SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange hold placards outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London on December 10, 2021. (Photo: Niklas Halle'n/AFP via Getty Images)
Press Freedoms Under 'Grave Threat' as British Court Rules Assange Can Be Extradited to US
"This is an utterly shameful development that has alarming implications not only for Assange's mental health, but also for journalism and press freedom around the world."
Dec 10, 2021
This is a developing news story... Check back for possible updates...
A British court ruled Friday that WikiLeaks founder and publisher Julian Assange can be extradited to the United States to face charges of violating the Espionage Act, a decision that rights groups say poses a profound threat to global press freedoms.
"How can it be fair, how can it be right... to extradite Julian to the very country which plotted to kill him?"
"This is an utterly shameful development that has alarming implications not only for Assange's mental health, but also for journalism and press freedom around the world," Rebecca Vincent, director of international campaigns for Reporters Without Borders, said in response to the ruling.
The decision, which Assange's legal team is expected to appeal, overturns an earlier ruling by Judge Vanessa Baraitser of the Westminster Magistrates' Court, who argued in January that extradition would endanger the WikiLeaks founder's life.
"We will appeal this decision at the earliest possible moment," Stella Moris, Assange's fiancee, said in a statement. "How can it be fair, how can it be right, how can it be possible, to extradite Julian to the very country which plotted to kill him?"
The Biden administration has thus far ignored pressure from human rights groups to drop the charges, which stem from Assange's publication of classified information that exposed U.S. war crimes. The Espionage Act charges were filed during the tenure of former President Donald Trump, whose administration reportedly considered assassinating or kidnapping Assange, who has been detained in a high-security London prison since 2019.
"Julian's life is once more under grave threat, and so is the right of journalists to publish material that governments and corporations find inconvenient," Kristinn Hrafnsson, editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, said Friday. "This is about the right of a free press to publish without being threatened by a bullying superpower."
The British court's ruling in favor of Assange's extradition came on the final day of the U.S.-hosted "Summit for Democracy," an irony that was not lost on critics.
"Biden's administration cannot reasonably claim to support principles of democracy and human rights while at the same time seeking the extradition of a publisher, Julian Assange, which is opposed by global press freedom organizations," Shadowproof's Kevin Gosztola argued in response to the decision.
Christophe Deloire, executive director of Reporters Without Borders, warned that the British court's ruling could "prove historic for all the wrong reasons."
"We defend this case because of its dangerous implications for the future of press freedom around the world," said Deloire. "It is time to put a stop to this more than decade-long persecution once and for all. It is time to free Assange."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
This is a developing news story... Check back for possible updates...
A British court ruled Friday that WikiLeaks founder and publisher Julian Assange can be extradited to the United States to face charges of violating the Espionage Act, a decision that rights groups say poses a profound threat to global press freedoms.
"How can it be fair, how can it be right... to extradite Julian to the very country which plotted to kill him?"
"This is an utterly shameful development that has alarming implications not only for Assange's mental health, but also for journalism and press freedom around the world," Rebecca Vincent, director of international campaigns for Reporters Without Borders, said in response to the ruling.
The decision, which Assange's legal team is expected to appeal, overturns an earlier ruling by Judge Vanessa Baraitser of the Westminster Magistrates' Court, who argued in January that extradition would endanger the WikiLeaks founder's life.
"We will appeal this decision at the earliest possible moment," Stella Moris, Assange's fiancee, said in a statement. "How can it be fair, how can it be right, how can it be possible, to extradite Julian to the very country which plotted to kill him?"
The Biden administration has thus far ignored pressure from human rights groups to drop the charges, which stem from Assange's publication of classified information that exposed U.S. war crimes. The Espionage Act charges were filed during the tenure of former President Donald Trump, whose administration reportedly considered assassinating or kidnapping Assange, who has been detained in a high-security London prison since 2019.
"Julian's life is once more under grave threat, and so is the right of journalists to publish material that governments and corporations find inconvenient," Kristinn Hrafnsson, editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, said Friday. "This is about the right of a free press to publish without being threatened by a bullying superpower."
