SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) speaks at a news conference on September 17, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Rashida Tlaib Corrects Jim Clyburn: '$3.5 Trillion Is the Floor'
Remarks by the prominent South Carolina Democrat, warned one observer, "could easily ruin negotiations and imperil" the party's reconciliation agenda.
Sep 09, 2021
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib of Michigan pushed back late Wednesday after fellow Rep. Jim Clyburn--the third-ranking Democrat in the House--said that $3.5 trillion was not the "floor" but rather the "ceiling" for the emerging budget reconciliation package, a position that puts him firmly at odds with many members of his own party.
In an appearance on CNN, Clyburn (D-S.C.) falsely claimed that "no one has ever said" the popular $3.5 trillion figure represents the floor for reconciliation negotiations. In recent days, as Common Dreams has reported, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and other prominent progressives have publicly made clear that $3.5 trillion is already a compromise and that they will not approve of anything less.
Tlaib, a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, reiterated that stance in response to Clyburn's remarks, declaring on Twitter: "$3.5 trillion is the floor."
During his CNN interview, Clyburn invoked new reports that conservative Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.)--a key swing vote--won't support a reconciliation package any larger than $1.5 trillion, potentially endangering the legislation's prospects in the evenly divided U.S. Senate.
"Somewhere between $1.5 and $3.5 there is $2 trillion," Clyburn said. "Those $2 trillion are there. And I think that there's a lot of room for people to sit down and negotiate. It may be that when you're sitting around the table, you may not need $3.5 trillion to do what the president wants done and what the country needs done. But let's work on it and stay out of all this negotiating in the media."
Observers warned that Clyburn's public intervention in the ongoing reconciliation talks could be highly damaging to Democrats' efforts to secure as much climate and safety-net funding as possible in the package, which represents a centerpiece of President Joe Biden's domestic policy agenda.
"Clyburn may be a political kingmaker, but with legislation he's a reverse King Midas," tweeted David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect. "This could easily ruin negotiations and imperil the agenda."
The South Carolina Democrat's comments came shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters Wednesday that while she doesn't "know what the number will be" once negotiations end, Democratic committees are moving ahead with legislative mark-ups at the $3.5 trillion level--the outer boundary set by a recently approved budget resolution.
"We will pay for more than half, maybe all of the legislation," Pelosi said, referring to the tax hikes on wealthy individuals and large corporations that Democrats are planning to enact in order to offset new spending on healthcare, paid leave, green energy, immigration reform, and other priorities.
To those advocating for a lower price tag, Pelosi asked: "Where would you cut? Child care? Family medical leave paid for? Universal pre-K? Home healthcare?"
Earlier this week, Jayapal--the chair of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus--told the Washington Post that in her view "there is no flexibility on the price tag."
"And it's not because I care about what the top line is. It's because I care about delivering on these benefits," said Jayapal. "If we don't deliver, then I think all of the people who came out and voted for Democrats to take control of the House, the Senate, and the White House are going to come out and say, 'that's it.'"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib of Michigan pushed back late Wednesday after fellow Rep. Jim Clyburn--the third-ranking Democrat in the House--said that $3.5 trillion was not the "floor" but rather the "ceiling" for the emerging budget reconciliation package, a position that puts him firmly at odds with many members of his own party.
In an appearance on CNN, Clyburn (D-S.C.) falsely claimed that "no one has ever said" the popular $3.5 trillion figure represents the floor for reconciliation negotiations. In recent days, as Common Dreams has reported, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and other prominent progressives have publicly made clear that $3.5 trillion is already a compromise and that they will not approve of anything less.
Tlaib, a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, reiterated that stance in response to Clyburn's remarks, declaring on Twitter: "$3.5 trillion is the floor."
During his CNN interview, Clyburn invoked new reports that conservative Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.)--a key swing vote--won't support a reconciliation package any larger than $1.5 trillion, potentially endangering the legislation's prospects in the evenly divided U.S. Senate.
"Somewhere between $1.5 and $3.5 there is $2 trillion," Clyburn said. "Those $2 trillion are there. And I think that there's a lot of room for people to sit down and negotiate. It may be that when you're sitting around the table, you may not need $3.5 trillion to do what the president wants done and what the country needs done. But let's work on it and stay out of all this negotiating in the media."
