SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A man walks near polluting factories in Kamisu, Japan on November 29, 2019. (Photo: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Getty Images)
'Delay Is the New Denial': Study Confirms 99.9% of Scientists Agree on Climate
"It's pretty much case closed for any meaningful public conversation about the reality of human-caused climate change."
Oct 19, 2021
The lead author of a new study showing that 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers released over the past decade agree that global heating is caused primarily by human activity said Tuesday that the research should be "the last word" in the purported--but largely contrived--debate about what's causing the climate emergency.
"The reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution."
The new research by Cornell University scientists updates and expands a 2013 study that showed 97% of peer-reviewed papers published between 1991 and 2012 supported the theory of anthropogenic climate change (ACC)--the notion that human activity was causing and exacerbating global heating.
The researchers started by examining 3,000 studies selected randomly from the 88,125 English-language climate papers published between 2012 and 2020. Of those 3,000 papers, only four were ACC-skeptical.
"Our results confirm, as has been found in numerous other previous studies of this question, that there is no significant scientific debate among experts about whether or not climate change is human-caused," the study states. "This issue has been comprehensively settled, and the reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution."
The paper continues:
The tiny number of papers that have been published during our time period which disagree with this overwhelming scientific consensus have had no discernible impact, presumably because they do not provide any convincing evidence to refute the hypothesis that... "it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century," and that... "it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land."
Mark Lynas, a visiting fellow at Cornell's Alliance for Science and the paper's lead author, told the Cornell Chronicle that "we are virtually certain that the consensus is well over 99% now and that it's pretty much case closed for any meaningful public conversation about the reality of human-caused climate change."
However, recent polling reveals that around one-third of Americans still do not believe human-caused climate change exists. Fossil fuel interests, the public relations firms and politicians they support, and the distorting influence of "both sides" climate reporting by advertiser-funded corporate media all play a role in this persistent--but dwindling--skepticism.
"The prevalence of mis/disinformation about the role of [greenhouse gas] emissions in modern climate change is unlikely to be driven purely by genuine scientific illiteracy or lack of understanding," the new study's authors note. "Even so, in our view it remains important to continue to inform society on the state of the evidence."
"Mitigating future warming requires urgent efforts to eliminate fossil fuels combustion and other major sources of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions," the paper stresses. "Our study helps confirm that there is no remaining scientific uncertainty about the urgency and gravity of this task."
Lynas added, "This pretty much should be the last word."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The lead author of a new study showing that 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers released over the past decade agree that global heating is caused primarily by human activity said Tuesday that the research should be "the last word" in the purported--but largely contrived--debate about what's causing the climate emergency.
"The reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution."
The new research by Cornell University scientists updates and expands a 2013 study that showed 97% of peer-reviewed papers published between 1991 and 2012 supported the theory of anthropogenic climate change (ACC)--the notion that human activity was causing and exacerbating global heating.
The researchers started by examining 3,000 studies selected randomly from the 88,125 English-language climate papers published between 2012 and 2020. Of those 3,000 papers, only four were ACC-skeptical.
"Our results confirm, as has been found in numerous other previous studies of this question, that there is no significant scientific debate among experts about whether or not climate change is human-caused," the study states. "This issue has been comprehensively settled, and the reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution."
The paper continues:
The tiny number of papers that have been published during our time period which disagree with this overwhelming scientific consensus have had no discernible impact, presumably because they do not provide any convincing evidence to refute the hypothesis that... "it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century," and that... "it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land."
Mark Lynas, a visiting fellow at Cornell's Alliance for Science and the paper's lead author, told the Cornell Chronicle that "we are virtually certain that the consensus is well over 99% now and that it's pretty much case closed for any meaningful public conversation about the reality of human-caused climate change."
However, recent polling reveals that around one-third of Americans still do not believe human-caused climate change exists. Fossil fuel interests, the public relations firms and politicians they support, and the distorting influence of "both sides" climate reporting by advertiser-funded corporate media all play a role in this persistent--but dwindling--skepticism.
"The prevalence of mis/disinformation about the role of [greenhouse gas] emissions in modern climate change is unlikely to be driven purely by genuine scientific illiteracy or lack of understanding," the new study's authors note. "Even so, in our view it remains important to continue to inform society on the state of the evidence."
"Mitigating future warming requires urgent efforts to eliminate fossil fuels combustion and other major sources of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions," the paper stresses. "Our study helps confirm that there is no remaining scientific uncertainty about the urgency and gravity of this task."
Lynas added, "This pretty much should be the last word."
The lead author of a new study showing that 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers released over the past decade agree that global heating is caused primarily by human activity said Tuesday that the research should be "the last word" in the purported--but largely contrived--debate about what's causing the climate emergency.
"The reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution."
The new research by Cornell University scientists updates and expands a 2013 study that showed 97% of peer-reviewed papers published between 1991 and 2012 supported the theory of anthropogenic climate change (ACC)--the notion that human activity was causing and exacerbating global heating.
The researchers started by examining 3,000 studies selected randomly from the 88,125 English-language climate papers published between 2012 and 2020. Of those 3,000 papers, only four were ACC-skeptical.
"Our results confirm, as has been found in numerous other previous studies of this question, that there is no significant scientific debate among experts about whether or not climate change is human-caused," the study states. "This issue has been comprehensively settled, and the reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution."
The paper continues:
The tiny number of papers that have been published during our time period which disagree with this overwhelming scientific consensus have had no discernible impact, presumably because they do not provide any convincing evidence to refute the hypothesis that... "it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century," and that... "it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land."
Mark Lynas, a visiting fellow at Cornell's Alliance for Science and the paper's lead author, told the Cornell Chronicle that "we are virtually certain that the consensus is well over 99% now and that it's pretty much case closed for any meaningful public conversation about the reality of human-caused climate change."
However, recent polling reveals that around one-third of Americans still do not believe human-caused climate change exists. Fossil fuel interests, the public relations firms and politicians they support, and the distorting influence of "both sides" climate reporting by advertiser-funded corporate media all play a role in this persistent--but dwindling--skepticism.
"The prevalence of mis/disinformation about the role of [greenhouse gas] emissions in modern climate change is unlikely to be driven purely by genuine scientific illiteracy or lack of understanding," the new study's authors note. "Even so, in our view it remains important to continue to inform society on the state of the evidence."
"Mitigating future warming requires urgent efforts to eliminate fossil fuels combustion and other major sources of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions," the paper stresses. "Our study helps confirm that there is no remaining scientific uncertainty about the urgency and gravity of this task."
Lynas added, "This pretty much should be the last word."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.