SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
An immigrant family seeking asylum prepare to be taken to a border patrol processing facility after crossing into the U.S. on June 16, 2021 in LaJoya, Texas. (Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
'Unnecessary and Irresponsible': Biden Slammed for Continuation of Trump-Era Deportation Policy
"Expelling asylum seekers has never been about public health," said one immigrant rights group.
Feb 04, 2022
Immigrant rights defenders redoubled their calls to end a Trump-era deportation policy known as Title 42 after the CDC confirmed Thursday that the measure will remain in place despite long-standing criticism.
"We need a humane, functioning asylum system. Not Title 42," tweeted the National Immigration Forum.
Setting off a wave of criticism was new reporting by CBS News on the CDC's latest assessment of the policy.
Widely condemned since it was first invoked by the Trump administration at the start of the pandemic, Title 42 relies on a clause in public health law to restrict immigration at the border. Rights groups like Amnesty International USA, however, have said it's been exploited by both the current and former administrations to unjustly expel hundreds of thousands of asylum-seekers.
"Public health advocates, including former officials from the CDC, have long contended that Title 42 has no public health rationale," Amy Fischer, Americas advocacy director at the group, said in a December statement. "Instead, it serves as a politically-motivated tool, using racist, xenophobic tropes about immigrants to weaponize Covid-19 against migrants and asylum-seekers."
In a decision that sparked outrage from human rights defenders, the administration announced in December--months after it fought to keep the Title 42 on the books--that it was continuing the policy, and, according to the new reporting, it will continue to remain in effect.
According to CBS News, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky instructed officials in August to review the policy every 60 days. A third assessment that ended this week resulted in a determination to keep Title 42 in effect.
"The current reassessment examined the present impact of the pandemic throughout the United States and at the U.S. borders, taking special note of the surge in cases and hospitalizations since December due to the highly transmissible Omicron variant," a CDC spokesperson told the outlet.
Among those expressing concern in response to the announcement was former Democratic presidential candidate and secretary of housing and urban development Julian Castro.
"Not only is this a wrong, overly burdensome and cruel policy, it may help bring about a spectacular collapse of the Democratic base this November and in 2024," he tweeted. "It's unnecessary and irresponsible all around."
The Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project rejected the basis for the policy, saying that "expelling asylum seekers has never been about public health."
The new reporting came days after over 100 groups urged the Biden administration to drop the policy.
"Title 42 expulsions have nothing to do with protecting public health and are not necessary to protect the public from the spread of Covid-19," they wrote to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.
"Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic," they wrote, "public health experts, the UN Refugee Agency, and other humanitarian advocates have demonstrated that it is possible to protect public health and ensure access to asylum simultaneously. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) objected to the use of Title 42 for mass expulsions of migrants and confirmed such expulsions lacked a valid public health basis. Your chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci has himself stated that immigrants are 'absolutely not' driving a Covid-19 outbreak and that expelling migrants is not a solution to an outbreak."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Immigrant rights defenders redoubled their calls to end a Trump-era deportation policy known as Title 42 after the CDC confirmed Thursday that the measure will remain in place despite long-standing criticism.
"We need a humane, functioning asylum system. Not Title 42," tweeted the National Immigration Forum.
Setting off a wave of criticism was new reporting by CBS News on the CDC's latest assessment of the policy.
Widely condemned since it was first invoked by the Trump administration at the start of the pandemic, Title 42 relies on a clause in public health law to restrict immigration at the border. Rights groups like Amnesty International USA, however, have said it's been exploited by both the current and former administrations to unjustly expel hundreds of thousands of asylum-seekers.
"Public health advocates, including former officials from the CDC, have long contended that Title 42 has no public health rationale," Amy Fischer, Americas advocacy director at the group, said in a December statement. "Instead, it serves as a politically-motivated tool, using racist, xenophobic tropes about immigrants to weaponize Covid-19 against migrants and asylum-seekers."
In a decision that sparked outrage from human rights defenders, the administration announced in December--months after it fought to keep the Title 42 on the books--that it was continuing the policy, and, according to the new reporting, it will continue to remain in effect.
