SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Assange supporters gather outside the court as the Julian Assange extradition verdict is delivered in London on January 4, 2020. (Photo: Tayfun Salci/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
'Absolutely Outrageous': UK Judge Denies Julian Assange Bail, Keeping WikiLeaks Founder in Prison
"Shows how authoritarian the British judiciary is. The only thing the U.S. cares about is keeping Assange in a cage, silenced, and disappeared. This gives them the best of all worlds: he stays in prison, with no need to prove he's guilty of anything."
Jan 05, 2021
A British judge on Wednesday morning denied bail to Julian Assange, a move that will keep the WikiLeaks founder detained in a notorious London prison as the Trump administration appeals the U.K. court's rejection of its extradition request.
"This is absolutely outrageous for the judge to deny Assange bail and to claim that Belmarsh is doing a fine job of handling Covid, even while London is on lockdown," tweeted Shadow Proof managing editor Kevin Gosztola, who has been closely covering the Assange hearings. "Judge proves yet again how captive she is to the U.K. agency interests, which tend to show subservience to the U.S. government."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald echoed Gosztola's criticism of Judge Vanessa Baraitser's decision, noting that "there are no charges pending against Julian Assange in the U.K."
"A U.K. judge denied the U.S.'s request to extradite him, the only place where charges are pending," Greenwald added. "Despite this, the judge just ruled he must remain imprisoned--in a Covid-ridden high-security prison--while the U.S. appeals."
Baraitser's decision to deny Assange's bail request came just days after she rejected the Trump administration's push to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the U.S., where he would likely face up to 175 years in prison for publishing classified documents, an act of journalism.
In her ruling, Baraitser made clear that she denied the U.S. request not because of the threat extradition would pose to press freedoms, but because of the brutality of the American prison system.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A British judge on Wednesday morning denied bail to Julian Assange, a move that will keep the WikiLeaks founder detained in a notorious London prison as the Trump administration appeals the U.K. court's rejection of its extradition request.
"This is absolutely outrageous for the judge to deny Assange bail and to claim that Belmarsh is doing a fine job of handling Covid, even while London is on lockdown," tweeted Shadow Proof managing editor Kevin Gosztola, who has been closely covering the Assange hearings. "Judge proves yet again how captive she is to the U.K. agency interests, which tend to show subservience to the U.S. government."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald echoed Gosztola's criticism of Judge Vanessa Baraitser's decision, noting that "there are no charges pending against Julian Assange in the U.K."
"A U.K. judge denied the U.S.'s request to extradite him, the only place where charges are pending," Greenwald added. "Despite this, the judge just ruled he must remain imprisoned--in a Covid-ridden high-security prison--while the U.S. appeals."
Baraitser's decision to deny Assange's bail request came just days after she rejected the Trump administration's push to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the U.S., where he would likely face up to 175 years in prison for publishing classified documents, an act of journalism.
In her ruling, Baraitser made clear that she denied the U.S. request not because of the threat extradition would pose to press freedoms, but because of the brutality of the American prison system.
A British judge on Wednesday morning denied bail to Julian Assange, a move that will keep the WikiLeaks founder detained in a notorious London prison as the Trump administration appeals the U.K. court's rejection of its extradition request.
"This is absolutely outrageous for the judge to deny Assange bail and to claim that Belmarsh is doing a fine job of handling Covid, even while London is on lockdown," tweeted Shadow Proof managing editor Kevin Gosztola, who has been closely covering the Assange hearings. "Judge proves yet again how captive she is to the U.K. agency interests, which tend to show subservience to the U.S. government."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald echoed Gosztola's criticism of Judge Vanessa Baraitser's decision, noting that "there are no charges pending against Julian Assange in the U.K."
"A U.K. judge denied the U.S.'s request to extradite him, the only place where charges are pending," Greenwald added. "Despite this, the judge just ruled he must remain imprisoned--in a Covid-ridden high-security prison--while the U.S. appeals."
Baraitser's decision to deny Assange's bail request came just days after she rejected the Trump administration's push to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the U.S., where he would likely face up to 175 years in prison for publishing classified documents, an act of journalism.
In her ruling, Baraitser made clear that she denied the U.S. request not because of the threat extradition would pose to press freedoms, but because of the brutality of the American prison system.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.