have valid marriages, it does not in any way remove the
sting of this ruling," added Solmonese.
Over
the past decade, public acceptance of marriage equality for same-sex
couples has changed dramatically. For the first time, more Americans
say they support marriage for same-sex couples (49%) than oppose it
(46%), according to the latest Washington Post/ABC poll released in
late April.
the past decade, public acceptance of marriage equality for same-sex
couples has changed dramatically. For the first time, more Americans
say they support marriage for same-sex couples (49%) than oppose it
(46%), according to the latest Washington Post/ABC poll released in
late April.
WHERE MARRIAGE STANDS TODAY:
Twelve
states plus Washington, D.C. have laws providing at least some form of
state-level relationship recognition for same-sex couples.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont (as of September 1, 2009),
and Maine (as of mid-September 2009, pending possible repeal effort)
recognize marriage for same-sex couples under state law. Five
states--California, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington
(as of July 26, 2009, pending possible repeal effort)--plus Washington,
D.C. provide same-sex couples with access to the state level benefits
and responsibilities of marriage, through either civil unions or
domestic partnerships.
states plus Washington, D.C. have laws providing at least some form of
state-level relationship recognition for same-sex couples.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont (as of September 1, 2009),
and Maine (as of mid-September 2009, pending possible repeal effort)
recognize marriage for same-sex couples under state law. Five
states--California, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington
(as of July 26, 2009, pending possible repeal effort)--plus Washington,
D.C. provide same-sex couples with access to the state level benefits
and responsibilities of marriage, through either civil unions or
domestic partnerships.
Hawaii
provides same-sex couples with limited rights and benefits. New York
recognizes marriages by same-sex couples validly entered into outside
of New York. Legislatures in New Hampshire and New York are
considering marriage legislation that would permit same-sex couples to
marry in those states, and the D.C. Council has passed legislation that
would recognize marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in
other jurisdictions (that legislation is going through a Congressional
review period).
provides same-sex couples with limited rights and benefits. New York
recognizes marriages by same-sex couples validly entered into outside
of New York. Legislatures in New Hampshire and New York are
considering marriage legislation that would permit same-sex couples to
marry in those states, and the D.C. Council has passed legislation that
would recognize marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in
other jurisdictions (that legislation is going through a Congressional
review period).
IMPORTANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
For an electronic map showing where marriage equality stands in the states, please visit: www.HRC.org/State_Laws.
For a summary of the history of the case and for a comprehensive listing of HRC's work in California on Proposition 8, please visit:www.HRC.org/California.
A breakdown of the ruling and interpretation by the HRC legal team will be available shortly on HRCBackStory.org: https://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/05/prop-8-decision-analysisprop-8-decision-analysis/
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
Amnesty Urges War Crimes Probe Into US Bombing of Yemen Migrant Jail
"The major loss of civilian life in this attack raises serious concerns about whether the U.S. complied with its obligations under international humanitarian law, including the rules on distinction and precautions."
May 19, 2025
The human rights group Amnesty International on Monday called for an investigation of an April U.S. airstrike on a migrant detention center in Yemen that killed and wounded more than 100 people as part of a wider bombing campaign targeting Houthi rebels that has left hundreds of people dead.
The U.S.—which has been bombing Yemen since 2002 as part of the so-called War on Terror launched after the September 11, 2001 attacks—intensified strikes in March 2025 in response to Houthi resistance to Israel's annihilation of Gaza and countries who support it. U.S. airstrtikes on Yemen, which averaged around a dozen per month during the final year of the Biden administration, soared to more than 60 in March under President Donald Trump, according to the Yemen Data Project.
"Under international humanitarian law attacking forces have an obligation to do everything feasible to distinguish between military and civilian targets."
On April 28, U.S. forces bombed the detention center for African migrants in the city of Sa'ada. People familiar with the site told Amnesty that all but one of the migrants jailed at the facility at the time of the attack were Ethiopians, except for one Eritrean. One person told Amnesty that they spoke to survivors of the strike, who said that detainees were sleeping when the center was bombed at around 4:00 am local time.
"They said they woke up to find dismembered bodies around them," the person recounted. "You could see the shock and horror on their faces. Some were still unable to speak because of the trauma."
Another witness said victims "suffered from different fractures and bruises," with some "in critical condition... two had amputated legs."
According to Amnesty:
Under international humanitarian law attacking forces have an obligation to do everything feasible to distinguish between military and civilian targets, to verify whether their intended target is a military objective and to cancel an attack if there is doubt. When attacking a military objective, parties to a conflict must also take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians in the vicinity.
