

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Pro-choice demonstrators protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on November 1, 2021. (Photo: Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Reproductive rights advocates said Tuesday that women in Texas are suffering and their rights are being violated by the state's forced-pregnancy law as they called on the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene to end the delay of their lawsuit now languishing in a lower federal court.
"For 125 days, Texans have fled to find reproductive care. SCOTUS needs to act immediately and put an end to these delays."
In legal filings Monday night, the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) and other groups said a right-wing federal appeals court is unnecessarily delaying their case and demanded the court return their challenge to a district court judge.
When it ruled that S.B. 8 could stand in December--banning abortion care in the state past six weeks of pregnancy--the Supreme Court also decided that abortion providers in Texas could move forward with their challenge to the law. The providers were permitted to sue licensing officials to block them from enforcing S.B. 8, which also deputizes ordinary citizens and allows them to sue anyone who helps a pregnant person obtain abortion care.
The high court returned the case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is dominated by conservative judges and has refused to send the case back to the district court which previously ruled in the providers' favor--a delay the ACLU condemned as "unconscionable, cruel, and downright dangerous."
In the weeks after S.B. 8 went into effect, Planned Parenthood in Oklahoma reported a 133% increase in patients from Texas, overwhelming clinics and leaving all patients with longer waits for healthcare.
"Countless people have already been forced to carry pregnancies against their will in a state with a severe maternal mortality crisis," said the ACLU.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals could prolong proceedings for months, advocates say, unless the Supreme Court requires the panel to return the case to the lower court.
"Absent intervention by the Court, the Fifth Circuit is poised to entertain questions already decided by the Court in direct violation of this Court's mandate and delay further resolution of this case in the district court by at least weeks, and potentially months or more," Marc Hearron, sebior counsel for the CRR, wrote in legal filings.
The CRR tweeted that it "won't stop fighting until Texas's unconstitutional law is blocked, for good."
The federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in the case on Friday.
"The Supreme Court must urgently step in to prevent the Fifth Circuit from needlessly delaying our lawsuit and compounding the harm this ban has already inflicted on Texans," said the ACLU. "Enough is enough."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Reproductive rights advocates said Tuesday that women in Texas are suffering and their rights are being violated by the state's forced-pregnancy law as they called on the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene to end the delay of their lawsuit now languishing in a lower federal court.
"For 125 days, Texans have fled to find reproductive care. SCOTUS needs to act immediately and put an end to these delays."
In legal filings Monday night, the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) and other groups said a right-wing federal appeals court is unnecessarily delaying their case and demanded the court return their challenge to a district court judge.
When it ruled that S.B. 8 could stand in December--banning abortion care in the state past six weeks of pregnancy--the Supreme Court also decided that abortion providers in Texas could move forward with their challenge to the law. The providers were permitted to sue licensing officials to block them from enforcing S.B. 8, which also deputizes ordinary citizens and allows them to sue anyone who helps a pregnant person obtain abortion care.
The high court returned the case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is dominated by conservative judges and has refused to send the case back to the district court which previously ruled in the providers' favor--a delay the ACLU condemned as "unconscionable, cruel, and downright dangerous."
In the weeks after S.B. 8 went into effect, Planned Parenthood in Oklahoma reported a 133% increase in patients from Texas, overwhelming clinics and leaving all patients with longer waits for healthcare.
"Countless people have already been forced to carry pregnancies against their will in a state with a severe maternal mortality crisis," said the ACLU.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals could prolong proceedings for months, advocates say, unless the Supreme Court requires the panel to return the case to the lower court.
"Absent intervention by the Court, the Fifth Circuit is poised to entertain questions already decided by the Court in direct violation of this Court's mandate and delay further resolution of this case in the district court by at least weeks, and potentially months or more," Marc Hearron, sebior counsel for the CRR, wrote in legal filings.
The CRR tweeted that it "won't stop fighting until Texas's unconstitutional law is blocked, for good."
The federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in the case on Friday.
"The Supreme Court must urgently step in to prevent the Fifth Circuit from needlessly delaying our lawsuit and compounding the harm this ban has already inflicted on Texans," said the ACLU. "Enough is enough."
Reproductive rights advocates said Tuesday that women in Texas are suffering and their rights are being violated by the state's forced-pregnancy law as they called on the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene to end the delay of their lawsuit now languishing in a lower federal court.
"For 125 days, Texans have fled to find reproductive care. SCOTUS needs to act immediately and put an end to these delays."
In legal filings Monday night, the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) and other groups said a right-wing federal appeals court is unnecessarily delaying their case and demanded the court return their challenge to a district court judge.
When it ruled that S.B. 8 could stand in December--banning abortion care in the state past six weeks of pregnancy--the Supreme Court also decided that abortion providers in Texas could move forward with their challenge to the law. The providers were permitted to sue licensing officials to block them from enforcing S.B. 8, which also deputizes ordinary citizens and allows them to sue anyone who helps a pregnant person obtain abortion care.
The high court returned the case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is dominated by conservative judges and has refused to send the case back to the district court which previously ruled in the providers' favor--a delay the ACLU condemned as "unconscionable, cruel, and downright dangerous."
In the weeks after S.B. 8 went into effect, Planned Parenthood in Oklahoma reported a 133% increase in patients from Texas, overwhelming clinics and leaving all patients with longer waits for healthcare.
"Countless people have already been forced to carry pregnancies against their will in a state with a severe maternal mortality crisis," said the ACLU.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals could prolong proceedings for months, advocates say, unless the Supreme Court requires the panel to return the case to the lower court.
"Absent intervention by the Court, the Fifth Circuit is poised to entertain questions already decided by the Court in direct violation of this Court's mandate and delay further resolution of this case in the district court by at least weeks, and potentially months or more," Marc Hearron, sebior counsel for the CRR, wrote in legal filings.
The CRR tweeted that it "won't stop fighting until Texas's unconstitutional law is blocked, for good."
The federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in the case on Friday.
"The Supreme Court must urgently step in to prevent the Fifth Circuit from needlessly delaying our lawsuit and compounding the harm this ban has already inflicted on Texans," said the ACLU. "Enough is enough."