

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Gas prices over $7.00 a gallon are displayed at a Chevron gas station on May 25, 2022 in Menlo Park, California. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
A new paper published Tuesday shows that U.S. corporate price markups and profits surged to their highest levels since the 1950s last year, bolstering arguments for an excess profits tax as a way to rein in sky-high inflation.
Authored by Mike Konczal and Niko Lusiani of the Roosevelt Institute, the analysis finds that markups--the difference between the actual cost of a good or service and the selling price--"were both the highest level on record and the largest one-year increase" in 2021.
"Almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Markups this high mean there is room for reversing them with little economic harm and likely societal benefit," Konczal said in a statement. "To tackle inflation, we need an all-of-the-above administrative and legislative approach that includes demand, supply, and market power interventions."
In their new brief, Konczal and Lusiani note that higher markups don't always mean larger profits.
"But they did in 2021," the researchers write, showing that the net profit margins of U.S. firms jumped from an annual average of 5.5% between 1960 and 1980 to 9.5% in 2021 as companies pushed up prices, citing inflationary pressures across the global economy as their justification.
"How high companies can increase their sales up and above their costs... matters for the economy more generally because these markups distribute economic gains from workers and consumers to firms and shareholders," said Lusiani. "This is especially the case when almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Making corporations once again price-takers rather than price-makers," Lusiani added, "will help bring down prices, and in time lead to a more equitable, innovative economy."
The new research comes as the White House struggles to formulate a coherent and effective response to an inflation surge that has become a serious economic and political problem, particularly as the pivotal 2022 midterms approach.
Survey data shows that U.S. voters, including those in key battleground states, overwhelmingly want the Biden administration to challenge corporate power and support a windfall profits tax to counter soaring prices at grocery stores, gas stations, and elsewhere across the economy.
Konczal and Lusiani's brief makes the case for a new tax to combat excess profits that they say have become "widespread." Such a tax, the researchers argue, would help redistribute "runaway economic gains while simultaneously eroding company incentives to increase their markups."
Additionally, they write, "increasing competition and reducing market power" through antitrust action "would bring down inflation to some degree, no matter its cause."
Related Content

But influential U.S. economists--former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers chief among them--have argued that solving high inflation would require pushing down wages and throwing millions of people out of work.
"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation--in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment or five years of 6% unemployment or one year of 10% unemployment," Summers, who spoke with President Joe Biden by phone Monday morning, said in an address in London later that same day.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is leading an effort to tamp down inflation by aggressively hiking interest rates, has also cited modest wage increases over the past two years as a factor behind rising inflation, expressing his desire to "get wages down" despite evidence that wage growth has slowed in recent months.
Konczal and Lusiani contend in their paper that "while the idea that we are facing the threat of a wage-price spiral is becoming conventional wisdom, this brief and other research finds that changes to labor and worker compensation are not driving factors in recent markups."
"If margins are unusually high, then there's the possibility that profits and markups can decrease as either supply opens up or demand cools, removing pricing pressure," they write. "Such a high profit margin also means that there's room for wages to increase without necessarily raising prices--an important dynamic in a hot labor market."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A new paper published Tuesday shows that U.S. corporate price markups and profits surged to their highest levels since the 1950s last year, bolstering arguments for an excess profits tax as a way to rein in sky-high inflation.
Authored by Mike Konczal and Niko Lusiani of the Roosevelt Institute, the analysis finds that markups--the difference between the actual cost of a good or service and the selling price--"were both the highest level on record and the largest one-year increase" in 2021.
"Almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Markups this high mean there is room for reversing them with little economic harm and likely societal benefit," Konczal said in a statement. "To tackle inflation, we need an all-of-the-above administrative and legislative approach that includes demand, supply, and market power interventions."
In their new brief, Konczal and Lusiani note that higher markups don't always mean larger profits.
"But they did in 2021," the researchers write, showing that the net profit margins of U.S. firms jumped from an annual average of 5.5% between 1960 and 1980 to 9.5% in 2021 as companies pushed up prices, citing inflationary pressures across the global economy as their justification.
"How high companies can increase their sales up and above their costs... matters for the economy more generally because these markups distribute economic gains from workers and consumers to firms and shareholders," said Lusiani. "This is especially the case when almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Making corporations once again price-takers rather than price-makers," Lusiani added, "will help bring down prices, and in time lead to a more equitable, innovative economy."
The new research comes as the White House struggles to formulate a coherent and effective response to an inflation surge that has become a serious economic and political problem, particularly as the pivotal 2022 midterms approach.
Survey data shows that U.S. voters, including those in key battleground states, overwhelmingly want the Biden administration to challenge corporate power and support a windfall profits tax to counter soaring prices at grocery stores, gas stations, and elsewhere across the economy.
Konczal and Lusiani's brief makes the case for a new tax to combat excess profits that they say have become "widespread." Such a tax, the researchers argue, would help redistribute "runaway economic gains while simultaneously eroding company incentives to increase their markups."
Additionally, they write, "increasing competition and reducing market power" through antitrust action "would bring down inflation to some degree, no matter its cause."
Related Content

