

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Saudi Arabia's minister of energy gestures during a press conference in Vienna, Austria on October 5, 2022. (Photo: Vladimir Simicek/AFP via Getty Images)
The International Energy Agency warned Thursday that the Saudi-led OPEC cartel's decision to slash oil production in the coming weeks could be the final catalyst for a global economic recession as central banks try--and, thus far, fail--to rein in inflation with demand-crushing interest rate hikes.
"With unrelenting inflationary pressures and interest rate hikes taking their toll, higher oil prices may prove the tipping point for a global economy already on the brink of recession," the IEA said in its monthly report on the state of the global oil market.
"This is MBS' October surprise. This is his election interference."
OPEC leaders announced last week that starting in November, members of the alliance will cut their combined oil production by two million barrels per day in an effort to prop up prices, a move that drew furious responses from the Biden administration and Democratic members of Congress.
The IEA said in its new report that OPEC's "plan to sharply curtail oil supplies to the market has derailed the growth trajectory of oil supply through the remainder of this year and next, with the resulting higher price levels exacerbating market volatility and heightening energy security concerns."
The energy agency's assessment builds on recent warnings from other prominent global institutions--including the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank--that a painful global recession could be right around the corner thanks to a confluence of factors, including Russia's war on Ukraine, stubbornly high inflation, ongoing supply chain snags from the pandemic, financial instability, and relentless corporate profiteering.
New Consumer Price Index figures released Thursday show that U.S. inflation rose in September, heightening concerns that the Federal Reserve could push the country into recession with additional large rate hikes--the impacts of which reverberate worldwide, particularly in poor nations.
OPEC's decision to slash oil output piles on yet another recessionary risk factor, according to the IEA, as it's likely to drive worldwide gas prices back up after their recent downtrend.
Facing massive backlash from U.S. lawmakers and the Biden White House over OPEC's planned production cut, Saudi Arabia's foreign ministry suggested in a statement Thursday that the Biden administration privately urged OPEC to postpone its supply reduction announcement by one month, a delay that would have pushed the decision off until after the U.S. midterm elections.
In response, White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby accused the Saudis of trying to "deflect" and said the U.S. presented the kingdom with an analysis showing that "there was no market basis to cut production targets, and that they could easily wait until the next OPEC meeting to see how things developed."
"Other OPEC nations communicated to us privately that they also disagreed with the Saudi decision, but felt coerced to support Saudi's direction," Kirby added. "We are reevaluating our relationship with Saudi Arabia in light of these actions."
Analysts have argued that OPEC's move was clearly politically motivated.
"This is MBS' October surprise," Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept, referring to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. "This is his election interference."
"It forces Biden to make a choice," Parsi added. "Will he protect America's democracy and Democratic lawmakers in Congress, or will he triple down on a flawed gamble that says that the U.S. has no choice but to acquiesce to Saudi Arabia to prevent Riyadh from aligning with Russia?"
This story has been updated with comments from White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The International Energy Agency warned Thursday that the Saudi-led OPEC cartel's decision to slash oil production in the coming weeks could be the final catalyst for a global economic recession as central banks try--and, thus far, fail--to rein in inflation with demand-crushing interest rate hikes.
"With unrelenting inflationary pressures and interest rate hikes taking their toll, higher oil prices may prove the tipping point for a global economy already on the brink of recession," the IEA said in its monthly report on the state of the global oil market.
"This is MBS' October surprise. This is his election interference."
OPEC leaders announced last week that starting in November, members of the alliance will cut their combined oil production by two million barrels per day in an effort to prop up prices, a move that drew furious responses from the Biden administration and Democratic members of Congress.
The IEA said in its new report that OPEC's "plan to sharply curtail oil supplies to the market has derailed the growth trajectory of oil supply through the remainder of this year and next, with the resulting higher price levels exacerbating market volatility and heightening energy security concerns."
The energy agency's assessment builds on recent warnings from other prominent global institutions--including the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank--that a painful global recession could be right around the corner thanks to a confluence of factors, including Russia's war on Ukraine, stubbornly high inflation, ongoing supply chain snags from the pandemic, financial instability, and relentless corporate profiteering.
