SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Activists occupied Sen. Bob Casey's (D-Pa.) office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on May 10, 2022, after which the lawmaker announced his intention to vote for the Women's Health Protection Act. (Photo: Lancaster Stands Up/Twitter)
Sen. Bob Casey Commits to Vote for Abortion Rights After Sit-In at His Office
"We came here to demand that Sen. Casey pass the Women's Health Protection Act," said one sit-in participant. "Now he is committing to do just that."
May 10, 2022
Progressive activists occupied Democratic Sen. Bob Casey's office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on Tuesday, after which the historically anti-choice lawmaker announced his intention to vote for the Women's Health Protection Act to codify the reproductive rights that are now in peril thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing majority.
"This week, I will again vote yes to advance debate on the Women's Health Protection Act and I will support the bill if there is a vote on final passage in the future," Casey said in a statement.
The Pennsylvania Democrat's statement was released just minutes after members of Lancaster Stands Up occupied his office in the state capital.
"Community pressure works," said Becca Rast, managing director of Justice Democrats.
In his statement, Casey said that "in the nearly three months since the Senate last voted on the Women's Health Protection Act, the circumstances around the entire debate on abortion have changed."
"In light of the leaked Supreme Court decision draft overturning Roe v. Wade, and subsequent reports that Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate will introduce legislation to enact a nationwide six-week ban," he continued, "the real question of the moment is: do you support a categorical ban on abortion? During my time in public office, I have never voted for--nor do I support--such a ban."
The Women's Health Protection Act would enshrine patients' right to receive legal and safe abortions and healthcare professionals' right to provide them. Casey and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) were the only two Democrats who refused to co-sponsor the Senate's version of the legislation when it was reintroduced last year.
"We came here to demand that Sen. Casey pass the Women's Health Protection Act," Hannah Henrichon, a Millersville University student and sit-in participant, said in a statement. "Now he is committing to do just that."
Suzy Wurtz from Lancaster Stands Up said that "people all over our state have been standing up and demanding that our elected officials, including Sen. Casey, fight to protect our reproductive rights."
"Thank you Sen. Casey for listening to us and making the choice to fight for us," she added.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has teed up a Wednesday vote on a modified version of the Women's Health Protection Act.
House Democrats--with the lone exception of right-wing Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas--supported the passage of the Women's Health Protection Act last September. However, the bill died in the upper chamber in February when Manchin joined all Senate Republicans present to block the measure before it even reached the floor. Casey, for his part, did vote to advance debate on the bill.
Because the filibuster requires 60 votes to advance most legislation, the latest iteration of the Women's Health Protection Act is destined for the same fate unless the entire Senate Democratic Caucus--including Manchin and fellow conservative Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona--and Vice President Kamala Harris vote to suspend the anti-democratic rule that gives veto power to the minority party in a closely divided upper chamber.
Less than 24 hours after the publication of Justice Samuel Alito's leaked draft opinion, which shows that the high court's right-wing majority is set to strike down Roe v. Wade, Manchin doubled down on his defense of the filibuster, characterizing it as "the only protection we have in democracy."
If Senate Democrats fail to eliminate the filibuster and pass the Women's Health Protection Act and Alito's draft ruling is not substantially changed before it is officially issued, abortion could soon be outlawed in more than half the country.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
Progressive activists occupied Democratic Sen. Bob Casey's office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on Tuesday, after which the historically anti-choice lawmaker announced his intention to vote for the Women's Health Protection Act to codify the reproductive rights that are now in peril thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing majority.
"This week, I will again vote yes to advance debate on the Women's Health Protection Act and I will support the bill if there is a vote on final passage in the future," Casey said in a statement.
The Pennsylvania Democrat's statement was released just minutes after members of Lancaster Stands Up occupied his office in the state capital.
"Community pressure works," said Becca Rast, managing director of Justice Democrats.
In his statement, Casey said that "in the nearly three months since the Senate last voted on the Women's Health Protection Act, the circumstances around the entire debate on abortion have changed."
"In light of the leaked Supreme Court decision draft overturning Roe v. Wade, and subsequent reports that Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate will introduce legislation to enact a nationwide six-week ban," he continued, "the real question of the moment is: do you support a categorical ban on abortion? During my time in public office, I have never voted for--nor do I support--such a ban."
The Women's Health Protection Act would enshrine patients' right to receive legal and safe abortions and healthcare professionals' right to provide them. Casey and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) were the only two Democrats who refused to co-sponsor the Senate's version of the legislation when it was reintroduced last year.
