SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Judge Cory Wilson testifies during his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C. on May 20, 2020. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Judge Who Ruled Against CFPB Took Thousands in Wall Street Campaign Cash: Watchdog
"The financial services industry's relentless attacks on the CFPB proves its work protecting consumers is more vital than ever," said one advocate.
Oct 20, 2022
The federal judge who ruled this week that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding structure is unconstitutional was a longtime recipient of campaign cash from Wall Street bankers--including several whose banks were held accountable by the bureau for abusive practices--a government watchdog revealed Wednesday.
Accountable.US released an analysis of campaign contributions received by Judge Cory Wilson of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals between 2014 and 2018, when he was a Republican candidate and member of the Mississippi House of Representatives.
According to the group, Wilson took at least $10,500 from Wall Street bankers.
The analysis was released a day after Wilson handed down a ruling in a case filed by payday lending groups against the CFPB. The judge claimed in his decision that it is unconstitutional for the CFPB to be funded by the Federal Reserve System rather than by Congress, drawing condemnation from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and other consumer advocates.
The case "shows just how far predatory lenders are willing to go to avert any accountability for their abusive practices," said Liz Zelnick, director of economic security and corporate power for Accountable.US. "It's no surprise this lawsuit was brought by an industry with an ax to grind against the CFPB after facing numerous fines mistreating consumers."
Beyond that, Zelnick added, the group's findings regarding Wilson's financial ties to the industry CFPB regulates shows the case "was advanced by a judge who's taken thousands from the banking industry that too is determined to weaken the bureau's authority."
As the Revolving Door Project at the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted, Wilson's contributions included at least $2,500 from Trustmark National Bank, which was recently fined by the CFPB for discriminatory practices.
\u201c@accountable_us Wilson, who was confirmed in a 2018 near-party-line Senate vote, took donations from several top bankers at Trustmark. \n\nLast year, the CFPB and other regulators fined Trustmark over $8 million for discriminating against Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. https://t.co/vgJIpXEF0n\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1666294002
"The financial services industry's relentless attacks on the CFPB proves its work protecting consumers is more vital than ever," said Zelnick.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The federal judge who ruled this week that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding structure is unconstitutional was a longtime recipient of campaign cash from Wall Street bankers--including several whose banks were held accountable by the bureau for abusive practices--a government watchdog revealed Wednesday.
Accountable.US released an analysis of campaign contributions received by Judge Cory Wilson of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals between 2014 and 2018, when he was a Republican candidate and member of the Mississippi House of Representatives.
According to the group, Wilson took at least $10,500 from Wall Street bankers.
The analysis was released a day after Wilson handed down a ruling in a case filed by payday lending groups against the CFPB. The judge claimed in his decision that it is unconstitutional for the CFPB to be funded by the Federal Reserve System rather than by Congress, drawing condemnation from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and other consumer advocates.
The case "shows just how far predatory lenders are willing to go to avert any accountability for their abusive practices," said Liz Zelnick, director of economic security and corporate power for Accountable.US. "It's no surprise this lawsuit was brought by an industry with an ax to grind against the CFPB after facing numerous fines mistreating consumers."
Beyond that, Zelnick added, the group's findings regarding Wilson's financial ties to the industry CFPB regulates shows the case "was advanced by a judge who's taken thousands from the banking industry that too is determined to weaken the bureau's authority."
As the Revolving Door Project at the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted, Wilson's contributions included at least $2,500 from Trustmark National Bank, which was recently fined by the CFPB for discriminatory practices.
\u201c@accountable_us Wilson, who was confirmed in a 2018 near-party-line Senate vote, took donations from several top bankers at Trustmark. \n\nLast year, the CFPB and other regulators fined Trustmark over $8 million for discriminating against Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. https://t.co/vgJIpXEF0n\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1666294002
"The financial services industry's relentless attacks on the CFPB proves its work protecting consumers is more vital than ever," said Zelnick.
From Your Site Articles
- 'Lawless and Reckless': Warren Condemns Fifth Circuit Attack on CFPB ›
- Consumer Advocates Applaud as Federal Court 'Yet Again' Finds CFPB's Funding Constitutional ›
- Federal Judge Blocks CFPB Rule Aimed at Preventing Discrimination by Small Business Lenders ›
- CFPB Has Returned $240 Million to Constituents of GOP Lawmakers Attacking Agency ›
The federal judge who ruled this week that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding structure is unconstitutional was a longtime recipient of campaign cash from Wall Street bankers--including several whose banks were held accountable by the bureau for abusive practices--a government watchdog revealed Wednesday.
Accountable.US released an analysis of campaign contributions received by Judge Cory Wilson of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals between 2014 and 2018, when he was a Republican candidate and member of the Mississippi House of Representatives.
According to the group, Wilson took at least $10,500 from Wall Street bankers.
The analysis was released a day after Wilson handed down a ruling in a case filed by payday lending groups against the CFPB. The judge claimed in his decision that it is unconstitutional for the CFPB to be funded by the Federal Reserve System rather than by Congress, drawing condemnation from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and other consumer advocates.
The case "shows just how far predatory lenders are willing to go to avert any accountability for their abusive practices," said Liz Zelnick, director of economic security and corporate power for Accountable.US. "It's no surprise this lawsuit was brought by an industry with an ax to grind against the CFPB after facing numerous fines mistreating consumers."
Beyond that, Zelnick added, the group's findings regarding Wilson's financial ties to the industry CFPB regulates shows the case "was advanced by a judge who's taken thousands from the banking industry that too is determined to weaken the bureau's authority."
As the Revolving Door Project at the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted, Wilson's contributions included at least $2,500 from Trustmark National Bank, which was recently fined by the CFPB for discriminatory practices.
\u201c@accountable_us Wilson, who was confirmed in a 2018 near-party-line Senate vote, took donations from several top bankers at Trustmark. \n\nLast year, the CFPB and other regulators fined Trustmark over $8 million for discriminating against Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. https://t.co/vgJIpXEF0n\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1666294002
"The financial services industry's relentless attacks on the CFPB proves its work protecting consumers is more vital than ever," said Zelnick.
From Your Site Articles
- 'Lawless and Reckless': Warren Condemns Fifth Circuit Attack on CFPB ›
- Consumer Advocates Applaud as Federal Court 'Yet Again' Finds CFPB's Funding Constitutional ›
- Federal Judge Blocks CFPB Rule Aimed at Preventing Discrimination by Small Business Lenders ›
- CFPB Has Returned $240 Million to Constituents of GOP Lawmakers Attacking Agency ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.