Climate activists rally against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell outside of the Federal Reserve Board Building on October 29, 2021 in Washington, D.C.
(Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Nov 20, 2021
With President Joe Biden reportedly nearing a decision on his pick to head the Federal Reserve, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are ramping up their criticism of the central bank's current chair over his refusal to treat the climate crisis as a systemic threat.
"The Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat."
On Friday, Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) issued a joint statement announcing that they would oppose the renomination of Jerome Powell--a Trump appointee--for a second term as Fed chair.
"Powell refuses to recognize climate change as an urgent and systemic economic threat," the senators said. "During his tenure, Chair Powell first ignored climate change and then resisted calls for the Fed to use its tools to fight it, arguing that climate change 'is really an issue that is assigned to lots of other government agencies, not so much the Fed.'"
"Climate is not a long-term challenge for the Fed; it demands action now," they added. "Climate effects exacerbate supply chain struggles and commodity price volatility... President Biden must appoint a Fed chair who will ensure the Fed is fulfilling its mandate to safeguard our financial system and shares the administration's view that fighting climate change is the responsibility of every policymaker. That person is not Jerome Powell."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--who said in September that Powell's record of weakening Wall Street regulations makes him a "dangerous man"--and progressive House Democrats have also spoken out against the incumbent Fed chair, whose current term expires in February.
Biden has reportedly interviewed both Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard for the job, and the president could announce his pick as soon as this weekend. Given that Powell--a Republican--would likely have significant support from the Senate GOP, Democrats would need more than three senators to prevent him from staying on for another term.
On Friday evening, the Revolving Door Project (RDP)--which has vocally opposed Powell's renomination for a number of reasons--raised fresh concerns about the Fed chair's potential conflicts of interest, which the group characterized as "disqualifying."
In a statement, RDP director Jeff Hauser said that "Powell explicitly claimed to have received approval from the Office of Government Ethics to continue to hold municipal bonds as the Federal Reserve undertook extraordinary pandemic response efforts, including in the muni bond market."
"But an inquiry from the Revolving Door Project has revealed the absence of any records of any communications of any kind between Powell and the Office of Government Ethics, suggesting that Powell received no such approval, and seemingly contradicting his earlier statement to the press," said Hauser. "These revelations are yet another indictment of Powell's disregard for ethics rules and disrespect for the public he is meant to serve."
\u201cUPDATE: We received a response to one of our requests!\n \nThe Fed says it has no record of communications between Jerome Powell and the Office of Government Ethics in the last 2 yrs, despite his claims that he \u201cchecked with\u201d OGE about his conflicts at start of pandemic response\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1637356491
While voicing alarm over his possible ethics violations, Powell's progressive critics have largely focused on his climate record at the Fed, which one observer warned is "sleepwalking through climate chaos" and failing to utilize the tools at its disposal to mitigate risks posed by extreme weather and other consequences of planetary heating.
The Wall Street Journalreported Friday that fossil fuel corporations "were disproportionate beneficiaries of Fed programs meant to buoy U.S. businesses during the pandemic."
"Oil and gas companies have raked in record amounts of private-sector financing since the Fed's 2020 interest-rate cuts and corporate bond-buying programs, upending years of declining investment in fossil fuels," the Journal noted.
Yevgeny Shrago, policy counsel at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted in response to the Journal's reporting that "the Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat--bailouts that were broadened under Republican political pressure to specifically include many of these companies."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
climate emergencyelizabeth warrenfederal reservejeff merkleypublic citizensheldon whitehouselael brainardrevolving door projectjerome powell
With President Joe Biden reportedly nearing a decision on his pick to head the Federal Reserve, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are ramping up their criticism of the central bank's current chair over his refusal to treat the climate crisis as a systemic threat.
"The Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat."
On Friday, Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) issued a joint statement announcing that they would oppose the renomination of Jerome Powell--a Trump appointee--for a second term as Fed chair.
"Powell refuses to recognize climate change as an urgent and systemic economic threat," the senators said. "During his tenure, Chair Powell first ignored climate change and then resisted calls for the Fed to use its tools to fight it, arguing that climate change 'is really an issue that is assigned to lots of other government agencies, not so much the Fed.'"
"Climate is not a long-term challenge for the Fed; it demands action now," they added. "Climate effects exacerbate supply chain struggles and commodity price volatility... President Biden must appoint a Fed chair who will ensure the Fed is fulfilling its mandate to safeguard our financial system and shares the administration's view that fighting climate change is the responsibility of every policymaker. That person is not Jerome Powell."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--who said in September that Powell's record of weakening Wall Street regulations makes him a "dangerous man"--and progressive House Democrats have also spoken out against the incumbent Fed chair, whose current term expires in February.
Biden has reportedly interviewed both Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard for the job, and the president could announce his pick as soon as this weekend. Given that Powell--a Republican--would likely have significant support from the Senate GOP, Democrats would need more than three senators to prevent him from staying on for another term.
On Friday evening, the Revolving Door Project (RDP)--which has vocally opposed Powell's renomination for a number of reasons--raised fresh concerns about the Fed chair's potential conflicts of interest, which the group characterized as "disqualifying."