"The U.S. attacked a well-known detention facility where the Houthis have been detaining migrants who had no means to take shelter. The major loss of civilian life in this attack raises serious concerns about whether the U.S. complied with its obligations under international humanitarian law, including the rules on distinction and precautions," Amnesty International secretary general Agnès Callamard said Monday.
"The U.S. must conduct a prompt, independent, and transparent investigation into this airstrike and into any other airstrikes that have resulted in civilian casualties as well as those where the rules of international humanitarian law may have been violated," Callamard added.
Other recent U.S. massacres in Yemen include the April 17 bombing of the Ras Isa fuel terminal in the Hodeida region, which Houthi officials said killed at least 80 people and wounded more than 170 others, and the April 20 strike on the popular Farwah market in the Shuub neighborhood of the capital Sanaa that killed at least 12 people and wounded 30 others.
"At a time when the U.S. appears to be
shrinking efforts aimed at reducing civilian harm by U.S. lethal actions, the U.S. Congress should play its oversight role and demand information on investigations to date on these strikes," Callamard said. "Congress must further ensure that civilian harm mitigation and response mechanisms remain intact and robustly respond to this and other recent incidents."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Civil Society Groups Call for Diplomatic Convoy to Get Aid Into Gaza as 2 Million Face Starvation
"The risk of famine in Gaza is increasing with the deliberate withholding of humanitarian aid," said the head of the World Health Organization.
May 19, 2025
As Israeli leaders were split over a plan to allow a "minimal" amount of aid into Gaza on Monday, Palestinian and global civil society groups issued a call for an international humanitarian mission that would go much further in fighting the looming famine across the enclave.
With the World Food Program and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East having "exhausted their reserves," more than 750 international groups joined "Unified Call to Confront Famine" and ensure the blockade stopping more than 3,000 food aid trucks and 116,000 metric tons of food are allowed into the enclave.
"We are witnessing, in real time, the deliberate starvation of a civilian population as a method of warfare," said Human Rights Watch (HRW), which also joined the call, in a statement. "Over 2 million Palestinians in Gaza are living in famine."
The group echoed an address by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), at the World Health Assembly on Monday in Geneva.
"The risk of famine in Gaza is increasing with the deliberate withholding of humanitarian aid," said Tedros. "The WHO has said around a quarter of the 2.1 million population in Gaza are facing 'a catastrophic situation of hunger, acute malnutrition, starvation, illness, and death' due to the Israeli blockade."
With aid that is "ready and waiting to enter Gaza" entirely blockaded by Israel since March 2, just before the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) broke a temporary cease-fire, civil society groups said states should join a "Diplomatic Humanitarian Convoy to Gaza through the Rafah Crossing."
In the convoy, official diplomatic missions would accompany thousands of aid trucks into Gaza, coordinating with the United Nations and the government of Egypt.
"Inaction will lead to mass death by starvation, enable further grave illegalities, and undermine the international legal system."
Supporting groups noted that governments that are "complicit in the ongoing atrocities," such as the U.S., the top international IDF funder, and called on "individual diplomats, parliamentarians, and ministers from those countries to join the convoy in their personal capacities." They also called on international media outlets to join—"to bear witness, to document the famine, and to expose the blockade starving Gaza."
"This is a human imperative," said HRW. "A Diplomatic Humanitarian Convoy would mark a historic step to break the siege, end the starvation, and affirm the world's rejection of hunger as a weapon of war."
The call came a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the government's "greatest friends in the world" had made clear that they "cannot accept images of hunger, mass hunger."
Images of Palestinians in Gaza suffering from a lack of food, medicine, water, and other aid have been widely available since long before the current blockade, but Netanyahu's comments suggested that allies like the U.S. government have applied pressure to allow aid into the enclave.
On his trip to the Middle East last week, U.S. President Donald Trump said the U.S. would have the looming famine in Gaza "taken care of."
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a United Nations-backed food insecurity initiative, said last week that at least 244,000 people in Gaza are facing Phase 5-level hunger, defined as "extreme deprivation of food."
"Starvation, death, destitution, and extremely critical levels of acute malnutrition are or will likely be evident," said the IPC.
The entire enclave is in Phase 4, which is characterized by "large food consumption gaps... very high acute malnutrition and excess mortality."
Aid and medical workers are struggling to treat thousands of children who have been diagnosed with acute malnutrition.
"We currently are lacking nutrition rehabilitation supplies and equipment, including pharmaceuticals," said Richard Peeperkorn, WHO representative in the occupied Palestinian territories. "Because of the blockades, supplies are dwindling rapidly."
Nutritionist Rana Soboh toldThe Associated Press Monday that she treated a mother who had fainted while breastfeeding her newborn after having gone days without eating.
