SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) enters a Senators Only elevator before attending the Weekly Senate Policy Luncheon on June 25, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Tom Brenner/Getty Images)
NYT Rebuked for Tom Cotton Op-Ed Calling for US Military to Use 'Overwhelming Show of Force' Against Protests
"This is the most openly authoritarian piece of writing I've read from an American politician who has been in power during my lifetime."
Jun 03, 2020
The New York Times drew sharp criticism on Wednesday for publishing an op-ed by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton calling for the military to be deployed to the nation's streets to respond to the protests over the police killing of George Floyd.
The op-ed was titled "Send in the Troops."
In the op-ed, Cotton (R-Ark.) claimed that "[o]utnumbered police officers, encumbered by feckless politicians, bore the brunt of the violence" from the unrest. He added that certain "elites have excused this orgy of violence in the spirit of radical chic, calling it an understandable response to the wrongful death of George Floyd."
He also suggested that suggested the protesters are "nihilist criminals... simply out for loot and the thrill of destruction, with cadres of left-wing radicals like antifa infiltrating protest marches to exploit Floyd's death for their own anarchic purposes."
To respond to the social justice uprising, Cotton called for "an overwhelming show of force to disperse, detain, and ultimately deter lawbreakers," and reiterated his call for President Donald Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy military to streets, dismissing opponents of using that 1807 law as "excitable critics, ignorant of both the law and our history."
"Some governors have mobilized the National Guard, yet others refuse, and in some cases the rioters still outnumber the police and Guard combined. In these circumstances, the Insurrection Act authorizes the president to employ the military 'or any other means' in 'cases of insurrection, or obstruction to the laws,'" claimed Cotton.
"Why, New York Times, why?" tweeted Jason Lyall, a political scientist at Dartmouth.
"Trump is not the only problem of this country," tweeted writer and historian Massimo Faggioli. "I am not referring to Sen. Cotton, but also to the NYT choosing to publish this."
Wow. Is this where we are, @nyt???
Send In the Troops https://t.co/0mVQ6yw5UP
-- Tayari Jones (@tayari) June 3, 2020
Others responding to the new op-ed focused on Cotton's language and claims.
"This is the most openly authoritarian piece of writing I've read from an American politician who has been in power during my lifetime," tweeted author and HuffPost reporter Zach Carter.
"Tom Cotton is a fascist," tweeted journalist Walker Bragman. "Hate oozes from every word of this dehumanizing screed."
Cotton had already urged Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act in recent days, saying in a Monday interview on Fox News, "If local law enforcement is overwhelmed, if local politicians will not do their most basic job to protect our citizens, let's see how these anarchists respond when the 101st Airborne is on the other side of the street."
The Times has previously pubished op-eds by Cotton, including one from last year in which he argues the U.S. should buy Greenland, a purchase Trump also floated.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The New York Times drew sharp criticism on Wednesday for publishing an op-ed by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton calling for the military to be deployed to the nation's streets to respond to the protests over the police killing of George Floyd.
The op-ed was titled "Send in the Troops."
In the op-ed, Cotton (R-Ark.) claimed that "[o]utnumbered police officers, encumbered by feckless politicians, bore the brunt of the violence" from the unrest. He added that certain "elites have excused this orgy of violence in the spirit of radical chic, calling it an understandable response to the wrongful death of George Floyd."
He also suggested that suggested the protesters are "nihilist criminals... simply out for loot and the thrill of destruction, with cadres of left-wing radicals like antifa infiltrating protest marches to exploit Floyd's death for their own anarchic purposes."
To respond to the social justice uprising, Cotton called for "an overwhelming show of force to disperse, detain, and ultimately deter lawbreakers," and reiterated his call for President Donald Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy military to streets, dismissing opponents of using that 1807 law as "excitable critics, ignorant of both the law and our history."
"Some governors have mobilized the National Guard, yet others refuse, and in some cases the rioters still outnumber the police and Guard combined. In these circumstances, the Insurrection Act authorizes the president to employ the military 'or any other means' in 'cases of insurrection, or obstruction to the laws,'" claimed Cotton.
"Why, New York Times, why?" tweeted Jason Lyall, a political scientist at Dartmouth.
"Trump is not the only problem of this country," tweeted writer and historian Massimo Faggioli. "I am not referring to Sen. Cotton, but also to the NYT choosing to publish this."
Wow. Is this where we are, @nyt???
Send In the Troops https://t.co/0mVQ6yw5UP
-- Tayari Jones (@tayari) June 3, 2020
Others responding to the new op-ed focused on Cotton's language and claims.
"This is the most openly authoritarian piece of writing I've read from an American politician who has been in power during my lifetime," tweeted author and HuffPost reporter Zach Carter.
"Tom Cotton is a fascist," tweeted journalist Walker Bragman. "Hate oozes from every word of this dehumanizing screed."
Cotton had already urged Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act in recent days, saying in a Monday interview on Fox News, "If local law enforcement is overwhelmed, if local politicians will not do their most basic job to protect our citizens, let's see how these anarchists respond when the 101st Airborne is on the other side of the street."
The Times has previously pubished op-eds by Cotton, including one from last year in which he argues the U.S. should buy Greenland, a purchase Trump also floated.
The New York Times drew sharp criticism on Wednesday for publishing an op-ed by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton calling for the military to be deployed to the nation's streets to respond to the protests over the police killing of George Floyd.
The op-ed was titled "Send in the Troops."
In the op-ed, Cotton (R-Ark.) claimed that "[o]utnumbered police officers, encumbered by feckless politicians, bore the brunt of the violence" from the unrest. He added that certain "elites have excused this orgy of violence in the spirit of radical chic, calling it an understandable response to the wrongful death of George Floyd."
He also suggested that suggested the protesters are "nihilist criminals... simply out for loot and the thrill of destruction, with cadres of left-wing radicals like antifa infiltrating protest marches to exploit Floyd's death for their own anarchic purposes."
To respond to the social justice uprising, Cotton called for "an overwhelming show of force to disperse, detain, and ultimately deter lawbreakers," and reiterated his call for President Donald Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy military to streets, dismissing opponents of using that 1807 law as "excitable critics, ignorant of both the law and our history."
"Some governors have mobilized the National Guard, yet others refuse, and in some cases the rioters still outnumber the police and Guard combined. In these circumstances, the Insurrection Act authorizes the president to employ the military 'or any other means' in 'cases of insurrection, or obstruction to the laws,'" claimed Cotton.
"Why, New York Times, why?" tweeted Jason Lyall, a political scientist at Dartmouth.
"Trump is not the only problem of this country," tweeted writer and historian Massimo Faggioli. "I am not referring to Sen. Cotton, but also to the NYT choosing to publish this."
Wow. Is this where we are, @nyt???
Send In the Troops https://t.co/0mVQ6yw5UP
-- Tayari Jones (@tayari) June 3, 2020
Others responding to the new op-ed focused on Cotton's language and claims.
"This is the most openly authoritarian piece of writing I've read from an American politician who has been in power during my lifetime," tweeted author and HuffPost reporter Zach Carter.
"Tom Cotton is a fascist," tweeted journalist Walker Bragman. "Hate oozes from every word of this dehumanizing screed."
Cotton had already urged Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act in recent days, saying in a Monday interview on Fox News, "If local law enforcement is overwhelmed, if local politicians will not do their most basic job to protect our citizens, let's see how these anarchists respond when the 101st Airborne is on the other side of the street."
The Times has previously pubished op-eds by Cotton, including one from last year in which he argues the U.S. should buy Greenland, a purchase Trump also floated.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.