"We came here to demand that Sen. Casey pass the Women's Health Protection Act," Hannah Henrichon, a Millersville University student and sit-in participant, said in a statement. "Now he is committing to do just that."
Suzy Wurtz from Lancaster Stands Up said that "people all over our state have been standing up and demanding that our elected officials, including Sen. Casey, fight to protect our reproductive rights."
"Thank you Sen. Casey for listening to us and making the choice to fight for us," she added.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has teed up a Wednesday vote on a modified version of the Women's Health Protection Act.
House Democrats--with the lone exception of right-wing Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas--supported the passage of the Women's Health Protection Act last September. However, the bill died in the upper chamber in February when Manchin joined all Senate Republicans present to block the measure before it even reached the floor. Casey, for his part, did vote to advance debate on the bill.
Because the filibuster requires 60 votes to advance most legislation, the latest iteration of the Women's Health Protection Act is destined for the same fate unless the entire Senate Democratic Caucus--including Manchin and fellow conservative Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona--and Vice President Kamala Harris vote to suspend the anti-democratic rule that gives veto power to the minority party in a closely divided upper chamber.
Less than 24 hours after the publication of Justice Samuel Alito's leaked draft opinion, which shows that the high court's right-wing majority is set to strike down Roe v. Wade, Manchin doubled down on his defense of the filibuster, characterizing it as "the only protection we have in democracy."
If Senate Democrats fail to eliminate the filibuster and pass the Women's Health Protection Act and Alito's draft ruling is not substantially changed before it is officially issued, abortion could soon be outlawed in more than half the country.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
Progressive activists occupied Democratic Sen. Bob Casey's office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on Tuesday, after which the historically anti-choice lawmaker announced his intention to vote for the Women's Health Protection Act to codify the reproductive rights that are now in peril thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing majority.
"This week, I will again vote yes to advance debate on the Women's Health Protection Act and I will support the bill if there is a vote on final passage in the future," Casey said in a statement.
The Pennsylvania Democrat's statement was released just minutes after members of Lancaster Stands Up occupied his office in the state capital.
"Community pressure works," said Becca Rast, managing director of Justice Democrats.
In his statement, Casey said that "in the nearly three months since the Senate last voted on the Women's Health Protection Act, the circumstances around the entire debate on abortion have changed."
"In light of the leaked Supreme Court decision draft overturning Roe v. Wade, and subsequent reports that Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate will introduce legislation to enact a nationwide six-week ban," he continued, "the real question of the moment is: do you support a categorical ban on abortion? During my time in public office, I have never voted for--nor do I support--such a ban."
The Women's Health Protection Act would enshrine patients' right to receive legal and safe abortions and healthcare professionals' right to provide them. Casey and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) were the only two Democrats who refused to co-sponsor the Senate's version of the legislation when it was reintroduced last year.
"We came here to demand that Sen. Casey pass the Women's Health Protection Act," Hannah Henrichon, a Millersville University student and sit-in participant, said in a statement. "Now he is committing to do just that."
Suzy Wurtz from Lancaster Stands Up said that "people all over our state have been standing up and demanding that our elected officials, including Sen. Casey, fight to protect our reproductive rights."
"Thank you Sen. Casey for listening to us and making the choice to fight for us," she added.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has teed up a Wednesday vote on a modified version of the Women's Health Protection Act.
House Democrats--with the lone exception of right-wing Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas--supported the passage of the Women's Health Protection Act last September. However, the bill died in the upper chamber in February when Manchin joined all Senate Republicans present to block the measure before it even reached the floor. Casey, for his part, did vote to advance debate on the bill.
Because the filibuster requires 60 votes to advance most legislation, the latest iteration of the Women's Health Protection Act is destined for the same fate unless the entire Senate Democratic Caucus--including Manchin and fellow conservative Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona--and Vice President Kamala Harris vote to suspend the anti-democratic rule that gives veto power to the minority party in a closely divided upper chamber.
Less than 24 hours after the publication of Justice Samuel Alito's leaked draft opinion, which shows that the high court's right-wing majority is set to strike down Roe v. Wade, Manchin doubled down on his defense of the filibuster, characterizing it as "the only protection we have in democracy."
If Senate Democrats fail to eliminate the filibuster and pass the Women's Health Protection Act and Alito's draft ruling is not substantially changed before it is officially issued, abortion could soon be outlawed in more than half the country.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.