Observers warned that Clyburn's public intervention in the ongoing reconciliation talks could be highly damaging to Democrats' efforts to secure as much climate and safety-net funding as possible in the package, which represents a centerpiece of President Joe Biden's domestic policy agenda.
"Clyburn may be a political kingmaker, but with legislation he's a reverse King Midas," tweeted David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect. "This could easily ruin negotiations and imperil the agenda."
The South Carolina Democrat's comments came shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters Wednesday that while she doesn't "know what the number will be" once negotiations end, Democratic committees are moving ahead with legislative mark-ups at the $3.5 trillion level--the outer boundary set by a recently approved budget resolution.
"We will pay for more than half, maybe all of the legislation," Pelosi said, referring to the tax hikes on wealthy individuals and large corporations that Democrats are planning to enact in order to offset new spending on healthcare, paid leave, green energy, immigration reform, and other priorities.
To those advocating for a lower price tag, Pelosi asked: "Where would you cut? Child care? Family medical leave paid for? Universal pre-K? Home healthcare?"
Earlier this week, Jayapal--the chair of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus--told the Washington Post that in her view "there is no flexibility on the price tag."
"And it's not because I care about what the top line is. It's because I care about delivering on these benefits," said Jayapal. "If we don't deliver, then I think all of the people who came out and voted for Democrats to take control of the House, the Senate, and the White House are going to come out and say, 'that's it.'"
From Your Site Articles
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib of Michigan pushed back late Wednesday after fellow Rep. Jim Clyburn--the third-ranking Democrat in the House--said that $3.5 trillion was not the "floor" but rather the "ceiling" for the emerging budget reconciliation package, a position that puts him firmly at odds with many members of his own party.
In an appearance on CNN, Clyburn (D-S.C.) falsely claimed that "no one has ever said" the popular $3.5 trillion figure represents the floor for reconciliation negotiations. In recent days, as Common Dreams has reported, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and other prominent progressives have publicly made clear that $3.5 trillion is already a compromise and that they will not approve of anything less.
Tlaib, a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, reiterated that stance in response to Clyburn's remarks, declaring on Twitter: "$3.5 trillion is the floor."
During his CNN interview, Clyburn invoked new reports that conservative Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.)--a key swing vote--won't support a reconciliation package any larger than $1.5 trillion, potentially endangering the legislation's prospects in the evenly divided U.S. Senate.
"Somewhere between $1.5 and $3.5 there is $2 trillion," Clyburn said. "Those $2 trillion are there. And I think that there's a lot of room for people to sit down and negotiate. It may be that when you're sitting around the table, you may not need $3.5 trillion to do what the president wants done and what the country needs done. But let's work on it and stay out of all this negotiating in the media."
Observers warned that Clyburn's public intervention in the ongoing reconciliation talks could be highly damaging to Democrats' efforts to secure as much climate and safety-net funding as possible in the package, which represents a centerpiece of President Joe Biden's domestic policy agenda.
"Clyburn may be a political kingmaker, but with legislation he's a reverse King Midas," tweeted David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect. "This could easily ruin negotiations and imperil the agenda."
The South Carolina Democrat's comments came shortly after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters Wednesday that while she doesn't "know what the number will be" once negotiations end, Democratic committees are moving ahead with legislative mark-ups at the $3.5 trillion level--the outer boundary set by a recently approved budget resolution.
"We will pay for more than half, maybe all of the legislation," Pelosi said, referring to the tax hikes on wealthy individuals and large corporations that Democrats are planning to enact in order to offset new spending on healthcare, paid leave, green energy, immigration reform, and other priorities.
To those advocating for a lower price tag, Pelosi asked: "Where would you cut? Child care? Family medical leave paid for? Universal pre-K? Home healthcare?"
Earlier this week, Jayapal--the chair of the nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus--told the Washington Post that in her view "there is no flexibility on the price tag."
"And it's not because I care about what the top line is. It's because I care about delivering on these benefits," said Jayapal. "If we don't deliver, then I think all of the people who came out and voted for Democrats to take control of the House, the Senate, and the White House are going to come out and say, 'that's it.'"
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.