Afghans who lost family members in a massive earthquake examine the ruins in the Spera district of Khost on June 30, 2022. (Photo: Sardar Shafaq/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Omar Slams NDAA Provision Blocking US Aid to Afghans Amid 'Horrific' Crisis
"We should be doing everything in our power to deliver humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people," said the Minnesota Democrat, "not needlessly limiting the aid we can supply."
Rep. Ilhan Omar warned Wednesday that a provision buried in the sprawling National Defense Authorization Act would bar the Pentagon from distributing aid to the people of Afghanistan even as they're engulfed in a massive humanitarian emergency following two decades of deadly U.S. occupation.
"Afghanistan is facing one of the most horrific humanitarian crises on the planet," Omar (D-Minn.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, wrote on Twitter. "We should be doing everything in our power to deliver humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people, not needlessly limiting the aid we can supply."
"Almost 95% of Afghans don't have enough food to eat, a massive increase from last year."
Investigative journalist Daniel Boguslaw reported for The Intercept Wednesday that language in the House version of the $839 billion NDAA--which could pass with bipartisan approval as soon as this week--would prohibit "Defense Department funds from being used to 'transport currency or other items of value to the Taliban, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, or any subsidiary, agent, or instrumentality of either the Taliban or the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,' effectively halting American aid to the Taliban-controlled country."
"While the bill's language places emphasis on banning the transport of currency, it will also block Defense Department planes from transporting nearly every conceivable good--including food and lifesaving medical supplies--to Afghanistan, where tens of millions of people currently face starvation and medicine shortages," Boguslaw noted. "A major earthquake last month brought in a flurry of international assistance, including humanitarian aid from the U.S. military--help that would be barred by the new legislation."
In an attempt to strike the language and ensure the flow of badly needed aid into the hunger-stricken and war-torn country, Omar introduced an NDAA amendment that would have permitted President Joe Biden "to waive the restrictions on cash transfers to Afghanistan if he determines there is a pressing humanitarian need, or it is otherwise in the national security interest of the United States."
But the House Rules Committee deemed the amendment out of order earlier this week, meaning it will not even receive a vote on the House floor.
As Boguslaw pointed out Wednesday, Omar's proposal likely would've faced long odds if it was approved for a floor vote.
"Previous floor votes suggested that not only would Republicans oppose it, but so would a number of Democrats up for reelection, looking to burnish their anti-Taliban credentials," Boguslaw wrote. "In February, Democratic representatives including Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Kurt Schrader of Oregon, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, David Trone of Maryland, and Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania voted against a related amendment introduced by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)."
In a statement to The Intercept, Omar said that "almost 95% of Afghans don't have enough food to eat, a massive increase from last year."
"My amendment," she added, "simply gave the president authority to deliver lifesaving aid, instead of needlessly hamstringing him."
Omar's lonely effort to highlight the dangers of the NDAA provision comes as the Biden administration is facing pressure from aid groups to reverse its seizure of roughly $7 billion in Afghan central bank assets held in U.S. institutions.
The Biden administration froze the assets last August after the Taliban retook power, despite warnings that the move would further hinder the country's ability to stave off mass starvation and economic collapse. Analysts have projected that the current U.S. sanctions regime against Afghanistan could kill more people than 20 years of war.
Ignoring such dire predictions, the administration in February announced a plan to permanently seize the Afghan central bank assets, splitting the $7 billion between the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks and an ill-defined fund purportedly designed to benefit ordinary Afghans.
The Washington Post reported late last month that the latter $3.5 billion "has remained unused" as Afghan children starve.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Rep. Ilhan Omar warned Wednesday that a provision buried in the sprawling National Defense Authorization Act would bar the Pentagon from distributing aid to the people of Afghanistan even as they're engulfed in a massive humanitarian emergency following two decades of deadly U.S. occupation.
"Afghanistan is facing one of the most horrific humanitarian crises on the planet," Omar (D-Minn.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, wrote on Twitter. "We should be doing everything in our power to deliver humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people, not needlessly limiting the aid we can supply."
"Almost 95% of Afghans don't have enough food to eat, a massive increase from last year."
Investigative journalist Daniel Boguslaw reported for The Intercept Wednesday that language in the House version of the $839 billion NDAA--which could pass with bipartisan approval as soon as this week--would prohibit "Defense Department funds from being used to 'transport currency or other items of value to the Taliban, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, or any subsidiary, agent, or instrumentality of either the Taliban or the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,' effectively halting American aid to the Taliban-controlled country."
"While the bill's language places emphasis on banning the transport of currency, it will also block Defense Department planes from transporting nearly every conceivable good--including food and lifesaving medical supplies--to Afghanistan, where tens of millions of people currently face starvation and medicine shortages," Boguslaw noted. "A major earthquake last month brought in a flurry of international assistance, including humanitarian aid from the U.S. military--help that would be barred by the new legislation."
