SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Starbucks Workers United members and supporters--including Socialist Alternative Seattle City Council Member Kshama Sawant (front, right) protest at a January 25, 2022 rally in support of unionization in Seattle. (Photo: Starbucks Workers United/Twitter)
NLRB Complaint Accuses Starbucks of Retaliating Against Union Leaders
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees" seeking to unionize in Arizona.
Mar 15, 2022
The National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday filed a complaint on behalf of Starbucks Workers United--a labor group helping employees at nearly 140 U.S. Starbucks stores to unionize--alleging the coffee giant retaliated and discriminated against union leaders in Phoenix, Arizona.
According to Bloomberg, the Phoenix NLRB regional director formally accused Starbucks of illegally surveilling and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize.
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees."
Starbucks Workers United this week also filed charges with the NLRB accusing Starbucks of slashing worker hours in a deliberate union-busting bid.
"These hours cuts are in swift response to workplace organizing campaigns at Starbucks stores around the country," the union said, according to More Perfect Union.
"The reduction of hours has resulted in lost pay; has rendered, or will soon render, employees ineligible for benefits that have hours-worked eligibility requirements, including healthcare coverage and the Starbucks College Achievement Plan (tuition coverage); and has or will soon result in the constructive discharge of Starbucks employees," the complaint--which alleges that the shift cuts are occurring in at least 20 states--says.
"In the eight years I've worked for Starbucks, I've never seen the company slash hours this severely or this widely," Sarah Pappin, a Starbucks shift supervisor in Seattle, told More Perfect Union. "While it's true we trim hours in January and February, I've never [seen] us cut hours like this in March when our business is already ramping up for the season."
"Many of my coworkers have no idea how they're going to pay rent for April," Pappin added. "Some of my core that were previously getting scheduled 20-plus hours a week are being scheduled less than 10 now."
Joseph Thompson, a barista at a Santa Cruz, California Starbucks, said in a statement that "as a full-time, low-income college student, I rely on at least 20 hours a week for benefits and paying bills. Living paycheck to paycheck is already hard, but now that Starbucks is cutting hours across the board and targeting union leaders, [it] just further emphasizes the need for a union."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday filed a complaint on behalf of Starbucks Workers United--a labor group helping employees at nearly 140 U.S. Starbucks stores to unionize--alleging the coffee giant retaliated and discriminated against union leaders in Phoenix, Arizona.
According to Bloomberg, the Phoenix NLRB regional director formally accused Starbucks of illegally surveilling and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize.
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees."
Starbucks Workers United this week also filed charges with the NLRB accusing Starbucks of slashing worker hours in a deliberate union-busting bid.
"These hours cuts are in swift response to workplace organizing campaigns at Starbucks stores around the country," the union said, according to More Perfect Union.
"The reduction of hours has resulted in lost pay; has rendered, or will soon render, employees ineligible for benefits that have hours-worked eligibility requirements, including healthcare coverage and the Starbucks College Achievement Plan (tuition coverage); and has or will soon result in the constructive discharge of Starbucks employees," the complaint--which alleges that the shift cuts are occurring in at least 20 states--says.
"In the eight years I've worked for Starbucks, I've never seen the company slash hours this severely or this widely," Sarah Pappin, a Starbucks shift supervisor in Seattle, told More Perfect Union. "While it's true we trim hours in January and February, I've never [seen] us cut hours like this in March when our business is already ramping up for the season."
"Many of my coworkers have no idea how they're going to pay rent for April," Pappin added. "Some of my core that were previously getting scheduled 20-plus hours a week are being scheduled less than 10 now."
Joseph Thompson, a barista at a Santa Cruz, California Starbucks, said in a statement that "as a full-time, low-income college student, I rely on at least 20 hours a week for benefits and paying bills. Living paycheck to paycheck is already hard, but now that Starbucks is cutting hours across the board and targeting union leaders, [it] just further emphasizes the need for a union."
The National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday filed a complaint on behalf of Starbucks Workers United--a labor group helping employees at nearly 140 U.S. Starbucks stores to unionize--alleging the coffee giant retaliated and discriminated against union leaders in Phoenix, Arizona.
According to Bloomberg, the Phoenix NLRB regional director formally accused Starbucks of illegally surveilling and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize.
The federal agency said the company "has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees."
Starbucks Workers United this week also filed charges with the NLRB accusing Starbucks of slashing worker hours in a deliberate union-busting bid.
"These hours cuts are in swift response to workplace organizing campaigns at Starbucks stores around the country," the union said, according to More Perfect Union.
"The reduction of hours has resulted in lost pay; has rendered, or will soon render, employees ineligible for benefits that have hours-worked eligibility requirements, including healthcare coverage and the Starbucks College Achievement Plan (tuition coverage); and has or will soon result in the constructive discharge of Starbucks employees," the complaint--which alleges that the shift cuts are occurring in at least 20 states--says.
"In the eight years I've worked for Starbucks, I've never seen the company slash hours this severely or this widely," Sarah Pappin, a Starbucks shift supervisor in Seattle, told More Perfect Union. "While it's true we trim hours in January and February, I've never [seen] us cut hours like this in March when our business is already ramping up for the season."
"Many of my coworkers have no idea how they're going to pay rent for April," Pappin added. "Some of my core that were previously getting scheduled 20-plus hours a week are being scheduled less than 10 now."
Joseph Thompson, a barista at a Santa Cruz, California Starbucks, said in a statement that "as a full-time, low-income college student, I rely on at least 20 hours a week for benefits and paying bills. Living paycheck to paycheck is already hard, but now that Starbucks is cutting hours across the board and targeting union leaders, [it] just further emphasizes the need for a union."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.