The sun goes down behind smokestacks in Schwelgern, Germany on June 27, 2019. (Photo: Marcel Kusch/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Climate Critics Warn of 'Big Gaps' in Biden Plan to Eliminate Overseas Fossil Fuel Funding
"It’s time to end government support for all fossil fuels everywhere," said one advocate.
Climate action groups expressed cautious optimism Friday after the Biden administration unveiled plans to immediately eliminate federal support for overseas fossil fuel projects--answering a demand long made by advocates and lawmakers--but warned that the new policy contains significant loopholes and called on the White House to take further action.
"The loopholes for 'strategic' projects, and the lack of action at home, leave big gaps."
According to a cable sent from administration to officials to U.S. embassies all over the world late last week, and first reported on by Bloomberg Friday, the U.S. for the first time will end federal support for coal terminals, power plants, and other projects.
"Our international energy engagement will center on promoting clean energy, advancing innovative technologies, boosting U.S. clean-tech competitiveness and providing financing and technical assistance to support net-zero transitions around the world," the officials told the embassies.
The move is expected to bring to a halt billions of dollars in annual overseas fossil fuel funding, including an average of $16 billion that went to natural gas projects between 2017 and 2019, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Jamie Henn, director of Fossil Free Media, credited "years of campaigning" by advocacy groups with pushing President Joe Biden to come to the decision, and called the announcement "a big step forward."
But loopholes in the plan did not go unnoticed by Henn and other advocates. As the Washington Post reported, funding will still be available for projects related to "compelling national security concerns, foreign policy considerations, or the need to expand energy access in vulnerable areas."
"The loopholes for 'strategic' projects, and the lack of action at home, leave big gaps," Henn tweeted. "It's time to end government support for all fossil fuels everywhere."
Bronwen Tucker, global public finance campaign co-manager for Oil Change International, expressed hope that the exemptions to the new guidance could be "implemented in good faith," in which case the policy "should end almost all U.S. international finance for fossil fuels."
"But if they are poorly interpreted, it could allow up to 61% ($6.9 billion) of U.S. international fossil fuel support since the Paris Agreement to continue," said Tucker. "The U.S. must also be much more ambitious and specific on how it will provide its fair share of climate finance, debt forgiveness, and renewable energy funding abroad to support a just transition."
Advocates also pushed the president to end support for fossil fuel projects in the U.S., including the Enbridge Line 3 and Dakota Access pipelines.
"Taxpayer money should not subsidize the destruction of the planet," said Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-Calif.), who was among the lawmakers who signed a letter in May calling on Biden to end overseas fossil fuel funding. "We also need to repeal fossil fuel subsidies here at home."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Climate action groups expressed cautious optimism Friday after the Biden administration unveiled plans to immediately eliminate federal support for overseas fossil fuel projects--answering a demand long made by advocates and lawmakers--but warned that the new policy contains significant loopholes and called on the White House to take further action.
"The loopholes for 'strategic' projects, and the lack of action at home, leave big gaps."
According to a cable sent from administration to officials to U.S. embassies all over the world late last week, and first reported on by Bloomberg Friday, the U.S. for the first time will end federal support for coal terminals, power plants, and other projects.
"Our international energy engagement will center on promoting clean energy, advancing innovative technologies, boosting U.S. clean-tech competitiveness and providing financing and technical assistance to support net-zero transitions around the world," the officials told the embassies.
The move is expected to bring to a halt billions of dollars in annual overseas fossil fuel funding, including an average of $16 billion that went to natural gas projects between 2017 and 2019, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Jamie Henn, director of Fossil Free Media, credited "years of campaigning" by advocacy groups with pushing President Joe Biden to come to the decision, and called the announcement "a big step forward."
But loopholes in the plan did not go unnoticed by Henn and other advocates. As the Washington Post reported, funding will still be available for projects related to "compelling national security concerns, foreign policy considerations, or the need to expand energy access in vulnerable areas."
"The loopholes for 'strategic' projects, and the lack of action at home, leave big gaps," Henn tweeted. "It's time to end government support for all fossil fuels everywhere."
Bronwen Tucker, global public finance campaign co-manager for Oil Change International, expressed hope that the exemptions to the new guidance could be "implemented in good faith," in which case the policy "should end almost all U.S. international finance for fossil fuels."
"But if they are poorly interpreted, it could allow up to 61% ($6.9 billion) of U.S. international fossil fuel support since the Paris Agreement to continue," said Tucker. "The U.S. must also be much more ambitious and specific on how it will provide its fair share of climate finance, debt forgiveness, and renewable energy funding abroad to support a just transition."
Advocates also pushed the president to end support for fossil fuel projects in the U.S., including the Enbridge Line 3 and Dakota Access pipelines.
"Taxpayer money should not subsidize the destruction of the planet," said Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-Calif.), who was among the lawmakers who signed a letter in May calling on Biden to end overseas fossil fuel funding. "We also need to repeal fossil fuel subsidies here at home."
Climate action groups expressed cautious optimism Friday after the Biden administration unveiled plans to immediately eliminate federal support for overseas fossil fuel projects--answering a demand long made by advocates and lawmakers--but warned that the new policy contains significant loopholes and called on the White House to take further action.
"The loopholes for 'strategic' projects, and the lack of action at home, leave big gaps."
According to a cable sent from administration to officials to U.S. embassies all over the world late last week, and first reported on by Bloomberg Friday, the U.S. for the first time will end federal support for coal terminals, power plants, and other projects.
"Our international energy engagement will center on promoting clean energy, advancing innovative technologies, boosting U.S. clean-tech competitiveness and providing financing and technical assistance to support net-zero transitions around the world," the officials told the embassies.
The move is expected to bring to a halt billions of dollars in annual overseas fossil fuel funding, including an average of $16 billion that went to natural gas projects between 2017 and 2019, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Jamie Henn, director of Fossil Free Media, credited "years of campaigning" by advocacy groups with pushing President Joe Biden to come to the decision, and called the announcement "a big step forward."
But loopholes in the plan did not go unnoticed by Henn and other advocates. As the Washington Post reported, funding will still be available for projects related to "compelling national security concerns, foreign policy considerations, or the need to expand energy access in vulnerable areas."
"The loopholes for 'strategic' projects, and the lack of action at home, leave big gaps," Henn tweeted. "It's time to end government support for all fossil fuels everywhere."
Bronwen Tucker, global public finance campaign co-manager for Oil Change International, expressed hope that the exemptions to the new guidance could be "implemented in good faith," in which case the policy "should end almost all U.S. international finance for fossil fuels."
"But if they are poorly interpreted, it could allow up to 61% ($6.9 billion) of U.S. international fossil fuel support since the Paris Agreement to continue," said Tucker. "The U.S. must also be much more ambitious and specific on how it will provide its fair share of climate finance, debt forgiveness, and renewable energy funding abroad to support a just transition."
Advocates also pushed the president to end support for fossil fuel projects in the U.S., including the Enbridge Line 3 and Dakota Access pipelines.
"Taxpayer money should not subsidize the destruction of the planet," said Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-Calif.), who was among the lawmakers who signed a letter in May calling on Biden to end overseas fossil fuel funding. "We also need to repeal fossil fuel subsidies here at home."