SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Starbucks Workers United members and supporters--including Socialist Alternative Seattle City Council Member Kshama Sawant (front, right) protest at a January 25, 2022 rally in support of unionization in Seattle. (Photo: Starbucks Workers United/Twitter)
NLRB Complaint Accuses Starbucks of Retaliating Against Union Leaders
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees" seeking to unionize in Arizona.
Mar 15, 2022
The National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday filed a complaint on behalf of Starbucks Workers United--a labor group helping employees at nearly 140 U.S. Starbucks stores to unionize--alleging the coffee giant retaliated and discriminated against union leaders in Phoenix, Arizona.
According toBloomberg, the Phoenix NLRB regional director formally accused Starbucks of illegally surveilling and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize.
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees."
\u201cBREAKING: Today, the NLRB issued a formal Complaint against Starbucks for alleged retaliation & discrimination against union leaders in Phoenix, AZ.\u201d— Starbucks Workers United (@Starbucks Workers United) 1647381454
Starbucks Workers United this week also filed charges with the NLRB accusing Starbucks of slashing worker hours in a deliberate union-busting bid.
"These hours cuts are in swift response to workplace organizing campaigns at Starbucks stores around the country," the union said, according toMore Perfect Union.
\u201cUnionizing Starbucks workers allege the company is retaliating against them by cutting their hours.\n\nWorkers have lost up to 15 hours per week, per @SBWorkersUnited. Starbucks has fired several workers who got second jobs to cover the lost income. https://t.co/hODGYxQixf\u201d— More Perfect Union (@More Perfect Union) 1647362700
"The reduction of hours has resulted in lost pay; has rendered, or will soon render, employees ineligible for benefits that have hours-worked eligibility requirements, including healthcare coverage and the Starbucks College Achievement Plan (tuition coverage); and has or will soon result in the constructive discharge of Starbucks employees," the complaint--which alleges that the shift cuts are occurring in at least 20 states--says.
"In the eight years I've worked for Starbucks, I've never seen the company slash hours this severely or this widely," Sarah Pappin, a Starbucks shift supervisor in Seattle, told More Perfect Union. "While it's true we trim hours in January and February, I've never [seen] us cut hours like this in March when our business is already ramping up for the season."
"Many of my coworkers have no idea how they're going to pay rent for April," Pappin added. "Some of my core that were previously getting scheduled 20-plus hours a week are being scheduled less than 10 now."
Joseph Thompson, a barista at a Santa Cruz, California Starbucks, said in a statement that "as a full-time, low-income college student, I rely on at least 20 hours a week for benefits and paying bills. Living paycheck to paycheck is already hard, but now that Starbucks is cutting hours across the board and targeting union leaders, [it] just further emphasizes the need for a union."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday filed a complaint on behalf of Starbucks Workers United--a labor group helping employees at nearly 140 U.S. Starbucks stores to unionize--alleging the coffee giant retaliated and discriminated against union leaders in Phoenix, Arizona.
According toBloomberg, the Phoenix NLRB regional director formally accused Starbucks of illegally surveilling and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize.
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees."
\u201cBREAKING: Today, the NLRB issued a formal Complaint against Starbucks for alleged retaliation & discrimination against union leaders in Phoenix, AZ.\u201d— Starbucks Workers United (@Starbucks Workers United) 1647381454
Starbucks Workers United this week also filed charges with the NLRB accusing Starbucks of slashing worker hours in a deliberate union-busting bid.
"These hours cuts are in swift response to workplace organizing campaigns at Starbucks stores around the country," the union said, according toMore Perfect Union.
\u201cUnionizing Starbucks workers allege the company is retaliating against them by cutting their hours.\n\nWorkers have lost up to 15 hours per week, per @SBWorkersUnited. Starbucks has fired several workers who got second jobs to cover the lost income. https://t.co/hODGYxQixf\u201d— More Perfect Union (@More Perfect Union) 1647362700
"The reduction of hours has resulted in lost pay; has rendered, or will soon render, employees ineligible for benefits that have hours-worked eligibility requirements, including healthcare coverage and the Starbucks College Achievement Plan (tuition coverage); and has or will soon result in the constructive discharge of Starbucks employees," the complaint--which alleges that the shift cuts are occurring in at least 20 states--says.
"In the eight years I've worked for Starbucks, I've never seen the company slash hours this severely or this widely," Sarah Pappin, a Starbucks shift supervisor in Seattle, told More Perfect Union. "While it's true we trim hours in January and February, I've never [seen] us cut hours like this in March when our business is already ramping up for the season."
"Many of my coworkers have no idea how they're going to pay rent for April," Pappin added. "Some of my core that were previously getting scheduled 20-plus hours a week are being scheduled less than 10 now."
Joseph Thompson, a barista at a Santa Cruz, California Starbucks, said in a statement that "as a full-time, low-income college student, I rely on at least 20 hours a week for benefits and paying bills. Living paycheck to paycheck is already hard, but now that Starbucks is cutting hours across the board and targeting union leaders, [it] just further emphasizes the need for a union."
The National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday filed a complaint on behalf of Starbucks Workers United--a labor group helping employees at nearly 140 U.S. Starbucks stores to unionize--alleging the coffee giant retaliated and discriminated against union leaders in Phoenix, Arizona.
According toBloomberg, the Phoenix NLRB regional director formally accused Starbucks of illegally surveilling and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize.
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees."
\u201cBREAKING: Today, the NLRB issued a formal Complaint against Starbucks for alleged retaliation & discrimination against union leaders in Phoenix, AZ.\u201d— Starbucks Workers United (@Starbucks Workers United) 1647381454
Starbucks Workers United this week also filed charges with the NLRB accusing Starbucks of slashing worker hours in a deliberate union-busting bid.
"These hours cuts are in swift response to workplace organizing campaigns at Starbucks stores around the country," the union said, according toMore Perfect Union.
\u201cUnionizing Starbucks workers allege the company is retaliating against them by cutting their hours.\n\nWorkers have lost up to 15 hours per week, per @SBWorkersUnited. Starbucks has fired several workers who got second jobs to cover the lost income. https://t.co/hODGYxQixf\u201d— More Perfect Union (@More Perfect Union) 1647362700
"The reduction of hours has resulted in lost pay; has rendered, or will soon render, employees ineligible for benefits that have hours-worked eligibility requirements, including healthcare coverage and the Starbucks College Achievement Plan (tuition coverage); and has or will soon result in the constructive discharge of Starbucks employees," the complaint--which alleges that the shift cuts are occurring in at least 20 states--says.
"In the eight years I've worked for Starbucks, I've never seen the company slash hours this severely or this widely," Sarah Pappin, a Starbucks shift supervisor in Seattle, told More Perfect Union. "While it's true we trim hours in January and February, I've never [seen] us cut hours like this in March when our business is already ramping up for the season."
"Many of my coworkers have no idea how they're going to pay rent for April," Pappin added. "Some of my core that were previously getting scheduled 20-plus hours a week are being scheduled less than 10 now."
Joseph Thompson, a barista at a Santa Cruz, California Starbucks, said in a statement that "as a full-time, low-income college student, I rely on at least 20 hours a week for benefits and paying bills. Living paycheck to paycheck is already hard, but now that Starbucks is cutting hours across the board and targeting union leaders, [it] just further emphasizes the need for a union."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.