
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) visits striking United Auto Workers union members as they picket at the General Motors Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly Plant on September 25, 2019 in Detroit, Michigan. (Photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
'He'd Be Terrific': Progressives Enthusiastic at Prospect of Lifelong Worker Champion Bernie Sanders as Labor Secretary
While progressives were mostly excited by the possibility of Sanders taking over the Labor Department, some voiced concerns about the consequences of losing a powerful left voice in the Senate.
Progressives were on the whole enthusiastic about the prospect of Sen. Bernie Sanders taking charge of the Labor Department after Politico reported late Thursday that the lifelong champion of the working class has expressed interest in pursuing the position should Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden emerge victorious from next month's pivotal election.
Sanders told Politico that his "main focus" at the moment is on ensuring that Biden defeats incumbent President Donald Trump on November 3 and would neither confirm nor deny that he is seeking the top Labor Department post, which is currently occupied by former corporate lawyer and union opponent Eugene Scalia.
But two unnamed people close to the Vermont senator told Politico that Sanders--who has been campaigning relentlessly for Biden both virtually and in person in recent weeks--"has been making his push for the top job at the Labor Department in part by reaching out to allies on the transition team."
"Sanders sees an opportunity to achieve long-held policy goals for the working class under Biden," Politico reported, citing an anonymous source familiar with the senator's thinking.
Economist Robert Reich, who served as Labor Secretary under President Bill Clinton, voiced his approval of Sanders' reported push for the job, which would put the senator in a powerful position to enact significant changes to U.S. labor regulations and crack down on abusive corporations.
"He'd be terrific," Reich told Politico.
Other progressives echoed Reich, welcoming the possibility of an unabashed advocate of union rights taking over a department that over the past four years has moved to roll back worker protections and treated corporate abuses with kid gloves.
"Hey we have an idea and it's LET'S DO THIS," advocacy group People's Action tweeted in response to Politico's reporting.
"Sanders as Labor Secretary... we're into it," added environmental group 350 Action.
While the progressive response to news of Sanders' interest in the Department of Labor post was largely positive, some warned about the potential consequences of losing Sanders as a critical voice and key advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All in the Senate.
"It's a really bad idea for Sanders to become Labor Secretary because as an administration official he would be unable to harshly criticize the Biden White House," tweeted Nathan Robinson, editor of the left-wing magazine Current Affairs. "We are going to urgently need independent left voices to tell the truth about Biden, not apologists."
If Biden wins the presidential election next month and offers Sanders the labor secretary job, the Vermont senator would have to decide whether to vacate his seat and potentially allow Vermont's Republican Gov. Phil Scott--who is facing off against Sanders-endorsed Democratic nominee David Zuckerman next month--to name his temporary replacement. Under Vermont law, a special election for the seat must take place within six months of the vacancy.
" Bernie Sanders as Secretary of Labor would indeed be excellent," progressive activist Stephanie Quilao tweeted.
But Quilao also noted that Sanders is poised to become chairman of both the powerful Senate Budget Committee and the Senate Subcommittee on Health if Democrats win control of the chamber in November, raising the question of where the progressive stalwart would have the most impact.
"Which position has more power and influence?" Quilao asked.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressives were on the whole enthusiastic about the prospect of Sen. Bernie Sanders taking charge of the Labor Department after Politico reported late Thursday that the lifelong champion of the working class has expressed interest in pursuing the position should Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden emerge victorious from next month's pivotal election.
Sanders told Politico that his "main focus" at the moment is on ensuring that Biden defeats incumbent President Donald Trump on November 3 and would neither confirm nor deny that he is seeking the top Labor Department post, which is currently occupied by former corporate lawyer and union opponent Eugene Scalia.
But two unnamed people close to the Vermont senator told Politico that Sanders--who has been campaigning relentlessly for Biden both virtually and in person in recent weeks--"has been making his push for the top job at the Labor Department in part by reaching out to allies on the transition team."
"Sanders sees an opportunity to achieve long-held policy goals for the working class under Biden," Politico reported, citing an anonymous source familiar with the senator's thinking.
Economist Robert Reich, who served as Labor Secretary under President Bill Clinton, voiced his approval of Sanders' reported push for the job, which would put the senator in a powerful position to enact significant changes to U.S. labor regulations and crack down on abusive corporations.
"He'd be terrific," Reich told Politico.
