January, 13 2009, 08:53am EDT

ACLU Files Habeas Petition Challenging Guantanamo Detention Of Prisoner Captured As Juvenile
Former Prosecutor Supports ACLU Legal Effort Representing Mohammed Jawad
WASHINGTON
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a petition for habeas
corpus today in federal court in the District of Columbia to challenge the
unlawful detention of Mohammed Jawad, who has been held for over six years at
Guantanamo Bay. Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld, the former lead prosecutor in Jawad's
military commission case, is supporting the ACLU's legal challenge.
Jawad, now about 23 years old, has been in custody since he was captured at
the age of 16 or 17 and is one of two Guantanamo prisoners the United States is
prosecuting for acts allegedly committed when they were juveniles. Jawad is
accused of throwing a hand grenade at two U.S. service members and their
interpreter in Afghanistan.
"It would be a miscarriage of justice for President-elect Obama to continue
Mr. Jawad's unlawful detention in Guantanamo, particularly considering that Mr.
Jawad was captured as a teenager and detained based on alleged confessions
obtained through torture," said Hina Shamsi, staff attorney with the ACLU
National Security Project. "The Bush administration compounded this injustice by
using torture-derived evidence to prosecute Mr. Jawad for war crimes in the
unconstitutional military commissions. The government's continued detention and
prosecution of Mr. Jawad violates America's values and the Constitution, as well
as this country's binding obligations under the Geneva Conventions and human
rights law."
In September, prosecutor Vandeveld left the military commissions because he
did not believe he could ethically proceed with the case. In a declaration filed
in support of Jawad's petition, Vandeveld told the court that there is "no
credible evidence or legal basis" to justify Jawad's detention and prosecution,
and that the commission system's flaws make it impossible for anyone "to harbor
the remotest hope that justice is an achievable goal." Vandeveld does not
believe Jawad's release presents any risk.
"I have no doubt at all - none - that Mr. Jawad would pose no threat
whatsoever to me, his former prosecutor and now-repentant persecutor," said
Vandeveld in his declaration. "Six years is long enough for a boy of sixteen to
serve in virtual solitary confinement, in a distant land, for reasons he may
never fully understand. Mr. Jawad should be released to resume his life in a
civil society, for his sake, and for our own sense of justice and perhaps to
restore a measure of our basic humanity."
In a separate legal case argued today, the Bush administration is in the
United States Court of Military Commission Review appealing a military
commission judge's decision to throw out the torture-tainted evidence against
Jawad. In November, Army judge Col. Stephen Henley held that evidence collected
while Jawad was in U.S. custody could not be admitted in his trial because it
had been obtained under duress. The government told the judge that Jawad's
alleged confessions were the centerpiece of its case against him and has asked
the proceedings to be stayed until the appeals court rules.
"The fact that the government persists in trying to use evidence obtained
through torture says everything you need to know about the integrity of its
case," said U.S. Air Force Major David J. R. Frakt, who represents Jawad in the
military commission case and is co-counsel in the habeas case. "But the larger
problem is that Mr. Jawad should never have been prosecuted in the military
commissions system at all. Our values of due process and fair justice apply to
all defendants and should not depend upon whom we are prosecuting and what the
alleged crimes are. Mr. Jawad's only meaningful opportunity to challenge the
basis for his detention comes through this habeas case, in a legitimate court."
Among other forms of abusive treatment, Jawad was subjected to the military's
so-called "frequent flyer" program, in which detainees at Guantanamo were
subjected to sleep deprivation for extended periods of time. In May 2004, a few
months after Jawad tried to commit suicide in his cell, prison officials
deprived him of sleep for two weeks by moving him 112 times in 14 days - and
they did so after having been ordered by their commanding general to discontinue
this inhumane program.
Attorneys on the habeas case are Shamsi and Jonathan Hafetz of the ACLU
National Security Project, Arthur Spitzer of the ACLU of the National Capital
Area and Frakt.
