SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Environmental and Indigenous activists protested outside a hall at the start of a plenary session during the COP25 Climate Conference on Dec. 11, 2019 in Madrid, Spain. (Photo: Pablo Blazquez Dominguez/Getty Images)
'Amazing News': Climate Activists Celebrate Victory After Forcing Company to Abandon Proposed Tar Sands Project
While welcoming this win against the fossil fuel industry, organizers vowed to "continue to fight because our planet and future is at stake."
Feb 23, 2020
Climate campaigners celebrated a "momentous win" in Canada after Teck Resources on Sunday withdrew its application to build a tar sands mine in Alberta and the CEO admitted that because of "growing debate" over fossil fuel use amid a the climate crisis, "it is now evidence that there is no constructive path forward for the project."
"Make no mistake, Teck abandoned the Frontier project because people are standing up to demand real climate action."
--Emma Jackson, 350.org
Teck Resources president and CEO Don Lindsay added in his letter (pdf) to Canadian Minister of Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson that "questions about the societal implications of energy development, climate change, and Indigenous rights are critically important ones for Canada, its provinces, and Indigenous governments to work through."
Lindsay also suggested the public opposition that Teck has faced over Frontier will continue to impede other fossil fuel projects:
The promise of Canada's potential will not be realized until governments can reach agreement around how climate policy considerations will be addressed in the context of future responsible energy sector development. Without clarity on this critical question, the situation that has faced Frontier will be faced by future projects and it will be very difficult to attract future investment, either domestic or foreign.
"When the CEO of a major fossil fuel company releases a statement like this--it's a good sign the tide is turning," the global environmental advocacy group 350.org tweeted late Sunday, sharing Lindsay's letter.
Author and activist Bill McKibben, who co-founded 350.org, highlighted campaigners' efforts to prevent the project from moving forward. As he put it: "What great organizing!"
The group's Toronto branch told climate activists who fought against the Frontier mine: "This one goes out to you. We will continue to fight because our planet and future is at stake."
"Make no mistake, Teck abandoned the Frontier project because people are standing up to demand real climate action. This is a chance for Canada to come together and start building a Green New Deal," Emma Jackson, an organizer with 350.org based in Edmonton, said in a statement Monday. "In its letter, Teck mentioned the need for a real climate plan in Canada, and we agree."
"But instead of pushing fossil fuel projects that divide our communities and only benefit a wealthy few, our government needs to commit to a rapid, just transition that respects Indigenous rights, supports working families by creating millions of good unionized jobs, and gives Canada the best chance it has to meet our global climate commitments," Jackson added.
Vancouver-based Teck said in 2014 that the mine would cost $20.6 billion CAD ($15.52 billion USD) to construct. The mine was expected to generate thousands of construction and operational jobs but also produce about 260,000 barrels of oil daily and four million tons of climate-heating emissions annually.
The environmental group Greenpeace Canada welcomed Teck's withdrawal decision in a tweet Sunday and pointed out that the country can now focus on creating jobs that help solve the climate crisis rather that ones which contribute to it.
The Leap--which advocates for systemic change to address the climate crisis, inequality, and racism--congratulated Indigenous opponents of the Frontier mine in a tweet Monday. The group added: "Corporations like Teck know what our government refuses to; we can't afford new fossil fuel investments in an era of climate crisis."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's cabinet was expected to make a decision on the Frontier proposal before the end of the month. Following Teck's move Sunday, Wilkinson and Natural Resources Minister Seamus O'Regan confirmed that cabinet will no longer weigh in on the project, according to CBC News.
In 350.org's statement Monday, Canadian campaign director Amara Possian pointed to other contentious fossil fuel projects that are still set to move forward, including an expansion project for a government-owned pipeline, despite objections from climate activists and Indigenous groups.
" Justin Trudeau should be embarrassed that Teck Resources Ltd., a massive fossil fuel company, recognized the tide turning against fossil fuel expansion before his government," she said. "Whether it's Teck Frontier, Coastal GasLink, or TransMountain, history will not be kind to politicians or corporations who ignore these projects' impacts on Indigenous sovereignty and our climate."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
350.orgbig oilbill mckibbenfirst nationsfossil fuelsglobal witnessindigenousjustin trudeauoil change internationaltar sands
Climate campaigners celebrated a "momentous win" in Canada after Teck Resources on Sunday withdrew its application to build a tar sands mine in Alberta and the CEO admitted that because of "growing debate" over fossil fuel use amid a the climate crisis, "it is now evidence that there is no constructive path forward for the project."
"Make no mistake, Teck abandoned the Frontier project because people are standing up to demand real climate action."
--Emma Jackson, 350.org
Teck Resources president and CEO Don Lindsay added in his letter (pdf) to Canadian Minister of Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson that "questions about the societal implications of energy development, climate change, and Indigenous rights are critically important ones for Canada, its provinces, and Indigenous governments to work through."
Lindsay also suggested the public opposition that Teck has faced over Frontier will continue to impede other fossil fuel projects:
The promise of Canada's potential will not be realized until governments can reach agreement around how climate policy considerations will be addressed in the context of future responsible energy sector development. Without clarity on this critical question, the situation that has faced Frontier will be faced by future projects and it will be very difficult to attract future investment, either domestic or foreign.
"When the CEO of a major fossil fuel company releases a statement like this--it's a good sign the tide is turning," the global environmental advocacy group 350.org tweeted late Sunday, sharing Lindsay's letter.
Author and activist Bill McKibben, who co-founded 350.org, highlighted campaigners' efforts to prevent the project from moving forward. As he put it: "What great organizing!"
The group's Toronto branch told climate activists who fought against the Frontier mine: "This one goes out to you. We will continue to fight because our planet and future is at stake."
