To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
App-based drivers from Uber and Lyft protest in a caravan in front of City Hall in Los Angeles on October 22, 2020 where elected leaders hold a conference urging voters to reject on the November 3 election, Proposition 22, that would classify app-based drivers as independent contractors and not employees or agents. (Phot:y Frederic J. BROWN / AFP via Getty Images)
A California judge ruled Friday that Proposition 22--a measure that let so-called gig economy companies like Uber and Lyft limit worker protections--is unconstitutional.
"This is a MAJOR and deserved win for drivers and gig workers," the California Labor Federation tweeted Friday in response to the ruling.
"For two years, drivers have been saying that democracy cannot be bought and today's decision shows they were right."
Passed last November after over $200 million in campaign spending by major gig companies, Prop 22 let the companies classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.
Morgan Harper, senior advisor at the American Economic Liberties Project, previously called Prop 22 "not just the most expensive ballot initiative of all time" but "an egregious display of the ways dominant corporations use ill-won profits to entrench their power, shape public discourse, influence government policy, and avoid accountability."
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and drivers filed suit, with a February challenge at the Alameda County Superior Court after the California Supreme Court declined to hear their petition. The workers alleged in part that the measure denied the state Legislature the ability to grant workers the right to organize for better working conditions.
\u201cWe\u2019re proud to stand with Gig Drivers in the fight against #Prop22, which aimed to unconstitutionally deny gig drivers their fundamental rights. We're proud to support drivers in their fight for basic rights and for the integrity of our democracy.\u201d— SEIU California (@SEIU California) 1629511786
Siding with the workers, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch said Friday that Prop 22 was "unenforceable," citing in part the law's "difficult to the point of near impossibility" requirement of the support of seven-eighths of the state Legislature to make any changes.
"A prohibition on legislation authorizing collective bargaining by app-based drivers does not promote the right to work as an independent contractor, nor does it protect work flexibility, nor does it provide minimum workplace safety and pay standards for those workers," Roesch wrote. "It appears only to protect the economic interest of the network companies in having a divided, ununionized workforce, which is not a stated goal of the legislation."
Bob Schoonover, president of the SEIU California State Council, welcomed the development, saying Friday the "ruling by Judge Roesch striking down Proposition 22 couldn't be clearer: The gig industry-funded ballot initiative was unconstitutional and is therefore unenforceable."
"Companies like Uber and Lyft spent $225 million in an effort to take away rights from workers in a way that violates California's constitution," he said, accusing the companies of having "tried to boost their profits by undermining democracy and the state constitution."
Veena Dubal, a professor at the University of California Hastings Law School who filed a court brief in support of the workers, previously said Prop 22's passage amounted to "the most radical undoing of labor legislation since Taft-Hartley in 1947."
In a tweet hours after Roesch's ruling, she pointed to a still-long road ahead for worker rights.
"We won tonight, but make no mistake," Dubal wrote. "Victory is never handed by legal edict to working people. To the contrary, our collective struggles are just beginning. May the platform plantation owners lose sleep as we build solidarity and power for equality and justice."
The coalition representing the gig economies, meanwhile, has announced its intention to appeal.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
A California judge ruled Friday that Proposition 22--a measure that let so-called gig economy companies like Uber and Lyft limit worker protections--is unconstitutional.
"This is a MAJOR and deserved win for drivers and gig workers," the California Labor Federation tweeted Friday in response to the ruling.
"For two years, drivers have been saying that democracy cannot be bought and today's decision shows they were right."
Passed last November after over $200 million in campaign spending by major gig companies, Prop 22 let the companies classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.
Morgan Harper, senior advisor at the American Economic Liberties Project, previously called Prop 22 "not just the most expensive ballot initiative of all time" but "an egregious display of the ways dominant corporations use ill-won profits to entrench their power, shape public discourse, influence government policy, and avoid accountability."
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and drivers filed suit, with a February challenge at the Alameda County Superior Court after the California Supreme Court declined to hear their petition. The workers alleged in part that the measure denied the state Legislature the ability to grant workers the right to organize for better working conditions.
\u201cWe\u2019re proud to stand with Gig Drivers in the fight against #Prop22, which aimed to unconstitutionally deny gig drivers their fundamental rights. We're proud to support drivers in their fight for basic rights and for the integrity of our democracy.\u201d— SEIU California (@SEIU California) 1629511786
Siding with the workers, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch said Friday that Prop 22 was "unenforceable," citing in part the law's "difficult to the point of near impossibility" requirement of the support of seven-eighths of the state Legislature to make any changes.