The ACLU's legal brief and the declaration from Vandeveld are available at: www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/38305lgl20090113.html
Additional information about the ACLU's work related to the detention of
prisoners at Guantanamo Bay can be found online at: www.aclu.org/gitmo
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
Environmental and Indigenous Groups Mobilize to Stop 'Alligator Alcatraz'
"This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades.
Jun 30, 2025
As Florida's Republican government moves to construct a sprawling new immigration detention center in the heart of the Everglades, nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz," environmental groups and a wide range of other activists have begun to mobilize against it.
Florida's Republican attorney general, James Uthmeier, announced last week that construction of the jail, at the site of a disused airbase in the Big Cypress National Preserve, had begun. According to Fox 4 Now, an affiliate in Southwest Florida, construction has moved at "a blistering pace," with the site expected to be done by next week.
Three environmental advocacy groups have launched a lawsuit to try to halt the construction of the facility. And on Saturday, hundreds of protesters flocked to the remote site to voice their opposition.
Opponents have called out the cruelty of the plan, which comes as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's crusade to deport thousands of immigrants per day. They also called out the site's potential to inflict severe harm to local wildlife in one of America's most unique ecosystems.
Florida's government has said the site will have no environmental impact. Last week, Uthmeier described the area as a barren swampland. He said the site "presents an efficient, low-cost opportunity to build a temporary detention facility because you don't need to invest that much in the perimeter. People get out, there's not much waiting for 'em other than alligators and pythons," he said in the video. "Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide."
But local indigenous leaders have said that's not true. Saturday's protest was led by Native American groups, who say that the site will destroy their sacred homelands. According to The Associated Press, Big Cypress is home to 15 traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages, as well as ceremonial and burial grounds and other gathering sites.
"Rather than Miccosukee homelands being an uninhabited wasteland for alligators and pythons, as some have suggested, the Big Cypress is the Tribe's traditional homelands. The landscape has protected the Miccosukee and Seminole people for generations," Miccosukee Chairman Talbert Cypress wrote in a statement on social media last week.
Environmental groups, meanwhile, have disputed the state's claims that the site will have no environmental impact. On Friday, the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Everglades, and Earthjustice sued the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the site was being constructed without any of the environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act.
"The site is more than 96% wetlands, surrounded by Big Cypress National Preserve, and is habitat for the endangered Florida panther and other iconic species. This scheme is not only cruel, it threatens the Everglades ecosystem that state and federal taxpayers have spent billions to protect," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades.
Governor Ron DeSantis used emergency powers to fast track the proposal, which the Center for Biological Diversity says has left no room for public input or environmental review required by federal law.
"This reckless attack on the Everglades—the lifeblood of Florida—risks polluting sensitive waters and turning more endangered Florida panthers into roadkill. It makes no sense to build what’s essentially a new development in the Everglades for any reason, but this reason is particularly despicable," said Elise Bennett, Florida and Caribbean director and attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity.
Reuters has reported that the planned jail could hold up to 5,000 detained migrants at a time and could cost $450 million per year to maintain. It comes as President Trump has sought to increase deportations to a quota of 3,000 per day. The majority of those who have been arrested by federal immigration authorities have no criminal records.
"This massive detention center," Bennett said, "will blight one of the most iconic ecosystems in the world."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Kristi Noem Took Personal Cut of Political Donations While Governor of South Dakota: Report
"No wonder Pam Bondi gutted the public integrity section of DOJ. To protect utterly corrupt monsters like Kristi Noem."
Jun 30, 2025
The investigative outlet ProPublica revealed Monday that Kristi Noem secretly took a personal cut of funds she raised for a nonprofit that boosted her political career—and then did not disclose the income when President Donald Trump selected her to serve as head of the Department of Homeland Security.
ProPublica reported that in 2023, while Noem was governor of South Dakota, the nonprofit group American Resolve Policy Fund "routed funds to a personal company of Noem's that had recently been established in Delaware." The company is called Ashwood Strategies, and it was registered in June 2023.
