
A U.S. Air Force MQ-9 Reaper drone sits on the tarmac of Creech Air Force Base in Nevada at dusk. (Photo: USAF)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
A U.S. Air Force MQ-9 Reaper drone sits on the tarmac of Creech Air Force Base in Nevada at dusk. (Photo: USAF)
The Biden administration is planning to sell Ukraine armed attack drones as the embattled country continues to defend itself from Russia's nearly 100-day invasion, a move that experts say would risk increasing the chance of war between the United States and Russia.
"Supplying large, long-range drones would be a significant escalation in the types of systems supplied to Ukraine."
Reuters reports the administration plans to sell four General Atomics MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones that can be armed with Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles and can fly for 30 hours or more and collect massive amounts of intelligence. The pilotless aircraft--which are a variant of the U.S. Army's Predator drones--can also carry as many as eight Hellfire missiles.
News of the planned sale followed reports that Ukraine will receive Lockheed Martin's High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which can strike targets roughly 50 miles away with satellite-guided missiles.
The United States and its NATO allies have already sent tens of billions of military dollars to Ukraine, as well as weapons including 155 mm howitzers and tens of thousands of artillery rounds, main battle tanks, Boeing's Harpoon anti-ship missiles, and Bayraktar drones from Turkey.
\u201cOn one hand they assure us the US isn't giving #Ukraine weapons that can penetrate deep into #Russia and start a wider war .... until we do. NEW report on possible killer drone sale to Kyiv: https://t.co/fICesTqofp @Antiwarcom @scotthortonshow @KyleAnzalone_ @DanielLarison\u201d— Kelley B. Vlahos (@Kelley B. Vlahos) 1654119863
Moscow officials have repeatedly warned that the transfer of Western weaponry to Ukraine is a provocative escalation that could lead ultimately lead to war between Russia and the United States--the world's two leading nuclear powers--and that incoming NATO arms are legitimate targets for Russian attack.
The U.S. Congress can still block the proposed sale.
Considering the possibility that Ukraine would receive U.S. attack drones, William D. Hartung, senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept last month that "in my view, Ukraine has the right to defend itself, and some weapons supplies are warranted on that basis."
"But supplying large, long-range drones would be a significant escalation in the types of systems supplied to Ukraine," he continued, "and as such shouldn't go forward without significant scrutiny by Congress."
Another concern is Ukraine's status as a leading source for illicit weapons. The Global Organized Crime Index calls the country "one of the largest arms trafficking markets" in Europe.
"Before flooding Ukraine with additional weapons," the Quincy Institute's Taylor Giorno warned in March, "the U.S. and its NATO allies should consider the risks that they could fuel future conflicts long after the current war has ended."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Biden administration is planning to sell Ukraine armed attack drones as the embattled country continues to defend itself from Russia's nearly 100-day invasion, a move that experts say would risk increasing the chance of war between the United States and Russia.
"Supplying large, long-range drones would be a significant escalation in the types of systems supplied to Ukraine."
Reuters reports the administration plans to sell four General Atomics MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones that can be armed with Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles and can fly for 30 hours or more and collect massive amounts of intelligence. The pilotless aircraft--which are a variant of the U.S. Army's Predator drones--can also carry as many as eight Hellfire missiles.
News of the planned sale followed reports that Ukraine will receive Lockheed Martin's High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which can strike targets roughly 50 miles away with satellite-guided missiles.
The United States and its NATO allies have already sent tens of billions of military dollars to Ukraine, as well as weapons including 155 mm howitzers and tens of thousands of artillery rounds, main battle tanks, Boeing's Harpoon anti-ship missiles, and Bayraktar drones from Turkey.
\u201cOn one hand they assure us the US isn't giving #Ukraine weapons that can penetrate deep into #Russia and start a wider war .... until we do. NEW report on possible killer drone sale to Kyiv: https://t.co/fICesTqofp @Antiwarcom @scotthortonshow @KyleAnzalone_ @DanielLarison\u201d— Kelley B. Vlahos (@Kelley B. Vlahos) 1654119863
Moscow officials have repeatedly warned that the transfer of Western weaponry to Ukraine is a provocative escalation that could lead ultimately lead to war between Russia and the United States--the world's two leading nuclear powers--and that incoming NATO arms are legitimate targets for Russian attack.
The U.S. Congress can still block the proposed sale.
Considering the possibility that Ukraine would receive U.S. attack drones, William D. Hartung, senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept last month that "in my view, Ukraine has the right to defend itself, and some weapons supplies are warranted on that basis."
"But supplying large, long-range drones would be a significant escalation in the types of systems supplied to Ukraine," he continued, "and as such shouldn't go forward without significant scrutiny by Congress."
Another concern is Ukraine's status as a leading source for illicit weapons. The Global Organized Crime Index calls the country "one of the largest arms trafficking markets" in Europe.
"Before flooding Ukraine with additional weapons," the Quincy Institute's Taylor Giorno warned in March, "the U.S. and its NATO allies should consider the risks that they could fuel future conflicts long after the current war has ended."
The Biden administration is planning to sell Ukraine armed attack drones as the embattled country continues to defend itself from Russia's nearly 100-day invasion, a move that experts say would risk increasing the chance of war between the United States and Russia.
"Supplying large, long-range drones would be a significant escalation in the types of systems supplied to Ukraine."
Reuters reports the administration plans to sell four General Atomics MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones that can be armed with Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles and can fly for 30 hours or more and collect massive amounts of intelligence. The pilotless aircraft--which are a variant of the U.S. Army's Predator drones--can also carry as many as eight Hellfire missiles.
News of the planned sale followed reports that Ukraine will receive Lockheed Martin's High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which can strike targets roughly 50 miles away with satellite-guided missiles.
The United States and its NATO allies have already sent tens of billions of military dollars to Ukraine, as well as weapons including 155 mm howitzers and tens of thousands of artillery rounds, main battle tanks, Boeing's Harpoon anti-ship missiles, and Bayraktar drones from Turkey.
\u201cOn one hand they assure us the US isn't giving #Ukraine weapons that can penetrate deep into #Russia and start a wider war .... until we do. NEW report on possible killer drone sale to Kyiv: https://t.co/fICesTqofp @Antiwarcom @scotthortonshow @KyleAnzalone_ @DanielLarison\u201d— Kelley B. Vlahos (@Kelley B. Vlahos) 1654119863
Moscow officials have repeatedly warned that the transfer of Western weaponry to Ukraine is a provocative escalation that could lead ultimately lead to war between Russia and the United States--the world's two leading nuclear powers--and that incoming NATO arms are legitimate targets for Russian attack.
The U.S. Congress can still block the proposed sale.
Considering the possibility that Ukraine would receive U.S. attack drones, William D. Hartung, senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept last month that "in my view, Ukraine has the right to defend itself, and some weapons supplies are warranted on that basis."
"But supplying large, long-range drones would be a significant escalation in the types of systems supplied to Ukraine," he continued, "and as such shouldn't go forward without significant scrutiny by Congress."
Another concern is Ukraine's status as a leading source for illicit weapons. The Global Organized Crime Index calls the country "one of the largest arms trafficking markets" in Europe.
"Before flooding Ukraine with additional weapons," the Quincy Institute's Taylor Giorno warned in March, "the U.S. and its NATO allies should consider the risks that they could fuel future conflicts long after the current war has ended."