

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton could testify before Congress over the conduct of President Donald Trump. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
As the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump grows nearer, calls are increasing for Congress to subpoena former National Security Advisor John Bolton to find out what the former White House official knows.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has refused to commit to allowing witnesses at the president's Senate trial, but Bolton's declaration that he would be willing to testify if officially ordered has led to a chorus of voices urging the Democratic-controlled House to subpoena him instead.
has opened the door for the advisor to at least appear before the House, the New York Times' David Leonhardt argued Thursday, where Bolton's testimony could have a lasting effect.
"Democrats have little ability to influence Senate Republicans, at least in the short term," New York Times columnist David Leonhardt wrote Thursday. "But they can and should do everything in their power to influence public opinion, which may well influence the makeup of the Senate and the occupant of the White House in the longer term."
Bolton is considered a potential key witness in Trump's efforts in August and September to withhold military aid as a pressure point to force Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President and current 2020 Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden.
As Common Dreams reported, Bolton on Monday said he would abide by a Senate subpoena if one were issued.
"If the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify," the former advisor said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has thus far delayed the Senate trial by withholding the articles of impeachment until McConnell provides a roamap for the trial. Senate Democrats have recently called for the speaker to turn the articles over but the California Democrat said Thursday she was not ready to do so yet--adding that holding the articles back had already led to Bolton's Monday declaration.
"I'll send them over when I'm ready," Pelosi during a Thursday morning press conference on Capitol Hill.
As Crooked Media's Brian Beutler pointed out, Bolton's willingness to submit to a subpoena change the calculation:
Schumer's view reflects the strategy Democrats set in motion before Bolton chimed in: Delay the trial until Republicans announced whether they would rig it or not. Maximize pressure on them to conduct a fair trial, but make their coverup scheme clear to the world if not. With Bolton's statement in hand, and Republicans grasping at inane justifications for not issuing him the subpoena he's requested, House Democrats should change plans: issue him a subpoena themselves, and advise Republicans that the trial won't begin until Bolton testifies, in one chamber or the other.
In an essay for NBC Think, Kurt Bardella opined that a refusal to call Bolton before Congress now that the former advisor has put the ball in lawmakers' court could have ramifications beyond the Trump presidency.
"What Congress does--or doesn't--do will be used as a blueprint for whoever comes next," wrote Bardella.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump grows nearer, calls are increasing for Congress to subpoena former National Security Advisor John Bolton to find out what the former White House official knows.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has refused to commit to allowing witnesses at the president's Senate trial, but Bolton's declaration that he would be willing to testify if officially ordered has led to a chorus of voices urging the Democratic-controlled House to subpoena him instead.
has opened the door for the advisor to at least appear before the House, the New York Times' David Leonhardt argued Thursday, where Bolton's testimony could have a lasting effect.
"Democrats have little ability to influence Senate Republicans, at least in the short term," New York Times columnist David Leonhardt wrote Thursday. "But they can and should do everything in their power to influence public opinion, which may well influence the makeup of the Senate and the occupant of the White House in the longer term."
Bolton is considered a potential key witness in Trump's efforts in August and September to withhold military aid as a pressure point to force Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President and current 2020 Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden.
As Common Dreams reported, Bolton on Monday said he would abide by a Senate subpoena if one were issued.
"If the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify," the former advisor said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has thus far delayed the Senate trial by withholding the articles of impeachment until McConnell provides a roamap for the trial. Senate Democrats have recently called for the speaker to turn the articles over but the California Democrat said Thursday she was not ready to do so yet--adding that holding the articles back had already led to Bolton's Monday declaration.
"I'll send them over when I'm ready," Pelosi during a Thursday morning press conference on Capitol Hill.
As Crooked Media's Brian Beutler pointed out, Bolton's willingness to submit to a subpoena change the calculation:
Schumer's view reflects the strategy Democrats set in motion before Bolton chimed in: Delay the trial until Republicans announced whether they would rig it or not. Maximize pressure on them to conduct a fair trial, but make their coverup scheme clear to the world if not. With Bolton's statement in hand, and Republicans grasping at inane justifications for not issuing him the subpoena he's requested, House Democrats should change plans: issue him a subpoena themselves, and advise Republicans that the trial won't begin until Bolton testifies, in one chamber or the other.
In an essay for NBC Think, Kurt Bardella opined that a refusal to call Bolton before Congress now that the former advisor has put the ball in lawmakers' court could have ramifications beyond the Trump presidency.
"What Congress does--or doesn't--do will be used as a blueprint for whoever comes next," wrote Bardella.
As the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump grows nearer, calls are increasing for Congress to subpoena former National Security Advisor John Bolton to find out what the former White House official knows.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has refused to commit to allowing witnesses at the president's Senate trial, but Bolton's declaration that he would be willing to testify if officially ordered has led to a chorus of voices urging the Democratic-controlled House to subpoena him instead.
has opened the door for the advisor to at least appear before the House, the New York Times' David Leonhardt argued Thursday, where Bolton's testimony could have a lasting effect.
"Democrats have little ability to influence Senate Republicans, at least in the short term," New York Times columnist David Leonhardt wrote Thursday. "But they can and should do everything in their power to influence public opinion, which may well influence the makeup of the Senate and the occupant of the White House in the longer term."
Bolton is considered a potential key witness in Trump's efforts in August and September to withhold military aid as a pressure point to force Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President and current 2020 Democratic frontrunner Joe Biden.
As Common Dreams reported, Bolton on Monday said he would abide by a Senate subpoena if one were issued.
"If the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify," the former advisor said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has thus far delayed the Senate trial by withholding the articles of impeachment until McConnell provides a roamap for the trial. Senate Democrats have recently called for the speaker to turn the articles over but the California Democrat said Thursday she was not ready to do so yet--adding that holding the articles back had already led to Bolton's Monday declaration.
"I'll send them over when I'm ready," Pelosi during a Thursday morning press conference on Capitol Hill.
As Crooked Media's Brian Beutler pointed out, Bolton's willingness to submit to a subpoena change the calculation:
Schumer's view reflects the strategy Democrats set in motion before Bolton chimed in: Delay the trial until Republicans announced whether they would rig it or not. Maximize pressure on them to conduct a fair trial, but make their coverup scheme clear to the world if not. With Bolton's statement in hand, and Republicans grasping at inane justifications for not issuing him the subpoena he's requested, House Democrats should change plans: issue him a subpoena themselves, and advise Republicans that the trial won't begin until Bolton testifies, in one chamber or the other.
In an essay for NBC Think, Kurt Bardella opined that a refusal to call Bolton before Congress now that the former advisor has put the ball in lawmakers' court could have ramifications beyond the Trump presidency.
"What Congress does--or doesn't--do will be used as a blueprint for whoever comes next," wrote Bardella.