SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Members of European Parliament on June 14, 2023 took a major step toward barring law enforcement agencies from using facial recognition technology in most cases.
(Photo: Violeta Stoimenova/Getty Images)
In 'Win for Fundamental Rights,' EU Advances AI Rules Restricting Facial Recognition
Rights groups called on lawmakers to include protections for migrants at border crossings in the final legislation, which could be passed later this year.
Jun 14, 2023
Digital rights groups on Wednesday applauded lawmakers across the European Union after they passed a draft law that would strictly regulate the use of artificial intelligence including facial recognition technology and chatbots, potentially setting a new standard for protecting the public from the misuse of AI—but noted that some provisions could exclude vulnerable people.
The European Parliament passed a major legislative hurdle as it voted in favor of the draft rules in the Artificial Intelligence Act, with 499 lawmakers supporting the provisions, 28 opposing, and 93 abstaining from voting.
The sweeping proposal would require makers of "generative AI systems" such as the chatbot ChatGPT and "deepfake" videos to publish summaries of the material they use to train their systems and prove that the machines will not generate illegal content. Failure to prove the safety of their products could result in companies being compelled to delete their applications or being fined up to 7% of their revenue, which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars.
The law would also prohibit companies from scraping biometric data from social media to create databases of users, a practice that U.S. company Clearview AI was barred from continuing last year after a court settlement resulting from a strong state-level law in Illinois.
Facial recognition provisions emerged in recent days as a key point of contention between progressive lawmakers and members of the center-right European People's Party (EPP), who filed amendments last week to include exceptions to a ban on the technology in public spaces. The exceptions would have applied when police were searching for missing children, violent criminals, and accused terrorists.
Despite the "aggressive last-minute push," said the European Digital Rights (EDRi) coalition, "the MEPs showed that they heard the voices of over 250,000 people across Europe who want keep our public spaces free of facial recognition and other biometric mass surveillance systems."
The coalition delivered a petition signed by people from across the continent last week, demanding a ban on facial recognition technology use in public spaces.
"This is the clearest signal yet that the European Parliament has put forward the protection of all our rights to live freely and with dignity in public spaces, over private profits and false claims of 'security,'" said Ella Jakubowska, senior policy adviser at EDRi.
The draft law includes provisions banning "emotional recognition"—which has been used to identify tiredness in truck drivers in China—in schools and workplaces, as well as public facial recognition surveillance, predictive policing, and social scoring.
With the recent introduction of ChatGPT and new capabilities in the field of AI rapidly developing, EDRi called the passage of the draft law "in many ways a win for fundamental rights."
The coalition was among the critics noting that the AI Act in its current form does not extend protections to migrants at border crossings in the E.U. "even though AI systems are increasingly developed to track, control, and monitor migrants in new and harmful ways."
"The list of prohibited practices that was adopted today does not include the use of AI to facilitate illegal pushbacks, or to profile people on the move in a discriminatory manner," said EDRi. "Without these prohibitions, the European Parliament reinforces the panopticon at the E.U.'s borders."
As members of European Parliament, the European Commission, and the Council of the European Union negotiate the final legislation—which could be passed into law later this year—the digital rights group Access Now said policymakers should "add bans on automated risk-assessment in migration procedures and predictive analytics systems used to curtail migration movements."
"In this historic AI Act vote, the European Parliament called for a society free from mass surveillance," said Caterina Rodelli, E.U. policy analyst at Access Now. "However, it has drawn a thick line between the haves and the have nots—the lack of bans for AI systems used in migration confirms the E.U. does not seek to protect fundamental rights when migrant people are the rights-holders."
"Without prohibitions in the migration context," added Rodelli, "the E.U. is sacrificing the rights of people on the move and will deliberately put marginalized communities at risk."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Digital rights groups on Wednesday applauded lawmakers across the European Union after they passed a draft law that would strictly regulate the use of artificial intelligence including facial recognition technology and chatbots, potentially setting a new standard for protecting the public from the misuse of AI—but noted that some provisions could exclude vulnerable people.
The European Parliament passed a major legislative hurdle as it voted in favor of the draft rules in the Artificial Intelligence Act, with 499 lawmakers supporting the provisions, 28 opposing, and 93 abstaining from voting.
The sweeping proposal would require makers of "generative AI systems" such as the chatbot ChatGPT and "deepfake" videos to publish summaries of the material they use to train their systems and prove that the machines will not generate illegal content. Failure to prove the safety of their products could result in companies being compelled to delete their applications or being fined up to 7% of their revenue, which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars.
The law would also prohibit companies from scraping biometric data from social media to create databases of users, a practice that U.S. company Clearview AI was barred from continuing last year after a court settlement resulting from a strong state-level law in Illinois.
Facial recognition provisions emerged in recent days as a key point of contention between progressive lawmakers and members of the center-right European People's Party (EPP), who filed amendments last week to include exceptions to a ban on the technology in public spaces. The exceptions would have applied when police were searching for missing children, violent criminals, and accused terrorists.
Despite the "aggressive last-minute push," said the European Digital Rights (EDRi) coalition, "the MEPs showed that they heard the voices of over 250,000 people across Europe who want keep our public spaces free of facial recognition and other biometric mass surveillance systems."
