To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Climate campaigners have been calling for years on companies and shareholders to divest from fossil fuels for the good of the planet, and a new "sell" rating from Goldman Sachs for oil and gas giant Exxon confirms divestment makes good financial sense for investers as well. (Photo: Friends of the Earth Scotland/Flickr/cc)
Three days after CNBC host Jim Cramer pronounced fossil fuel investments as being "in the death knell phase," Goldman Sachson Monday downgraded its stock assessment for ExxonMobil, advising investors to sell their shares of the oil and gas giant.
The Wall Street firm changed its "neutral" rating to "sell" following its fourth quarter earnings reports which showed Exxon's earnings falling from $6 billion in 2018 to $5.6 billion last year.
The firm found no "compelling case" for holding on to Exxon's stocks, according to CNBC, and advised investors that "more compelling returns opportunities exist both among the global majors and global large cap stocks outside of energy."
As author and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben tweeted, Goldman Sachs' decision confirms that aside from helping to "preserve a livable planet," another reason to divest fossil fuel stocks is "so that you won't lose your money."
\u201cThe best reason to divest fossil fuel stock is that you'd like to help preserve a livable planet.\nAnother reason is so that you won't lose your money.\nhttps://t.co/cigoyKWqfc\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1580748182
Goldman Sachs predicted that Exxon will meet just half of its targeted returns by 2025.
The firm's prediction is just the latest indication that the financial sector and other profit-driven entities are beginning to see fossil fuels as an impractical investment.
"A reminder that capital often doesn't walk, it runs."
--Nathan Lemphers, Smart Prosperity InstituteAs Common Dreams reported last November, analysts at Toronto-based firm Corporate Knights found that investing in fossil fuels cost pension funds in California and Colorado cost retirees $19 billion collectively over a decade.
A number of cities have divested from Wells Fargo for its funding of fossil fuel projects, and as Common Dreams reported Friday, Cramer announced on CNBC's "Squawk Box" that he is "done" with fossil fuel investments, suggesting oil, gas, and coal have become relics of the past.
"The world's changed," Cramer said. "New money managers want to appease younger people who believe that you can't ever make a fossil fuel company sustainable... You can tell that the world's turned on them, and it's actually kind of happening very quickly."
\u201c\u201cI\u2019m done with fossil fuels. They\u2019re done,\u201d @MadMoneyOnCNBC's @JimCramer says after oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron reported Q4 earnings this morning. \u201cWe\u2019re in the death knell phase.\u201d https://t.co/rdcmoeRGMB\u201d— CNBC (@CNBC) 1580479751
Mary Sweeters, outreach manager for Insure Our Future, a campaign calling on insurance companies to divest from fossil fuels, was among those who noted Cramer's comments and Goldman Sachs' analysis on Monday.
\u201cICYMI: @GoldmanSachs downgrades Exxon stock to 'sell' while @jimcramer describes oil's status as "in the death knell phase".\u201d— Mary Sweeters (@Mary Sweeters) 1580743854
Environmental policy researcher Nathan Lemphers jokingly referred to Goldman Sachs analysts running from Exxon stocks as "eco-radicals" as he noted on Twitter that other investment banks appear to be following suit.
\u201cEco-radicals @GoldmanSachs downgrade @exxonmobil to "sell" status. Seems like many other major investment banks are following suit. A reminder that capital often doesn't walk, it runs. https://t.co/DpyuHAu1if\u201d— Nathan Lemphers (@Nathan Lemphers) 1580737313
"It's time for a strategy that's better for the climate and shareholders alike," wrote Edward Mason, head of responsible investment for the Church of England, which voted nearly two years ago to divest from fossil fuels by 2023.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Three days after CNBC host Jim Cramer pronounced fossil fuel investments as being "in the death knell phase," Goldman Sachson Monday downgraded its stock assessment for ExxonMobil, advising investors to sell their shares of the oil and gas giant.
The Wall Street firm changed its "neutral" rating to "sell" following its fourth quarter earnings reports which showed Exxon's earnings falling from $6 billion in 2018 to $5.6 billion last year.
The firm found no "compelling case" for holding on to Exxon's stocks, according to CNBC, and advised investors that "more compelling returns opportunities exist both among the global majors and global large cap stocks outside of energy."
As author and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben tweeted, Goldman Sachs' decision confirms that aside from helping to "preserve a livable planet," another reason to divest fossil fuel stocks is "so that you won't lose your money."
\u201cThe best reason to divest fossil fuel stock is that you'd like to help preserve a livable planet.\nAnother reason is so that you won't lose your money.\nhttps://t.co/cigoyKWqfc\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1580748182
Goldman Sachs predicted that Exxon will meet just half of its targeted returns by 2025.
The firm's prediction is just the latest indication that the financial sector and other profit-driven entities are beginning to see fossil fuels as an impractical investment.
"A reminder that capital often doesn't walk, it runs."
--Nathan Lemphers, Smart Prosperity InstituteAs Common Dreams reported last November, analysts at Toronto-based firm Corporate Knights found that investing in fossil fuels cost pension funds in California and Colorado cost retirees $19 billion collectively over a decade.
