SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs as U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick holds a chart during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025.
(Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP via Getty Images)
Third Federal Court Ruling in Less Than 24 Hours Puts 'Unlawful' Trump Tariffs on Path to Supreme Court
The trio of related rulings are more than likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
May 29, 2025
Update:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday put a stay on a lower-court ruling from a day earlier, which put a block on a large portion of President Donald Trump's tariff regime.
The latest intervention from the federal courts, according to Axios, "will deepen the chaos around the Court of International Trade's Wednesday order, which threatens to upend global commerce."
The appellate ruling only makes it more likely that the cases involving Trump's tariff order will find their way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's highest court could take the case as early as Friday.
Earlier:
For the second time in less than 24 hours, a federal court Thursday blocked tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, ruling he exceeded his presidential authority with the sweeping and arbitrary nature of the orders.
U.S District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee who serves in Washington, D.C., determined Trump's orders were "unlawful" as he could not unilaterally declare emergencies in order to justify the imposition of tariffs against other nations.
The International Economic Emergency Powers Act, by which Trump justified his ability to impose the tariffs, "does not authorize the President to impose the tariffs set forth" in the series of executive orders issued, said Contreras in his decision. The ruling was accompanied, according to Politico, "by a preliminary injunction on the collection of the duties on the two plaintiffs who brought the case."
Contreras, however, stayed his order for two weeks "so the parties may seek review in the Court of Appeals."
Thursday's ruling comes a day after a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade unanimously ruled against Trump's tariff policy, a decision that was seen as a significant blow to the president's chaotic tariff agenda which has resulted in wild swings in the global economy.
In a filing on Thursday in reaction to Wednesday's ruling, the Department of Justice asked a federal court of appeals for a stay to the decision in anticipation of a likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Update:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday put a stay on a lower-court ruling from a day earlier, which put a block on a large portion of President Donald Trump's tariff regime.
The latest intervention from the federal courts, according to Axios, "will deepen the chaos around the Court of International Trade's Wednesday order, which threatens to upend global commerce."
The appellate ruling only makes it more likely that the cases involving Trump's tariff order will find their way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's highest court could take the case as early as Friday.
Earlier:
For the second time in less than 24 hours, a federal court Thursday blocked tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, ruling he exceeded his presidential authority with the sweeping and arbitrary nature of the orders.
U.S District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee who serves in Washington, D.C., determined Trump's orders were "unlawful" as he could not unilaterally declare emergencies in order to justify the imposition of tariffs against other nations.
The International Economic Emergency Powers Act, by which Trump justified his ability to impose the tariffs, "does not authorize the President to impose the tariffs set forth" in the series of executive orders issued, said Contreras in his decision. The ruling was accompanied, according to Politico, "by a preliminary injunction on the collection of the duties on the two plaintiffs who brought the case."
Contreras, however, stayed his order for two weeks "so the parties may seek review in the Court of Appeals."
Thursday's ruling comes a day after a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade unanimously ruled against Trump's tariff policy, a decision that was seen as a significant blow to the president's chaotic tariff agenda which has resulted in wild swings in the global economy.
In a filing on Thursday in reaction to Wednesday's ruling, the Department of Justice asked a federal court of appeals for a stay to the decision in anticipation of a likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Update:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday put a stay on a lower-court ruling from a day earlier, which put a block on a large portion of President Donald Trump's tariff regime.
The latest intervention from the federal courts, according to Axios, "will deepen the chaos around the Court of International Trade's Wednesday order, which threatens to upend global commerce."
The appellate ruling only makes it more likely that the cases involving Trump's tariff order will find their way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's highest court could take the case as early as Friday.
Earlier:
For the second time in less than 24 hours, a federal court Thursday blocked tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, ruling he exceeded his presidential authority with the sweeping and arbitrary nature of the orders.
U.S District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee who serves in Washington, D.C., determined Trump's orders were "unlawful" as he could not unilaterally declare emergencies in order to justify the imposition of tariffs against other nations.
The International Economic Emergency Powers Act, by which Trump justified his ability to impose the tariffs, "does not authorize the President to impose the tariffs set forth" in the series of executive orders issued, said Contreras in his decision. The ruling was accompanied, according to Politico, "by a preliminary injunction on the collection of the duties on the two plaintiffs who brought the case."
Contreras, however, stayed his order for two weeks "so the parties may seek review in the Court of Appeals."
Thursday's ruling comes a day after a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade unanimously ruled against Trump's tariff policy, a decision that was seen as a significant blow to the president's chaotic tariff agenda which has resulted in wild swings in the global economy.
In a filing on Thursday in reaction to Wednesday's ruling, the Department of Justice asked a federal court of appeals for a stay to the decision in anticipation of a likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.