The British court's ruling in favor of Assange's extradition came on the final day of the U.S.-hosted "Summit for Democracy," an irony that was not lost on critics.
"Biden's administration cannot reasonably claim to support principles of democracy and human rights while at the same time seeking the extradition of a publisher, Julian Assange, which is opposed by global press freedom organizations," Shadowproof's Kevin Gosztola argued in response to the decision.
Christophe Deloire, executive director of Reporters Without Borders, warned that the British court's ruling could "prove historic for all the wrong reasons."
"We defend this case because of its dangerous implications for the future of press freedom around the world," said Deloire. "It is time to put a stop to this more than decade-long persecution once and for all. It is time to free Assange."
From Your Site Articles
- US Lawmakers Renew Call for Biden to Drop Charges Against Julian Assange ›
- Rights Groups Warn Extradition of Assange Would Have 'Dangerous Implications for Future of Journalism' ›
- Assange Had Stroke, Says Fiancee Stella Moris, Warning of 'Dangerous Impact' of Imprisonment ›
- 'Drop the Charges,' Says Amnesty Ahead of Key Julian Assange Hearing ›
- Despite WSJ Reporting, Julian Assange Lawyer Says 'No Indication' of Plea Deal ›
This is a developing news story... Check back for possible updates...
A British court ruled Friday that WikiLeaks founder and publisher Julian Assange can be extradited to the United States to face charges of violating the Espionage Act, a decision that rights groups say poses a profound threat to global press freedoms.
"How can it be fair, how can it be right... to extradite Julian to the very country which plotted to kill him?"
"This is an utterly shameful development that has alarming implications not only for Assange's mental health, but also for journalism and press freedom around the world," Rebecca Vincent, director of international campaigns for Reporters Without Borders, said in response to the ruling.
The decision, which Assange's legal team is expected to appeal, overturns an earlier ruling by Judge Vanessa Baraitser of the Westminster Magistrates' Court, who argued in January that extradition would endanger the WikiLeaks founder's life.
"We will appeal this decision at the earliest possible moment," Stella Moris, Assange's fiancee, said in a statement. "How can it be fair, how can it be right, how can it be possible, to extradite Julian to the very country which plotted to kill him?"
The Biden administration has thus far ignored pressure from human rights groups to drop the charges, which stem from Assange's publication of classified information that exposed U.S. war crimes. The Espionage Act charges were filed during the tenure of former President Donald Trump, whose administration reportedly considered assassinating or kidnapping Assange, who has been detained in a high-security London prison since 2019.
"Julian's life is once more under grave threat, and so is the right of journalists to publish material that governments and corporations find inconvenient," Kristinn Hrafnsson, editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, said Friday. "This is about the right of a free press to publish without being threatened by a bullying superpower."
The British court's ruling in favor of Assange's extradition came on the final day of the U.S.-hosted "Summit for Democracy," an irony that was not lost on critics.
"Biden's administration cannot reasonably claim to support principles of democracy and human rights while at the same time seeking the extradition of a publisher, Julian Assange, which is opposed by global press freedom organizations," Shadowproof's Kevin Gosztola argued in response to the decision.
Christophe Deloire, executive director of Reporters Without Borders, warned that the British court's ruling could "prove historic for all the wrong reasons."
"We defend this case because of its dangerous implications for the future of press freedom around the world," said Deloire. "It is time to put a stop to this more than decade-long persecution once and for all. It is time to free Assange."
From Your Site Articles
- US Lawmakers Renew Call for Biden to Drop Charges Against Julian Assange ›
- Rights Groups Warn Extradition of Assange Would Have 'Dangerous Implications for Future of Journalism' ›
- Assange Had Stroke, Says Fiancee Stella Moris, Warning of 'Dangerous Impact' of Imprisonment ›
- 'Drop the Charges,' Says Amnesty Ahead of Key Julian Assange Hearing ›
- Despite WSJ Reporting, Julian Assange Lawyer Says 'No Indication' of Plea Deal ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.