SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sunrise NYC, a climate activist group, rallies in front of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's office in Midtown Manhattan demanding that he support the Green New Deal. (Photo: Gabriele Holtermann-Gorden/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Research Shows 'Linking Climate Policy to Social and Economic Justice Makes It More Popular'
"The public wants a Green New Deal. The public wants green stimulus. The public wants to address inequality."
Jun 12, 2020
Amid persistent calls for a green and just recovery from the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and nationwide protests against systemic racism and injustice, researchers on Friday detailed recent studies showing "policy packages that address the climate crisis alongside income inequality, racial injustice, and the economic crisis are more popular among voters."
The protests sparked by Minneapolis police killing George Floyd have renewed pressure on all levels of government to pursue racial justice--and not just in terms of police violence against historically marginalized groups, particularly black Americans, but also when it comes to economic and environmental injustice.
In their piece for the Washington Post, the three researchers acknowledge the current slate of urgent crises facing the country and how these crises are linked to racial inequality before detailing the results of two nationally representative public opinion studies they conducted over the past year. "The take-home message is clear," the researchers write. "Linking climate policy with social and economic reforms makes climate action more popular with the public."
One example of this policymaking approach that the researchers highlight is the Green New Deal resolution introduced in February 2019 by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). The resolution calls for tackling "the existential threat posed by climate change" through a 10-year shift to 100% clean energy that ensures a just transition for workers and frontline communities, in part by creating millions of new, well-paying jobs.
The researchers behind the studies and Post piece are Parrish Bergquist--a postdoctoral researcher at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and an incoming assistant professor of public policy at Georgetown University--along with Matto Mildenberger and Leah Stokes, who are both assistant professors of political science at the University of California at Santa Barbara and have each published books on climate policymaking.
In a tweet about the Post piece Friday, Stokes reiterated their finding that "linking climate policy to social and economic justice makes it more popular" and drew attention to the resolution from Ocasio-Cortez and Markey, writing that it turns out they "had a really popular idea when they proposed the Green New Deal."
The first study--detailed in a peer-reviewed, open access paper published last month in Environmental Research Letters--surveyed 2,476 Americans online last summer. Some respondents reviewed climate packages that included social or economic programs while others reviewed packages with only climate policies.
"We found unambiguous evidence that Americans support the key idea behind the Green New Deal: addressing climate change alongside economic and social problems," the researchers write in the Post. As they explain:
Compared with a policy package with only climate reforms, including economic policies such as a jobs guarantee, unionized clean energy jobs, and retraining for fossil fuel workers increased support for the package by an average of 12 percentage points. While Democrats in our survey viewed these policies more favorably, including economic measures in a climate package does not drive Republicans away.
We found similar results when we added some social policy planks, such as affordable housing and a $15 minimum wage. The social policies we tested increased support for a climate policy package by an average of 11 percentage points. That said, some social policies--such as universal, government-run health insurance and free college--increased the package's overall popularity but decreased Republican support.
The second study, conducted last month, surveyed 1,049 Americans to determine the popularity of including climate policies in the stimulus packages necessitated by the ongoing pandemic. Similar to the first study, the researchers found "packages that invest in clean energy and transportation are more popular than coronavirus spending that ignores the climate crisis."
"In our survey, including investments in wind and solar increases support by 8.5 percentage points, making it one of the most popular policy planks that we tested. While clean energy investments are mostly popular among Democrats, including them does not decrease Republican support," they write. "Yet, so far, Congress has not focused on green stimulus."
The researches note that "the climate crisis will not take a break during the pandemic" and "climate impacts will fall disproportionately on communities of color, including black Americans--the same groups who are already hit hardest by the Covid-19 crisis, unemployment, and police brutality."
Given the popularity of pairing urgently needed climate action with policies that address inequality, racial injustice, and the economic crisis, the researchers conclude that "in the future, we might find Congress taking this approach."
