SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A voter arrives to drop off their ballot in Allentown, Pennsylvania on October 29, 2020. (Photo: Angela Weiss/Getty Images)
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a law that allows all of the state's registered voters to submit their ballots by mail, rebuffing an effort by Republican lawmakers to overturn a statute they supported years earlier.
In its ruling, the court's majority declared that "we find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting." The court's two Republican justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and Kevin Brobson, dissented.
"Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The decision stems from a lawsuit that Pennsylvania Republicans filed in the summer of 2021 claiming that Act 77--a 2019 law allowing no-excuse vote-by-mail in the commonwealth--ran afoul of the state constitution and enabled fraud, a narrative that the GOP attempted to advance following former President Donald Trump's lie-riddled attacks on mail-in voting during the 2020 election.
Khalif Ali, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania, applauded the court's rejection of state Republicans' argument, declaring in a statement that the ruling represents "a major victory for voting rights."
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Act 77 ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose," said Ali. "Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The court's ruling came less than 100 days before the midterm elections in which Pennsylvania will feature prominently, as the state could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate next year.
John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee in the race for the state's open Senate seat, celebrated the ruling in a series of tweets and blasted the Republicans who led the lawsuit after helping pass Act 77.
"I don't know anyone who needs to hear this," Fetterman wrote, "but voting in Pennsylvania is safe, open, and secure."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a law that allows all of the state's registered voters to submit their ballots by mail, rebuffing an effort by Republican lawmakers to overturn a statute they supported years earlier.
In its ruling, the court's majority declared that "we find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting." The court's two Republican justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and Kevin Brobson, dissented.
"Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The decision stems from a lawsuit that Pennsylvania Republicans filed in the summer of 2021 claiming that Act 77--a 2019 law allowing no-excuse vote-by-mail in the commonwealth--ran afoul of the state constitution and enabled fraud, a narrative that the GOP attempted to advance following former President Donald Trump's lie-riddled attacks on mail-in voting during the 2020 election.
Khalif Ali, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania, applauded the court's rejection of state Republicans' argument, declaring in a statement that the ruling represents "a major victory for voting rights."
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Act 77 ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose," said Ali. "Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The court's ruling came less than 100 days before the midterm elections in which Pennsylvania will feature prominently, as the state could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate next year.
John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee in the race for the state's open Senate seat, celebrated the ruling in a series of tweets and blasted the Republicans who led the lawsuit after helping pass Act 77.
"I don't know anyone who needs to hear this," Fetterman wrote, "but voting in Pennsylvania is safe, open, and secure."
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a law that allows all of the state's registered voters to submit their ballots by mail, rebuffing an effort by Republican lawmakers to overturn a statute they supported years earlier.
In its ruling, the court's majority declared that "we find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting." The court's two Republican justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and Kevin Brobson, dissented.
"Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The decision stems from a lawsuit that Pennsylvania Republicans filed in the summer of 2021 claiming that Act 77--a 2019 law allowing no-excuse vote-by-mail in the commonwealth--ran afoul of the state constitution and enabled fraud, a narrative that the GOP attempted to advance following former President Donald Trump's lie-riddled attacks on mail-in voting during the 2020 election.
Khalif Ali, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania, applauded the court's rejection of state Republicans' argument, declaring in a statement that the ruling represents "a major victory for voting rights."
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Act 77 ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose," said Ali. "Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The court's ruling came less than 100 days before the midterm elections in which Pennsylvania will feature prominently, as the state could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate next year.
John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee in the race for the state's open Senate seat, celebrated the ruling in a series of tweets and blasted the Republicans who led the lawsuit after helping pass Act 77.
"I don't know anyone who needs to hear this," Fetterman wrote, "but voting in Pennsylvania is safe, open, and secure."