

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Audience members hold signs during the BET special "Young, Gifted, and Broke: Our Student Loan Crisis" on September 10, 2019 at Howard Theater in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Richard Chapin Downs Jr./Getty Images for BET)
As President Joe Biden faces sustained criticism for dismissing calls to cancel $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower, new polling released Thursday reveals strong support for him to "go big" and carry out that proposal.
Data for Progress found (pdf) that 54% of likely voters think Biden should use his executive authority to cancel $50,000 in student debt compared to just 37% who said he should not forgive that debt.
"It's almost like the American people want government to meet the scale of the crisis," wrote Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.)--a co-sponsor of legislation introduced in December calling on Biden to cancel up to $50,000 in Federal student loan debt--in a tweet responding to the poll.
As Data for Progress' Prerna Jagadeesh wrote in a blog post analyzing the findings, Biden should view student debt cancellation as "not a liability but rather an opportunity, given how popular student loan debt cancellation is with the American people."
The polling of 1,219 likely voters took place January 6-January 11. The poll's margin of error is +-2.8 percentage points.
The progressive group also queried respondents about cancelling just $10,000 in student debt per borrower. It found that 52% backed that proposal compared to 38% who said Biden should not forgive that amount of student debt.
"As the chart shows, support was slightly higher in the $50,000 condition, though within the margin of error," wrote Jagadeesh. "There is no evidence that going smaller will help Biden."
Data for Progress' poll came the same week Biden said at a CNN town hall that he "will not" cancel $50,000 in student loan debt, telling the audience that he objected to the forgiveness of "billions of dollars of debt for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn" and said the funds should instead be directed "for early education for young children who... come from disadvantaged circumstances."
"Who cares what school someone went to?" Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), another co-sponsor of the debt cancellation proposal, tweeted in response to Biden's comments. "Entire generations of working class kids were encouraged to go into more debt under the guise of elitism. This is wrong."
"Nowhere does it say we must trade-off early childhood education for student loan forgiveness. We can have both," she added.
Further evidence against Biden's objection to cancelling $50,000 in student came Thursday with a report from social science research group Jain Family Institute showing how the action would lessen the nation's economic inequality.
"With rising debt levels seen in all groups and states, coupled with the current pandemic-induced recession and its unemployment effects, any forgiveness policy is also an opportunity to stimulate the economy, in addition to its egalitarian effects," the report said.
"There is no evidence that going smaller will help Biden."
--Prerna Jagadeesh, Data for Progress Passage of the $50,000 debt cancellation proposal would mean "[n]early 85% of young borrowers in the poorest communities would become free of student debt."
The research also shows that "blanket forgiveness is progressive: for lower-income communities, a cancellation of a given dollar amount of student debt means a greater proportional reduction in outstanding debt, so a cancellation of this type reduces student debt-to-income disparities between the rich and the poor," the report found. "That is more evident the higher the dollar amount of the cancellation, to the point that a total cancellation of all outstanding student debt reduces debt-to-income disparities the most."
Data for Progress' Jagadeesh also noted that "cancelling a full $50,000 of student loan debt per person via executive order won't just be a one-time handout to college educated people--it will help people who did not receive a college degree too." She continued:
Cancelling student debt will improve the economy overall and strengthen every component of President Biden's pandemic recovery package. Every month, the average American student debt holder makes loan payments of $200 to $300. Cancelling that debt would be akin to giving those people an extra stimulus check every month. That's not to mention that people drowning in student loan debt are considerably less likely to start a small business or buy a home--cancelling $50,000 of their debt will enable these people to meaningfully participate in the American economy for the first time in their lives.
Speaking with Democracy Now! Thursday, filmmaker and Debt Collective organizer Astra Taylor stressed that President Biden possesses the authority to cancel all student debt. "It was granted by Congress decades ago. And he can erase all federal student loans. And he should," she said.
Joining Taylor on the segment was Braxton Brewington, a digital strategist with the Debt Collective. He called the decision not to cancel student debt "policy assault" and said that those who "would benefit the most from student loan debt [cancellation] are individuals like me, Black and Brown borrowers, mostly Black women borrowers, who, frankly, have upwards of $35,000, $50,000, hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of debt."
But, Brewington added, "this is an intergenerational issue," noting that seniors can get part of "their Social Security checks garnished for student loan debt, which is insane."