A number of cities have divested from Wells Fargo for its funding of fossil fuel projects, and as Common Dreams reported Friday, Cramer announced on CNBC's "Squawk Box" that he is "done" with fossil fuel investments, suggesting oil, gas, and coal have become relics of the past.
"The world's changed," Cramer said. "New money managers want to appease younger people who believe that you can't ever make a fossil fuel company sustainable... You can tell that the world's turned on them, and it's actually kind of happening very quickly."
\u201c\u201cI\u2019m done with fossil fuels. They\u2019re done,\u201d @MadMoneyOnCNBC's @JimCramer says after oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron reported Q4 earnings this morning. \u201cWe\u2019re in the death knell phase.\u201d https://t.co/rdcmoeRGMB\u201d— CNBC (@CNBC) 1580479751
Mary Sweeters, outreach manager for Insure Our Future, a campaign calling on insurance companies to divest from fossil fuels, was among those who noted Cramer's comments and Goldman Sachs' analysis on Monday.
\u201cICYMI: @GoldmanSachs downgrades Exxon stock to 'sell' while @jimcramer describes oil's status as "in the death knell phase".\u201d— Mary Sweeters (@Mary Sweeters) 1580743854
Environmental policy researcher Nathan Lemphers jokingly referred to Goldman Sachs analysts running from Exxon stocks as "eco-radicals" as he noted on Twitter that other investment banks appear to be following suit.
\u201cEco-radicals @GoldmanSachs downgrade @exxonmobil to "sell" status. Seems like many other major investment banks are following suit. A reminder that capital often doesn't walk, it runs. https://t.co/DpyuHAu1if\u201d— Nathan Lemphers (@Nathan Lemphers) 1580737313
"It's time for a strategy that's better for the climate and shareholders alike," wrote Edward Mason, head of responsible investment for the Church of England, which voted nearly two years ago to divest from fossil fuels by 2023.
Three days after CNBC host Jim Cramer pronounced fossil fuel investments as being "in the death knell phase," Goldman Sachson Monday downgraded its stock assessment for ExxonMobil, advising investors to sell their shares of the oil and gas giant.
The Wall Street firm changed its "neutral" rating to "sell" following its fourth quarter earnings reports which showed Exxon's earnings falling from $6 billion in 2018 to $5.6 billion last year.
The firm found no "compelling case" for holding on to Exxon's stocks, according to CNBC, and advised investors that "more compelling returns opportunities exist both among the global majors and global large cap stocks outside of energy."
As author and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben tweeted, Goldman Sachs' decision confirms that aside from helping to "preserve a livable planet," another reason to divest fossil fuel stocks is "so that you won't lose your money."
\u201cThe best reason to divest fossil fuel stock is that you'd like to help preserve a livable planet.\nAnother reason is so that you won't lose your money.\nhttps://t.co/cigoyKWqfc\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1580748182
Goldman Sachs predicted that Exxon will meet just half of its targeted returns by 2025.
The firm's prediction is just the latest indication that the financial sector and other profit-driven entities are beginning to see fossil fuels as an impractical investment.
"A reminder that capital often doesn't walk, it runs."
--Nathan Lemphers, Smart Prosperity InstituteAs Common Dreams reported last November, analysts at Toronto-based firm Corporate Knights found that investing in fossil fuels cost pension funds in California and Colorado cost retirees $19 billion collectively over a decade.
A number of cities have divested from Wells Fargo for its funding of fossil fuel projects, and as Common Dreams reported Friday, Cramer announced on CNBC's "Squawk Box" that he is "done" with fossil fuel investments, suggesting oil, gas, and coal have become relics of the past.
"The world's changed," Cramer said. "New money managers want to appease younger people who believe that you can't ever make a fossil fuel company sustainable... You can tell that the world's turned on them, and it's actually kind of happening very quickly."
\u201c\u201cI\u2019m done with fossil fuels. They\u2019re done,\u201d @MadMoneyOnCNBC's @JimCramer says after oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron reported Q4 earnings this morning. \u201cWe\u2019re in the death knell phase.\u201d https://t.co/rdcmoeRGMB\u201d— CNBC (@CNBC) 1580479751
Mary Sweeters, outreach manager for Insure Our Future, a campaign calling on insurance companies to divest from fossil fuels, was among those who noted Cramer's comments and Goldman Sachs' analysis on Monday.
\u201cICYMI: @GoldmanSachs downgrades Exxon stock to 'sell' while @jimcramer describes oil's status as "in the death knell phase".\u201d— Mary Sweeters (@Mary Sweeters) 1580743854
Environmental policy researcher Nathan Lemphers jokingly referred to Goldman Sachs analysts running from Exxon stocks as "eco-radicals" as he noted on Twitter that other investment banks appear to be following suit.
\u201cEco-radicals @GoldmanSachs downgrade @exxonmobil to "sell" status. Seems like many other major investment banks are following suit. A reminder that capital often doesn't walk, it runs. https://t.co/DpyuHAu1if\u201d— Nathan Lemphers (@Nathan Lemphers) 1580737313
"It's time for a strategy that's better for the climate and shareholders alike," wrote Edward Mason, head of responsible investment for the Church of England, which voted nearly two years ago to divest from fossil fuels by 2023.