Gas prices over $7.00 a gallon are displayed at a Chevron gas station on May 25, 2022 in Menlo Park, California. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
A new paper published Tuesday shows that U.S. corporate price markups and profits surged to their highest levels since the 1950s last year, bolstering arguments for an excess profits tax as a way to rein in sky-high inflation.
Authored by Mike Konczal and Niko Lusiani of the Roosevelt Institute, the analysis finds that markups--the difference between the actual cost of a good or service and the selling price--"were both the highest level on record and the largest one-year increase" in 2021.
"Almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Markups this high mean there is room for reversing them with little economic harm and likely societal benefit," Konczal said in a statement. "To tackle inflation, we need an all-of-the-above administrative and legislative approach that includes demand, supply, and market power interventions."
In their new brief, Konczal and Lusiani note that higher markups don't always mean larger profits.
"But they did in 2021," the researchers write, showing that the net profit margins of U.S. firms jumped from an annual average of 5.5% between 1960 and 1980 to 9.5% in 2021 as companies pushed up prices, citing inflationary pressures across the global economy as their justification.
"How high companies can increase their sales up and above their costs... matters for the economy more generally because these markups distribute economic gains from workers and consumers to firms and shareholders," said Lusiani. "This is especially the case when almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Making corporations once again price-takers rather than price-makers," Lusiani added, "will help bring down prices, and in time lead to a more equitable, innovative economy."
The new research comes as the White House struggles to formulate a coherent and effective response to an inflation surge that has become a serious economic and political problem, particularly as the pivotal 2022 midterms approach.
Survey data shows that U.S. voters, including those in key battleground states, overwhelmingly want the Biden administration to challenge corporate power and support a windfall profits tax to counter soaring prices at grocery stores, gas stations, and elsewhere across the economy.
Konczal and Lusiani's brief makes the case for a new tax to combat excess profits that they say have become "widespread." Such a tax, the researchers argue, would help redistribute "runaway economic gains while simultaneously eroding company incentives to increase their markups."
Additionally, they write, "increasing competition and reducing market power" through antitrust action "would bring down inflation to some degree, no matter its cause."
Related Content
With US Consumers 'Getting Fleeced,' Democrats Demand Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil
But influential U.S. economists--former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers chief among them--have argued that solving high inflation would require pushing down wages and throwing millions of people out of work.
"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation--in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment or five years of 6% unemployment or one year of 10% unemployment," Summers, who spoke with President Joe Biden by phone Monday morning, said in an address in London later that same day.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is leading an effort to tamp down inflation by aggressively hiking interest rates, has also cited modest wage increases over the past two years as a factor behind rising inflation, expressing his desire to "get wages down" despite evidence that wage growth has slowed in recent months.
Konczal and Lusiani contend in their paper that "while the idea that we are facing the threat of a wage-price spiral is becoming conventional wisdom, this brief and other research finds that changes to labor and worker compensation are not driving factors in recent markups."
"If margins are unusually high, then there's the possibility that profits and markups can decrease as either supply opens up or demand cools, removing pricing pressure," they write. "Such a high profit margin also means that there's room for wages to increase without necessarily raising prices--an important dynamic in a hot labor market."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new paper published Tuesday shows that U.S. corporate price markups and profits surged to their highest levels since the 1950s last year, bolstering arguments for an excess profits tax as a way to rein in sky-high inflation.
Authored by Mike Konczal and Niko Lusiani of the Roosevelt Institute, the analysis finds that markups--the difference between the actual cost of a good or service and the selling price--"were both the highest level on record and the largest one-year increase" in 2021.
"Almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Markups this high mean there is room for reversing them with little economic harm and likely societal benefit," Konczal said in a statement. "To tackle inflation, we need an all-of-the-above administrative and legislative approach that includes demand, supply, and market power interventions."
In their new brief, Konczal and Lusiani note that higher markups don't always mean larger profits.
"But they did in 2021," the researchers write, showing that the net profit margins of U.S. firms jumped from an annual average of 5.5% between 1960 and 1980 to 9.5% in 2021 as companies pushed up prices, citing inflationary pressures across the global economy as their justification.
"How high companies can increase their sales up and above their costs... matters for the economy more generally because these markups distribute economic gains from workers and consumers to firms and shareholders," said Lusiani. "This is especially the case when almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Making corporations once again price-takers rather than price-makers," Lusiani added, "will help bring down prices, and in time lead to a more equitable, innovative economy."
The new research comes as the White House struggles to formulate a coherent and effective response to an inflation surge that has become a serious economic and political problem, particularly as the pivotal 2022 midterms approach.
Survey data shows that U.S. voters, including those in key battleground states, overwhelmingly want the Biden administration to challenge corporate power and support a windfall profits tax to counter soaring prices at grocery stores, gas stations, and elsewhere across the economy.
Konczal and Lusiani's brief makes the case for a new tax to combat excess profits that they say have become "widespread." Such a tax, the researchers argue, would help redistribute "runaway economic gains while simultaneously eroding company incentives to increase their markups."