New Consumer Price Index figures released Thursday show that U.S. inflation rose in September, heightening concerns that the Federal Reserve could push the country into recession with additional large rate hikes--the impacts of which reverberate worldwide, particularly in poor nations.
OPEC's decision to slash oil output piles on yet another recessionary risk factor, according to the IEA, as it's likely to drive worldwide gas prices back up after their recent downtrend.
Facing massive backlash from U.S. lawmakers and the Biden White House over OPEC's planned production cut, Saudi Arabia's foreign ministry suggested in a statement Thursday that the Biden administration privately urged OPEC to postpone its supply reduction announcement by one month, a delay that would have pushed the decision off until after the U.S. midterm elections.
In response, White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby accused the Saudis of trying to "deflect" and said the U.S. presented the kingdom with an analysis showing that "there was no market basis to cut production targets, and that they could easily wait until the next OPEC meeting to see how things developed."
"Other OPEC nations communicated to us privately that they also disagreed with the Saudi decision, but felt coerced to support Saudi's direction," Kirby added. "We are reevaluating our relationship with Saudi Arabia in light of these actions."
Analysts have argued that OPEC's move was clearly politically motivated.
"This is MBS' October surprise," Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept, referring to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. "This is his election interference."
"It forces Biden to make a choice," Parsi added. "Will he protect America's democracy and Democratic lawmakers in Congress, or will he triple down on a flawed gamble that says that the U.S. has no choice but to acquiesce to Saudi Arabia to prevent Riyadh from aligning with Russia?"
This story has been updated with comments from White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby.
The International Energy Agency warned Thursday that the Saudi-led OPEC cartel's decision to slash oil production in the coming weeks could be the final catalyst for a global economic recession as central banks try--and, thus far, fail--to rein in inflation with demand-crushing interest rate hikes.
"With unrelenting inflationary pressures and interest rate hikes taking their toll, higher oil prices may prove the tipping point for a global economy already on the brink of recession," the IEA said in its monthly report on the state of the global oil market.
"This is MBS' October surprise. This is his election interference."
OPEC leaders announced last week that starting in November, members of the alliance will cut their combined oil production by two million barrels per day in an effort to prop up prices, a move that drew furious responses from the Biden administration and Democratic members of Congress.
The IEA said in its new report that OPEC's "plan to sharply curtail oil supplies to the market has derailed the growth trajectory of oil supply through the remainder of this year and next, with the resulting higher price levels exacerbating market volatility and heightening energy security concerns."
The energy agency's assessment builds on recent warnings from other prominent global institutions--including the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank--that a painful global recession could be right around the corner thanks to a confluence of factors, including Russia's war on Ukraine, stubbornly high inflation, ongoing supply chain snags from the pandemic, financial instability, and relentless corporate profiteering.
New Consumer Price Index figures released Thursday show that U.S. inflation rose in September, heightening concerns that the Federal Reserve could push the country into recession with additional large rate hikes--the impacts of which reverberate worldwide, particularly in poor nations.
OPEC's decision to slash oil output piles on yet another recessionary risk factor, according to the IEA, as it's likely to drive worldwide gas prices back up after their recent downtrend.
Facing massive backlash from U.S. lawmakers and the Biden White House over OPEC's planned production cut, Saudi Arabia's foreign ministry suggested in a statement Thursday that the Biden administration privately urged OPEC to postpone its supply reduction announcement by one month, a delay that would have pushed the decision off until after the U.S. midterm elections.
In response, White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby accused the Saudis of trying to "deflect" and said the U.S. presented the kingdom with an analysis showing that "there was no market basis to cut production targets, and that they could easily wait until the next OPEC meeting to see how things developed."
"Other OPEC nations communicated to us privately that they also disagreed with the Saudi decision, but felt coerced to support Saudi's direction," Kirby added. "We are reevaluating our relationship with Saudi Arabia in light of these actions."
Analysts have argued that OPEC's move was clearly politically motivated.
"This is MBS' October surprise," Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept, referring to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. "This is his election interference."
"It forces Biden to make a choice," Parsi added. "Will he protect America's democracy and Democratic lawmakers in Congress, or will he triple down on a flawed gamble that says that the U.S. has no choice but to acquiesce to Saudi Arabia to prevent Riyadh from aligning with Russia?"
This story has been updated with comments from White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby.