

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Supporters of imprisoned former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) political party rally in Peshawar on February 10, 2024.
Independent candidates affiliated with the jailed former prime minister's party staged a shock upset despite allegations of widespread electoral fraud led by Pakistan's military.
In what many observers called a "shock" result, candidates affiliated with imprisoned former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan's party won the most National Assembly seats in a general election that raised international concerns over alleged fraud committed by the country's powerful military.
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) said Saturday afternoon that independent candidates—93 of them affiliated with Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party—won 100 of 265 contested parliamentary seats. The conservative Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz party, led by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, won 73 seats. Most pollsters had expected the party to win the most seats. The center-left Pakistan People's Party was in third place with 54 seats. Nearly two days after polls closed, results were still not in for 10 seats.
Both Khan and Sharif declared victory Friday, but with none of the three major parties winning the 169 seats required for a parliamentary majority, it remains unclear who will be chosen to lead the nuclear-armed nation of 245 million inhabitants.
As The New York Times' Christina Goldbaum reported from Islamabad:
The success of Mr. Khan's party was a head-spinning upset in an election that the military thought would be an easy victory for Mr. Sharif. Ahead of last week's election, Pakistan's powerful generals had jailed Mr. Khan, arrested candidates allied with him and intimidated his supporters to clear his party from the playing field—or so they thought. Instead, the election results confirmed that Mr. Khan remains a formidable force in Pakistani politics, despite his ouster and subsequent imprisonment...
Mr. Khan, a former cricket star turned populist politician, was sentenced to a total of 34 years in prison after being convicted in four separate cases on charges that included leaking state secrets and unlawful marriage, and that he has called politically motivated.
PTI leaders sounded the alarm on what they said was the military's widespread rigging of at least dozens of races.
The Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN), a Pakistani civil society coalition, said approximately 60 million Pakistanis voted in the elections and that more than 1.1 million election officials performed their duties well despite the "highly challenging political environment."
"They ensured the integrity of voting and counting processes at the polling stations that largely remained free of controversy... against the backdrop of fears of militant and political violence," FAFEN added.
However, FAFEN lamented "the caretaker government's suspension of cellular and internet services on election day—regardless of the security reasons—undermined years of parliamentary efforts to reform the election results management process through amendments to the Elections Act, 2017, which were meant to maximize the integrity, efficiency, and transparency of electoral outcomes."
The government was also widely criticized for imposing a telecommunications blackout that blocked cell phone and internet service across the country during the election. Government officials said the blackout was necessary for national security reasons after Wednesday's bombings in Balochistan that killed and wounded scores of people. However, critics noted the nationwide nature of the telecom suspension in refuting the government's "security" claims.
In the United States—whose government stands accused of helping to oust Khan—State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller on Friday expressed concerns over "undue restrictions on freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly" during the election.
"We condemn electoral violence, restrictions on the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including attacks on media workers, and restrictions on access to the Internet and telecommunication services, and are concerned about allegations of interference in the electoral process," Miller added. "Claims of interference or fraud should be fully investigated."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In what many observers called a "shock" result, candidates affiliated with imprisoned former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan's party won the most National Assembly seats in a general election that raised international concerns over alleged fraud committed by the country's powerful military.
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) said Saturday afternoon that independent candidates—93 of them affiliated with Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party—won 100 of 265 contested parliamentary seats. The conservative Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz party, led by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, won 73 seats. Most pollsters had expected the party to win the most seats. The center-left Pakistan People's Party was in third place with 54 seats. Nearly two days after polls closed, results were still not in for 10 seats.
Both Khan and Sharif declared victory Friday, but with none of the three major parties winning the 169 seats required for a parliamentary majority, it remains unclear who will be chosen to lead the nuclear-armed nation of 245 million inhabitants.
As The New York Times' Christina Goldbaum reported from Islamabad:
The success of Mr. Khan's party was a head-spinning upset in an election that the military thought would be an easy victory for Mr. Sharif. Ahead of last week's election, Pakistan's powerful generals had jailed Mr. Khan, arrested candidates allied with him and intimidated his supporters to clear his party from the playing field—or so they thought. Instead, the election results confirmed that Mr. Khan remains a formidable force in Pakistani politics, despite his ouster and subsequent imprisonment...
