For Immediate Release
104 Citizens Groups Criticize Anti-Democratic Rulemaking
Bush Administration to Cripple Endangered Species Act With Little Public Input, Oversight
WASHINGTON - Today, representatives from 104 conservation and
scientific organizations representing millions of American's submitted a
letter to Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne and Secretary of Commerce
Carlos Gutierrez calling for increased transparency and opportunities for
public participation on a new rule proposal. The rule, published by the Bush
administration in the federal register last week, would radically weaken the
Endangered Species Act. The administration is only accepting public comment for
"Rather than a narrow tweaking of the regulations, the proposal
represents a back-door attack on the Endangered Species Act. The American
people deserve and expect a full public process to vet such far-reaching
changes to this landmark conservation law," said Leda Huta, Director of
the Endangered Species Coalition.
The administration is also refusing to accept e-mail comments or hold
public hearings on the proposed rule. Instead, comments will be accepted by
mail, or through a government Web
site that warns reviewers their personal information will be posted on the
internet for public dissemination.
"It appears as if the administration is doing whatever it can to
discourage participation in the democratic process," said John Kostyack,
of the National Wildlife Federation. "I think we can expect more sneaky
assaults like this on our public land and wildlife laws as this Administration
heads for the exits."
Press, reporting on leaked documents, revealed last week that the Bush administration plans to weaken the Endangered
Species Act. The proposed changes are intended to eliminate
the requirement that federal agencies consult with independent wildlife experts
and to prohibit consideration of the impacts of global warming on wildlife.
"The Bush administration proposal eliminates the critical checks
and balances needed to protect imperiled birds and cuts species experts
from the process of making decisions that need to be science-based," said
Mike Daulton, with National Audubon Society.
"The Endangered Species Act is a safety net for our
nation's wildlife, fish and plants on the brink of extinction. The
Bush administration's proposed regulations will cut a giant loophole in
the safety net," said Bill Snape of the Center for Biological Diversity.
"We have a responsibility to future generations to be good stewards and
protect endangered species and the special places they call home."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
If you think a better world is possible, support our people-powered media model today
The corporate media puts the interests of the 1% ahead of all of us. That's wrong. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
If you believe the survival of independent media is vital to a healthy democracy, please step forward with a donation to nonprofit Common Dreams today:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded last year that
nearly one-third of plant and animal species on Earth are at an increased risk
of extinction due to global warming.
"Animals on the brink of extinction need consideration and
protection guided by the best experts in the federal government: US Fish and
Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service biologists," said
Susan Holmes of Earthjustice.
The proposed regulatory changes came out in the eleventh hour of the
Bush administration. The abbreviated timeline and restrictive commenting
options raise serious concerns that the Department of the Interior and the
Department of Commerce is attempting to rewrite a bedrock environmental statute
without allowing for adequate public involvement.
The proposed regulatory changes were published August 15, 2008, while
Congress was out for recess and many Americans were enjoying the summer
Sean Cosgrove with the Conservation Law Foundation agrees, "For
one of our nation's most important and successful environmental laws, the
thirty-day comment period is woefully inadequate for the public to review and
comment on this critical proposal."
The coalition is urging DOI and DOC
to extend the comment period to 120 days, allowing the public adequate time to
address the breadth and depth that these changes to the Endangered Species Act
regulations will have on protecting our most imperiled wildlife.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news outlet. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
As the guardian of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the Endangered Species Coalition (ESC) is composed of 380 environmental, conservation, religious, scientific, humane, sporting and business groups around the country. Our tools are public education, scientific information and citizen participation in decisions affecting the fate of at-risk species. Through extensive grassroots work, education, discussions with lawmakers, and the dissemination of information, we work to ensure that the Act itself, as well as the species it protects, can be passed on safely into the future.