The piece comes about a week after the DNC Council on the Environment and Climate Crisis put out a Democratic Party platform recommendation--directed at presumptive presidential nominee Joe Biden--calling for a national plan through 2050 that is "informed by the vision and aspirations of the Green New Deal."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Amid persistent calls for a green and just recovery from the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and nationwide protests against systemic racism and injustice, researchers on Friday detailed recent studies showing "policy packages that address the climate crisis alongside income inequality, racial injustice, and the economic crisis are more popular among voters."
The protests sparked by Minneapolis police killing George Floyd have renewed pressure on all levels of government to pursue racial justice--and not just in terms of police violence against historically marginalized groups, particularly black Americans, but also when it comes to economic and environmental injustice.
In their piece for the Washington Post, the three researchers acknowledge the current slate of urgent crises facing the country and how these crises are linked to racial inequality before detailing the results of two nationally representative public opinion studies they conducted over the past year. "The take-home message is clear," the researchers write. "Linking climate policy with social and economic reforms makes climate action more popular with the public."
One example of this policymaking approach that the researchers highlight is the Green New Deal resolution introduced in February 2019 by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). The resolution calls for tackling "the existential threat posed by climate change" through a 10-year shift to 100% clean energy that ensures a just transition for workers and frontline communities, in part by creating millions of new, well-paying jobs.
The researchers behind the studies and Post piece are Parrish Bergquist--a postdoctoral researcher at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and an incoming assistant professor of public policy at Georgetown University--along with Matto Mildenberger and Leah Stokes, who are both assistant professors of political science at the University of California at Santa Barbara and have each published books on climate policymaking.
In a tweet about the Post piece Friday, Stokes reiterated their finding that "linking climate policy to social and economic justice makes it more popular" and drew attention to the resolution from Ocasio-Cortez and Markey, writing that it turns out they "had a really popular idea when they proposed the Green New Deal."
The first study--detailed in a peer-reviewed, open access paper published last month in Environmental Research Letters--surveyed 2,476 Americans online last summer. Some respondents reviewed climate packages that included social or economic programs while others reviewed packages with only climate policies.
"We found unambiguous evidence that Americans support the key idea behind the Green New Deal: addressing climate change alongside economic and social problems," the researchers write in the Post. As they explain:
Compared with a policy package with only climate reforms, including economic policies such as a jobs guarantee, unionized clean energy jobs, and retraining for fossil fuel workers increased support for the package by an average of 12 percentage points. While Democrats in our survey viewed these policies more favorably, including economic measures in a climate package does not drive Republicans away.
We found similar results when we added some social policy planks, such as affordable housing and a $15 minimum wage. The social policies we tested increased support for a climate policy package by an average of 11 percentage points. That said, some social policies--such as universal, government-run health insurance and free college--increased the package's overall popularity but decreased Republican support.
The second study, conducted last month, surveyed 1,049 Americans to determine the popularity of including climate policies in the stimulus packages necessitated by the ongoing pandemic. Similar to the first study, the researchers found "packages that invest in clean energy and transportation are more popular than coronavirus spending that ignores the climate crisis."
"In our survey, including investments in wind and solar increases support by 8.5 percentage points, making it one of the most popular policy planks that we tested. While clean energy investments are mostly popular among Democrats, including them does not decrease Republican support," they write. "Yet, so far, Congress has not focused on green stimulus."
The researches note that "the climate crisis will not take a break during the pandemic" and "climate impacts will fall disproportionately on communities of color, including black Americans--the same groups who are already hit hardest by the Covid-19 crisis, unemployment, and police brutality."
Given the popularity of pairing urgently needed climate action with policies that address inequality, racial injustice, and the economic crisis, the researchers conclude that "in the future, we might find Congress taking this approach."
