SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A billowing white mushroom cloud, mottled with orange, pushes through a layer of clouds during Operation Ivy, the first test of a hydrogen bomb, at Enewetak Atoll in the Marshall Islands. (Photo: Corbis via Getty Images)
Dozens of organizations on Monday urged U.S. lawmakers to stop sustaining a "dangerous and outdated" nuclear bomb program and instead reallocate $98 million to life-saving global Covid-19 vaccine production efforts.
"The pandemic has made abundantly clear that our most urgent threats can not be solved by pouring more money into weapons of war," the groups, including Public Citizen and Council for a Livable World, wrote in a letter to senators.
"Vaccinating the global population is in the obvious interest of our security."
The weapon at issue in the new letter is the B83 nuclear bomb, which the groups call "a Cold War relic." The biggest nuke in the U.S. stockpile, it's capable of "immense collateral damage," the groups wrote, "as just one of these weapons yields nearly half of all the explosives used in World War II, including both atomic bombs."
The Obama-Biden administration slated the megaton-class B83 gravity bomb for retirement, with the B61-12, which has a lower explosive yield and less radioactive fallout, as a replacement. The Trump administration, however, reversed that retirement decision.
The Biden-Harris administration then went further with a proposal to massively boost funding for the B83.
"Indefinitely sustaining this weapon will only become more expensive as it continues to age," the letter states, urging Congress to "seize this opportunity to retire the weapon from the stockpile, thus freeing up valuable taxpayer dollars to meet true human needs."
In stark contrast to maintaining the weaponry, the letter says, "vaccinating the global population is in the obvious interest of our security."
Related Content
The diversion of funds could also address "a global vaccine apartheid," by contributing to the World Health Organization's Covid-19 vaccine hub and efforts to ramp up production facilities in low- and middle-income countries as well as distribution efforts.
To take this "straightforward" step, the groups are calling on senators to support an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2022 that was submitted this month by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). Their proposal calls for "reallocation of funding for B83 gravity bomb life extension to support global vaccine production capacity."
According to a Sunday "dear colleague" letter from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the Senate could consider the NDAA this week.
Public Citizen is also calling on its supporters to sign a petition urging senators to back the Merkley-Warren amendment and divert the $98 million slated for the B83 program to global vaccine access efforts instead.
"The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic," the group declared, "is a public health and national security threat that can't be fought with guns or tanks or nuclear weapons."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Dozens of organizations on Monday urged U.S. lawmakers to stop sustaining a "dangerous and outdated" nuclear bomb program and instead reallocate $98 million to life-saving global Covid-19 vaccine production efforts.
"The pandemic has made abundantly clear that our most urgent threats can not be solved by pouring more money into weapons of war," the groups, including Public Citizen and Council for a Livable World, wrote in a letter to senators.
"Vaccinating the global population is in the obvious interest of our security."
The weapon at issue in the new letter is the B83 nuclear bomb, which the groups call "a Cold War relic." The biggest nuke in the U.S. stockpile, it's capable of "immense collateral damage," the groups wrote, "as just one of these weapons yields nearly half of all the explosives used in World War II, including both atomic bombs."
The Obama-Biden administration slated the megaton-class B83 gravity bomb for retirement, with the B61-12, which has a lower explosive yield and less radioactive fallout, as a replacement. The Trump administration, however, reversed that retirement decision.
The Biden-Harris administration then went further with a proposal to massively boost funding for the B83.
"Indefinitely sustaining this weapon will only become more expensive as it continues to age," the letter states, urging Congress to "seize this opportunity to retire the weapon from the stockpile, thus freeing up valuable taxpayer dollars to meet true human needs."
In stark contrast to maintaining the weaponry, the letter says, "vaccinating the global population is in the obvious interest of our security."
Related Content
The diversion of funds could also address "a global vaccine apartheid," by contributing to the World Health Organization's Covid-19 vaccine hub and efforts to ramp up production facilities in low- and middle-income countries as well as distribution efforts.
To take this "straightforward" step, the groups are calling on senators to support an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2022 that was submitted this month by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). Their proposal calls for "reallocation of funding for B83 gravity bomb life extension to support global vaccine production capacity."
According to a Sunday "dear colleague" letter from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the Senate could consider the NDAA this week.
Public Citizen is also calling on its supporters to sign a petition urging senators to back the Merkley-Warren amendment and divert the $98 million slated for the B83 program to global vaccine access efforts instead.
"The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic," the group declared, "is a public health and national security threat that can't be fought with guns or tanks or nuclear weapons."
Dozens of organizations on Monday urged U.S. lawmakers to stop sustaining a "dangerous and outdated" nuclear bomb program and instead reallocate $98 million to life-saving global Covid-19 vaccine production efforts.
"The pandemic has made abundantly clear that our most urgent threats can not be solved by pouring more money into weapons of war," the groups, including Public Citizen and Council for a Livable World, wrote in a letter to senators.
"Vaccinating the global population is in the obvious interest of our security."
The weapon at issue in the new letter is the B83 nuclear bomb, which the groups call "a Cold War relic." The biggest nuke in the U.S. stockpile, it's capable of "immense collateral damage," the groups wrote, "as just one of these weapons yields nearly half of all the explosives used in World War II, including both atomic bombs."
The Obama-Biden administration slated the megaton-class B83 gravity bomb for retirement, with the B61-12, which has a lower explosive yield and less radioactive fallout, as a replacement. The Trump administration, however, reversed that retirement decision.
The Biden-Harris administration then went further with a proposal to massively boost funding for the B83.
"Indefinitely sustaining this weapon will only become more expensive as it continues to age," the letter states, urging Congress to "seize this opportunity to retire the weapon from the stockpile, thus freeing up valuable taxpayer dollars to meet true human needs."
In stark contrast to maintaining the weaponry, the letter says, "vaccinating the global population is in the obvious interest of our security."
Related Content
The diversion of funds could also address "a global vaccine apartheid," by contributing to the World Health Organization's Covid-19 vaccine hub and efforts to ramp up production facilities in low- and middle-income countries as well as distribution efforts.
To take this "straightforward" step, the groups are calling on senators to support an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2022 that was submitted this month by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). Their proposal calls for "reallocation of funding for B83 gravity bomb life extension to support global vaccine production capacity."
According to a Sunday "dear colleague" letter from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the Senate could consider the NDAA this week.
Public Citizen is also calling on its supporters to sign a petition urging senators to back the Merkley-Warren amendment and divert the $98 million slated for the B83 program to global vaccine access efforts instead.
"The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic," the group declared, "is a public health and national security threat that can't be fought with guns or tanks or nuclear weapons."