The next day Soboh met a mother of a malnourished 1-year-old boy who weighed just 11 pounds, having lived his entire life during Israel's bombardment of Gaza and the near-total blockade that began in October 2023 in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack.
"He hadn't grown any teeth," the AP reported. "He was too weak to cry. The mother was also malnourished, 'a skeleton, covered in skin.' When the mother asked for food, Soboh started crying uncontrollably."
A U.N. official said Monday that under Netanyahu's plan to provide "minimal" aid, 20 aid trucks carrying food was expected to enter Gaza; before Israel began its assault on Gaza, about 500 trucks entered the enclave per day.
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has objected to the tiny amount of food that may soon enter Gaza, saying it will "fuel Hamas and give it oxygen."
Netanyahu said the plan would be a "bridge" to a new aid system in which a private foundation and U.S. security contractors would distribute humanitarian assistance. The U.N. has rejected the proposal, saying it is "at odds with the DNA of any principled humanitarian organization."
HRW said the call for all humanitarian aid to enter Gaza in diplomatic convoy was grounded in "international law, shared morality, the Genocide Convention, the International Court of Justice's provisional measures, [and] the U.N. Charter."
"Inaction," said the group, "will lead to mass death by starvation, enable further grave illegalities, and undermine the international legal system."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'They Are Now Planning on Annihilating Khan Younis': New IDF Displacement Order Sparks Alarm
The United Nations human rights chief called Israel's intensifying assault on Gaza "tantamount to ethnic cleansing."
May 19, 2025
The Israeli military on Monday designated Gaza's second-largest city a combat zone and ordered all residents to evacuate ahead of an "unprecedented attack," the latest escalation of Israel's U.S.-backed genocidal assault on the enclave's besieged and starving population.
The forced displacement order came as Israeli tanks and troops pushed further into the Gaza Strip as part of a renewed ground assault on the territory, which has been decimated by relentless bombings that began in the aftermath of the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack.
The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said Monday that the rate of Israeli killings in Gaza has intensified significantly in recent days, crushing any lingering hope of an imminent cease-fire and heightening alarm over the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian emergency on the ground.
The group estimated that more than 300,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced between May 12 and 18, with that number set to grow with the evacuation of Khan Younis.
"This surge in lethal attacks is part of a broader escalation by the Israeli military, marked by a scorched-earth policy and the systematic destruction of Gaza's remaining residential areas and infrastructure," said Euro-Med. "The ongoing campaign—now in its 19th month—has been characterised by mass killings, enforced starvation, and the deliberate dismantling of life-sustaining systems, with the explicit aim of eradicating the Palestinian population in Gaza and eliminating any possibility of return or reconstruction."
Avichay Adraee, a spokesperson for the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), wrote in a social media post early Monday that "from this moment, Khan Younis governorate will be considered a dangerous combat zone."
"The IDF will launch an unprecedented attack to destroy the capabilities of terrorist organizations in this area," Adraee continued. "For your safety, evacuate immediately."
Video footage posted to social media showed Israeli airstrikes pounding the area and residents scrambling to evacuate their families, many of whom have already been displaced multiple times since late 2023.
"They are literally forcing all of Gazans into a concentration camp in what used to be Rafah in southern Gaza, after destroying it. They are now planning on annihilating Khan Younis," Elia Ayoub, a researcher based in the United Kingdom, wrote Monday. "There's never been a genocide so thoroughly documented as it was live-streamed straight to our phones."
The east of Khanyounis is evacuating. Gaza. pic.twitter.com/ujGnrCq2Xc
— TIMES OF GAZA (@Timesofgaza) May 19, 2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is facing an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for war crimes in Gaza, said Monday that the IDF is moving to seize "full control" of the "entire strip" while allowing in "minimal" humanitarian aid—remarks that deepened concerns about Israeli plans to starve out Gaza's population and annex the territory.
"If this means annexation, it violates international law," Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard said in response to Netanyahu's comments. "Sweden maintains that the territory of Gaza must not be changed or reduced."
"There needs to be a cease-fire and end to the fighting, and the hostages must be released," she added. "No more statements or plans from the Israeli government that exacerbate the situation for civilians in Gaza."
Over the past 24 hours, Israeli airstrikes have killed more than 130 people, bringing the official death toll since October 2023 to 53,486, according to Gaza's Ministry of Health.
In a statement late last week, United Nations human rights chief Volker Türk warned that Israel's "latest barrage of bombs" and "methodical destruction of entire neighborhoods"—as well as the cut-off of humanitarian assistance—signals "a push for a permanent demographic shift in Gaza that is in defiance of international law and is tantamount to ethnic cleansing."
"We must stop the clock on this madness," said Türk.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular