Mar 11, 2021
A new paper from a group of leading economists rebukes the "ugliness of vaccine hoarding" by some wealthy nations and calls for a suspension of pharmaceutical companies' patent rights to counter the unequal access to doses and help end the coronavirus pandemic.
The proposals are laid out in a report released Thursday from the Institute for New Economic Thinking's (INET) Commission on Global Economic Transformation, a body chaired by Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Michael Spence.
The authors point to "the glaring deficiencies in our global debt regime" and frame their proposals as immediate measures that would foster "robust recovery."
\u201cINET\u2019s Commission on Global Economic Transformation - Interim Report on the Global Response to the Pandemic https://t.co/qU6UauUOK8\u201d— Institute for New Economic Thinking (@Institute for New Economic Thinking) 1615472353
There have been "unseemly and unfair vaccine grabs by the governments of some of the advanced countries," the report says. It cites as an example Canada, which secured jabs "for more than 10 times their current population." And while millions of doses have already been administered in dozens of wealther nations, "[a]s of the time of writing this report, 130 countries were yet to have administered a single dose."
The report notes that COVAX, the World World Health Organization-led initiative working for equitable access to Covid-19 vaccines, is still underfunded despite wealthier nations' ability to boost financing. "COVAX is unable to procure the required vaccines from producers who have received regulatory approval, because of vaccine grabbing by governments," the authors write.
Further distribution of doses is possible, the report argues, if the WHO takes "a proactive approach" to vaccines developed by other nations, including those from Russia and China, once governments' regulatory authorities deem them safe.
But right now, according to the economists, there is "completely unnecessary" vaccine scarcity, as a result of pharmaceutical companies' patent rights that give them "a monopoly on production" despite massive public funding. From the report:
Patents are usually seen as a necessary reward for invention/innovation, yet in the specific case of Covid-19 vaccines, pharma companies have received massive support from governments that have mostly and in some cases completely covered their R&D costs. In the U.S. alone, the six major vaccine companies received over $12 billion in public support; other rich country governments also provided support to these companies for developing these vaccines. They also benefited from prior public research and reduced costs of clinical testing because of more unpaid volunteers for trials. It is likely that the three "leader" vaccines have already received what could be considered as reasonable returns on their own investment, and more.
The economists note that wealthy countries are blocking a demand for the WTO to waive Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) rules in order to allow generic manufacturing of the vaccines to boost production. That opposition is self-defeating, the report asserts, given that the waiver would "benefit their own populations by making available more doses of vaccines quickly, and larger supply would reduce costs of additional doses of vaccines, making them cheaper for governments and taxpayers across the world."
A "global move for suspension and/or modification of intellectual property rights, for matters relating to essential public health concerns, is essential," the report says, and urges governments of wealther nations to "press vaccine manufacturers to share their knowledge with local producers and facilitate their ability to do so."
To further aid economic recovering big government spending is needed, including through measures like an extension of unemployment insurance. "This is not the time for austerity," they write.
Richer nations were also cautioned against pushing "fiscal austerity in IMF agreements" or "measures that increase inequality (like regressive taxation)."
The economists also address the crushing debt held by poorer nations. The wrote: "Money that is sent abroad to service their debt is money that could have been spent to rejuvenate the economy, to provide health protection for citizens, to purchase vaccines, etc."
In light of the continued economic downturn, the report says that"what is needed today is not just a debt moratorium, which simply kicks the can down the road while making the debts owed by the developing countries larger, but a deep and timely debt restructuring."
Political leaders, the group added, must "recognize that a healthy world economy is not possible without recovery in its poorer parts."
Stiglitz discussed the report Friday in an interview with Democracy Now!
He told hold Amy Goodman that the lack of suspension of intellectual property rights regarding coronavirus vaccines is "just foolish."