Mr. Khan, a former cricket star turned populist politician, was sentenced to a total of 34 years in prison after being convicted in four separate cases on charges that included leaking state secrets and unlawful marriage, and that he has called politically motivated.
PTI leaders sounded the alarm on what they said was the military's widespread rigging of at least dozens of races.
The Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN), a Pakistani civil society coalition, said approximately 60 million Pakistanis voted in the elections and that more than 1.1 million election officials performed their duties well despite the "highly challenging political environment."
"They ensured the integrity of voting and counting processes at the polling stations that largely remained free of controversy... against the backdrop of fears of militant and political violence," FAFEN added.
However, FAFEN lamented "the caretaker government's suspension of cellular and internet services on election day—regardless of the security reasons—undermined years of parliamentary efforts to reform the election results management process through amendments to the Elections Act, 2017, which were meant to maximize the integrity, efficiency, and transparency of electoral outcomes."
The government was also widely criticized for imposing a telecommunications blackout that blocked cell phone and internet service across the country during the election. Government officials said the blackout was necessary for national security reasons after Wednesday's bombings in Balochistan that killed and wounded scores of people. However, critics noted the nationwide nature of the telecom suspension in refuting the government's "security" claims.
In the United States—whose government stands accused of helping to oust Khan—State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller on Friday expressed concerns over "undue restrictions on freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly" during the election.
"We condemn electoral violence, restrictions on the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including attacks on media workers, and restrictions on access to the Internet and telecommunication services, and are concerned about allegations of interference in the electoral process," Miller added. "Claims of interference or fraud should be fully investigated."
In what many observers called a "shock" result, candidates affiliated with imprisoned former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan's party won the most National Assembly seats in a general election that raised international concerns over alleged fraud committed by the country's powerful military.
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) said Saturday afternoon that independent candidates—93 of them affiliated with Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party—won 100 of 265 contested parliamentary seats. The conservative Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz party, led by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, won 73 seats. Most pollsters had expected the party to win the most seats. The center-left Pakistan People's Party was in third place with 54 seats. Nearly two days after polls closed, results were still not in for 10 seats.
Both Khan and Sharif declared victory Friday, but with none of the three major parties winning the 169 seats required for a parliamentary majority, it remains unclear who will be chosen to lead the nuclear-armed nation of 245 million inhabitants.
As The New York Times' Christina Goldbaum reported from Islamabad:
The success of Mr. Khan's party was a head-spinning upset in an election that the military thought would be an easy victory for Mr. Sharif. Ahead of last week's election, Pakistan's powerful generals had jailed Mr. Khan, arrested candidates allied with him and intimidated his supporters to clear his party from the playing field—or so they thought. Instead, the election results confirmed that Mr. Khan remains a formidable force in Pakistani politics, despite his ouster and subsequent imprisonment...
Mr. Khan, a former cricket star turned populist politician, was sentenced to a total of 34 years in prison after being convicted in four separate cases on charges that included leaking state secrets and unlawful marriage, and that he has called politically motivated.
PTI leaders sounded the alarm on what they said was the military's widespread rigging of at least dozens of races.
The Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN), a Pakistani civil society coalition, said approximately 60 million Pakistanis voted in the elections and that more than 1.1 million election officials performed their duties well despite the "highly challenging political environment."
"They ensured the integrity of voting and counting processes at the polling stations that largely remained free of controversy... against the backdrop of fears of militant and political violence," FAFEN added.
However, FAFEN lamented "the caretaker government's suspension of cellular and internet services on election day—regardless of the security reasons—undermined years of parliamentary efforts to reform the election results management process through amendments to the Elections Act, 2017, which were meant to maximize the integrity, efficiency, and transparency of electoral outcomes."
The government was also widely criticized for imposing a telecommunications blackout that blocked cell phone and internet service across the country during the election. Government officials said the blackout was necessary for national security reasons after Wednesday's bombings in Balochistan that killed and wounded scores of people. However, critics noted the nationwide nature of the telecom suspension in refuting the government's "security" claims.
In the United States—whose government stands accused of helping to oust Khan—State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller on Friday expressed concerns over "undue restrictions on freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly" during the election.
"We condemn electoral violence, restrictions on the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including attacks on media workers, and restrictions on access to the Internet and telecommunication services, and are concerned about allegations of interference in the electoral process," Miller added. "Claims of interference or fraud should be fully investigated."