October, 30 2008, 02:52pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Tim Bradley, Brennan Center for Justice, 646-452-5637 or 314-440-9936
Sabrina Williams Advancement Project, 202-728-9557 or 305-904-3960
Jenny Flanagan, Colorado Common Cause, 303-292-2163 or 303-842-1515
Purged Colorado Voters Win Unprecedented Protections to Ensure Votes Are Counted
DENVER
An agreement reached late yesterday before a federal judge in
Colorado ensures that tens of thousands of Colorado voters illegally
purged from the registration lists will have their votes counted. The
decision was hailed by voting rights and good-government groups in
Colorado and nationwide as a victory for voters and a clear message to
election officials must take the necessary steps to make sure that
ballots cast by eligible voters must be counted.
"This is a major victory for voters. All eligible Colorado voters
who followed the rules should have confidence that on November 4th they
will be able to vote and their vote will be counted," said Ben
Monterroso, national director of Mi Familia Vota.
Under the settlement between plaintiffs-Mi Familia Vota, Colorado
Common Cause and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU)-and
the defendant, the Colorado Secretary of State, every wrongfully purged
Colorado voter in question will be placed on a protection list that
assumes their eligibility and guarantees that in the event they are
given a provisional ballot on Election Day, county election officials
will promptly verify their eligibility.
Any ballots of the purged voters contested at the county
level-rather than be discarded and not counted as often happens with
provisional ballots-will have to be reviewed by the Colorado Secretary
of State as well as advocates for the purged voters in order to make
sure all eligible votes are counted. If the Secretary elects to reject
the ballot, representatives of the plaintiffs will also have the
opportunity to review the registration and contest any rejections of
wrongfully purged voters. Additionally, the court will retain
continuing jurisdiction over the tens of thousands of voters wrongfully
purged-which allows plaintiffs to go directly to the judge to swiftly
resolve any disputes and guarantee votes are properly counted.
This stipulation means that the purged Colorado voters in question
will get at least three layers of protections-by the county, state,
plaintiffs' representatives and, if needed, a federal judge-an
unprecedented degree of oversight to ensure that all eligible votes are
counted.
"This settlement provides unprecedented protections to the voters of
Colorado and ensures that the ballots of voters who were erroneously
purged will be accurately counted," said Penda Hair of the Advancement
Project.
"This is a real victory for all of us and particularly the
wrongfully purged voters in Colorado. Most of these voters had no idea
they'd been barred from the voting booth. Today, we all have assurance
that their votes will count. It is a sweet and just victory," said Jim
Johnson, Chair of the Board of the Brennan Center for Justice and
partner at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.
"This is a good outcome for Colorado voters and we are please that
the Secretary of State worked with us to achieve this resolution. Going
forward, the state must work to do better for its voters," said Myrna
Perez, Counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice.
Plaintiffs also noted on Thursday that the extraordinary relief
granted to Colorado voters just six days before the election is only a
first step to improving Colorado's purge practices. After the election,
plaintiffs will continue to work to change Colorado's procedures to
improve protections for all voters.
To read the stipulation agreed to before Judge U.S. District Judge John Kane, click here.
To arrange an interview with one of the experts involved in issuing
the complaint, please contact any of the individuals listed above.
BACKGROUND ON THE CASE
The complaint was filed on behalf of Colorado Common Cause, Mi
Familia Vota, and Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
contending that, in an action not required by any Colorado law, the
Secretary of State has removed tens of thousands of voters from the
official voter rolls. The move was a violation of the NVRA, which bans
systematic removal of voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal
election except for narrowly specified reasons. Civic groups brought
substantial evidence that during the NVRA's 90 day no-purge period,
defendant Secretary of State actually removed approximately 30,000
voters' registration records from Colorado's voting rolls, in addition
to the 1,892 whose removal may have been permitted under the NVRA
because of death, incarceration for a felony, or withdrawal.
Several thousand eligible voters have also been removed from the
voter registration list due to a Colorado law that requires
cancellation of new registrations when a non-forwardable notice sent by
mail to the voter is returned as undeliverable within 20 days of
receipt of the registration application. A similar law in Michigan was
recently found by the US District Court to violate the NVRA and
unenforceable.
The plaintiffs were represented by the Advancement Project; Brennan
Center for Justice; Debevoise & Plimpton, LLC; Altshuler Berzon,
LLP; Fair Elections Legal Network; and
Richardson Rosenblatt & Associates, LLC.
All of the parties to the complaint urge voters to "know before they
go" to the polls and to vote early if possible to ensure that any
problems are flagged early and to reduce pressure on polling places on
Election Day. Voters can check their registration, find out where to
vote, or report a problem by going to www.JustVoteColorado.com or by
calling 866-OUR-VOTE.
The Brennan Center for Justice is a nonpartisan law and policy institute. We strive to uphold the values of democracy. We stand for equal justice and the rule of law. We work to craft and advance reforms that will make American democracy work, for all.
(646) 292-8310LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 88 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Correction: This article originally said Trump faces 91 federal and state felony charges. The correct number is 88.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular