Former President George W. Bush sits at his desk in the Oval Office after addressing the nation about the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
MSNBC Contributor Catches Heat for Claiming George W. Bush Didn't Politicize 9/11 'In Any Way'
"There is 9/11 whitewashing and memory-holing happening right now, and it's dangerous."
Progressives and those with a basic working knowledge of modern history alike were outraged on Monday afternoon when former TIME managing editor Richard Stengel claimed in an interview with MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace that former President George W. Bush did not politicize the 9/11 attacks which happened on the 43rd president's watch and defined his presidency.
"Truth isn't real," tweeted podcaster Livvy Fanon, "nothing matters."
Stengel made the remarks to Wallace--who worked in the Bush White House as communications director--during a conversation on President Donald Trump's handling and politicization of the coronavirus outbreak crisis that has paralyzed the world.
"I was thinking back to 9/11, Nicolle, and I have no recollection of George Bush politicizing it in any way," said Stengel. "I mean, he always talked to all Americans, he always said this was a challenge for all Americans, he didn't put it in terms of red and blue."
Progressives weighed in on social media, criticizing both Stengel's comments in particular and Wallace's role at MSNBC in general.
"If your memory is this bad maybe you shouldn't be on national television as an authority on anything," tweeted Right Wing Watch journalist Jared Holt.
Journalist Brendan James, host of the history podcast Blowback, noted the fact that Wallace "was Bush's comms director through the height of the Iraq War" and was nonetheless able to seamlessly transition into a role as a hero of the nominally liberal #Resistance.
"Criminals from past administrations get hired by the press and erase history of their crimes in real time," said James.
The claims from Stengel were met with skepticism by observers who remembered Bush's use of the post-9/11 era to push Congress to approve the PATRIOT Act's vast spying powers, made the attacks a central plank of a propaganda effort that resulted in the disastrous invasion of Iraq, said that the world was either "with us or against us" in a vaguely defined "war on terror," imprisoned hundreds without trial at Guantanamo Bay, oversaw a shadowy global torture regime, and manipulated Americans' fears of future attacks and Muslims for electoral gain for the remainder of his two terms in office.
"There is 9/11 whitewashing and memory-holing happening right now, and it's dangerous," tweeted Daily Beast national security reporter Spencer Ackerman.
Ackerman, whose forthcoming book Reign of Terror addresses the Bush response to 9/11 and the rise of nationalism in the U.S. that came with it, expounded in a series of tweets on the danger of misremembering the post-9/11 era in order to score political points against Trump.
"America was never prepared to actually remember 9/11 in its horror, trauma, and immediate cynical political manipulation," said Ackerman. "Now we're doing something worse: creating false nostalgia for an unmitigated disaster to use as a cudgel against Trump, though it's part of how Trump got here."
And, Ackerman added, the lack of acccountability for administration officials like Wallace compounds the problem.
"The people creating this nostalgia, like the MSNBC host who used to work for Bush and the [former] TIME managing editor who somehow has forgotten a defining event of recent American history, are those who experienced the fewest consequences from the generation-long nightmare 9/11 begat," Ackerman said.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressives and those with a basic working knowledge of modern history alike were outraged on Monday afternoon when former TIME managing editor Richard Stengel claimed in an interview with MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace that former President George W. Bush did not politicize the 9/11 attacks which happened on the 43rd president's watch and defined his presidency.
"Truth isn't real," tweeted podcaster Livvy Fanon, "nothing matters."
Stengel made the remarks to Wallace--who worked in the Bush White House as communications director--during a conversation on President Donald Trump's handling and politicization of the coronavirus outbreak crisis that has paralyzed the world.
"I was thinking back to 9/11, Nicolle, and I have no recollection of George Bush politicizing it in any way," said Stengel. "I mean, he always talked to all Americans, he always said this was a challenge for all Americans, he didn't put it in terms of red and blue."
Progressives weighed in on social media, criticizing both Stengel's comments in particular and Wallace's role at MSNBC in general.
"If your memory is this bad maybe you shouldn't be on national television as an authority on anything," tweeted Right Wing Watch journalist Jared Holt.
Journalist Brendan James, host of the history podcast Blowback, noted the fact that Wallace "was Bush's comms director through the height of the Iraq War" and was nonetheless able to seamlessly transition into a role as a hero of the nominally liberal #Resistance.