The piece comes about a week after the DNC Council on the Environment and Climate Crisis put out a Democratic Party platform recommendation--directed at presumptive presidential nominee Joe Biden--calling for a national plan through 2050 that is "informed by the vision and aspirations of the Green New Deal."
Amid persistent calls for a green and just recovery from the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and nationwide protests against systemic racism and injustice, researchers on Friday detailed recent studies showing "policy packages that address the climate crisis alongside income inequality, racial injustice, and the economic crisis are more popular among voters."
The protests sparked by Minneapolis police killing George Floyd have renewed pressure on all levels of government to pursue racial justice--and not just in terms of police violence against historically marginalized groups, particularly black Americans, but also when it comes to economic and environmental injustice.
In their piece for the Washington Post, the three researchers acknowledge the current slate of urgent crises facing the country and how these crises are linked to racial inequality before detailing the results of two nationally representative public opinion studies they conducted over the past year. "The take-home message is clear," the researchers write. "Linking climate policy with social and economic reforms makes climate action more popular with the public."
One example of this policymaking approach that the researchers highlight is the Green New Deal resolution introduced in February 2019 by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). The resolution calls for tackling "the existential threat posed by climate change" through a 10-year shift to 100% clean energy that ensures a just transition for workers and frontline communities, in part by creating millions of new, well-paying jobs.
The researchers behind the studies and Post piece are Parrish Bergquist--a postdoctoral researcher at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and an incoming assistant professor of public policy at Georgetown University--along with Matto Mildenberger and Leah Stokes, who are both assistant professors of political science at the University of California at Santa Barbara and have each published books on climate policymaking.
In a tweet about the Post piece Friday, Stokes reiterated their finding that "linking climate policy to social and economic justice makes it more popular" and drew attention to the resolution from Ocasio-Cortez and Markey, writing that it turns out they "had a really popular idea when they proposed the Green New Deal."
The first study--detailed in a peer-reviewed, open access paper published last month in Environmental Research Letters--surveyed 2,476 Americans online last summer. Some respondents reviewed climate packages that included social or economic programs while others reviewed packages with only climate policies.
"We found unambiguous evidence that Americans support the key idea behind the Green New Deal: addressing climate change alongside economic and social problems," the researchers write in the Post. As they explain:
Compared with a policy package with only climate reforms, including economic policies such as a jobs guarantee, unionized clean energy jobs, and retraining for fossil fuel workers increased support for the package by an average of 12 percentage points. While Democrats in our survey viewed these policies more favorably, including economic measures in a climate package does not drive Republicans away.
We found similar results when we added some social policy planks, such as affordable housing and a $15 minimum wage. The social policies we tested increased support for a climate policy package by an average of 11 percentage points. That said, some social policies--such as universal, government-run health insurance and free college--increased the package's overall popularity but decreased Republican support.
The second study, conducted last month, surveyed 1,049 Americans to determine the popularity of including climate policies in the stimulus packages necessitated by the ongoing pandemic. Similar to the first study, the researchers found "packages that invest in clean energy and transportation are more popular than coronavirus spending that ignores the climate crisis."
"In our survey, including investments in wind and solar increases support by 8.5 percentage points, making it one of the most popular policy planks that we tested. While clean energy investments are mostly popular among Democrats, including them does not decrease Republican support," they write. "Yet, so far, Congress has not focused on green stimulus."
The researches note that "the climate crisis will not take a break during the pandemic" and "climate impacts will fall disproportionately on communities of color, including black Americans--the same groups who are already hit hardest by the Covid-19 crisis, unemployment, and police brutality."
Given the popularity of pairing urgently needed climate action with policies that address inequality, racial injustice, and the economic crisis, the researchers conclude that "in the future, we might find Congress taking this approach."
The piece comes about a week after the DNC Council on the Environment and Climate Crisis put out a Democratic Party platform recommendation--directed at presumptive presidential nominee Joe Biden--calling for a national plan through 2050 that is "informed by the vision and aspirations of the Green New Deal."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.