An election worker opens envelopes containing vote-by-mail ballots for the August 4 Washington state primary at King County Elections in Renton, Washington on August 3, 2020. (Photo: Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)
Victory for Mail-In Voting in Tennessee as Federal Judge Rules Against GOP-Enacted State Law
"The court recognized that forcing voters to choose between voting and their health violates the Constitution."
In a win for voting rights advocates, a federal judge Wednesday temporarily blocked a Tennessee law that bars first-time voters from casting their ballots by mail unless they show identification at an election office beforehand.
"This is an important victory for Tennessee voters wishing to participate in the 2020 election that don't want to have to choose between their health and exercising their right to vote," Danielle Lang, co-director of voting rights and redistricting at Campaign Legal Center, said in a press release. "Especially during an election held during a pandemic, it is important that anybody be able to vote by absentee and mail ballot to encourage participation."
According to reporting by the Associated Press, U.S. District Judge Eli Richardson in Nashville ordered the preliminary injunction in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, assuring that he did so without concern "about how his decisions could aid one side or the other on the political front." The change must be in place for the November 3 general election, he said.
The Judge Richardson wrote that the state argued for its law, which plaintiffs say affected an estimated 128,000 newly registered voters last election cycle, through "a non-existent" congressional requirement and congressional intent. Tennessee has about 4.1 million registered voters.
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted in celebration of the ruling Wednesday night.
Richardson, appointed to the court by President Donald Trump, had previously ruled against two other requests from plaintiffs in the lawsuit, one that dealt with distribution of absentee voting forms and another relating to the state's signature matching requirement.
"The court concludes that the requested injunction would favorably impact the public interest because as discussed above, it would serve to prevent what, based on the current record, likely would be a violation of the First Amendment right to vote enjoyed by the American citizenry," Richardson wrote.
Richardson's ruling is not the first affecting voting laws in the Volunteer State amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. According to reporting from The Tennessean:
A state court judge in June ordered that all eligible voters should have an absentee voting option during the health crisis, and that ruling was carried out during the Aug. 6 primary. However, the state kept enforcing the first-time voter requirement, which the state judge said the plaintiffs failed to bring up before her ruling.
Then the state Supreme Court overturned the absentee expansion last month, restoring the excuse-based absentee voting system and citing the state's promise--made for the first time in front of the high court--that people can vote by mail if they believe they or someone in their care face a higher risk of Covid-19 due to underlying health conditions.
"The court recognized that forcing voters to choose between voting and their health violates the Constitution," Ezra Rosenberg, co-director of the voting rights project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said in a statement. "This decision means that first-time voters in Tennessee who registered by mail or online--and there are tens of thousands of them, many of whom are young--can vote in November by mail, without risking their health."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a win for voting rights advocates, a federal judge Wednesday temporarily blocked a Tennessee law that bars first-time voters from casting their ballots by mail unless they show identification at an election office beforehand.
"This is an important victory for Tennessee voters wishing to participate in the 2020 election that don't want to have to choose between their health and exercising their right to vote," Danielle Lang, co-director of voting rights and redistricting at Campaign Legal Center, said in a press release. "Especially during an election held during a pandemic, it is important that anybody be able to vote by absentee and mail ballot to encourage participation."
According to reporting by the Associated Press, U.S. District Judge Eli Richardson in Nashville ordered the preliminary injunction in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, assuring that he did so without concern "about how his decisions could aid one side or the other on the political front." The change must be in place for the November 3 general election, he said.
The Judge Richardson wrote that the state argued for its law, which plaintiffs say affected an estimated 128,000 newly registered voters last election cycle, through "a non-existent" congressional requirement and congressional intent. Tennessee has about 4.1 million registered voters.
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted in celebration of the ruling Wednesday night.
Richardson, appointed to the court by President Donald Trump, had previously ruled against two other requests from plaintiffs in the lawsuit, one that dealt with distribution of absentee voting forms and another relating to the state's signature matching requirement.
"The court concludes that the requested injunction would favorably impact the public interest because as discussed above, it would serve to prevent what, based on the current record, likely would be a violation of the First Amendment right to vote enjoyed by the American citizenry," Richardson wrote.
Richardson's ruling is not the first affecting voting laws in the Volunteer State amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. According to reporting from The Tennessean:
A state court judge in June ordered that all eligible voters should have an absentee voting option during the health crisis, and that ruling was carried out during the Aug. 6 primary. However, the state kept enforcing the first-time voter requirement, which the state judge said the plaintiffs failed to bring up before her ruling.
Then the state Supreme Court overturned the absentee expansion last month, restoring the excuse-based absentee voting system and citing the state's promise--made for the first time in front of the high court--that people can vote by mail if they believe they or someone in their care face a higher risk of Covid-19 due to underlying health conditions.
"The court recognized that forcing voters to choose between voting and their health violates the Constitution," Ezra Rosenberg, co-director of the voting rights project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said in a statement. "This decision means that first-time voters in Tennessee who registered by mail or online--and there are tens of thousands of them, many of whom are young--can vote in November by mail, without risking their health."
In a win for voting rights advocates, a federal judge Wednesday temporarily blocked a Tennessee law that bars first-time voters from casting their ballots by mail unless they show identification at an election office beforehand.
"This is an important victory for Tennessee voters wishing to participate in the 2020 election that don't want to have to choose between their health and exercising their right to vote," Danielle Lang, co-director of voting rights and redistricting at Campaign Legal Center, said in a press release. "Especially during an election held during a pandemic, it is important that anybody be able to vote by absentee and mail ballot to encourage participation."
According to reporting by the Associated Press, U.S. District Judge Eli Richardson in Nashville ordered the preliminary injunction in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, assuring that he did so without concern "about how his decisions could aid one side or the other on the political front." The change must be in place for the November 3 general election, he said.
The Judge Richardson wrote that the state argued for its law, which plaintiffs say affected an estimated 128,000 newly registered voters last election cycle, through "a non-existent" congressional requirement and congressional intent. Tennessee has about 4.1 million registered voters.
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted in celebration of the ruling Wednesday night.
Richardson, appointed to the court by President Donald Trump, had previously ruled against two other requests from plaintiffs in the lawsuit, one that dealt with distribution of absentee voting forms and another relating to the state's signature matching requirement.
"The court concludes that the requested injunction would favorably impact the public interest because as discussed above, it would serve to prevent what, based on the current record, likely would be a violation of the First Amendment right to vote enjoyed by the American citizenry," Richardson wrote.
Richardson's ruling is not the first affecting voting laws in the Volunteer State amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. According to reporting from The Tennessean:
A state court judge in June ordered that all eligible voters should have an absentee voting option during the health crisis, and that ruling was carried out during the Aug. 6 primary. However, the state kept enforcing the first-time voter requirement, which the state judge said the plaintiffs failed to bring up before her ruling.
Then the state Supreme Court overturned the absentee expansion last month, restoring the excuse-based absentee voting system and citing the state's promise--made for the first time in front of the high court--that people can vote by mail if they believe they or someone in their care face a higher risk of Covid-19 due to underlying health conditions.
"The court recognized that forcing voters to choose between voting and their health violates the Constitution," Ezra Rosenberg, co-director of the voting rights project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said in a statement. "This decision means that first-time voters in Tennessee who registered by mail or online--and there are tens of thousands of them, many of whom are young--can vote in November by mail, without risking their health."