SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Climate activists rally against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell outside of the Federal Reserve Board Building on October 29, 2021 in Washington, D.C.
With President Joe Biden reportedly nearing a decision on his pick to head the Federal Reserve, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are ramping up their criticism of the central bank's current chair over his refusal to treat the climate crisis as a systemic threat.
"The Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat."
On Friday, Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) issued a joint statement announcing that they would oppose the renomination of Jerome Powell--a Trump appointee--for a second term as Fed chair.
"Powell refuses to recognize climate change as an urgent and systemic economic threat," the senators said. "During his tenure, Chair Powell first ignored climate change and then resisted calls for the Fed to use its tools to fight it, arguing that climate change 'is really an issue that is assigned to lots of other government agencies, not so much the Fed.'"
"Climate is not a long-term challenge for the Fed; it demands action now," they added. "Climate effects exacerbate supply chain struggles and commodity price volatility... President Biden must appoint a Fed chair who will ensure the Fed is fulfilling its mandate to safeguard our financial system and shares the administration's view that fighting climate change is the responsibility of every policymaker. That person is not Jerome Powell."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--who said in September that Powell's record of weakening Wall Street regulations makes him a "dangerous man"--and progressive House Democrats have also spoken out against the incumbent Fed chair, whose current term expires in February.
Biden has reportedly interviewed both Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard for the job, and the president could announce his pick as soon as this weekend. Given that Powell--a Republican--would likely have significant support from the Senate GOP, Democrats would need more than three senators to prevent him from staying on for another term.
On Friday evening, the Revolving Door Project (RDP)--which has vocally opposed Powell's renomination for a number of reasons--raised fresh concerns about the Fed chair's potential conflicts of interest, which the group characterized as "disqualifying."
In a statement, RDP director Jeff Hauser said that "Powell explicitly claimed to have received approval from the Office of Government Ethics to continue to hold municipal bonds as the Federal Reserve undertook extraordinary pandemic response efforts, including in the muni bond market."
"But an inquiry from the Revolving Door Project has revealed the absence of any records of any communications of any kind between Powell and the Office of Government Ethics, suggesting that Powell received no such approval, and seemingly contradicting his earlier statement to the press," said Hauser. "These revelations are yet another indictment of Powell's disregard for ethics rules and disrespect for the public he is meant to serve."
\u201cUPDATE: We received a response to one of our requests!\n \nThe Fed says it has no record of communications between Jerome Powell and the Office of Government Ethics in the last 2 yrs, despite his claims that he \u201cchecked with\u201d OGE about his conflicts at start of pandemic response\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1637356491
While voicing alarm over his possible ethics violations, Powell's progressive critics have largely focused on his climate record at the Fed, which one observer warned is "sleepwalking through climate chaos" and failing to utilize the tools at its disposal to mitigate risks posed by extreme weather and other consequences of planetary heating.
The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that fossil fuel corporations "were disproportionate beneficiaries of Fed programs meant to buoy U.S. businesses during the pandemic."
"Oil and gas companies have raked in record amounts of private-sector financing since the Fed's 2020 interest-rate cuts and corporate bond-buying programs, upending years of declining investment in fossil fuels," the Journal noted.
Yevgeny Shrago, policy counsel at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted in response to the Journal's reporting that "the Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat--bailouts that were broadened under Republican political pressure to specifically include many of these companies."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
With President Joe Biden reportedly nearing a decision on his pick to head the Federal Reserve, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are ramping up their criticism of the central bank's current chair over his refusal to treat the climate crisis as a systemic threat.
"The Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat."
On Friday, Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) issued a joint statement announcing that they would oppose the renomination of Jerome Powell--a Trump appointee--for a second term as Fed chair.
"Powell refuses to recognize climate change as an urgent and systemic economic threat," the senators said. "During his tenure, Chair Powell first ignored climate change and then resisted calls for the Fed to use its tools to fight it, arguing that climate change 'is really an issue that is assigned to lots of other government agencies, not so much the Fed.'"
"Climate is not a long-term challenge for the Fed; it demands action now," they added. "Climate effects exacerbate supply chain struggles and commodity price volatility... President Biden must appoint a Fed chair who will ensure the Fed is fulfilling its mandate to safeguard our financial system and shares the administration's view that fighting climate change is the responsibility of every policymaker. That person is not Jerome Powell."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--who said in September that Powell's record of weakening Wall Street regulations makes him a "dangerous man"--and progressive House Democrats have also spoken out against the incumbent Fed chair, whose current term expires in February.