Taylor, in her remarks, said student debt cancellation should be framed as "an economic justice issue, it's a racial justice issue, and canceling student debt is also a democracy issue, because we all are entitled to live in a society where our fellow people can pursue education."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As President Joe Biden faces sustained criticism for dismissing calls to cancel $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower, new polling released Thursday reveals strong support for him to "go big" and carry out that proposal.
Data for Progress found (pdf) that 54% of likely voters think Biden should use his executive authority to cancel $50,000 in student debt compared to just 37% who said he should not forgive that debt.
"It's almost like the American people want government to meet the scale of the crisis," wrote Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.)--a co-sponsor of legislation introduced in December calling on Biden to cancel up to $50,000 in Federal student loan debt--in a tweet responding to the poll.
As Data for Progress' Prerna Jagadeesh wrote in a blog post analyzing the findings, Biden should view student debt cancellation as "not a liability but rather an opportunity, given how popular student loan debt cancellation is with the American people."
The polling of 1,219 likely voters took place January 6-January 11. The poll's margin of error is +-2.8 percentage points.
The progressive group also queried respondents about cancelling just $10,000 in student debt per borrower. It found that 52% backed that proposal compared to 38% who said Biden should not forgive that amount of student debt.
"As the chart shows, support was slightly higher in the $50,000 condition, though within the margin of error," wrote Jagadeesh. "There is no evidence that going smaller will help Biden."
Data for Progress' poll came the same week Biden said at a CNN town hall that he "will not" cancel $50,000 in student loan debt, telling the audience that he objected to the forgiveness of "billions of dollars of debt for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn" and said the funds should instead be directed "for early education for young children who... come from disadvantaged circumstances."
"Who cares what school someone went to?" Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), another co-sponsor of the debt cancellation proposal, tweeted in response to Biden's comments. "Entire generations of working class kids were encouraged to go into more debt under the guise of elitism. This is wrong."
"Nowhere does it say we must trade-off early childhood education for student loan forgiveness. We can have both," she added.
Further evidence against Biden's objection to cancelling $50,000 in student came Thursday with a report from social science research group Jain Family Institute showing how the action would lessen the nation's economic inequality.
"With rising debt levels seen in all groups and states, coupled with the current pandemic-induced recession and its unemployment effects, any forgiveness policy is also an opportunity to stimulate the economy, in addition to its egalitarian effects," the report said.
"There is no evidence that going smaller will help Biden."
--Prerna Jagadeesh, Data for Progress Passage of the $50,000 debt cancellation proposal would mean "[n]early 85% of young borrowers in the poorest communities would become free of student debt."
The research also shows that "blanket forgiveness is progressive: for lower-income communities, a cancellation of a given dollar amount of student debt means a greater proportional reduction in outstanding debt, so a cancellation of this type reduces student debt-to-income disparities between the rich and the poor," the report found. "That is more evident the higher the dollar amount of the cancellation, to the point that a total cancellation of all outstanding student debt reduces debt-to-income disparities the most."
Data for Progress' Jagadeesh also noted that "cancelling a full $50,000 of student loan debt per person via executive order won't just be a one-time handout to college educated people--it will help people who did not receive a college degree too." She continued:
Cancelling student debt will improve the economy overall and strengthen every component of President Biden's pandemic recovery package. Every month, the average American student debt holder makes loan payments of $200 to $300. Cancelling that debt would be akin to giving those people an extra stimulus check every month. That's not to mention that people drowning in student loan debt are considerably less likely to start a small business or buy a home--cancelling $50,000 of their debt will enable these people to meaningfully participate in the American economy for the first time in their lives.
Speaking with Democracy Now! Thursday, filmmaker and Debt Collective organizer Astra Taylor stressed that President Biden possesses the authority to cancel all student debt. "It was granted by Congress decades ago. And he can erase all federal student loans. And he should," she said.
Joining Taylor on the segment was Braxton Brewington, a digital strategist with the Debt Collective. He called the decision not to cancel student debt "policy assault" and said that those who "would benefit the most from student loan debt [cancellation] are individuals like me, Black and Brown borrowers, mostly Black women borrowers, who, frankly, have upwards of $35,000, $50,000, hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of debt."
But, Brewington added, "this is an intergenerational issue," noting that seniors can get part of "their Social Security checks garnished for student loan debt, which is insane."
Taylor, in her remarks, said student debt cancellation should be framed as "an economic justice issue, it's a racial justice issue, and canceling student debt is also a democracy issue, because we all are entitled to live in a society where our fellow people can pursue education."