The coalition delivered a petition signed by people from across the continent last week, demanding a ban on facial recognition technology use in public spaces.
"This is the clearest signal yet that the European Parliament has put forward the protection of all our rights to live freely and with dignity in public spaces, over private profits and false claims of 'security,'" said Ella Jakubowska, senior policy adviser at EDRi.
The draft law includes provisions banning "emotional recognition"—which has been used to identify tiredness in truck drivers in China—in schools and workplaces, as well as public facial recognition surveillance, predictive policing, and social scoring.
With the recent introduction of ChatGPT and new capabilities in the field of AI rapidly developing, EDRi called the passage of the draft law "in many ways a win for fundamental rights."
The coalition was among the critics noting that the AI Act in its current form does not extend protections to migrants at border crossings in the E.U. "even though AI systems are increasingly developed to track, control, and monitor migrants in new and harmful ways."
"The list of prohibited practices that was adopted today does not include the use of AI to facilitate illegal pushbacks, or to profile people on the move in a discriminatory manner," said EDRi. "Without these prohibitions, the European Parliament reinforces the panopticon at the E.U.'s borders."
As members of European Parliament, the European Commission, and the Council of the European Union negotiate the final legislation—which could be passed into law later this year—the digital rights group Access Now said policymakers should "add bans on automated risk-assessment in migration procedures and predictive analytics systems used to curtail migration movements."
"In this historic AI Act vote, the European Parliament called for a society free from mass surveillance," said Caterina Rodelli, E.U. policy analyst at Access Now. "However, it has drawn a thick line between the haves and the have nots—the lack of bans for AI systems used in migration confirms the E.U. does not seek to protect fundamental rights when migrant people are the rights-holders."
"Without prohibitions in the migration context," added Rodelli, "the E.U. is sacrificing the rights of people on the move and will deliberately put marginalized communities at risk."
Digital rights groups on Wednesday applauded lawmakers across the European Union after they passed a draft law that would strictly regulate the use of artificial intelligence including facial recognition technology and chatbots, potentially setting a new standard for protecting the public from the misuse of AI—but noted that some provisions could exclude vulnerable people.
The European Parliament passed a major legislative hurdle as it voted in favor of the draft rules in the Artificial Intelligence Act, with 499 lawmakers supporting the provisions, 28 opposing, and 93 abstaining from voting.
The sweeping proposal would require makers of "generative AI systems" such as the chatbot ChatGPT and "deepfake" videos to publish summaries of the material they use to train their systems and prove that the machines will not generate illegal content. Failure to prove the safety of their products could result in companies being compelled to delete their applications or being fined up to 7% of their revenue, which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars.
The law would also prohibit companies from scraping biometric data from social media to create databases of users, a practice that U.S. company Clearview AI was barred from continuing last year after a court settlement resulting from a strong state-level law in Illinois.
Facial recognition provisions emerged in recent days as a key point of contention between progressive lawmakers and members of the center-right European People's Party (EPP), who filed amendments last week to include exceptions to a ban on the technology in public spaces. The exceptions would have applied when police were searching for missing children, violent criminals, and accused terrorists.
Despite the "aggressive last-minute push," said the European Digital Rights (EDRi) coalition, "the MEPs showed that they heard the voices of over 250,000 people across Europe who want keep our public spaces free of facial recognition and other biometric mass surveillance systems."
The coalition delivered a petition signed by people from across the continent last week, demanding a ban on facial recognition technology use in public spaces.
"This is the clearest signal yet that the European Parliament has put forward the protection of all our rights to live freely and with dignity in public spaces, over private profits and false claims of 'security,'" said Ella Jakubowska, senior policy adviser at EDRi.
The draft law includes provisions banning "emotional recognition"—which has been used to identify tiredness in truck drivers in China—in schools and workplaces, as well as public facial recognition surveillance, predictive policing, and social scoring.
With the recent introduction of ChatGPT and new capabilities in the field of AI rapidly developing, EDRi called the passage of the draft law "in many ways a win for fundamental rights."
The coalition was among the critics noting that the AI Act in its current form does not extend protections to migrants at border crossings in the E.U. "even though AI systems are increasingly developed to track, control, and monitor migrants in new and harmful ways."
"The list of prohibited practices that was adopted today does not include the use of AI to facilitate illegal pushbacks, or to profile people on the move in a discriminatory manner," said EDRi. "Without these prohibitions, the European Parliament reinforces the panopticon at the E.U.'s borders."
As members of European Parliament, the European Commission, and the Council of the European Union negotiate the final legislation—which could be passed into law later this year—the digital rights group Access Now said policymakers should "add bans on automated risk-assessment in migration procedures and predictive analytics systems used to curtail migration movements."
"In this historic AI Act vote, the European Parliament called for a society free from mass surveillance," said Caterina Rodelli, E.U. policy analyst at Access Now. "However, it has drawn a thick line between the haves and the have nots—the lack of bans for AI systems used in migration confirms the E.U. does not seek to protect fundamental rights when migrant people are the rights-holders."
"Without prohibitions in the migration context," added Rodelli, "the E.U. is sacrificing the rights of people on the move and will deliberately put marginalized communities at risk."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.