Biden has reportedly interviewed both Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard for the job, and the president could announce his pick as soon as this weekend. Given that Powell--a Republican--would likely have significant support from the Senate GOP, Democrats would need more than three senators to prevent him from staying on for another term.
On Friday evening, the Revolving Door Project (RDP)--which has vocally opposed Powell's renomination for a number of reasons--raised fresh concerns about the Fed chair's potential conflicts of interest, which the group characterized as "disqualifying."
In a statement, RDP director Jeff Hauser said that "Powell explicitly claimed to have received approval from the Office of Government Ethics to continue to hold municipal bonds as the Federal Reserve undertook extraordinary pandemic response efforts, including in the muni bond market."
"But an inquiry from the Revolving Door Project has revealed the absence of any records of any communications of any kind between Powell and the Office of Government Ethics, suggesting that Powell received no such approval, and seemingly contradicting his earlier statement to the press," said Hauser. "These revelations are yet another indictment of Powell's disregard for ethics rules and disrespect for the public he is meant to serve."
\u201cUPDATE: We received a response to one of our requests!\n \nThe Fed says it has no record of communications between Jerome Powell and the Office of Government Ethics in the last 2 yrs, despite his claims that he \u201cchecked with\u201d OGE about his conflicts at start of pandemic response\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1637356491
While voicing alarm over his possible ethics violations, Powell's progressive critics have largely focused on his climate record at the Fed, which one observer warned is "sleepwalking through climate chaos" and failing to utilize the tools at its disposal to mitigate risks posed by extreme weather and other consequences of planetary heating.
The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that fossil fuel corporations "were disproportionate beneficiaries of Fed programs meant to buoy U.S. businesses during the pandemic."
"Oil and gas companies have raked in record amounts of private-sector financing since the Fed's 2020 interest-rate cuts and corporate bond-buying programs, upending years of declining investment in fossil fuels," the Journal noted.
Yevgeny Shrago, policy counsel at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted in response to the Journal's reporting that "the Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat--bailouts that were broadened under Republican political pressure to specifically include many of these companies."
With President Joe Biden reportedly nearing a decision on his pick to head the Federal Reserve, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are ramping up their criticism of the central bank's current chair over his refusal to treat the climate crisis as a systemic threat.
"The Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat."
On Friday, Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) issued a joint statement announcing that they would oppose the renomination of Jerome Powell--a Trump appointee--for a second term as Fed chair.
"Powell refuses to recognize climate change as an urgent and systemic economic threat," the senators said. "During his tenure, Chair Powell first ignored climate change and then resisted calls for the Fed to use its tools to fight it, arguing that climate change 'is really an issue that is assigned to lots of other government agencies, not so much the Fed.'"
"Climate is not a long-term challenge for the Fed; it demands action now," they added. "Climate effects exacerbate supply chain struggles and commodity price volatility... President Biden must appoint a Fed chair who will ensure the Fed is fulfilling its mandate to safeguard our financial system and shares the administration's view that fighting climate change is the responsibility of every policymaker. That person is not Jerome Powell."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--who said in September that Powell's record of weakening Wall Street regulations makes him a "dangerous man"--and progressive House Democrats have also spoken out against the incumbent Fed chair, whose current term expires in February.
Biden has reportedly interviewed both Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard for the job, and the president could announce his pick as soon as this weekend. Given that Powell--a Republican--would likely have significant support from the Senate GOP, Democrats would need more than three senators to prevent him from staying on for another term.
On Friday evening, the Revolving Door Project (RDP)--which has vocally opposed Powell's renomination for a number of reasons--raised fresh concerns about the Fed chair's potential conflicts of interest, which the group characterized as "disqualifying."
In a statement, RDP director Jeff Hauser said that "Powell explicitly claimed to have received approval from the Office of Government Ethics to continue to hold municipal bonds as the Federal Reserve undertook extraordinary pandemic response efforts, including in the muni bond market."
"But an inquiry from the Revolving Door Project has revealed the absence of any records of any communications of any kind between Powell and the Office of Government Ethics, suggesting that Powell received no such approval, and seemingly contradicting his earlier statement to the press," said Hauser. "These revelations are yet another indictment of Powell's disregard for ethics rules and disrespect for the public he is meant to serve."
\u201cUPDATE: We received a response to one of our requests!\n \nThe Fed says it has no record of communications between Jerome Powell and the Office of Government Ethics in the last 2 yrs, despite his claims that he \u201cchecked with\u201d OGE about his conflicts at start of pandemic response\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1637356491
While voicing alarm over his possible ethics violations, Powell's progressive critics have largely focused on his climate record at the Fed, which one observer warned is "sleepwalking through climate chaos" and failing to utilize the tools at its disposal to mitigate risks posed by extreme weather and other consequences of planetary heating.