"Make no mistake, Teck abandoned the Frontier project because people are standing up to demand real climate action. This is a chance for Canada to come together and start building a Green New Deal," Emma Jackson, an organizer with 350.org based in Edmonton, said in a statement Monday. "In its letter, Teck mentioned the need for a real climate plan in Canada, and we agree."
"But instead of pushing fossil fuel projects that divide our communities and only benefit a wealthy few, our government needs to commit to a rapid, just transition that respects Indigenous rights, supports working families by creating millions of good unionized jobs, and gives Canada the best chance it has to meet our global climate commitments," Jackson added.
Vancouver-based Teck said in 2014 that the mine would cost $20.6 billion CAD ($15.52 billion USD) to construct. The mine was expected to generate thousands of construction and operational jobs but also produce about 260,000 barrels of oil daily and four million tons of climate-heating emissions annually.
The environmental group Greenpeace Canada welcomed Teck's withdrawal decision in a tweet Sunday and pointed out that the country can now focus on creating jobs that help solve the climate crisis rather that ones which contribute to it.
The Leap--which advocates for systemic change to address the climate crisis, inequality, and racism--congratulated Indigenous opponents of the Frontier mine in a tweet Monday. The group added: "Corporations like Teck know what our government refuses to; we can't afford new fossil fuel investments in an era of climate crisis."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's cabinet was expected to make a decision on the Frontier proposal before the end of the month. Following Teck's move Sunday, Wilkinson and Natural Resources Minister Seamus O'Regan confirmed that cabinet will no longer weigh in on the project, according to CBC News.
In 350.org's statement Monday, Canadian campaign director Amara Possian pointed to other contentious fossil fuel projects that are still set to move forward, including an expansion project for a government-owned pipeline, despite objections from climate activists and Indigenous groups.
" Justin Trudeau should be embarrassed that Teck Resources Ltd., a massive fossil fuel company, recognized the tide turning against fossil fuel expansion before his government," she said. "Whether it's Teck Frontier, Coastal GasLink, or TransMountain, history will not be kind to politicians or corporations who ignore these projects' impacts on Indigenous sovereignty and our climate."
Climate campaigners celebrated a "momentous win" in Canada after Teck Resources on Sunday withdrew its application to build a tar sands mine in Alberta and the CEO admitted that because of "growing debate" over fossil fuel use amid a the climate crisis, "it is now evidence that there is no constructive path forward for the project."
"Make no mistake, Teck abandoned the Frontier project because people are standing up to demand real climate action."
--Emma Jackson, 350.org
Teck Resources president and CEO Don Lindsay added in his letter (pdf) to Canadian Minister of Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson that "questions about the societal implications of energy development, climate change, and Indigenous rights are critically important ones for Canada, its provinces, and Indigenous governments to work through."
Lindsay also suggested the public opposition that Teck has faced over Frontier will continue to impede other fossil fuel projects:
The promise of Canada's potential will not be realized until governments can reach agreement around how climate policy considerations will be addressed in the context of future responsible energy sector development. Without clarity on this critical question, the situation that has faced Frontier will be faced by future projects and it will be very difficult to attract future investment, either domestic or foreign.
"When the CEO of a major fossil fuel company releases a statement like this--it's a good sign the tide is turning," the global environmental advocacy group 350.org tweeted late Sunday, sharing Lindsay's letter.
Author and activist Bill McKibben, who co-founded 350.org, highlighted campaigners' efforts to prevent the project from moving forward. As he put it: "What great organizing!"
The group's Toronto branch told climate activists who fought against the Frontier mine: "This one goes out to you. We will continue to fight because our planet and future is at stake."
"Make no mistake, Teck abandoned the Frontier project because people are standing up to demand real climate action. This is a chance for Canada to come together and start building a Green New Deal," Emma Jackson, an organizer with 350.org based in Edmonton, said in a statement Monday. "In its letter, Teck mentioned the need for a real climate plan in Canada, and we agree."
"But instead of pushing fossil fuel projects that divide our communities and only benefit a wealthy few, our government needs to commit to a rapid, just transition that respects Indigenous rights, supports working families by creating millions of good unionized jobs, and gives Canada the best chance it has to meet our global climate commitments," Jackson added.
Vancouver-based Teck said in 2014 that the mine would cost $20.6 billion CAD ($15.52 billion USD) to construct. The mine was expected to generate thousands of construction and operational jobs but also produce about 260,000 barrels of oil daily and four million tons of climate-heating emissions annually.
The environmental group Greenpeace Canada welcomed Teck's withdrawal decision in a tweet Sunday and pointed out that the country can now focus on creating jobs that help solve the climate crisis rather that ones which contribute to it.
The Leap--which advocates for systemic change to address the climate crisis, inequality, and racism--congratulated Indigenous opponents of the Frontier mine in a tweet Monday. The group added: "Corporations like Teck know what our government refuses to; we can't afford new fossil fuel investments in an era of climate crisis."
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's cabinet was expected to make a decision on the Frontier proposal before the end of the month. Following Teck's move Sunday, Wilkinson and Natural Resources Minister Seamus O'Regan confirmed that cabinet will no longer weigh in on the project, according to CBC News.
In 350.org's statement Monday, Canadian campaign director Amara Possian pointed to other contentious fossil fuel projects that are still set to move forward, including an expansion project for a government-owned pipeline, despite objections from climate activists and Indigenous groups.
" Justin Trudeau should be embarrassed that Teck Resources Ltd., a massive fossil fuel company, recognized the tide turning against fossil fuel expansion before his government," she said. "Whether it's Teck Frontier, Coastal GasLink, or TransMountain, history will not be kind to politicians or corporations who ignore these projects' impacts on Indigenous sovereignty and our climate."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.