SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. President Donald Trump listens as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick speaks on April 30, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
(Photo: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Court Applauded for Slapping Down 'Corrupt, Authoritarian' Trump Tariff Scheme
"This is a huge political defeat, and Trump has nobody to blame except his own overreach," wrote one economist.
May 29, 2025
A panel of three federal judges late Wednesday unanimously ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by invoking emergency powers to impose broad-based tariffs on imports, a significant blow to a trade agenda that has wreaked havoc on small businesses, consumers, and the global economy.
The judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade, including one Trump appointee, halted the 10% import tariffs that Trump unilaterally imposed in April on goods from nearly every country, as well as additional levies on certain products from Canada and Mexico.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which Trump cited as the authority underlying his tariff scheme, does not confer "such unbounded authority" to the president, the court ruled Wednesday.
Melinda St. Louis, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, said in a statement that "Trump abused sweeping, unstrategic tariffs as part of a corrupt, authoritarian power grab to bully foreign countries and force U.S. companies to bend the knee to him and his billionaire friends."
"We welcome the court's decision striking down Trump's misuse of tariffs," St. Louis added.
The Trump administration almost immediately signaled plans to file an appeal in the case, which could ultimately wind up before the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court.
Economist Paul Krugman wrote in response to the Wednesday decision that "presumably the Trumpists will try to undo this judgment, one way or another—exploiting other loopholes in the law, maybe trying to bully the court into submission, maybe just defying the court altogether."
"But this is a huge political defeat," Krugman added, "and Trump has nobody to blame except his own overreach."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A panel of three federal judges late Wednesday unanimously ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by invoking emergency powers to impose broad-based tariffs on imports, a significant blow to a trade agenda that has wreaked havoc on small businesses, consumers, and the global economy.
The judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade, including one Trump appointee, halted the 10% import tariffs that Trump unilaterally imposed in April on goods from nearly every country, as well as additional levies on certain products from Canada and Mexico.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which Trump cited as the authority underlying his tariff scheme, does not confer "such unbounded authority" to the president, the court ruled Wednesday.
Melinda St. Louis, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, said in a statement that "Trump abused sweeping, unstrategic tariffs as part of a corrupt, authoritarian power grab to bully foreign countries and force U.S. companies to bend the knee to him and his billionaire friends."
"We welcome the court's decision striking down Trump's misuse of tariffs," St. Louis added.
The Trump administration almost immediately signaled plans to file an appeal in the case, which could ultimately wind up before the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court.
Economist Paul Krugman wrote in response to the Wednesday decision that "presumably the Trumpists will try to undo this judgment, one way or another—exploiting other loopholes in the law, maybe trying to bully the court into submission, maybe just defying the court altogether."
"But this is a huge political defeat," Krugman added, "and Trump has nobody to blame except his own overreach."
A panel of three federal judges late Wednesday unanimously ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by invoking emergency powers to impose broad-based tariffs on imports, a significant blow to a trade agenda that has wreaked havoc on small businesses, consumers, and the global economy.
The judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade, including one Trump appointee, halted the 10% import tariffs that Trump unilaterally imposed in April on goods from nearly every country, as well as additional levies on certain products from Canada and Mexico.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which Trump cited as the authority underlying his tariff scheme, does not confer "such unbounded authority" to the president, the court ruled Wednesday.
Melinda St. Louis, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, said in a statement that "Trump abused sweeping, unstrategic tariffs as part of a corrupt, authoritarian power grab to bully foreign countries and force U.S. companies to bend the knee to him and his billionaire friends."
"We welcome the court's decision striking down Trump's misuse of tariffs," St. Louis added.
The Trump administration almost immediately signaled plans to file an appeal in the case, which could ultimately wind up before the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court.
Economist Paul Krugman wrote in response to the Wednesday decision that "presumably the Trumpists will try to undo this judgment, one way or another—exploiting other loopholes in the law, maybe trying to bully the court into submission, maybe just defying the court altogether."
"But this is a huge political defeat," Krugman added, "and Trump has nobody to blame except his own overreach."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.