SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
People cast their ballots at the Richland County Voter Registration amd Elections Office on October 6, 2020 in Columbia, South Carolina. (Photo: Sean Rayford/Getty Images)
'Packing and Cracking': New Lawsuit Challenges South Carolina's Racial Redistricting
"This is classic gerrymandering. South Carolina lawmakers surgically carved up Black communities in key areas of the state to entrench their own political power. It has got to stop."
Dec 24, 2021
Alleging that South Carolina's Republican-controlled Legislature gerrymandered the state's House district map to intentionally discriminate against Black voters, civil rights groups on Thursday filed a lawsuit against Gov. Henry McMaster and state legislative and elections leaders to challenge the new redistricting law.
"The South Carolina Legislature enacted racially gerrymandered and intentionally dilutive state House districts that minimize Black South Carolinian voting power."
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court by the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and voter Taiwan Scott, who are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), the ACLU of South Carolina, Boroughs Bryant LLC, Arnold & Porter, and the General Counsel's Office of the NAACP. Those same groups sued the state in October over delays in mandatory post-Census redistricting.
Defendants include McMaster--who is a Republican--as well as GOP state Sens. Thomas Alexander and Luke Rankin; state Reps. James Lucas, Chris Murphy, and Wallace Jordan; and South Carolina Election Commission Chair John Wells.
At issue is H. 4493, which the plaintiffs claim was passed "in a flawed and nontransparent process" meant to disempower Black voters and solidify GOP control of the state Legislature.
"This is classic gerrymandering. South Carolina lawmakers surgically carved up Black communities in key areas of the state to entrench their own political power," said ACLU attorney Somil Trivedi. "It has got to stop."
The lawsuit alleges the South Carolina Legislature, which delayed redrawing the state's electoral districts as required after every decennial Census, "traded one constitutional violation--malapportionment--for two others: racial gerrymandering and intentional racial discrimination."
State lawmakers' gerrymandering "and intentional vote dilution in certain state House districts continues South Carolina's shameful history and ongoing record of discrimination," the suit claims.
"For every redistricting cycle since Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965... courts have needed to adjudicate racial discrimination claims relating to South Carolina state and/or congressional redistricting plans," the complaint notes. "This post-2020 redistricting cycle is no different."
According to the lawsuit:
House Bill 4493... which enacted racially gerrymandered districts into law and was motivated, at least in part, by a discriminatory purpose, is the latest example of a decades-long pattern by the Legislature of proposing or enacting state legislative districts that discriminate against Black voters to maintain the majority's power and deny Black South Carolinian voting power. The Legislature did so by using race as the predominant factor in creating certain state House districts without a legally acceptable justification and having a discriminatory purpose in packing and cracking Black voters to dilute their vote.
"Packing" refers to the practice of placing people of color in the same district in order to prevent them from having greater political power in surrounding districts. "Cracking" is the splitting of communities of color to dilute their power in a given district.
Brenda Murphy, president of the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, said that "this lawsuit is necessary to remedy the racial discrimination motivating H. 4493's passage and racially gerrymandered state House districts."
"For every redistricting cycle since Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965... courts have needed to adjudicate racial discrimination claims relating to South Carolina."
"Equal electoral access and fair representation are critical for the members and volunteers of the South Carolina NAACP," Murphy stated. "Elected officials must be responsive and accountable to the needs of Black communities throughout South Carolina."
Leah Aden, deputy director of litigation at LDF, said in a statement that the redistricting law "represents the latest iteration of South Carolina's ongoing record of racial discrimination against Black voters."
"The South Carolina Legislature enacted racially gerrymandered and intentionally dilutive state House districts that minimize Black South Carolinian voting power," she continued. "And the harms are predictable: Black voters will have fewer opportunities to elect candidates of choice or influence elections and thus have representatives who will be responsive to their needs for housing, economic, educational, and public safety opportunities."
"The challenged discriminatory districts should not stand," Aden asserted.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Alleging that South Carolina's Republican-controlled Legislature gerrymandered the state's House district map to intentionally discriminate against Black voters, civil rights groups on Thursday filed a lawsuit against Gov. Henry McMaster and state legislative and elections leaders to challenge the new redistricting law.
"The South Carolina Legislature enacted racially gerrymandered and intentionally dilutive state House districts that minimize Black South Carolinian voting power."
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court by the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and voter Taiwan Scott, who are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), the ACLU of South Carolina, Boroughs Bryant LLC, Arnold & Porter, and the General Counsel's Office of the NAACP. Those same groups sued the state in October over delays in mandatory post-Census redistricting.
Defendants include McMaster--who is a Republican--as well as GOP state Sens. Thomas Alexander and Luke Rankin; state Reps. James Lucas, Chris Murphy, and Wallace Jordan; and South Carolina Election Commission Chair John Wells.
At issue is H. 4493, which the plaintiffs claim was passed "in a flawed and nontransparent process" meant to disempower Black voters and solidify GOP control of the state Legislature.
"This is classic gerrymandering. South Carolina lawmakers surgically carved up Black communities in key areas of the state to entrench their own political power," said ACLU attorney Somil Trivedi. "It has got to stop."
The lawsuit alleges the South Carolina Legislature, which delayed redrawing the state's electoral districts as required after every decennial Census, "traded one constitutional violation--malapportionment--for two others: racial gerrymandering and intentional racial discrimination."
State lawmakers' gerrymandering "and intentional vote dilution in certain state House districts continues South Carolina's shameful history and ongoing record of discrimination," the suit claims.
