

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin speaks during the daily briefing on the novel coronavirus in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, D.C. on April 21, 2020. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was accused Friday of taking "exactly the wrong policy move right now" and sabotaging the economy for the incoming Biden administration after announcing an end-of-year cutoff to several key coronavirus relief lending programs at the Federal Reserve.
CNBC's reporting quoted one financial expert who likened the move by Mnuchin to stripping a ship of its lifeboats when they're most needed. The outlet explained:
Mnuchin announced Thursday that he will not extend the Federal Reserve's emergency lending programs that used Congress' CARES Act funds beyond Dec. 31. The move is expected to drastically reduce the central bank's ability to shore up the financial system.
"It's hard to find an economic rationale for it," Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe" on Friday.
"I don't think there's a good economic or public health or social reason to explain why they want to cut these programs," he added, "so it's kind of got to be politics, doesn't it?"
At issue are an array of relief loan programs facilitated by the Fed with funds provided by the Treasury that were authorized by Congress earlier this year. These programs include: the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Municipal Liquidity Facility, Main Street Lending Program, and Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility.
"With respect to the facilities that used CARES Act funding," Mnuchin wrote Thursday to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, "I was personally involved in drafting the relevant part of the legislation and believe the congressional intent as outlined in Section 4029 was to have the authority to originate new loans or purchase new assets (either directly or indirectly) expire on December 31, 2020."
"As such, I am requesting that the Federal Reserve return the unused funds to the Treasury. This will allow Congress to re-appropriate $455 billion, consisting of $429 billion in excess Treasury funds for the Federal Reserve facilities and $26 billion in unused Treasury direct loan funds," wrote Mnuchin.
Mnuchin's letter, as Bloomberg News reported, elicited swift rebuke from Powell. In a statement released "minutes" after Mnuchin's letter, the Fed urged that "the full suite of emergency facilities established during the coronavirus pandemic continue to serve their important role as a backstop for our still-strained and vulnerable economy."
"The central bank," noted Axios, "almost never issues public statements."
The Trump administration's move sparked a chorus of criticism from economists including Paul Krugman.
In a Friday Twitter thread, Krugman said "Mnuchin is effectively trying to create a financial crisis, or at least make one more likely." Krugman added that "basically we're looking at more sabotage by an administration on its way out."
Krugman was far from alone in his criticism:
Mnuchin's announcement also drew scathing rebuke from Neil Barofsky, former inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, who described the programs' move to the chopping block as a "reckless political decision," and called on the Trump administration "not [to] succumb to the political temptation to straitjacket its successor."
In his Friday op-ed at the New York Times, Barofsky urged Mnuchin to follow the approach of the George W. Bush administration's outgoing Treasury Department when it "did all that it could to preserve President-elect Barack Obama's discretion to use congressionally approved bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relied Program ... to steer our nation's recovery."
Trump's Treasury Department, wrote Barofsky, "should reverse [its] reckless course and follow the precedent set with TARP by extending these programs to give the newly elected administration as much flexibility as possible."
"It makes no sense to celebrate the programs for the success they have had in calming markets," Barofsky added, "while at the same time pulling the rug out from under them at a time when they are likely to be most needed."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was accused Friday of taking "exactly the wrong policy move right now" and sabotaging the economy for the incoming Biden administration after announcing an end-of-year cutoff to several key coronavirus relief lending programs at the Federal Reserve.
CNBC's reporting quoted one financial expert who likened the move by Mnuchin to stripping a ship of its lifeboats when they're most needed. The outlet explained:
Mnuchin announced Thursday that he will not extend the Federal Reserve's emergency lending programs that used Congress' CARES Act funds beyond Dec. 31. The move is expected to drastically reduce the central bank's ability to shore up the financial system.
"It's hard to find an economic rationale for it," Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe" on Friday.
"I don't think there's a good economic or public health or social reason to explain why they want to cut these programs," he added, "so it's kind of got to be politics, doesn't it?"
At issue are an array of relief loan programs facilitated by the Fed with funds provided by the Treasury that were authorized by Congress earlier this year. These programs include: the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Municipal Liquidity Facility, Main Street Lending Program, and Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility.
"With respect to the facilities that used CARES Act funding," Mnuchin wrote Thursday to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, "I was personally involved in drafting the relevant part of the legislation and believe the congressional intent as outlined in Section 4029 was to have the authority to originate new loans or purchase new assets (either directly or indirectly) expire on December 31, 2020."
"As such, I am requesting that the Federal Reserve return the unused funds to the Treasury. This will allow Congress to re-appropriate $455 billion, consisting of $429 billion in excess Treasury funds for the Federal Reserve facilities and $26 billion in unused Treasury direct loan funds," wrote Mnuchin.