"A prohibition on legislation authorizing collective bargaining by app-based drivers does not promote the right to work as an independent contractor, nor does it protect work flexibility, nor does it provide minimum workplace safety and pay standards for those workers," Roesch wrote. "It appears only to protect the economic interest of the network companies in having a divided, ununionized workforce, which is not a stated goal of the legislation."
Bob Schoonover, president of the SEIU California State Council, welcomed the development, saying Friday the "ruling by Judge Roesch striking down Proposition 22 couldn't be clearer: The gig industry-funded ballot initiative was unconstitutional and is therefore unenforceable."
"Companies like Uber and Lyft spent $225 million in an effort to take away rights from workers in a way that violates California's constitution," he said, accusing the companies of having "tried to boost their profits by undermining democracy and the state constitution."
Veena Dubal, a professor at the University of California Hastings Law School who filed a court brief in support of the workers, previously said Prop 22's passage amounted to "the most radical undoing of labor legislation since Taft-Hartley in 1947."
In a tweet hours after Roesch's ruling, she pointed to a still-long road ahead for worker rights.
"We won tonight, but make no mistake," Dubal wrote. "Victory is never handed by legal edict to working people. To the contrary, our collective struggles are just beginning. May the platform plantation owners lose sleep as we build solidarity and power for equality and justice."
The coalition representing the gig economies, meanwhile, has announced its intention to appeal.
A California judge ruled Friday that Proposition 22--a measure that let so-called gig economy companies like Uber and Lyft limit worker protections--is unconstitutional.
"This is a MAJOR and deserved win for drivers and gig workers," the California Labor Federation tweeted Friday in response to the ruling.
"For two years, drivers have been saying that democracy cannot be bought and today's decision shows they were right."
Passed last November after over $200 million in campaign spending by major gig companies, Prop 22 let the companies classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.
Morgan Harper, senior advisor at the American Economic Liberties Project, previously called Prop 22 "not just the most expensive ballot initiative of all time" but "an egregious display of the ways dominant corporations use ill-won profits to entrench their power, shape public discourse, influence government policy, and avoid accountability."
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and drivers filed suit, with a February challenge at the Alameda County Superior Court after the California Supreme Court declined to hear their petition. The workers alleged in part that the measure denied the state Legislature the ability to grant workers the right to organize for better working conditions.
\u201cWe\u2019re proud to stand with Gig Drivers in the fight against #Prop22, which aimed to unconstitutionally deny gig drivers their fundamental rights. We're proud to support drivers in their fight for basic rights and for the integrity of our democracy.\u201d— SEIU California (@SEIU California) 1629511786
Siding with the workers, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch said Friday that Prop 22 was "unenforceable," citing in part the law's "difficult to the point of near impossibility" requirement of the support of seven-eighths of the state Legislature to make any changes.
"A prohibition on legislation authorizing collective bargaining by app-based drivers does not promote the right to work as an independent contractor, nor does it protect work flexibility, nor does it provide minimum workplace safety and pay standards for those workers," Roesch wrote. "It appears only to protect the economic interest of the network companies in having a divided, ununionized workforce, which is not a stated goal of the legislation."
Bob Schoonover, president of the SEIU California State Council, welcomed the development, saying Friday the "ruling by Judge Roesch striking down Proposition 22 couldn't be clearer: The gig industry-funded ballot initiative was unconstitutional and is therefore unenforceable."
"Companies like Uber and Lyft spent $225 million in an effort to take away rights from workers in a way that violates California's constitution," he said, accusing the companies of having "tried to boost their profits by undermining democracy and the state constitution."
Veena Dubal, a professor at the University of California Hastings Law School who filed a court brief in support of the workers, previously said Prop 22's passage amounted to "the most radical undoing of labor legislation since Taft-Hartley in 1947."
In a tweet hours after Roesch's ruling, she pointed to a still-long road ahead for worker rights.
"We won tonight, but make no mistake," Dubal wrote. "Victory is never handed by legal edict to working people. To the contrary, our collective struggles are just beginning. May the platform plantation owners lose sleep as we build solidarity and power for equality and justice."
The coalition representing the gig economies, meanwhile, has announced its intention to appeal.
