A voter casts his early voting ballot at a drop box outside City Hall on October 17, 2020 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo: Mark Makela/Getty Images)
Jan 28, 2022
A sweeping Pennsylvania voting rights law that won praise from across the political spectrum when it was passed in 2019 was struck down by a state court Friday after Republican lawmakers--several of whom had voted for the law--claimed it unlawfully helped President Joe Biden to win the state in 2020.
"This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
The conservative-leaning Commonwealth Court ruled 3-2 that Act 77 is unconstitutional, reasoning that an 1838 amendment to the state constitution says Pennsylvanians must vote in person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. The rule must be overturned by the adoption of a new amendment, said the court.
State Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the court's ruling "is based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning, and is wrong on the law."
Act 77 will remain in effect for the time being, as the Pennsylvania State Department responded to the Commonwealth Court's decision by promptly appealing the case to the state Supreme Court, automatically placing a stay on the ruling.
But voting rights advocates warned that another ruling in favor of the 14 Republicans who sued over the law after former President Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania in the 2020 election would have dire consequences for democracy.
\u201cAct 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support, and vote by mail is wildly popular with Pennsylvania voters. We expect an appeal and a quick decision by the PA Supreme Court. The fight's not over yet, folks.\u201d— Common Cause PA (@Common Cause PA) 1643380960
The ruling is "without merit and a partisan attack on voting in Pennsylvania," tweeted Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Penn.). "This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
Passed by a Republican state legislature and signed into law by a Democratic governor, Act 77 permits Pennsylvania to vote by mail or absentee ballot without providing a reason. It also invested $90 million in election infrastructure upgrades, created a permanent list of mail-in voters, and reduced the voter registration deadline to 15 days from 30 days before an election.
Eleven of the 14 Republicans who asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots after the 2020 election, claiming Act 77 was unconstitutional, voted for the law in 2019. Two of the lawmakers were not in office at the time and one voted against it.
\u201cPennsylvania Commonwealth court overturned Act 77 \u2014 the 2019 election reform law that expanded mail-in voting: https://t.co/WiW8p9Oa2A\n\nRepublicans are celebrating this decision.\n\nA small reminder: Act 77 was a *Republican* bill that they voted for and bragged about passing!\u201d— Abraham Gutman (@Abraham Gutman) 1643397153
"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," state Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in an opinion in November 2020, rejecting the lawmakers' claim that Act 77 is unconstitutional. "Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A sweeping Pennsylvania voting rights law that won praise from across the political spectrum when it was passed in 2019 was struck down by a state court Friday after Republican lawmakers--several of whom had voted for the law--claimed it unlawfully helped President Joe Biden to win the state in 2020.
"This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
The conservative-leaning Commonwealth Court ruled 3-2 that Act 77 is unconstitutional, reasoning that an 1838 amendment to the state constitution says Pennsylvanians must vote in person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. The rule must be overturned by the adoption of a new amendment, said the court.
State Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the court's ruling "is based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning, and is wrong on the law."
Act 77 will remain in effect for the time being, as the Pennsylvania State Department responded to the Commonwealth Court's decision by promptly appealing the case to the state Supreme Court, automatically placing a stay on the ruling.
But voting rights advocates warned that another ruling in favor of the 14 Republicans who sued over the law after former President Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania in the 2020 election would have dire consequences for democracy.
\u201cAct 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support, and vote by mail is wildly popular with Pennsylvania voters. We expect an appeal and a quick decision by the PA Supreme Court. The fight's not over yet, folks.\u201d— Common Cause PA (@Common Cause PA) 1643380960
The ruling is "without merit and a partisan attack on voting in Pennsylvania," tweeted Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Penn.). "This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
Passed by a Republican state legislature and signed into law by a Democratic governor, Act 77 permits Pennsylvania to vote by mail or absentee ballot without providing a reason. It also invested $90 million in election infrastructure upgrades, created a permanent list of mail-in voters, and reduced the voter registration deadline to 15 days from 30 days before an election.
Eleven of the 14 Republicans who asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots after the 2020 election, claiming Act 77 was unconstitutional, voted for the law in 2019. Two of the lawmakers were not in office at the time and one voted against it.
\u201cPennsylvania Commonwealth court overturned Act 77 \u2014 the 2019 election reform law that expanded mail-in voting: https://t.co/WiW8p9Oa2A\n\nRepublicans are celebrating this decision.\n\nA small reminder: Act 77 was a *Republican* bill that they voted for and bragged about passing!\u201d— Abraham Gutman (@Abraham Gutman) 1643397153
"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," state Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in an opinion in November 2020, rejecting the lawmakers' claim that Act 77 is unconstitutional. "Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear."
A sweeping Pennsylvania voting rights law that won praise from across the political spectrum when it was passed in 2019 was struck down by a state court Friday after Republican lawmakers--several of whom had voted for the law--claimed it unlawfully helped President Joe Biden to win the state in 2020.
"This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
The conservative-leaning Commonwealth Court ruled 3-2 that Act 77 is unconstitutional, reasoning that an 1838 amendment to the state constitution says Pennsylvanians must vote in person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. The rule must be overturned by the adoption of a new amendment, said the court.
State Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the court's ruling "is based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning, and is wrong on the law."
Act 77 will remain in effect for the time being, as the Pennsylvania State Department responded to the Commonwealth Court's decision by promptly appealing the case to the state Supreme Court, automatically placing a stay on the ruling.
But voting rights advocates warned that another ruling in favor of the 14 Republicans who sued over the law after former President Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania in the 2020 election would have dire consequences for democracy.
\u201cAct 77 was passed with strong bipartisan support, and vote by mail is wildly popular with Pennsylvania voters. We expect an appeal and a quick decision by the PA Supreme Court. The fight's not over yet, folks.\u201d— Common Cause PA (@Common Cause PA) 1643380960
The ruling is "without merit and a partisan attack on voting in Pennsylvania," tweeted Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Penn.). "This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
Passed by a Republican state legislature and signed into law by a Democratic governor, Act 77 permits Pennsylvania to vote by mail or absentee ballot without providing a reason. It also invested $90 million in election infrastructure upgrades, created a permanent list of mail-in voters, and reduced the voter registration deadline to 15 days from 30 days before an election.
Eleven of the 14 Republicans who asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots after the 2020 election, claiming Act 77 was unconstitutional, voted for the law in 2019. Two of the lawmakers were not in office at the time and one voted against it.
\u201cPennsylvania Commonwealth court overturned Act 77 \u2014 the 2019 election reform law that expanded mail-in voting: https://t.co/WiW8p9Oa2A\n\nRepublicans are celebrating this decision.\n\nA small reminder: Act 77 was a *Republican* bill that they voted for and bragged about passing!\u201d— Abraham Gutman (@Abraham Gutman) 1643397153
"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," state Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in an opinion in November 2020, rejecting the lawmakers' claim that Act 77 is unconstitutional. "Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.