As President Joe Biden faces sustained criticism for dismissing calls to cancel $50,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower, new polling released Thursday reveals strong support for him to "go big" and carry out that proposal.
Data for Progress found (pdf) that 54% of likely voters think Biden should use his executive authority to cancel $50,000 in student debt compared to just 37% who said he should not forgive that debt.
"It's almost like the American people want government to meet the scale of the crisis," wrote Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.)--a co-sponsor of legislation introduced in December calling on Biden to cancel up to $50,000 in Federal student loan debt--in a tweet responding to the poll.
As Data for Progress' Prerna Jagadeesh wrote in a blog post analyzing the findings, Biden should view student debt cancellation as "not a liability but rather an opportunity, given how popular student loan debt cancellation is with the American people."
The polling of 1,219 likely voters took place January 6-January 11. The poll's margin of error is +-2.8 percentage points.
The progressive group also queried respondents about cancelling just $10,000 in student debt per borrower. It found that 52% backed that proposal compared to 38% who said Biden should not forgive that amount of student debt.
"As the chart shows, support was slightly higher in the $50,000 condition, though within the margin of error," wrote Jagadeesh. "There is no evidence that going smaller will help Biden."
Data for Progress' poll came the same week Biden said at a CNN town hall that he "will not" cancel $50,000 in student loan debt, telling the audience that he objected to the forgiveness of "billions of dollars of debt for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn" and said the funds should instead be directed "for early education for young children who... come from disadvantaged circumstances."
"Who cares what school someone went to?" Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), another co-sponsor of the debt cancellation proposal, tweeted in response to Biden's comments. "Entire generations of working class kids were encouraged to go into more debt under the guise of elitism. This is wrong."
"Nowhere does it say we must trade-off early childhood education for student loan forgiveness. We can have both," she added.
Further evidence against Biden's objection to cancelling $50,000 in student came Thursday with a report from social science research group Jain Family Institute showing how the action would lessen the nation's economic inequality.
"With rising debt levels seen in all groups and states, coupled with the current pandemic-induced recession and its unemployment effects, any forgiveness policy is also an opportunity to stimulate the economy, in addition to its egalitarian effects," the report said.
"There is no evidence that going smaller will help Biden."
--Prerna Jagadeesh, Data for Progress Passage of the $50,000 debt cancellation proposal would mean "[n]early 85% of young borrowers in the poorest communities would become free of student debt."
The research also shows that "blanket forgiveness is progressive: for lower-income communities, a cancellation of a given dollar amount of student debt means a greater proportional reduction in outstanding debt, so a cancellation of this type reduces student debt-to-income disparities between the rich and the poor," the report found. "That is more evident the higher the dollar amount of the cancellation, to the point that a total cancellation of all outstanding student debt reduces debt-to-income disparities the most."
Data for Progress' Jagadeesh also noted that "cancelling a full $50,000 of student loan debt per person via executive order won't just be a one-time handout to college educated people--it will help people who did not receive a college degree too." She continued:
Cancelling student debt will improve the economy overall and strengthen every component of President Biden's pandemic recovery package. Every month, the average American student debt holder makes loan payments of $200 to $300. Cancelling that debt would be akin to giving those people an extra stimulus check every month. That's not to mention that people drowning in student loan debt are considerably less likely to start a small business or buy a home--cancelling $50,000 of their debt will enable these people to meaningfully participate in the American economy for the first time in their lives.
Speaking with Democracy Now! Thursday, filmmaker and Debt Collective organizer Astra Taylor stressed that President Biden possesses the authority to cancel all student debt. "It was granted by Congress decades ago. And he can erase all federal student loans. And he should," she said.
Joining Taylor on the segment was Braxton Brewington, a digital strategist with the Debt Collective. He called the decision not to cancel student debt "policy assault" and said that those who "would benefit the most from student loan debt [cancellation] are individuals like me, Black and Brown borrowers, mostly Black women borrowers, who, frankly, have upwards of $35,000, $50,000, hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of debt."
But, Brewington added, "this is an intergenerational issue," noting that seniors can get part of "their Social Security checks garnished for student loan debt, which is insane."
Taylor, in her remarks, said student debt cancellation should be framed as "an economic justice issue, it's a racial justice issue, and canceling student debt is also a democracy issue, because we all are entitled to live in a society where our fellow people can pursue education."