Other progressives echoed Reich, welcoming the possibility of an unabashed advocate of union rights taking over a department that over the past four years has moved to roll back worker protections and treated corporate abuses with kid gloves.
"Hey we have an idea and it's LET'S DO THIS," advocacy group People's Action tweeted in response to Politico's reporting.
"Sanders as Labor Secretary... we're into it," added environmental group 350 Action.
While the progressive response to news of Sanders' interest in the Department of Labor post was largely positive, some warned about the potential consequences of losing Sanders as a critical voice and key advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All in the Senate.
"It's a really bad idea for Sanders to become Labor Secretary because as an administration official he would be unable to harshly criticize the Biden White House," tweeted Nathan Robinson, editor of the left-wing magazine Current Affairs. "We are going to urgently need independent left voices to tell the truth about Biden, not apologists."
If Biden wins the presidential election next month and offers Sanders the labor secretary job, the Vermont senator would have to decide whether to vacate his seat and potentially allow Vermont's Republican Gov. Phil Scott--who is facing off against Sanders-endorsed Democratic nominee David Zuckerman next month--to name his temporary replacement. Under Vermont law, a special election for the seat must take place within six months of the vacancy.
" Bernie Sanders as Secretary of Labor would indeed be excellent," progressive activist Stephanie Quilao tweeted.
But Quilao also noted that Sanders is poised to become chairman of both the powerful Senate Budget Committee and the Senate Subcommittee on Health if Democrats win control of the chamber in November, raising the question of where the progressive stalwart would have the most impact.
"Which position has more power and influence?" Quilao asked.
Progressives were on the whole enthusiastic about the prospect of Sen. Bernie Sanders taking charge of the Labor Department after Politico reported late Thursday that the lifelong champion of the working class has expressed interest in pursuing the position should Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden emerge victorious from next month's pivotal election.
Sanders told Politico that his "main focus" at the moment is on ensuring that Biden defeats incumbent President Donald Trump on November 3 and would neither confirm nor deny that he is seeking the top Labor Department post, which is currently occupied by former corporate lawyer and union opponent Eugene Scalia.
But two unnamed people close to the Vermont senator told Politico that Sanders--who has been campaigning relentlessly for Biden both virtually and in person in recent weeks--"has been making his push for the top job at the Labor Department in part by reaching out to allies on the transition team."
"Sanders sees an opportunity to achieve long-held policy goals for the working class under Biden," Politico reported, citing an anonymous source familiar with the senator's thinking.
Economist Robert Reich, who served as Labor Secretary under President Bill Clinton, voiced his approval of Sanders' reported push for the job, which would put the senator in a powerful position to enact significant changes to U.S. labor regulations and crack down on abusive corporations.
"He'd be terrific," Reich told Politico.
Other progressives echoed Reich, welcoming the possibility of an unabashed advocate of union rights taking over a department that over the past four years has moved to roll back worker protections and treated corporate abuses with kid gloves.
"Hey we have an idea and it's LET'S DO THIS," advocacy group People's Action tweeted in response to Politico's reporting.
"Sanders as Labor Secretary... we're into it," added environmental group 350 Action.
While the progressive response to news of Sanders' interest in the Department of Labor post was largely positive, some warned about the potential consequences of losing Sanders as a critical voice and key advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All in the Senate.
"It's a really bad idea for Sanders to become Labor Secretary because as an administration official he would be unable to harshly criticize the Biden White House," tweeted Nathan Robinson, editor of the left-wing magazine Current Affairs. "We are going to urgently need independent left voices to tell the truth about Biden, not apologists."
If Biden wins the presidential election next month and offers Sanders the labor secretary job, the Vermont senator would have to decide whether to vacate his seat and potentially allow Vermont's Republican Gov. Phil Scott--who is facing off against Sanders-endorsed Democratic nominee David Zuckerman next month--to name his temporary replacement. Under Vermont law, a special election for the seat must take place within six months of the vacancy.
" Bernie Sanders as Secretary of Labor would indeed be excellent," progressive activist Stephanie Quilao tweeted.
But Quilao also noted that Sanders is poised to become chairman of both the powerful Senate Budget Committee and the Senate Subcommittee on Health if Democrats win control of the chamber in November, raising the question of where the progressive stalwart would have the most impact.
"Which position has more power and influence?" Quilao asked.