"And it's particularly unconscionable," said Stiglitz, "given that the advanced countries' governments have actually financed a very large fraction of that research, and the companies themselves are already making multiple returns on their investments."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new paper from a group of leading economists rebukes the "ugliness of vaccine hoarding" by some wealthy nations and calls for a suspension of pharmaceutical companies' patent rights to counter the unequal access to doses and help end the coronavirus pandemic.
The proposals are laid out in a report released Thursday from the Institute for New Economic Thinking's (INET) Commission on Global Economic Transformation, a body chaired by Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Michael Spence.
The authors point to "the glaring deficiencies in our global debt regime" and frame their proposals as immediate measures that would foster "robust recovery."
\u201cINET\u2019s Commission on Global Economic Transformation - Interim Report on the Global Response to the Pandemic https://t.co/qU6UauUOK8\u201d— Institute for New Economic Thinking (@Institute for New Economic Thinking) 1615472353
There have been "unseemly and unfair vaccine grabs by the governments of some of the advanced countries," the report says. It cites as an example Canada, which secured jabs "for more than 10 times their current population." And while millions of doses have already been administered in dozens of wealther nations, "[a]s of the time of writing this report, 130 countries were yet to have administered a single dose."
The report notes that COVAX, the World World Health Organization-led initiative working for equitable access to Covid-19 vaccines, is still underfunded despite wealthier nations' ability to boost financing. "COVAX is unable to procure the required vaccines from producers who have received regulatory approval, because of vaccine grabbing by governments," the authors write.
Further distribution of doses is possible, the report argues, if the WHO takes "a proactive approach" to vaccines developed by other nations, including those from Russia and China, once governments' regulatory authorities deem them safe.
But right now, according to the economists, there is "completely unnecessary" vaccine scarcity, as a result of pharmaceutical companies' patent rights that give them "a monopoly on production" despite massive public funding. From the report:
Patents are usually seen as a necessary reward for invention/innovation, yet in the specific case of Covid-19 vaccines, pharma companies have received massive support from governments that have mostly and in some cases completely covered their R&D costs. In the U.S. alone, the six major vaccine companies received over $12 billion in public support; other rich country governments also provided support to these companies for developing these vaccines. They also benefited from prior public research and reduced costs of clinical testing because of more unpaid volunteers for trials. It is likely that the three "leader" vaccines have already received what could be considered as reasonable returns on their own investment, and more.
The economists note that wealthy countries are blocking a demand for the WTO to waive Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) rules in order to allow generic manufacturing of the vaccines to boost production. That opposition is self-defeating, the report asserts, given that the waiver would "benefit their own populations by making available more doses of vaccines quickly, and larger supply would reduce costs of additional doses of vaccines, making them cheaper for governments and taxpayers across the world."
A "global move for suspension and/or modification of intellectual property rights, for matters relating to essential public health concerns, is essential," the report says, and urges governments of wealther nations to "press vaccine manufacturers to share their knowledge with local producers and facilitate their ability to do so."
To further aid economic recovering big government spending is needed, including through measures like an extension of unemployment insurance. "This is not the time for austerity," they write.
Richer nations were also cautioned against pushing "fiscal austerity in IMF agreements" or "measures that increase inequality (like regressive taxation)."
The economists also address the crushing debt held by poorer nations. The wrote: "Money that is sent abroad to service their debt is money that could have been spent to rejuvenate the economy, to provide health protection for citizens, to purchase vaccines, etc."
In light of the continued economic downturn, the report says that"what is needed today is not just a debt moratorium, which simply kicks the can down the road while making the debts owed by the developing countries larger, but a deep and timely debt restructuring."
Political leaders, the group added, must "recognize that a healthy world economy is not possible without recovery in its poorer parts."
Stiglitz discussed the report Friday in an interview with Democracy Now!
He told hold Amy Goodman that the lack of suspension of intellectual property rights regarding coronavirus vaccines is "just foolish."
"And it's particularly unconscionable," said Stiglitz, "given that the advanced countries' governments have actually financed a very large fraction of that research, and the companies themselves are already making multiple returns on their investments."
