Under pressure to respond forcefully to the Supreme Court\u0026#039;s decision to strike down Roe v. Wade, Vice President Kamala Harris on Monday said the White House is not currently discussing the idea of using federal property to ensure access to abortion services for those living in states that have banned or are moving to ban the procedure.\r\n\r\nAsked specifically about the proposal during an interview with CNN\u0026#039;s Dana Bash, Harris initially dodged the question, saying the Biden administration is looking to \u0022do everything we can to empower women to not only seek but to receive the care where it is available.\u0022\r\n\r\nWhen Bash followed up, Harris said the idea is \u0022not right now what we are discussing.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022We are 130-odd days away from an election, which is going to include Senate races,\u0022 Harris added. \u0022Part of the issue here is the court is acting, and now Congress needs to act.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe vice president did say the White House is exploring options to guarantee that pregnant people have \u0022access to the medication they need\u0022 and \u0022freedom of travel\u0022 as Republican-controlled states look to restrict their residents\u0026#039; ability to obtain abortion care across state lines.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nAfter Harris\u0026#039; interview aired, an unnamed White House official told Insider that \u0022while this [federal lands] proposal is well-intentioned, it could put women and providers at risk.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022And importantly, in states where abortion is now illegal,\u0022 the official added, \u0022women and providers who are not federal employees could be potentially be prosecuted.\u0022\r\n\r\nSeveral prominent Democratic lawmakers, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), have called on the Biden administration to urgently and creatively use all of the federal resources at its disposal—including property—to provide access to abortion in Republican-led states where it\u0026#039;s now outlawed.\r\n\r\nEight states, including Texas and Oklahoma, enacted total abortion bans almost immediately after the Supreme Court\u0026#039;s right-wing majority handed down its ruling ending Roe, and others will soon follow as reproductive rights groups attempt to fight back with lawsuits and mass mobilizations.\r\n\r\nBefore Harris\u0026#039; interview aired Monday, Warren suggested that the Biden administration could move to set up Planned Parenthood outposts on the edges of national parks. Utah, Texas, and South Dakota are among the Republican-led states where such a strategy could be deployed—almost certainly sparking legal pushback from GOP officials.\r\n\r\n\u0022They could put up tents, have trained personnel—and be there to help people who need it,\u0022 Warren told the Washington Post. \u0022It\u0026#039;s time to declare a medical emergency.\u0022\r\n\r\nDuring a Friday rally in New York City, Ocasio-Cortez urged the Biden administration to \u0022open abortion clinics on federal lands in red states right now,\u0022 an effort that would likely involve utilizing Defense Department and Veterans Affairs facilities.\r\n\r\nThe New York Democrat characterized such a move—one of several she\u0026#039;s urging the administration to take—as \u0022the babiest of the babiest of the baby steps.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n- Restrain judicial review\r\n- Expand the court\r\n- Clinics on federal lands\r\n- Expand education and access to Plan C\r\n- Repeal Hyde\r\n- Hold floor votes codifying Griswold, Obergefell, Lawrence, Loving, etc\r\n- Vote on Escobar’s bill protecting clinics\r\n\r\nWe can do it!\r\nWe can at least TRY\r\n— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 26, 2022\r\n\r\n\r\nAs Vox\u0026#039;s Li Zhou explains, \u0022Because federal lands aren\u0026#039;t subject to states\u0026#039; civil laws and there\u0026#039;s room to interpret criminal laws, clinics could theoretically establish themselves on places like military bases without having to deal with a state\u0026#039;s bans.\u0022\r\n\r\nZhou cites Khiara Bridges of U.C. Berkeley\u0026#039;s Center on Reproductive Rights and Justice, who said last month that \u0022even though the land is inside the border of a state, it wouldn’t be governed by the laws of a state.\u0022\r\n\r\nThe Supreme Court\u0026#039;s ruling on Friday forced a number of clinics in GOP-dominated states across the country to cease operations, leaving many people seeking abortions confused about their options as trigger bans took effect.\r\n\r\nIn states such as Tennessee, trigger laws won\u0026#039;t become active for several weeks, causing a chaotic scramble among providers and patients. In states where abortion services are now prohibited, people may be forced to turn to international telehealth companies to obtain medication abortion.\r\n\r\nAt some clinics, including Alamo Women\u0026#039;s Reproductive Services Clinic in San Antonio, patients had to be turned away on the morning of the high court\u0026#039;s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u0026#039;s Health Organization.\r\n\r\n\u0022The Supreme Court made this decision today and, unfortunately, your geographical location affects your bodily autonomy,\u0022 Andrea Gallegos, the administrator of the San Antonio clinic, told patients waiting in the facility\u0026#039;s lobby.