In an attempt to strike the language and ensure the flow of badly needed aid into the hunger-stricken and war-torn country, Omar introduced an NDAA amendment that would have permitted President Joe Biden "to waive the restrictions on cash transfers to Afghanistan if he determines there is a pressing humanitarian need, or it is otherwise in the national security interest of the United States."
But the House Rules Committee deemed the amendment out of order earlier this week, meaning it will not even receive a vote on the House floor.
As Boguslaw pointed out Wednesday, Omar's proposal likely would've faced long odds if it was approved for a floor vote.
"Previous floor votes suggested that not only would Republicans oppose it, but so would a number of Democrats up for reelection, looking to burnish their anti-Taliban credentials," Boguslaw wrote. "In February, Democratic representatives including Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Kurt Schrader of Oregon, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, David Trone of Maryland, and Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania voted against a related amendment introduced by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)."
In a statement to The Intercept, Omar said that "almost 95% of Afghans don't have enough food to eat, a massive increase from last year."
"My amendment," she added, "simply gave the president authority to deliver lifesaving aid, instead of needlessly hamstringing him."
Omar's lonely effort to highlight the dangers of the NDAA provision comes as the Biden administration is facing pressure from aid groups to reverse its seizure of roughly $7 billion in Afghan central bank assets held in U.S. institutions.
The Biden administration froze the assets last August after the Taliban retook power, despite warnings that the move would further hinder the country's ability to stave off mass starvation and economic collapse. Analysts have projected that the current U.S. sanctions regime against Afghanistan could kill more people than 20 years of war.
Ignoring such dire predictions, the administration in February announced a plan to permanently seize the Afghan central bank assets, splitting the $7 billion between the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks and an ill-defined fund purportedly designed to benefit ordinary Afghans.
The Washington Post reported late last month that the latter $3.5 billion "has remained unused" as Afghan children starve.
Rep. Ilhan Omar warned Wednesday that a provision buried in the sprawling National Defense Authorization Act would bar the Pentagon from distributing aid to the people of Afghanistan even as they're engulfed in a massive humanitarian emergency following two decades of deadly U.S. occupation.
"Afghanistan is facing one of the most horrific humanitarian crises on the planet," Omar (D-Minn.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, wrote on Twitter. "We should be doing everything in our power to deliver humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people, not needlessly limiting the aid we can supply."
"Almost 95% of Afghans don't have enough food to eat, a massive increase from last year."
Investigative journalist Daniel Boguslaw reported for The Intercept Wednesday that language in the House version of the $839 billion NDAA--which could pass with bipartisan approval as soon as this week--would prohibit "Defense Department funds from being used to 'transport currency or other items of value to the Taliban, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, or any subsidiary, agent, or instrumentality of either the Taliban or the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,' effectively halting American aid to the Taliban-controlled country."
"While the bill's language places emphasis on banning the transport of currency, it will also block Defense Department planes from transporting nearly every conceivable good--including food and lifesaving medical supplies--to Afghanistan, where tens of millions of people currently face starvation and medicine shortages," Boguslaw noted. "A major earthquake last month brought in a flurry of international assistance, including humanitarian aid from the U.S. military--help that would be barred by the new legislation."
In an attempt to strike the language and ensure the flow of badly needed aid into the hunger-stricken and war-torn country, Omar introduced an NDAA amendment that would have permitted President Joe Biden "to waive the restrictions on cash transfers to Afghanistan if he determines there is a pressing humanitarian need, or it is otherwise in the national security interest of the United States."
But the House Rules Committee deemed the amendment out of order earlier this week, meaning it will not even receive a vote on the House floor.
As Boguslaw pointed out Wednesday, Omar's proposal likely would've faced long odds if it was approved for a floor vote.
"Previous floor votes suggested that not only would Republicans oppose it, but so would a number of Democrats up for reelection, looking to burnish their anti-Taliban credentials," Boguslaw wrote. "In February, Democratic representatives including Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Kurt Schrader of Oregon, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, David Trone of Maryland, and Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania voted against a related amendment introduced by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)."
In a statement to The Intercept, Omar said that "almost 95% of Afghans don't have enough food to eat, a massive increase from last year."
"My amendment," she added, "simply gave the president authority to deliver lifesaving aid, instead of needlessly hamstringing him."
Omar's lonely effort to highlight the dangers of the NDAA provision comes as the Biden administration is facing pressure from aid groups to reverse its seizure of roughly $7 billion in Afghan central bank assets held in U.S. institutions.
The Biden administration froze the assets last August after the Taliban retook power, despite warnings that the move would further hinder the country's ability to stave off mass starvation and economic collapse. Analysts have projected that the current U.S. sanctions regime against Afghanistan could kill more people than 20 years of war.
Ignoring such dire predictions, the administration in February announced a plan to permanently seize the Afghan central bank assets, splitting the $7 billion between the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks and an ill-defined fund purportedly designed to benefit ordinary Afghans.
The Washington Post reported late last month that the latter $3.5 billion "has remained unused" as Afghan children starve.