SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A voter arrives to drop off their ballot in Allentown, Pennsylvania on October 29, 2020. (Photo: Angela Weiss/Getty Images)
Rebuffing GOP Attack, Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds Universal Mail-In Voting
The ruling, said one advocate, "ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose."
Aug 02, 2022
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a law that allows all of the state's registered voters to submit their ballots by mail, rebuffing an effort by Republican lawmakers to overturn a statute they supported years earlier.
In its ruling, the court's majority declared that "we find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting." The court's two Republican justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and Kevin Brobson, dissented.
"Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The decision stems from a lawsuit that Pennsylvania Republicans filed in the summer of 2021 claiming that Act 77--a 2019 law allowing no-excuse vote-by-mail in the commonwealth--ran afoul of the state constitution and enabled fraud, a narrative that the GOP attempted to advance following former President Donald Trump's lie-riddled attacks on mail-in voting during the 2020 election.
Khalif Ali, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania, applauded the court's rejection of state Republicans' argument, declaring in a statement that the ruling represents "a major victory for voting rights."
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Act 77 ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose," said Ali. "Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The court's ruling came less than 100 days before the midterm elections in which Pennsylvania will feature prominently, as the state could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate next year.
John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee in the race for the state's open Senate seat, celebrated the ruling in a series of tweets and blasted the Republicans who led the lawsuit after helping pass Act 77.
"I don't know anyone who needs to hear this," Fetterman wrote, "but voting in Pennsylvania is safe, open, and secure."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a law that allows all of the state's registered voters to submit their ballots by mail, rebuffing an effort by Republican lawmakers to overturn a statute they supported years earlier.
In its ruling, the court's majority declared that "we find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting." The court's two Republican justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and Kevin Brobson, dissented.
"Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The decision stems from a lawsuit that Pennsylvania Republicans filed in the summer of 2021 claiming that Act 77--a 2019 law allowing no-excuse vote-by-mail in the commonwealth--ran afoul of the state constitution and enabled fraud, a narrative that the GOP attempted to advance following former President Donald Trump's lie-riddled attacks on mail-in voting during the 2020 election.
Khalif Ali, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania, applauded the court's rejection of state Republicans' argument, declaring in a statement that the ruling represents "a major victory for voting rights."
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Act 77 ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose," said Ali. "Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The court's ruling came less than 100 days before the midterm elections in which Pennsylvania will feature prominently, as the state could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate next year.
John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee in the race for the state's open Senate seat, celebrated the ruling in a series of tweets and blasted the Republicans who led the lawsuit after helping pass Act 77.
"I don't know anyone who needs to hear this," Fetterman wrote, "but voting in Pennsylvania is safe, open, and secure."
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a law that allows all of the state's registered voters to submit their ballots by mail, rebuffing an effort by Republican lawmakers to overturn a statute they supported years earlier.
In its ruling, the court's majority declared that "we find no restriction in our constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting." The court's two Republican justices, Sallie Updyke Mundy and Kevin Brobson, dissented.
"Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The decision stems from a lawsuit that Pennsylvania Republicans filed in the summer of 2021 claiming that Act 77--a 2019 law allowing no-excuse vote-by-mail in the commonwealth--ran afoul of the state constitution and enabled fraud, a narrative that the GOP attempted to advance following former President Donald Trump's lie-riddled attacks on mail-in voting during the 2020 election.
Khalif Ali, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania, applauded the court's rejection of state Republicans' argument, declaring in a statement that the ruling represents "a major victory for voting rights."
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Act 77 ensures that millions of Pennsylvania voters can continue to cast their ballots safely and conveniently in the manner they choose," said Ali. "Act 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support for good reason--making voting easier and more accessible is the right thing to do."
The court's ruling came less than 100 days before the midterm elections in which Pennsylvania will feature prominently, as the state could determine which party controls the U.S. Senate next year.
John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee in the race for the state's open Senate seat, celebrated the ruling in a series of tweets and blasted the Republicans who led the lawsuit after helping pass Act 77.
"I don't know anyone who needs to hear this," Fetterman wrote, "but voting in Pennsylvania is safe, open, and secure."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.