Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

ONE DAY left in this Mid-Year Campaign. This is our hour of need.
If you value independent journalism, please support Common Dreams.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Marilyn Sarelas of Portland, Maine, joins a crowd of demonstrators protesting the nomination and possible confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, at a rally across the street from the Portland office of Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins on Thursday, Oct. 4, 2018. (Photo: Tristan Spinski for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

'We. Will. Vote. Her. Out.': Maine Progressives Not Fooled Even a Little Bit by Susan Collins' Cynical Vote on Barrett

"Senator Collins has continued to enable Trump and McConnell's anti-choice, anti-freedom agenda. This vote is too little, too late."

Julia Conley

Progressives in Maine and across the U.S. on Tuesday urged Sen. Susan Collins' constituents to reject her latest attempt to cast herself as a moderate Republican after the four-term senator voted against Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation. 

Collins was the only member of her party to vote against the judge's confirmation and was one of two Republicans on Sunday to vote against advancing Barrett's nomination to the Senate floor. But in Maine, progressive activists who have spent recent years vowing to unseat Collins in next week's election said the senator's actions must not be confused for a principled stand against President Donald Trump's agenda.  

"Susan Collins' vote against Amy Barrett’s confirmation is a last-ditch effort to rewrite history and distract voters from her betrayal in voting to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court... That cannot be erased and voters will not forget."
—Ilyse Hogue, NARAL

Marie Follayttar, executive director of the grassroots group Mainers for Accountable Leadership, noted that Collins made clear she has no problem with Barrett serving as a federal judge when she supported her 2017 confirmation to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Collins made that vote despite the fact that Barrett had never before served as a judge, tried a case to verdict, or argued an appeal in court. While Collins has long branded herself as pro-choice, she voted for Barrett even though she has very publicly espoused anti-choice views. 

Dubbing her 'Sidekick Sue,' Follayttar told Common Dreams Tuesday that Collins was "given her hall pass by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell when—and only when—the votes to confirm were in and she could play the act of moderate senator from Maine."

Follayttar and other progressives argued that Collins' vote against Barrett on Monday night was one the Senate Republicans could afford, since every other member of the party supported sending Barrett to the Supreme Court.

Although Collins objected to the Senate vote on Barrett's confirmation just over a week before Election Day, while early voting is already underway across the country, grassroots group Suit Up Maine tweeted that the senator "approves of Barrett's anti-LGBTQ, anti-abortion, originalist views."

"WE. WILL. VOTE. HER. OUT," the organization said. 

The senator acknowledged as much on Sunday, stating, "Because this vote is occurring prior to the election, I will vote against the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett. To be clear, my vote does not reflect any conclusion that I have reached about Judge Barrett's qualifications to serve on the Supreme Court."

Reproductive rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America accused Collins of attempting to "rewrite history" two years after she supported the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who had been accused of sexual assault and had also issued anti-choice rulings as a federal judge. 

"Susan Collins' vote against Amy Barrett’s confirmation is a last-ditch effort to rewrite history and distract voters from her betrayal in voting to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court," said NARAL President Ilyse Hogue. "Collins' vote paved the way for cementing a right-wing majority on the Court bound and determined to gut Roe v. Wade and roll back decades of progress on reproductive freedom and women's rights. That cannot be erased and voters will not forget."

"Senator Collins has continued to enable Trump and McConnell's anti-choice, anti-freedom agenda," Hogue added. "This vote is too little, too late."

In addition to voting for Kavanaugh, Collins has supported the confirmations of dozens of President Donald Trump's anti-choice judiciary nominees, all while continuing to claim that she supports reproductive rights.

With Sara Gideon, the Democratic candidate running for Collins' seat, holding only a slim lead in recent polls, progressives are hoping to counter the narrative that persists in the mainstream press regarding Collins as a moderate voice in the Republican Party, as evidenced by recent Newsweek headlines calling her "the lone Republican to oppose" Barrett and claiming she's been "shunned by Trump" but is "standing firm" against the new justice.   

"When you look at her record: the tax giveaways, the Kavanaugh appointment, undermining the ACA—it's clear that Susan Collins is interested in keeping her access to wealth and power in Washington, but she's no longer interested in being our senator," said Willy Ritch, executive director of the Maine-based grassroots group 16 Counties Coalition.

"Susan Collins keeps saying she wants us to judge her on her record," added Ritch. "But her record shows she is loyal to Mitch McConnell and the corporate special interests that fund their campaigns, not the Mainers she claims to represent."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Just ONE DAY left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

'Indefensible': Outrage as New Reporting Shines Light on Biden Deal With McConnell

The president has reportedly agreed to nominate an anti-abortion Republican to a lifetime judgeship. In exchange, McConnell has vowed to stop blocking two Biden picks for term-limited U.S. attorney posts.

Jake Johnson ·


Assange Makes Final Appeal Against US Extradition

"If Julian Assange is not free, neither are we," said a protester at a Friday demonstration against the WikiLeaks founder's impending transfer. "None of us is free."

Brett Wilkins ·


'Payoff for 40 Years of Dark Money': Supreme Court Delivers for Corporate America

"It was the conservative court's larger agenda to gut the regulatory state and decimate executive powers to protect Americans' health and safety," warned one expert.

Jake Johnson ·


NARAL Pro-Choice Endorses Fetterman—Who Vows to End Senate Filibuster to Protect Abortion Rights

"We know we can count on him to boldly fight for abortion rights and access," said the head of one of the nation's largest reproductive rights advocacy groups.

Jon Queally ·


Texas Panel Denounced Over Attempt to Rebrand Slavery as 'Involuntary Relocation'

One progressive group called the proposal "a blatant attempt to whitewash history to fit a racist worldview."

Brett Wilkins ·

Common Dreams Logo