The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that fossil fuel corporations "were disproportionate beneficiaries of Fed programs meant to buoy U.S. businesses during the pandemic."
"Oil and gas companies have raked in record amounts of private-sector financing since the Fed's 2020 interest-rate cuts and corporate bond-buying programs, upending years of declining investment in fossil fuels," the Journal noted.
Yevgeny Shrago, policy counsel at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted in response to the Journal's reporting that "the Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat--bailouts that were broadened under Republican political pressure to specifically include many of these companies."
"Bureau of Labor Statistics data is what determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits," said Rep. John Larson. "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position."
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick to replace the top labor statistics official he fired earlier this month has called Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" that needs to be "sunset," comments that critics said further disqualify the nominee for the key government role.
During a December 2024 radio interview, Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni said it is a "mathematical fiction" that Social Security "can go on forever" and called for "some kind of transition program where unfortunately you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes, but never actually receive any of those benefits."
"That's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s," Antoni continued. "You're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security. Eventually, you need to sunset the program."
Trump's choice for the Commissioner of the Bureau Labor Statistics called Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" in an interview:
" What you need to do is have some kind of transition program where unfortunately you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes, but… pic.twitter.com/MXL7k1C644
— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) August 12, 2025
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), one of Social Security's most vocal defenders in Congress, said Antoni's position on the program matters because "Bureau of Labor Statistics data is what determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits."
"It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position," Larson said in a statement. "I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work."
Trump announced Antoni's nomination to serve as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) less than two weeks after the president fired the agency's former head, Erika McEntarfer, following the release of abysmal jobs figures. The firing sparked concerns that future BLS data will be manipulated to suit Trump's political interests.
Antoni was a contributor to the far-right Project 2025 agenda that the Trump administration appears to have drawn from repeatedly this year, and his position on Social Security echoes that of far-right billionaire Elon Musk, who has also falsely characterized the program as a Ponzi scheme.
During his time in the Trump administration, Musk spearheaded an assault on the Social Security Administration that continues in the present, causing widespread chaos at the agency and increasing wait times for beneficiaries.
"President Trump fired the commissioner of Labor Statistics to cover up a weak jobs report—and now he is replacing her with a Project 2025 lackey who wants to shut down Social Security," said Larson. "E.J. Antoni agrees with Elon Musk that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and said that middle-class seniors would be better off if it was eliminated."
"This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves," said one Amnesty campaigner.
After leaked drafts exposed the Trump administration's plans to downplay human rights abuses in some allied countries, including Israel, the U.S. Department of State released the final edition of an annual report on Tuesday, sparking fresh condemnation.
"Breaking with precedent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not provide a written introduction to the report nor did he make remarks about it," CNN reported. Still, Amanda Klasing, Amnesty International USA's national director of government relations and advocacy, called him out by name in a Tuesday statement.
"With the release of the U.S. State Department's human rights report, it is clear that the Trump administration has engaged in a very selective documentation of human rights abuses in certain countries," Klasing said. "In addition to eliminating entire sections for certain countries—for example discrimination against LGBTQ+ people—there are also arbitrary omissions within existing sections of the report based on the country."
Klasing explained that "we have criticized past reports when warranted, but have never seen reports quite like this. Never before have the reports gone this far in prioritizing an administration's political agenda over a consistent and truthful accounting of human rights violations around the world—softening criticism in some countries while ignoring violations in others. The State Department has said in relation to the reports less is more. However, for the victims and human rights defenders who rely on these reports to shine light on abuses and violations, less is just less."
"Secretary Rubio knows full well from his time in the Senate how vital these reports are in informing policy decisions and shaping diplomatic conversations, yet he has made the dangerous and short-sighted decision to put out a truncated version that doesn't tell the whole story of human rights violations," she continued. "This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves."
"Failing to adequately report on human rights violations further damages the credibility of the U.S. on human rights issues," she added. "It's shameful that the Trump administration and Secretary Rubio are putting politics above human lives."
The overarching report—which includes over 100 individual country reports—covers 2024, the last full calendar year of the Biden administration. The appendix says that in March, the report was "streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, and to be more responsive to the underlying legislative mandate and aligned to the administration's executive orders."