A new paper from a group of leading economists rebukes the "ugliness of vaccine hoarding" by some wealthy nations and calls for a suspension of pharmaceutical companies' patent rights to counter the unequal access to doses and help end the coronavirus pandemic.
The proposals are laid out in a report released Thursday from the Institute for New Economic Thinking's (INET) Commission on Global Economic Transformation, a body chaired by Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Michael Spence.
The authors point to "the glaring deficiencies in our global debt regime" and frame their proposals as immediate measures that would foster "robust recovery."
\u201cINET\u2019s Commission on Global Economic Transformation - Interim Report on the Global Response to the Pandemic https://t.co/qU6UauUOK8\u201d— Institute for New Economic Thinking (@Institute for New Economic Thinking) 1615472353
There have been "unseemly and unfair vaccine grabs by the governments of some of the advanced countries," the report says. It cites as an example Canada, which secured jabs "for more than 10 times their current population." And while millions of doses have already been administered in dozens of wealther nations, "[a]s of the time of writing this report, 130 countries were yet to have administered a single dose."
The report notes that COVAX, the World World Health Organization-led initiative working for equitable access to Covid-19 vaccines, is still underfunded despite wealthier nations' ability to boost financing. "COVAX is unable to procure the required vaccines from producers who have received regulatory approval, because of vaccine grabbing by governments," the authors write.
Further distribution of doses is possible, the report argues, if the WHO takes "a proactive approach" to vaccines developed by other nations, including those from Russia and China, once governments' regulatory authorities deem them safe.
But right now, according to the economists, there is "completely unnecessary" vaccine scarcity, as a result of pharmaceutical companies' patent rights that give them "a monopoly on production" despite massive public funding. From the report:
Patents are usually seen as a necessary reward for invention/innovation, yet in the specific case of Covid-19 vaccines, pharma companies have received massive support from governments that have mostly and in some cases completely covered their R&D costs. In the U.S. alone, the six major vaccine companies received over $12 billion in public support; other rich country governments also provided support to these companies for developing these vaccines. They also benefited from prior public research and reduced costs of clinical testing because of more unpaid volunteers for trials. It is likely that the three "leader" vaccines have already received what could be considered as reasonable returns on their own investment, and more.
The economists note that wealthy countries are blocking a demand for the WTO to waive Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) rules in order to allow generic manufacturing of the vaccines to boost production. That opposition is self-defeating, the report asserts, given that the waiver would "benefit their own populations by making available more doses of vaccines quickly, and larger supply would reduce costs of additional doses of vaccines, making them cheaper for governments and taxpayers across the world."
A "global move for suspension and/or modification of intellectual property rights, for matters relating to essential public health concerns, is essential," the report says, and urges governments of wealther nations to "press vaccine manufacturers to share their knowledge with local producers and facilitate their ability to do so."
To further aid economic recovering big government spending is needed, including through measures like an extension of unemployment insurance. "This is not the time for austerity," they write.
Richer nations were also cautioned against pushing "fiscal austerity in IMF agreements" or "measures that increase inequality (like regressive taxation)."
The economists also address the crushing debt held by poorer nations. The wrote: "Money that is sent abroad to service their debt is money that could have been spent to rejuvenate the economy, to provide health protection for citizens, to purchase vaccines, etc."
In light of the continued economic downturn, the report says that"what is needed today is not just a debt moratorium, which simply kicks the can down the road while making the debts owed by the developing countries larger, but a deep and timely debt restructuring."
Political leaders, the group added, must "recognize that a healthy world economy is not possible without recovery in its poorer parts."
Stiglitz discussed the report Friday in an interview with Democracy Now!
He told hold Amy Goodman that the lack of suspension of intellectual property rights regarding coronavirus vaccines is "just foolish."
"And it's particularly unconscionable," said Stiglitz, "given that the advanced countries' governments have actually financed a very large fraction of that research, and the companies themselves are already making multiple returns on their investments."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.