Mnuchin's letter, as Bloomberg News reported, elicited swift rebuke from Powell. In a statement released "minutes" after Mnuchin's letter, the Fed urged that "the full suite of emergency facilities established during the coronavirus pandemic continue to serve their important role as a backstop for our still-strained and vulnerable economy."
"The central bank," noted Axios, "almost never issues public statements."
The Trump administration's move sparked a chorus of criticism from economists including Paul Krugman.
In a Friday Twitter thread, Krugman said "Mnuchin is effectively trying to create a financial crisis, or at least make one more likely." Krugman added that "basically we're looking at more sabotage by an administration on its way out."
Krugman was far from alone in his criticism:
Mnuchin's announcement also drew scathing rebuke from Neil Barofsky, former inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, who described the programs' move to the chopping block as a "reckless political decision," and called on the Trump administration "not [to] succumb to the political temptation to straitjacket its successor."
In his Friday op-ed at the New York Times, Barofsky urged Mnuchin to follow the approach of the George W. Bush administration's outgoing Treasury Department when it "did all that it could to preserve President-elect Barack Obama's discretion to use congressionally approved bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relied Program ... to steer our nation's recovery."
Trump's Treasury Department, wrote Barofsky, "should reverse [its] reckless course and follow the precedent set with TARP by extending these programs to give the newly elected administration as much flexibility as possible."
"It makes no sense to celebrate the programs for the success they have had in calming markets," Barofsky added, "while at the same time pulling the rug out from under them at a time when they are likely to be most needed."
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was accused Friday of taking "exactly the wrong policy move right now" and sabotaging the economy for the incoming Biden administration after announcing an end-of-year cutoff to several key coronavirus relief lending programs at the Federal Reserve.
CNBC's reporting quoted one financial expert who likened the move by Mnuchin to stripping a ship of its lifeboats when they're most needed. The outlet explained:
Mnuchin announced Thursday that he will not extend the Federal Reserve's emergency lending programs that used Congress' CARES Act funds beyond Dec. 31. The move is expected to drastically reduce the central bank's ability to shore up the financial system.
"It's hard to find an economic rationale for it," Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe" on Friday.
"I don't think there's a good economic or public health or social reason to explain why they want to cut these programs," he added, "so it's kind of got to be politics, doesn't it?"
At issue are an array of relief loan programs facilitated by the Fed with funds provided by the Treasury that were authorized by Congress earlier this year. These programs include: the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Municipal Liquidity Facility, Main Street Lending Program, and Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility.
"With respect to the facilities that used CARES Act funding," Mnuchin wrote Thursday to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, "I was personally involved in drafting the relevant part of the legislation and believe the congressional intent as outlined in Section 4029 was to have the authority to originate new loans or purchase new assets (either directly or indirectly) expire on December 31, 2020."
"As such, I am requesting that the Federal Reserve return the unused funds to the Treasury. This will allow Congress to re-appropriate $455 billion, consisting of $429 billion in excess Treasury funds for the Federal Reserve facilities and $26 billion in unused Treasury direct loan funds," wrote Mnuchin.
Mnuchin's letter, as Bloomberg News reported, elicited swift rebuke from Powell. In a statement released "minutes" after Mnuchin's letter, the Fed urged that "the full suite of emergency facilities established during the coronavirus pandemic continue to serve their important role as a backstop for our still-strained and vulnerable economy."
"The central bank," noted Axios, "almost never issues public statements."
The Trump administration's move sparked a chorus of criticism from economists including Paul Krugman.
In a Friday Twitter thread, Krugman said "Mnuchin is effectively trying to create a financial crisis, or at least make one more likely." Krugman added that "basically we're looking at more sabotage by an administration on its way out."
Krugman was far from alone in his criticism:
Mnuchin's announcement also drew scathing rebuke from Neil Barofsky, former inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, who described the programs' move to the chopping block as a "reckless political decision," and called on the Trump administration "not [to] succumb to the political temptation to straitjacket its successor."
In his Friday op-ed at the New York Times, Barofsky urged Mnuchin to follow the approach of the George W. Bush administration's outgoing Treasury Department when it "did all that it could to preserve President-elect Barack Obama's discretion to use congressionally approved bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relied Program ... to steer our nation's recovery."
Trump's Treasury Department, wrote Barofsky, "should reverse [its] reckless course and follow the precedent set with TARP by extending these programs to give the newly elected administration as much flexibility as possible."
"It makes no sense to celebrate the programs for the success they have had in calming markets," Barofsky added, "while at the same time pulling the rug out from under them at a time when they are likely to be most needed."