But influential U.S. economists--former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers chief among them--have argued that solving high inflation would require pushing down wages and throwing millions of people out of work.
"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation--in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment or five years of 6% unemployment or one year of 10% unemployment," Summers, who spoke with President Joe Biden by phone Monday morning, said in an address in London later that same day.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is leading an effort to tamp down inflation by aggressively hiking interest rates, has also cited modest wage increases over the past two years as a factor behind rising inflation, expressing his desire to "get wages down" despite evidence that wage growth has slowed in recent months.
Konczal and Lusiani contend in their paper that "while the idea that we are facing the threat of a wage-price spiral is becoming conventional wisdom, this brief and other research finds that changes to labor and worker compensation are not driving factors in recent markups."
"If margins are unusually high, then there's the possibility that profits and markups can decrease as either supply opens up or demand cools, removing pricing pressure," they write. "Such a high profit margin also means that there's room for wages to increase without necessarily raising prices--an important dynamic in a hot labor market."
A new paper published Tuesday shows that U.S. corporate price markups and profits surged to their highest levels since the 1950s last year, bolstering arguments for an excess profits tax as a way to rein in sky-high inflation.
Authored by Mike Konczal and Niko Lusiani of the Roosevelt Institute, the analysis finds that markups--the difference between the actual cost of a good or service and the selling price--"were both the highest level on record and the largest one-year increase" in 2021.
"Almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Markups this high mean there is room for reversing them with little economic harm and likely societal benefit," Konczal said in a statement. "To tackle inflation, we need an all-of-the-above administrative and legislative approach that includes demand, supply, and market power interventions."
In their new brief, Konczal and Lusiani note that higher markups don't always mean larger profits.
"But they did in 2021," the researchers write, showing that the net profit margins of U.S. firms jumped from an annual average of 5.5% between 1960 and 1980 to 9.5% in 2021 as companies pushed up prices, citing inflationary pressures across the global economy as their justification.
"How high companies can increase their sales up and above their costs... matters for the economy more generally because these markups distribute economic gains from workers and consumers to firms and shareholders," said Lusiani. "This is especially the case when almost 100% of these firms' earnings derived from markups are distributed upward to shareholders rather than retained and reinvested."
"Making corporations once again price-takers rather than price-makers," Lusiani added, "will help bring down prices, and in time lead to a more equitable, innovative economy."
The new research comes as the White House struggles to formulate a coherent and effective response to an inflation surge that has become a serious economic and political problem, particularly as the pivotal 2022 midterms approach.
Survey data shows that U.S. voters, including those in key battleground states, overwhelmingly want the Biden administration to challenge corporate power and support a windfall profits tax to counter soaring prices at grocery stores, gas stations, and elsewhere across the economy.
Konczal and Lusiani's brief makes the case for a new tax to combat excess profits that they say have become "widespread." Such a tax, the researchers argue, would help redistribute "runaway economic gains while simultaneously eroding company incentives to increase their markups."
Additionally, they write, "increasing competition and reducing market power" through antitrust action "would bring down inflation to some degree, no matter its cause."
Related Content

But influential U.S. economists--former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers chief among them--have argued that solving high inflation would require pushing down wages and throwing millions of people out of work.
"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation--in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment or five years of 6% unemployment or one year of 10% unemployment," Summers, who spoke with President Joe Biden by phone Monday morning, said in an address in London later that same day.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is leading an effort to tamp down inflation by aggressively hiking interest rates, has also cited modest wage increases over the past two years as a factor behind rising inflation, expressing his desire to "get wages down" despite evidence that wage growth has slowed in recent months.
Konczal and Lusiani contend in their paper that "while the idea that we are facing the threat of a wage-price spiral is becoming conventional wisdom, this brief and other research finds that changes to labor and worker compensation are not driving factors in recent markups."
"If margins are unusually high, then there's the possibility that profits and markups can decrease as either supply opens up or demand cools, removing pricing pressure," they write. "Such a high profit margin also means that there's room for wages to increase without necessarily raising prices--an important dynamic in a hot labor market."