SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
House Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) and Garret Graves (R-La.) conduct a news conference on May 31, 2023.
"Democrats are united in stopping Republican attempts to take food out of the mouths of hungry Americans with their attacks on SNAP," wrote Rep. Jim McGovern.
Democrats on the U.S. House Agriculture Committee on Monday slammed the Republican leadership's ongoing attacks on federal nutrition assistance, specifically criticizing members of Speaker Kevin McCarthy's team for floating eligibility restrictions on top of those already imposed by the bipartisan debt ceiling agreement.
"You have seen what happens when leadership gets involved in dictating the details of the farm bill, particularly when the issue involved is SNAP, the safety net for America's working poor and elderly," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter to McCarthy (R-Calif.), referring to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
"The continued threat of making additional changes to SNAP eligibility or benefits is not helpful and even undermines [House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.)] as he works with his Democratic and Republican membership to bring a bipartisan farm bill out of the Agriculture Committee," the lawmakers continued. "Our nation's hungry and those who grow their food deserve a bipartisan farm bill to address their needs."
The Democratic lawmakers sent their letter days after Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.), one of McCarthy's top negotiators, told Politico that there is "additional progress or savings that can be maximized" with SNAP, an effective anti-hunger program that Republicans target for cuts every year.
"We kind of got what we could get in the debt ceiling," Graves said, pointing to the new SNAP work requirements for older adults—a change that experts say will put 750,000 people at risk of losing food aid. (Research has repeatedly shown that work requirements are not effective at boosting employment.)
"I think we're gonna continue working, whether it's [appropriations], farm bill, or others to keep building on it," added Graves, who is not a member of the House Agriculture Committee.
The House GOP leadership and rank-and-file Republicans—including members of the far-right Freedom Caucus—are looking to further restrict SNAP benefits at a time of increasing hunger across the U.S. According to recently released U.S. Census Bureau data, food insecurity has risen 35% since July 2021, impacting more than 27 million people.
"Democrats are united in stopping Republican attempts to take food out of the mouths of hungry Americans with their attacks on SNAP—America's most effective anti-hunger program," Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), a member of the House Agriculture Committee, wrote Monday.
On top of pursuing more changes to SNAP eligibility requirements, House Republicans are seeking $800 million in funding cuts to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in their agriculture appropriations bill for fiscal year 2024.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) warned last month that, if enacted, the cuts in the House GOP's agriculture legislation would be disastrous.
"We estimate that 650,000 to 750,000 eligible people—primarily toddlers, preschoolers, and postpartum adults—would be turned away from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children," wrote CBPP's Katie Bergh and Zoë Neuberger. "Another 4.6 million toddlers and preschoolers and pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding participants would have their benefits cut significantly."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Democrats on the U.S. House Agriculture Committee on Monday slammed the Republican leadership's ongoing attacks on federal nutrition assistance, specifically criticizing members of Speaker Kevin McCarthy's team for floating eligibility restrictions on top of those already imposed by the bipartisan debt ceiling agreement.
"You have seen what happens when leadership gets involved in dictating the details of the farm bill, particularly when the issue involved is SNAP, the safety net for America's working poor and elderly," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter to McCarthy (R-Calif.), referring to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
"The continued threat of making additional changes to SNAP eligibility or benefits is not helpful and even undermines [House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.)] as he works with his Democratic and Republican membership to bring a bipartisan farm bill out of the Agriculture Committee," the lawmakers continued. "Our nation's hungry and those who grow their food deserve a bipartisan farm bill to address their needs."
The Democratic lawmakers sent their letter days after Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.), one of McCarthy's top negotiators, told Politico that there is "additional progress or savings that can be maximized" with SNAP, an effective anti-hunger program that Republicans target for cuts every year.
"We kind of got what we could get in the debt ceiling," Graves said, pointing to the new SNAP work requirements for older adults—a change that experts say will put 750,000 people at risk of losing food aid. (Research has repeatedly shown that work requirements are not effective at boosting employment.)
"I think we're gonna continue working, whether it's [appropriations], farm bill, or others to keep building on it," added Graves, who is not a member of the House Agriculture Committee.
The House GOP leadership and rank-and-file Republicans—including members of the far-right Freedom Caucus—are looking to further restrict SNAP benefits at a time of increasing hunger across the U.S. According to recently released U.S. Census Bureau data, food insecurity has risen 35% since July 2021, impacting more than 27 million people.
"Democrats are united in stopping Republican attempts to take food out of the mouths of hungry Americans with their attacks on SNAP—America's most effective anti-hunger program," Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), a member of the House Agriculture Committee, wrote Monday.
On top of pursuing more changes to SNAP eligibility requirements, House Republicans are seeking $800 million in funding cuts to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in their agriculture appropriations bill for fiscal year 2024.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) warned last month that, if enacted, the cuts in the House GOP's agriculture legislation would be disastrous.
"We estimate that 650,000 to 750,000 eligible people—primarily toddlers, preschoolers, and postpartum adults—would be turned away from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children," wrote CBPP's Katie Bergh and Zoë Neuberger. "Another 4.6 million toddlers and preschoolers and pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding participants would have their benefits cut significantly."
Democrats on the U.S. House Agriculture Committee on Monday slammed the Republican leadership's ongoing attacks on federal nutrition assistance, specifically criticizing members of Speaker Kevin McCarthy's team for floating eligibility restrictions on top of those already imposed by the bipartisan debt ceiling agreement.
"You have seen what happens when leadership gets involved in dictating the details of the farm bill, particularly when the issue involved is SNAP, the safety net for America's working poor and elderly," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter to McCarthy (R-Calif.), referring to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
"The continued threat of making additional changes to SNAP eligibility or benefits is not helpful and even undermines [House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.)] as he works with his Democratic and Republican membership to bring a bipartisan farm bill out of the Agriculture Committee," the lawmakers continued. "Our nation's hungry and those who grow their food deserve a bipartisan farm bill to address their needs."
The Democratic lawmakers sent their letter days after Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.), one of McCarthy's top negotiators, told Politico that there is "additional progress or savings that can be maximized" with SNAP, an effective anti-hunger program that Republicans target for cuts every year.
"We kind of got what we could get in the debt ceiling," Graves said, pointing to the new SNAP work requirements for older adults—a change that experts say will put 750,000 people at risk of losing food aid. (Research has repeatedly shown that work requirements are not effective at boosting employment.)
"I think we're gonna continue working, whether it's [appropriations], farm bill, or others to keep building on it," added Graves, who is not a member of the House Agriculture Committee.
The House GOP leadership and rank-and-file Republicans—including members of the far-right Freedom Caucus—are looking to further restrict SNAP benefits at a time of increasing hunger across the U.S. According to recently released U.S. Census Bureau data, food insecurity has risen 35% since July 2021, impacting more than 27 million people.
"Democrats are united in stopping Republican attempts to take food out of the mouths of hungry Americans with their attacks on SNAP—America's most effective anti-hunger program," Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), a member of the House Agriculture Committee, wrote Monday.
On top of pursuing more changes to SNAP eligibility requirements, House Republicans are seeking $800 million in funding cuts to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in their agriculture appropriations bill for fiscal year 2024.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) warned last month that, if enacted, the cuts in the House GOP's agriculture legislation would be disastrous.
"We estimate that 650,000 to 750,000 eligible people—primarily toddlers, preschoolers, and postpartum adults—would be turned away from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children," wrote CBPP's Katie Bergh and Zoë Neuberger. "Another 4.6 million toddlers and preschoolers and pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding participants would have their benefits cut significantly."