Additionally, they write, "increasing competition and reducing market power" through antitrust action "would bring down inflation to some degree, no matter its cause."
Related Content
With US Consumers 'Getting Fleeced,' Democrats Demand Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil
But influential U.S. economists--former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers chief among them--have argued that solving high inflation would require pushing down wages and throwing millions of people out of work.
"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation--in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment or five years of 6% unemployment or one year of 10% unemployment," Summers, who spoke with President Joe Biden by phone Monday morning, said in an address in London later that same day.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is leading an effort to tamp down inflation by aggressively hiking interest rates, has also cited modest wage increases over the past two years as a factor behind rising inflation, expressing his desire to "get wages down" despite evidence that wage growth has slowed in recent months.
Konczal and Lusiani contend in their paper that "while the idea that we are facing the threat of a wage-price spiral is becoming conventional wisdom, this brief and other research finds that changes to labor and worker compensation are not driving factors in recent markups."
"If margins are unusually high, then there's the possibility that profits and markups can decrease as either supply opens up or demand cools, removing pricing pressure," they write. "Such a high profit margin also means that there's room for wages to increase without necessarily raising prices--an important dynamic in a hot labor market."
From Your Site Articles
- With US Consumers 'Getting Fleeced,' Democrats Demand Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil ›
- Corporate Lobbying 'Onslaught' Tanked Anti-Price Gouging Bills as Inflation Surged ›
- Economists Warn More Fed Rate Hikes Would 'Push Millions Out of Work' ›
- Fed and Biden Face Warnings That Inflation Response Could Spur Painful Recession ›
A new paper published Tuesday shows that U.S. corporate price markups and profits surged to their highest levels since the 1950s last year, bolstering arguments for an excess profits tax as a way to rein in sky-high inflation.
Authored by Mike Konczal and Niko Lusiani of the Roosevelt Institute, the analysis finds that markups--the difference between the actual cost of a good or service and the selling price--"were both the highest level on record and the largest one-year increase" in 2021.
"Almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Markups this high mean there is room for reversing them with little economic harm and likely societal benefit," Konczal said in a statement. "To tackle inflation, we need an all-of-the-above administrative and legislative approach that includes demand, supply, and market power interventions."
In their new brief, Konczal and Lusiani note that higher markups don't always mean larger profits.
"But they did in 2021," the researchers write, showing that the net profit margins of U.S. firms jumped from an annual average of 5.5% between 1960 and 1980 to 9.5% in 2021 as companies pushed up prices, citing inflationary pressures across the global economy as their justification.
"How high companies can increase their sales up and above their costs... matters for the economy more generally because these markups distribute economic gains from workers and consumers to firms and shareholders," said Lusiani. "This is especially the case when almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Making corporations once again price-takers rather than price-makers," Lusiani added, "will help bring down prices, and in time lead to a more equitable, innovative economy."
The new research comes as the White House struggles to formulate a coherent and effective response to an inflation surge that has become a serious economic and political problem, particularly as the pivotal 2022 midterms approach.
Survey data shows that U.S. voters, including those in key battleground states, overwhelmingly want the Biden administration to challenge corporate power and support a windfall profits tax to counter soaring prices at grocery stores, gas stations, and elsewhere across the economy.
Konczal and Lusiani's brief makes the case for a new tax to combat excess profits that they say have become "widespread." Such a tax, the researchers argue, would help redistribute "runaway economic gains while simultaneously eroding company incentives to increase their markups."
Additionally, they write, "increasing competition and reducing market power" through antitrust action "would bring down inflation to some degree, no matter its cause."
Related Content
With US Consumers 'Getting Fleeced,' Democrats Demand Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil
But influential U.S. economists--former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers chief among them--have argued that solving high inflation would require pushing down wages and throwing millions of people out of work.
"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation--in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment or five years of 6% unemployment or one year of 10% unemployment," Summers, who spoke with President Joe Biden by phone Monday morning, said in an address in London later that same day.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is leading an effort to tamp down inflation by aggressively hiking interest rates, has also cited modest wage increases over the past two years as a factor behind rising inflation, expressing his desire to "get wages down" despite evidence that wage growth has slowed in recent months.
Konczal and Lusiani contend in their paper that "while the idea that we are facing the threat of a wage-price spiral is becoming conventional wisdom, this brief and other research finds that changes to labor and worker compensation are not driving factors in recent markups."
"If margins are unusually high, then there's the possibility that profits and markups can decrease as either supply opens up or demand cools, removing pricing pressure," they write. "Such a high profit margin also means that there's room for wages to increase without necessarily raising prices--an important dynamic in a hot labor market."
From Your Site Articles
- With US Consumers 'Getting Fleeced,' Democrats Demand Windfall Profits Tax on Big Oil ›
- Corporate Lobbying 'Onslaught' Tanked Anti-Price Gouging Bills as Inflation Surged ›
- Economists Warn More Fed Rate Hikes Would 'Push Millions Out of Work' ›
- Fed and Biden Face Warnings That Inflation Response Could Spur Painful Recession ›