"Criminals from past administrations get hired by the press and erase history of their crimes in real time," said James.
The claims from Stengel were met with skepticism by observers who remembered Bush's use of the post-9/11 era to push Congress to approve the PATRIOT Act's vast spying powers, made the attacks a central plank of a propaganda effort that resulted in the disastrous invasion of Iraq, said that the world was either "with us or against us" in a vaguely defined "war on terror," imprisoned hundreds without trial at Guantanamo Bay, oversaw a shadowy global torture regime, and manipulated Americans' fears of future attacks and Muslims for electoral gain for the remainder of his two terms in office.
"There is 9/11 whitewashing and memory-holing happening right now, and it's dangerous," tweeted Daily Beast national security reporter Spencer Ackerman.
Ackerman, whose forthcoming book Reign of Terror addresses the Bush response to 9/11 and the rise of nationalism in the U.S. that came with it, expounded in a series of tweets on the danger of misremembering the post-9/11 era in order to score political points against Trump.
"America was never prepared to actually remember 9/11 in its horror, trauma, and immediate cynical political manipulation," said Ackerman. "Now we're doing something worse: creating false nostalgia for an unmitigated disaster to use as a cudgel against Trump, though it's part of how Trump got here."
And, Ackerman added, the lack of acccountability for administration officials like Wallace compounds the problem.
"The people creating this nostalgia, like the MSNBC host who used to work for Bush and the [former] TIME managing editor who somehow has forgotten a defining event of recent American history, are those who experienced the fewest consequences from the generation-long nightmare 9/11 begat," Ackerman said.
Progressives and those with a basic working knowledge of modern history alike were outraged on Monday afternoon when former TIME managing editor Richard Stengel claimed in an interview with MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace that former President George W. Bush did not politicize the 9/11 attacks which happened on the 43rd president's watch and defined his presidency.
"Truth isn't real," tweeted podcaster Livvy Fanon, "nothing matters."
Stengel made the remarks to Wallace--who worked in the Bush White House as communications director--during a conversation on President Donald Trump's handling and politicization of the coronavirus outbreak crisis that has paralyzed the world.
"I was thinking back to 9/11, Nicolle, and I have no recollection of George Bush politicizing it in any way," said Stengel. "I mean, he always talked to all Americans, he always said this was a challenge for all Americans, he didn't put it in terms of red and blue."
Progressives weighed in on social media, criticizing both Stengel's comments in particular and Wallace's role at MSNBC in general.
"If your memory is this bad maybe you shouldn't be on national television as an authority on anything," tweeted Right Wing Watch journalist Jared Holt.
Journalist Brendan James, host of the history podcast Blowback, noted the fact that Wallace "was Bush's comms director through the height of the Iraq War" and was nonetheless able to seamlessly transition into a role as a hero of the nominally liberal #Resistance.
"Criminals from past administrations get hired by the press and erase history of their crimes in real time," said James.
The claims from Stengel were met with skepticism by observers who remembered Bush's use of the post-9/11 era to push Congress to approve the PATRIOT Act's vast spying powers, made the attacks a central plank of a propaganda effort that resulted in the disastrous invasion of Iraq, said that the world was either "with us or against us" in a vaguely defined "war on terror," imprisoned hundreds without trial at Guantanamo Bay, oversaw a shadowy global torture regime, and manipulated Americans' fears of future attacks and Muslims for electoral gain for the remainder of his two terms in office.
"There is 9/11 whitewashing and memory-holing happening right now, and it's dangerous," tweeted Daily Beast national security reporter Spencer Ackerman.
Ackerman, whose forthcoming book Reign of Terror addresses the Bush response to 9/11 and the rise of nationalism in the U.S. that came with it, expounded in a series of tweets on the danger of misremembering the post-9/11 era in order to score political points against Trump.
"America was never prepared to actually remember 9/11 in its horror, trauma, and immediate cynical political manipulation," said Ackerman. "Now we're doing something worse: creating false nostalgia for an unmitigated disaster to use as a cudgel against Trump, though it's part of how Trump got here."
And, Ackerman added, the lack of acccountability for administration officials like Wallace compounds the problem.
"The people creating this nostalgia, like the MSNBC host who used to work for Bush and the [former] TIME managing editor who somehow has forgotten a defining event of recent American history, are those who experienced the fewest consequences from the generation-long nightmare 9/11 begat," Ackerman said.