In a statement, RDP director Jeff Hauser said that "Powell explicitly claimed to have received approval from the Office of Government Ethics to continue to hold municipal bonds as the Federal Reserve undertook extraordinary pandemic response efforts, including in the muni bond market."
"But an inquiry from the Revolving Door Project has revealed the absence of any records of any communications of any kind between Powell and the Office of Government Ethics, suggesting that Powell received no such approval, and seemingly contradicting his earlier statement to the press," said Hauser. "These revelations are yet another indictment of Powell's disregard for ethics rules and disrespect for the public he is meant to serve."
\u201cUPDATE: We received a response to one of our requests!\n \nThe Fed says it has no record of communications between Jerome Powell and the Office of Government Ethics in the last 2 yrs, despite his claims that he \u201cchecked with\u201d OGE about his conflicts at start of pandemic response\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1637356491
While voicing alarm over his possible ethics violations, Powell's progressive critics have largely focused on his climate record at the Fed, which one observer warned is "sleepwalking through climate chaos" and failing to utilize the tools at its disposal to mitigate risks posed by extreme weather and other consequences of planetary heating.
The Wall Street Journalreported Friday that fossil fuel corporations "were disproportionate beneficiaries of Fed programs meant to buoy U.S. businesses during the pandemic."
"Oil and gas companies have raked in record amounts of private-sector financing since the Fed's 2020 interest-rate cuts and corporate bond-buying programs, upending years of declining investment in fossil fuels," the Journal noted.
Yevgeny Shrago, policy counsel at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted in response to the Journal's reporting that "the Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat--bailouts that were broadened under Republican political pressure to specifically include many of these companies."
From Your Site Articles
With President Joe Biden reportedly nearing a decision on his pick to head the Federal Reserve, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups are ramping up their criticism of the central bank's current chair over his refusal to treat the climate crisis as a systemic threat.
"The Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat."
On Friday, Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) issued a joint statement announcing that they would oppose the renomination of Jerome Powell--a Trump appointee--for a second term as Fed chair.
"Powell refuses to recognize climate change as an urgent and systemic economic threat," the senators said. "During his tenure, Chair Powell first ignored climate change and then resisted calls for the Fed to use its tools to fight it, arguing that climate change 'is really an issue that is assigned to lots of other government agencies, not so much the Fed.'"
"Climate is not a long-term challenge for the Fed; it demands action now," they added. "Climate effects exacerbate supply chain struggles and commodity price volatility... President Biden must appoint a Fed chair who will ensure the Fed is fulfilling its mandate to safeguard our financial system and shares the administration's view that fighting climate change is the responsibility of every policymaker. That person is not Jerome Powell."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--who said in September that Powell's record of weakening Wall Street regulations makes him a "dangerous man"--and progressive House Democrats have also spoken out against the incumbent Fed chair, whose current term expires in February.
Biden has reportedly interviewed both Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard for the job, and the president could announce his pick as soon as this weekend. Given that Powell--a Republican--would likely have significant support from the Senate GOP, Democrats would need more than three senators to prevent him from staying on for another term.
On Friday evening, the Revolving Door Project (RDP)--which has vocally opposed Powell's renomination for a number of reasons--raised fresh concerns about the Fed chair's potential conflicts of interest, which the group characterized as "disqualifying."
In a statement, RDP director Jeff Hauser said that "Powell explicitly claimed to have received approval from the Office of Government Ethics to continue to hold municipal bonds as the Federal Reserve undertook extraordinary pandemic response efforts, including in the muni bond market."
"But an inquiry from the Revolving Door Project has revealed the absence of any records of any communications of any kind between Powell and the Office of Government Ethics, suggesting that Powell received no such approval, and seemingly contradicting his earlier statement to the press," said Hauser. "These revelations are yet another indictment of Powell's disregard for ethics rules and disrespect for the public he is meant to serve."
\u201cUPDATE: We received a response to one of our requests!\n \nThe Fed says it has no record of communications between Jerome Powell and the Office of Government Ethics in the last 2 yrs, despite his claims that he \u201cchecked with\u201d OGE about his conflicts at start of pandemic response\u201d— Revolving Door Project (@Revolving Door Project) 1637356491
While voicing alarm over his possible ethics violations, Powell's progressive critics have largely focused on his climate record at the Fed, which one observer warned is "sleepwalking through climate chaos" and failing to utilize the tools at its disposal to mitigate risks posed by extreme weather and other consequences of planetary heating.
The Wall Street Journalreported Friday that fossil fuel corporations "were disproportionate beneficiaries of Fed programs meant to buoy U.S. businesses during the pandemic."
"Oil and gas companies have raked in record amounts of private-sector financing since the Fed's 2020 interest-rate cuts and corporate bond-buying programs, upending years of declining investment in fossil fuels," the Journal noted.
Yevgeny Shrago, policy counsel at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, tweeted in response to the Journal's reporting that "the Fed's pandemic bailouts under Jerome Powell kept the fossil fuel industry afloat--bailouts that were broadened under Republican political pressure to specifically include many of these companies."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.