"For every redistricting cycle since Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965... courts have needed to adjudicate racial discrimination claims relating to South Carolina state and/or congressional redistricting plans," the complaint notes. "This post-2020 redistricting cycle is no different."
According to the lawsuit:
House Bill 4493... which enacted racially gerrymandered districts into law and was motivated, at least in part, by a discriminatory purpose, is the latest example of a decades-long pattern by the Legislature of proposing or enacting state legislative districts that discriminate against Black voters to maintain the majority's power and deny Black South Carolinian voting power. The Legislature did so by using race as the predominant factor in creating certain state House districts without a legally acceptable justification and having a discriminatory purpose in packing and cracking Black voters to dilute their vote.
"Packing" refers to the practice of placing people of color in the same district in order to prevent them from having greater political power in surrounding districts. "Cracking" is the splitting of communities of color to dilute their power in a given district.
Brenda Murphy, president of the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, said that "this lawsuit is necessary to remedy the racial discrimination motivating H. 4493's passage and racially gerrymandered state House districts."
"For every redistricting cycle since Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965... courts have needed to adjudicate racial discrimination claims relating to South Carolina."
"Equal electoral access and fair representation are critical for the members and volunteers of the South Carolina NAACP," Murphy stated. "Elected officials must be responsive and accountable to the needs of Black communities throughout South Carolina."
Leah Aden, deputy director of litigation at LDF, said in a statement that the redistricting law "represents the latest iteration of South Carolina's ongoing record of racial discrimination against Black voters."
"The South Carolina Legislature enacted racially gerrymandered and intentionally dilutive state House districts that minimize Black South Carolinian voting power," she continued. "And the harms are predictable: Black voters will have fewer opportunities to elect candidates of choice or influence elections and thus have representatives who will be responsive to their needs for housing, economic, educational, and public safety opportunities."
"The challenged discriminatory districts should not stand," Aden asserted.
From Your Site Articles
Alleging that South Carolina's Republican-controlled Legislature gerrymandered the state's House district map to intentionally discriminate against Black voters, civil rights groups on Thursday filed a lawsuit against Gov. Henry McMaster and state legislative and elections leaders to challenge the new redistricting law.
"The South Carolina Legislature enacted racially gerrymandered and intentionally dilutive state House districts that minimize Black South Carolinian voting power."
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court by the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and voter Taiwan Scott, who are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), the ACLU of South Carolina, Boroughs Bryant LLC, Arnold & Porter, and the General Counsel's Office of the NAACP. Those same groups sued the state in October over delays in mandatory post-Census redistricting.
Defendants include McMaster--who is a Republican--as well as GOP state Sens. Thomas Alexander and Luke Rankin; state Reps. James Lucas, Chris Murphy, and Wallace Jordan; and South Carolina Election Commission Chair John Wells.
At issue is H. 4493, which the plaintiffs claim was passed "in a flawed and nontransparent process" meant to disempower Black voters and solidify GOP control of the state Legislature.
"This is classic gerrymandering. South Carolina lawmakers surgically carved up Black communities in key areas of the state to entrench their own political power," said ACLU attorney Somil Trivedi. "It has got to stop."
The lawsuit alleges the South Carolina Legislature, which delayed redrawing the state's electoral districts as required after every decennial Census, "traded one constitutional violation--malapportionment--for two others: racial gerrymandering and intentional racial discrimination."
State lawmakers' gerrymandering "and intentional vote dilution in certain state House districts continues South Carolina's shameful history and ongoing record of discrimination," the suit claims.
"For every redistricting cycle since Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965... courts have needed to adjudicate racial discrimination claims relating to South Carolina state and/or congressional redistricting plans," the complaint notes. "This post-2020 redistricting cycle is no different."
According to the lawsuit:
House Bill 4493... which enacted racially gerrymandered districts into law and was motivated, at least in part, by a discriminatory purpose, is the latest example of a decades-long pattern by the Legislature of proposing or enacting state legislative districts that discriminate against Black voters to maintain the majority's power and deny Black South Carolinian voting power. The Legislature did so by using race as the predominant factor in creating certain state House districts without a legally acceptable justification and having a discriminatory purpose in packing and cracking Black voters to dilute their vote.
"Packing" refers to the practice of placing people of color in the same district in order to prevent them from having greater political power in surrounding districts. "Cracking" is the splitting of communities of color to dilute their power in a given district.
Brenda Murphy, president of the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, said that "this lawsuit is necessary to remedy the racial discrimination motivating H. 4493's passage and racially gerrymandered state House districts."
"For every redistricting cycle since Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965... courts have needed to adjudicate racial discrimination claims relating to South Carolina."
"Equal electoral access and fair representation are critical for the members and volunteers of the South Carolina NAACP," Murphy stated. "Elected officials must be responsive and accountable to the needs of Black communities throughout South Carolina."
Leah Aden, deputy director of litigation at LDF, said in a statement that the redistricting law "represents the latest iteration of South Carolina's ongoing record of racial discrimination against Black voters."
"The South Carolina Legislature enacted racially gerrymandered and intentionally dilutive state House districts that minimize Black South Carolinian voting power," she continued. "And the harms are predictable: Black voters will have fewer opportunities to elect candidates of choice or influence elections and thus have representatives who will be responsive to their needs for housing, economic, educational, and public safety opportunities."
"The challenged discriminatory districts should not stand," Aden asserted.
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.