"The payment totaled $80,000 that year, a significant boost to her roughly $130,000 government salary," according to the outlet. "Since the nonprofit is a so-called dark money group—one that's not required to disclose the names of its donors—the original source of the money remains unknown."
Experts told ProPublica that the arrangement and Noem's failure to disclose the income were unusual at best and possibly unlawful.
"If donors to these nonprofits are not just holding the keys to an elected official's political future but also literally providing them with their income, that's new and disturbing," Daniel Weiner, a former Federal Election Commission attorney who now works at the Brennan Center for Justice, told ProPublica.
Noem's lawyers denied that she violated the law but did not reply to ProPublica's questions about whether the Office of Government Ethics was aware of the $80,000 payment.
Unlike many Trump administration officials, Noem is not a billionaire. But "while she is among the least wealthy members of Trump's Cabinet, her personal spending habits have attracted notice," ProPublica observed, noting that she was "photographed wearing a gold Rolex Cosmograph Daytona watch that costs nearly $50,000 as she toured the Salvadoran prison where her agency is sending immigrants."
"In April, after her purse was stolen at a Washington, D.C. restaurant, it emerged she was carrying $3,000 in cash, which an official said was for 'dinner, activities, and Easter gifts,'" the outlet continued. "She was criticized for using taxpayer money as governor to pay for expenses related to trips to Paris, to Canada for bear hunting, and to Houston to have dental work done. At the time, Noem denied misusing public funds."
Political scientist Norman Ornstein wrote Monday that it was "no wonder [Attorney General] Pam Bondi gutted the public integrity section of DOJ."
"To protect utterly corrupt monsters like Kristi Noem," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Caving to Trump, Canada Drops Tax on US Tech Firms
One journalist accused Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney of chickening out.
Jun 30, 2025
Acquiescing to pressure from the Trump administration, the Canadian government announced on Sunday that the country will rescind the digital services tax, a levy that would have seen large American tech firms pay billions of dollars to Canada over the next few years.
The Sunday announcement from the Canadian government cited "anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement" as the reason for the rescission.
"Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis," said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the statement.
The digital services tax impacts companies that make over $20 million in revenue from Canadian users and customers through digital services like online advertising and shopping. Companies like Uber and Google would have paid a 3% levy on the money they made from Canadian sources, according to CBC News.
The reversal comes after U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday blasted the digital services tax, calling it a "direct and blatant attack on our country" on Truth Social.
Trump said he was suspending trade talks between the two countries because of the tax. "Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period," Trump wrote. The United States is Canada's largest trading partner.
Payments from tech firms subject to the digital services tax were due starting on Monday, though the tax has been in effect since last year.
"The June 30, 2025 collection will be halted," and Canada's Minister of Finance "will soon bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act," according to the Sunday statement.
"If Mark Carney folds in response to this pressure from Trump on the digital services tax, he proves he can be pushed around," said Canadian journalist Paris Marx on Bluesky, speaking prior to the announcement of the rescission. "The tax must be enforced," he added.
"Carney chickens out too," wrote the author Doug Henwood on Twitter on Monday.
In an opinion piece originally published in Canadian Dimension before the announcement on Sunday, Jared Walker, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Canadians for Tax Fairness, wrote that all the money generated for the tax could mean "more federal money for housing, transit, and healthcare transfers—all from some of the largest and most under-taxed companies in the world."
Walker also wrote that the digital service tax could serve as a counterweight to the so-called "revenge tax" provision in Trump's sprawling domestic tax and spending bill.
Section 899, called "Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes," would "increase withholding taxes for non-resident individuals and companies from countries that the U.S. believes have imposed discriminatory or unfair taxes," according to CBC. The digital services tax is one of the taxes the Trump administration believes is discriminatory.
"If 'elbows up' is going to be more than just a slogan, Canada can't cave to pressure when Donald Trump throws his weight around," wrote Walker, invoking the Canadian rallying cry in the face of American antagonism when it comes to trade.
"But this slogan also means the Carney government has to make sure it is working on behalf of everyday Canadians—not just the ultra-rich and big corporations that are only 'Canadian' when it's convenient," Walker wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular