

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Healthcare worker Daisie Esseie receives a Pfizer-BioNtech Covid-19 vaccine from nurse practitioner Hari Leon Joseph at the Research Centers of America in Hollywood, Florida on December 18, 2020. (Photo: Chandan Khanna/AFP via Getty Images)
Vaccine equity advocates said the White House's Wednesday announcement that it plans on ramping up domestic manufacturing to produce an additional one billion Covid-19 shots a year is a welcome step that still fails to meet the urgency of the moment.
The development, first reported by the New York Times, came amid sustained accusations that rich nations, including the U.S., are contributing to global Covid-19 "vaccine apartheid" by hoarding doses and insufficiently pressuring pharmaceutical companies--who are swirling in profits--to share their technology and know-how to bring the virus that's killed over five million people worldwide to an end.
"To truly protect everyone's interests, we need a global solution."
According to Our World in Data, only 4.7% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. In the U.S., by contrast, nearly 69% of the population has received at least one dose.
The Biden administration said the plan will see billions invested in an effort to address both the current and potential future pandemics. The Washington Post reported that the proposal would rely on companies that make mRNA vaccines, which include those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna.
White House Covid-19 coordinator Jeff Zients said production would start in the second half of 2022. David Kessler, who leads the White House's Covid-19 response, said, "We are looking to enter into a historic partnership with one or more experienced pharmaceutical partners" that the partnership would "be used for Covid and any future pandemic viruses with the goal of having enough vaccines available within six to nine months of the identification of the virus."
As Robbie Silverman, Oxfam America's senior advocacy manager, sees it, the plan leaves out a much-needed transfer of technology and problematically proposes increased production only within the U.S.
"In order to gain the upper hand on this and future pandemics," Silverman said in a statement, "manufacturing should be spread around the world, especially Africa, not limited to the U.S. We know the coronavirus does not respect national borders; to truly protect everyone's interests, we need a global solution."
In addition to needing to add "robust tech transfer" to its plan, Silverman said the U.S. should support a "comprehensive waiver" proposal for sharing Covid-19-related vaccines and technologies at the World Trade Organization ministerial meeting later this month.
"Will it amount to another subsidy to Moderna and Pfizer, or be controlled by, or at least accountable to, the public?"
Advocacy group Public Citizen--which earlier this year released a plan for how rich nations could produce eight billion coronavirus vaccine doses with a $25 billion investment--welcomed the newly announced manufacturing boost as a life-saving result of grassroots activists who've been pressuring the administration to address global vaccine inequity.
"We are heartened, even as we sorely wish the U.S. government had taken far more ambitious and transformative steps six months ago, one year ago, 18 months ago," Peter Maybarduk, director of the group's Access to Medicines program, said in a statement. "Nonetheless, a major investment to boost mRNA production can help save many lives, and potentially even shorten the pandemic."
However, "critical questions remain," said Maybarduk. "Who will control this added capacity?" he asked. "Will it amount to another subsidy to Moderna and Pfizer, or be controlled by, or at least accountable to, the public, including through use of the Defense Production Act?"
Like Silverman, Maybarduk lamented that the plan only calls for boosting production within the U.S. and leaves out technology transfer.
"Sharing doses is charity, and desperately needed," he said. "But sharing knowledge is justice."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Vaccine equity advocates said the White House's Wednesday announcement that it plans on ramping up domestic manufacturing to produce an additional one billion Covid-19 shots a year is a welcome step that still fails to meet the urgency of the moment.
The development, first reported by the New York Times, came amid sustained accusations that rich nations, including the U.S., are contributing to global Covid-19 "vaccine apartheid" by hoarding doses and insufficiently pressuring pharmaceutical companies--who are swirling in profits--to share their technology and know-how to bring the virus that's killed over five million people worldwide to an end.
"To truly protect everyone's interests, we need a global solution."
According to Our World in Data, only 4.7% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. In the U.S., by contrast, nearly 69% of the population has received at least one dose.
The Biden administration said the plan will see billions invested in an effort to address both the current and potential future pandemics. The Washington Post reported that the proposal would rely on companies that make mRNA vaccines, which include those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna.
White House Covid-19 coordinator Jeff Zients said production would start in the second half of 2022. David Kessler, who leads the White House's Covid-19 response, said, "We are looking to enter into a historic partnership with one or more experienced pharmaceutical partners" that the partnership would "be used for Covid and any future pandemic viruses with the goal of having enough vaccines available within six to nine months of the identification of the virus."
As Robbie Silverman, Oxfam America's senior advocacy manager, sees it, the plan leaves out a much-needed transfer of technology and problematically proposes increased production only within the U.S.
"In order to gain the upper hand on this and future pandemics," Silverman said in a statement, "manufacturing should be spread around the world, especially Africa, not limited to the U.S. We know the coronavirus does not respect national borders; to truly protect everyone's interests, we need a global solution."
In addition to needing to add "robust tech transfer" to its plan, Silverman said the U.S. should support a "comprehensive waiver" proposal for sharing Covid-19-related vaccines and technologies at the World Trade Organization ministerial meeting later this month.
"Will it amount to another subsidy to Moderna and Pfizer, or be controlled by, or at least accountable to, the public?"
Advocacy group Public Citizen--which earlier this year released a plan for how rich nations could produce eight billion coronavirus vaccine doses with a $25 billion investment--welcomed the newly announced manufacturing boost as a life-saving result of grassroots activists who've been pressuring the administration to address global vaccine inequity.
"We are heartened, even as we sorely wish the U.S. government had taken far more ambitious and transformative steps six months ago, one year ago, 18 months ago," Peter Maybarduk, director of the group's Access to Medicines program, said in a statement. "Nonetheless, a major investment to boost mRNA production can help save many lives, and potentially even shorten the pandemic."
However, "critical questions remain," said Maybarduk. "Who will control this added capacity?" he asked. "Will it amount to another subsidy to Moderna and Pfizer, or be controlled by, or at least accountable to, the public, including through use of the Defense Production Act?"
Like Silverman, Maybarduk lamented that the plan only calls for boosting production within the U.S. and leaves out technology transfer.
"Sharing doses is charity, and desperately needed," he said. "But sharing knowledge is justice."
Vaccine equity advocates said the White House's Wednesday announcement that it plans on ramping up domestic manufacturing to produce an additional one billion Covid-19 shots a year is a welcome step that still fails to meet the urgency of the moment.
The development, first reported by the New York Times, came amid sustained accusations that rich nations, including the U.S., are contributing to global Covid-19 "vaccine apartheid" by hoarding doses and insufficiently pressuring pharmaceutical companies--who are swirling in profits--to share their technology and know-how to bring the virus that's killed over five million people worldwide to an end.
"To truly protect everyone's interests, we need a global solution."
According to Our World in Data, only 4.7% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. In the U.S., by contrast, nearly 69% of the population has received at least one dose.
The Biden administration said the plan will see billions invested in an effort to address both the current and potential future pandemics. The Washington Post reported that the proposal would rely on companies that make mRNA vaccines, which include those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna.
White House Covid-19 coordinator Jeff Zients said production would start in the second half of 2022. David Kessler, who leads the White House's Covid-19 response, said, "We are looking to enter into a historic partnership with one or more experienced pharmaceutical partners" that the partnership would "be used for Covid and any future pandemic viruses with the goal of having enough vaccines available within six to nine months of the identification of the virus."
As Robbie Silverman, Oxfam America's senior advocacy manager, sees it, the plan leaves out a much-needed transfer of technology and problematically proposes increased production only within the U.S.
"In order to gain the upper hand on this and future pandemics," Silverman said in a statement, "manufacturing should be spread around the world, especially Africa, not limited to the U.S. We know the coronavirus does not respect national borders; to truly protect everyone's interests, we need a global solution."
In addition to needing to add "robust tech transfer" to its plan, Silverman said the U.S. should support a "comprehensive waiver" proposal for sharing Covid-19-related vaccines and technologies at the World Trade Organization ministerial meeting later this month.
"Will it amount to another subsidy to Moderna and Pfizer, or be controlled by, or at least accountable to, the public?"
Advocacy group Public Citizen--which earlier this year released a plan for how rich nations could produce eight billion coronavirus vaccine doses with a $25 billion investment--welcomed the newly announced manufacturing boost as a life-saving result of grassroots activists who've been pressuring the administration to address global vaccine inequity.
"We are heartened, even as we sorely wish the U.S. government had taken far more ambitious and transformative steps six months ago, one year ago, 18 months ago," Peter Maybarduk, director of the group's Access to Medicines program, said in a statement. "Nonetheless, a major investment to boost mRNA production can help save many lives, and potentially even shorten the pandemic."
However, "critical questions remain," said Maybarduk. "Who will control this added capacity?" he asked. "Will it amount to another subsidy to Moderna and Pfizer, or be controlled by, or at least accountable to, the public, including through use of the Defense Production Act?"
Like Silverman, Maybarduk lamented that the plan only calls for boosting production within the U.S. and leaves out technology transfer.
"Sharing doses is charity, and desperately needed," he said. "But sharing knowledge is justice."