SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A voter casts his early voting ballot at a drop box outside City Hall on October 17, 2020 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo: Mark Makela/Getty Images)
'Egregious': Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down Mail-In Voting Law
The ruling was stayed pending an appeal to the state's Supreme Court and as one voting advocate put it: "The fight's not over yet, folks."
Jan 28, 2022
A sweeping Pennsylvania voting rights law that won praise from across the political spectrum when it was passed in 2019 was struck down by a state court Friday after Republican lawmakers--several of whom had voted for the law--claimed it unlawfully helped President Joe Biden to win the state in 2020.
"This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
The conservative-leaning Commonwealth Court ruled 3-2 that Act 77 is unconstitutional, reasoning that an 1838 amendment to the state constitution says Pennsylvanians must vote in person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. The rule must be overturned by the adoption of a new amendment, said the court.
State Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the court's ruling "is based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning, and is wrong on the law."
Act 77 will remain in effect for the time being, as the Pennsylvania State Department responded to the Commonwealth Court's decision by promptly appealing the case to the state Supreme Court, automatically placing a stay on the ruling.
But voting rights advocates warned that another ruling in favor of the 14 Republicans who sued over the law after former President Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania in the 2020 election would have dire consequences for democracy.
The ruling is "without merit and a partisan attack on voting in Pennsylvania," tweeted Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Penn.). "This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
Passed by a Republican state legislature and signed into law by a Democratic governor, Act 77 permits Pennsylvania to vote by mail or absentee ballot without providing a reason. It also invested $90 million in election infrastructure upgrades, created a permanent list of mail-in voters, and reduced the voter registration deadline to 15 days from 30 days before an election.
Eleven of the 14 Republicans who asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots after the 2020 election, claiming Act 77 was unconstitutional, voted for the law in 2019. Two of the lawmakers were not in office at the time and one voted against it.
"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," state Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in an opinion in November 2020, rejecting the lawmakers' claim that Act 77 is unconstitutional. "Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A sweeping Pennsylvania voting rights law that won praise from across the political spectrum when it was passed in 2019 was struck down by a state court Friday after Republican lawmakers--several of whom had voted for the law--claimed it unlawfully helped President Joe Biden to win the state in 2020.
"This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
The conservative-leaning Commonwealth Court ruled 3-2 that Act 77 is unconstitutional, reasoning that an 1838 amendment to the state constitution says Pennsylvanians must vote in person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. The rule must be overturned by the adoption of a new amendment, said the court.
State Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the court's ruling "is based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning, and is wrong on the law."
Act 77 will remain in effect for the time being, as the Pennsylvania State Department responded to the Commonwealth Court's decision by promptly appealing the case to the state Supreme Court, automatically placing a stay on the ruling.
But voting rights advocates warned that another ruling in favor of the 14 Republicans who sued over the law after former President Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania in the 2020 election would have dire consequences for democracy.
The ruling is "without merit and a partisan attack on voting in Pennsylvania," tweeted Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Penn.). "This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
Passed by a Republican state legislature and signed into law by a Democratic governor, Act 77 permits Pennsylvania to vote by mail or absentee ballot without providing a reason. It also invested $90 million in election infrastructure upgrades, created a permanent list of mail-in voters, and reduced the voter registration deadline to 15 days from 30 days before an election.
Eleven of the 14 Republicans who asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots after the 2020 election, claiming Act 77 was unconstitutional, voted for the law in 2019. Two of the lawmakers were not in office at the time and one voted against it.
"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," state Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in an opinion in November 2020, rejecting the lawmakers' claim that Act 77 is unconstitutional. "Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear."
A sweeping Pennsylvania voting rights law that won praise from across the political spectrum when it was passed in 2019 was struck down by a state court Friday after Republican lawmakers--several of whom had voted for the law--claimed it unlawfully helped President Joe Biden to win the state in 2020.
"This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
The conservative-leaning Commonwealth Court ruled 3-2 that Act 77 is unconstitutional, reasoning that an 1838 amendment to the state constitution says Pennsylvanians must vote in person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. The rule must be overturned by the adoption of a new amendment, said the court.
State Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the court's ruling "is based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning, and is wrong on the law."
Act 77 will remain in effect for the time being, as the Pennsylvania State Department responded to the Commonwealth Court's decision by promptly appealing the case to the state Supreme Court, automatically placing a stay on the ruling.
But voting rights advocates warned that another ruling in favor of the 14 Republicans who sued over the law after former President Donald Trump lost Pennsylvania in the 2020 election would have dire consequences for democracy.
The ruling is "without merit and a partisan attack on voting in Pennsylvania," tweeted Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Penn.). "This must not stand and I look forward to an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme to correct this egregious ruling."
Passed by a Republican state legislature and signed into law by a Democratic governor, Act 77 permits Pennsylvania to vote by mail or absentee ballot without providing a reason. It also invested $90 million in election infrastructure upgrades, created a permanent list of mail-in voters, and reduced the voter registration deadline to 15 days from 30 days before an election.
Eleven of the 14 Republicans who asked the state Supreme Court to invalidate mail-in ballots after the 2020 election, claiming Act 77 was unconstitutional, voted for the law in 2019. Two of the lawmakers were not in office at the time and one voted against it.
"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," state Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in an opinion in November 2020, rejecting the lawmakers' claim that Act 77 is unconstitutional. "Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.