According to CBS News, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky instructed officials in August to review the policy every 60 days. A third assessment that ended this week resulted in a determination to keep Title 42 in effect.
"The current reassessment examined the present impact of the pandemic throughout the United States and at the U.S. borders, taking special note of the surge in cases and hospitalizations since December due to the highly transmissible Omicron variant," a CDC spokesperson told the outlet.
Among those expressing concern in response to the announcement was former Democratic presidential candidate and secretary of housing and urban development Julian Castro.
"Not only is this a wrong, overly burdensome and cruel policy, it may help bring about a spectacular collapse of the Democratic base this November and in 2024," he tweeted. "It's unnecessary and irresponsible all around."
The Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project rejected the basis for the policy, saying that "expelling asylum seekers has never been about public health."
The new reporting came days after over 100 groups urged the Biden administration to drop the policy.
"Title 42 expulsions have nothing to do with protecting public health and are not necessary to protect the public from the spread of Covid-19," they wrote to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.
"Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic," they wrote, "public health experts, the UN Refugee Agency, and other humanitarian advocates have demonstrated that it is possible to protect public health and ensure access to asylum simultaneously. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) objected to the use of Title 42 for mass expulsions of migrants and confirmed such expulsions lacked a valid public health basis. Your chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci has himself stated that immigrants are 'absolutely not' driving a Covid-19 outbreak and that expelling migrants is not a solution to an outbreak."
Immigrant rights defenders redoubled their calls to end a Trump-era deportation policy known as Title 42 after the CDC confirmed Thursday that the measure will remain in place despite long-standing criticism.
"We need a humane, functioning asylum system. Not Title 42," tweeted the National Immigration Forum.
Setting off a wave of criticism was new reporting by CBS News on the CDC's latest assessment of the policy.
Widely condemned since it was first invoked by the Trump administration at the start of the pandemic, Title 42 relies on a clause in public health law to restrict immigration at the border. Rights groups like Amnesty International USA, however, have said it's been exploited by both the current and former administrations to unjustly expel hundreds of thousands of asylum-seekers.
"Public health advocates, including former officials from the CDC, have long contended that Title 42 has no public health rationale," Amy Fischer, Americas advocacy director at the group, said in a December statement. "Instead, it serves as a politically-motivated tool, using racist, xenophobic tropes about immigrants to weaponize Covid-19 against migrants and asylum-seekers."
In a decision that sparked outrage from human rights defenders, the administration announced in December--months after it fought to keep the Title 42 on the books--that it was continuing the policy, and, according to the new reporting, it will continue to remain in effect.
According to CBS News, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky instructed officials in August to review the policy every 60 days. A third assessment that ended this week resulted in a determination to keep Title 42 in effect.
"The current reassessment examined the present impact of the pandemic throughout the United States and at the U.S. borders, taking special note of the surge in cases and hospitalizations since December due to the highly transmissible Omicron variant," a CDC spokesperson told the outlet.
Among those expressing concern in response to the announcement was former Democratic presidential candidate and secretary of housing and urban development Julian Castro.
"Not only is this a wrong, overly burdensome and cruel policy, it may help bring about a spectacular collapse of the Democratic base this November and in 2024," he tweeted. "It's unnecessary and irresponsible all around."
The Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project rejected the basis for the policy, saying that "expelling asylum seekers has never been about public health."
The new reporting came days after over 100 groups urged the Biden administration to drop the policy.
"Title 42 expulsions have nothing to do with protecting public health and are not necessary to protect the public from the spread of Covid-19," they wrote to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.
"Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic," they wrote, "public health experts, the UN Refugee Agency, and other humanitarian advocates have demonstrated that it is possible to protect public health and ensure access to asylum simultaneously. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) objected to the use of Title 42 for mass expulsions of migrants and confirmed such expulsions lacked a valid public health basis. Your chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci has himself stated that immigrants are 'absolutely not' driving a Covid-19 outbreak and that expelling migrants is not a solution to an outbreak."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.