As CNN detailed:
The latest report was stripped of many of the specific sections included in past reports, including reporting on alleged abuses based on sexual orientation, violence toward women, corruption in government, systemic racial or ethnic violence, or denial of a fair public trial. Some country reports, including for Afghanistan, do address human rights abuses against women.
"We were asked to edit down the human rights reports to the bare minimum of what was statutorily required," said Michael Honigstein, the former director of African Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Human Rights, Democracy, and Labor. He and his office helped compile the initial reports.
Over the past week, since the draft country reports leaked to the press, the Trump administration has come under fire for its portrayals of El Salvador, Israel, and Russia.
The report on Israel—and the illegally occupied Palestinian territories, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank—is just nine pages. The brevity even drew the attention of Israeli media. The Times of Israel highlighted that it "is much shorter than last year's edition compiled under the Biden administration and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza."
Since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Israeli forces have slaughtered over 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to local officials—though experts warn the true toll is likely far higher. As Israel has restricted humanitarian aid in recent months, over 200 people have starved to death, including 103 children.
The U.S. report on Israel does not mention the genocide case that Israel faces at the International Court of Justice over the assault on Gaza, or the International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The section on war crimes and genocide only says that "terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah continue to engage in the
indiscriminate targeting of Israeli civilians in violation of the law of armed conflict."
As the world mourns the killing of six more Palestinian media professionals in Gaza this week—which prompted calls for the United Nations Security Council to convene an emergency meeting—the report's section on press freedom is also short and makes no mention of the hundreds of journalists killed in Israel's annihilation of the strip:
The law generally provided for freedom of expression, including for members of the press and other media, and the government generally respected this right for most Israelis. NGOs and journalists reported authorities restricted press coverage and limited certain forms of expression, especially in the context of criticism against the war or sympathy for Palestinians in Gaza.
Noting that "the human rights reports have been among the U.S. government's most-read documents," DAWN senior adviser and 32-year State Department official Charles Blaha said the "significant omissions" in this year's report on Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank render it "functionally useless for Congress and the public as nothing more than a pro-Israel document."
Like Klasing at Amnesty, Sarah Leah Whitson, DAWN's executive director, specifically called out the U.S. secretary of state.
"Secretary Rubio has revamped the State Department reports for one principal purpose: to whitewash Israeli crimes, including its horrific genocide and starvation in Gaza. The report shockingly includes not a word about the overwhelming evidence of genocide, mass starvation, and the deliberate bombardment of civilians in Gaza," she said. "Rubio has defied the letter and intent of U.S. laws requiring the State Department to report truthfully and comprehensively about every country's human rights abuses, instead offering up anodyne cover for his murderous friends in Tel Aviv."
The Tuesday release came after a coalition of LGBTQ+ and human rights organizations on Monday filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department over its refusal to release the congressionally mandated report.
This article has been updated with comment from DAWN.
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," said the head of Common Cause.
As Republicans try to rig congressional maps in several states and Democrats threaten retaliatory measures, a pro-democracy watchdog on Tuesday unveiled new fairness standards underscoring that "independent redistricting commissions remain the gold standard for ending partisan gerrymandering."
Common Cause will hold an online media briefing Wednesday at noon Eastern time "to walk reporters though the six pieces of criteria the organization will use to evaluate any proposed maps."
The Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group said that "it will closely evaluate, but not automatically condemn, countermeasures" to Republican gerrymandering efforts—especially mid-decade redistricting not based on decennial censuses.
Amid the gerrymandering wars, we just launched 6 fairness criteria to hold all actors to the same principled standard: people first—not parties. Read our criteria here: www.commoncause.org/resources/po...
[image or embed]
— Common Cause (@commoncause.org) August 12, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Common Cause's six fairness criteria for mid-decade redistricting are:
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement. "But neither will we call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian tactics that undermine fair representation."
"We have established a fairness criteria that we will use to evaluate all countermeasures so we can respond to the most urgent threats to fair representation while holding all actors to the same principled standard: people—not parties—first," she added.
Common Cause's fairness criteria come amid the ongoing standoff between Republicans trying to gerrymander Texas' congressional map and Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in a bid to stymie a vote on the measure. Texas state senators on Tuesday approved the proposed map despite a walkout by most of their Democratic colleagues.
Leaders of several Democrat-controlled states, most notably California, have threatened retaliatory redistricting.
"This moment is about more than responding to a single threat—it's about building the movement for lasting reform," Kase Solomón asserted. "This is not an isolated political tactic; it is part of a broader march toward authoritarianism, dismantling people-powered democracy, and stripping away the people's ability to have a political voice and say in how they are governed."