SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) criticized the New York Police Department's deployment of a robotic K-9 unit to responde to a home invasion on February 23, 2021. (Photo: FNTV/YouTube screen grab)
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Condemns NYPD Test Deployment of K-9 Robot in Bronx Home
"Please ask yourself: when was the last time you saw next-generation, world class technology for education, healthcare, housing, etc. consistently prioritized for underserved communities like this?"
Feb 25, 2021
Arguing that money would be better spent on uplifting programs and policies rather than on high-tech policing of underserved communities, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Thursday blasted the New York Police Department for deploying a robotic police dog in a Bronx apartment building earlier this week.
Responding to a New York Post article about the NYPD's use of a "DigiDog" robotic K-9 unit in response to a home invasion, Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted, "Shout out to everyone who fought against community advocates who demanded these resources go to investments like school counseling instead. Now robotic surveillance ground drones are being deployed for testing on low-income communities of color with under-resourced schools."
Minutes later, she tweeted, "Please ask yourself: when was the last time you saw next-generation, world class technology for education, healthcare, housing, etc. consistently prioritized for underserved communities like this?"
Boston Dynamics, the manufacturer the "Spot" robot, advertises the 70-pound quadruped--which can run about three-and-a-half miles an hour and climb stairs--for $74,500, retail.
"Spot comes ready to operate, right out of the box," the company's website says. "With its flexible API [application programming interface] and payload interfaces, Spot can be customized for a variety of applications."
The NYPD version of the robot, which is still in its testing phase, is equipped with additional cameras and lights.
"This dog is going to save lives, protect people, and protect officers and that's our goal," NYPD Technical Assistance Response Unit Inspector Frank Digiacomo told WABC in December. "This robot is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things [in] very complex environments."
Boston Dynamics says it does not want Spot weaponized. And while the company says its robots aren't meant to kill people, it's easy to imagine how they could be customized or otherwise used to do just that. In 2016, Dallas police rigged a police bomb disposal robot with explosives to blow up a sniper who killed five officers.
Matthew Guariglia, privacy policy analyst at the San Francisco-based digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, wrote earlier this year that "the arrival of government-operated autonomous police robots does not look like predictions in science fiction movies."
"An army of robots with gun arms is not kicking down your door to arrest you," said Guariglia. "Instead, a robot snitch that looks like a rolling trash can is programmed to decide whether a person looks suspicious--and then call the human police on them." And while "police robots may not be able to hurt people like armed predator drones used in combat--yet--as history shows, calling the police on someone can prove equally deadly."
This is especially true given the well-documented algorithmic racial bias to which artificial intelligence is prone.
A more insidious threat of police robots, says Guariglia, involves surveillance.
"The next time you're at a protest and are relieved to see a robot rather than a baton-wielding officer, know that that robot may be using the IP address of your phone to identify your participation," he wrote. "This makes protesters vulnerable to reprisal from police and thus chills future exercise of constitutional rights."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Arguing that money would be better spent on uplifting programs and policies rather than on high-tech policing of underserved communities, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Thursday blasted the New York Police Department for deploying a robotic police dog in a Bronx apartment building earlier this week.
Responding to a New York Post article about the NYPD's use of a "DigiDog" robotic K-9 unit in response to a home invasion, Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted, "Shout out to everyone who fought against community advocates who demanded these resources go to investments like school counseling instead. Now robotic surveillance ground drones are being deployed for testing on low-income communities of color with under-resourced schools."
Minutes later, she tweeted, "Please ask yourself: when was the last time you saw next-generation, world class technology for education, healthcare, housing, etc. consistently prioritized for underserved communities like this?"
Boston Dynamics, the manufacturer the "Spot" robot, advertises the 70-pound quadruped--which can run about three-and-a-half miles an hour and climb stairs--for $74,500, retail.
"Spot comes ready to operate, right out of the box," the company's website says. "With its flexible API [application programming interface] and payload interfaces, Spot can be customized for a variety of applications."
The NYPD version of the robot, which is still in its testing phase, is equipped with additional cameras and lights.
"This dog is going to save lives, protect people, and protect officers and that's our goal," NYPD Technical Assistance Response Unit Inspector Frank Digiacomo told WABC in December. "This robot is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things [in] very complex environments."
Boston Dynamics says it does not want Spot weaponized. And while the company says its robots aren't meant to kill people, it's easy to imagine how they could be customized or otherwise used to do just that. In 2016, Dallas police rigged a police bomb disposal robot with explosives to blow up a sniper who killed five officers.
Matthew Guariglia, privacy policy analyst at the San Francisco-based digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, wrote earlier this year that "the arrival of government-operated autonomous police robots does not look like predictions in science fiction movies."
"An army of robots with gun arms is not kicking down your door to arrest you," said Guariglia. "Instead, a robot snitch that looks like a rolling trash can is programmed to decide whether a person looks suspicious--and then call the human police on them." And while "police robots may not be able to hurt people like armed predator drones used in combat--yet--as history shows, calling the police on someone can prove equally deadly."
This is especially true given the well-documented algorithmic racial bias to which artificial intelligence is prone.
A more insidious threat of police robots, says Guariglia, involves surveillance.
"The next time you're at a protest and are relieved to see a robot rather than a baton-wielding officer, know that that robot may be using the IP address of your phone to identify your participation," he wrote. "This makes protesters vulnerable to reprisal from police and thus chills future exercise of constitutional rights."
Arguing that money would be better spent on uplifting programs and policies rather than on high-tech policing of underserved communities, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Thursday blasted the New York Police Department for deploying a robotic police dog in a Bronx apartment building earlier this week.
Responding to a New York Post article about the NYPD's use of a "DigiDog" robotic K-9 unit in response to a home invasion, Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted, "Shout out to everyone who fought against community advocates who demanded these resources go to investments like school counseling instead. Now robotic surveillance ground drones are being deployed for testing on low-income communities of color with under-resourced schools."
Minutes later, she tweeted, "Please ask yourself: when was the last time you saw next-generation, world class technology for education, healthcare, housing, etc. consistently prioritized for underserved communities like this?"
Boston Dynamics, the manufacturer the "Spot" robot, advertises the 70-pound quadruped--which can run about three-and-a-half miles an hour and climb stairs--for $74,500, retail.
"Spot comes ready to operate, right out of the box," the company's website says. "With its flexible API [application programming interface] and payload interfaces, Spot can be customized for a variety of applications."
The NYPD version of the robot, which is still in its testing phase, is equipped with additional cameras and lights.
"This dog is going to save lives, protect people, and protect officers and that's our goal," NYPD Technical Assistance Response Unit Inspector Frank Digiacomo told WABC in December. "This robot is able to use its artificial intelligence to navigate things [in] very complex environments."
Boston Dynamics says it does not want Spot weaponized. And while the company says its robots aren't meant to kill people, it's easy to imagine how they could be customized or otherwise used to do just that. In 2016, Dallas police rigged a police bomb disposal robot with explosives to blow up a sniper who killed five officers.
Matthew Guariglia, privacy policy analyst at the San Francisco-based digital rights advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, wrote earlier this year that "the arrival of government-operated autonomous police robots does not look like predictions in science fiction movies."
"An army of robots with gun arms is not kicking down your door to arrest you," said Guariglia. "Instead, a robot snitch that looks like a rolling trash can is programmed to decide whether a person looks suspicious--and then call the human police on them." And while "police robots may not be able to hurt people like armed predator drones used in combat--yet--as history shows, calling the police on someone can prove equally deadly."
This is especially true given the well-documented algorithmic racial bias to which artificial intelligence is prone.
A more insidious threat of police robots, says Guariglia, involves surveillance.
"The next time you're at a protest and are relieved to see a robot rather than a baton-wielding officer, know that that robot may be using the IP address of your phone to identify your participation," he wrote. "This makes protesters vulnerable to reprisal from police and thus chills future exercise of constitutional rights."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.