Jan 05, 2020
Progressive anti-war voices expressed fresh condemnation of President Donald Trump overnight after he told reporters late Sunday that the people of Iraq would be sanctioned "like they've never seen before ever" if they follow through with an effort to force all U.S. military forces out of the country.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is." --Jeet Heer, The Nation
Answering questions aboard Air Force One on his way back from a two-week vacation in Florida to the White House, Trump was asked about Sunday's passage of a two-fold resolution in the Iraqi Parliament that called on the government to expel all American troops from the country and file a United Nations complaint against the U.S. for violating Iraq's sovereignty with last week's assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad.
In response, Trump said that the U.S. would not leave on "a friendly basis" and vowed to make the Iraqis pay the U.S. back for military expenditures made in the country during the occupation that followed the 2003 invasion.
"We will charge them sanctions like they've never seen before ever. It'll make Iranian sanctions look somewhat tame," Trump told the pool reporters. "If there's any hostility, that they do anything we think is inappropriate, we are going to put sanctions on Iraq, very big sanctions on Iraq."
The fact is that the people of Iraq have seen devastating sanctions imposed by the U.S. before and the results were catastrophic. A study published in The Lancet in 1995 put the number of child deaths attributable to U.S. sanctions following the first Gulf War as high a 576,000--over a period of less than four years. While other estimates are lower--and vary depending on the time period considered--the numbers remain in the hundreds of thousands of young children who would otherwise have lived if not for the devastating--and predictable--impacts of U.S. economic and trade sanctions.
In his comments about new U.S. sanctions, Trump specifically mentioned "a very extraordinarily expensive air base" the U.S. built in Iraq. "It cost billions of dollars to build. Long before my time," Trump said. "We're not leaving, until they pay us back for it."
Given the standing international call that the U.S. should be made to pay reparations for its destruction of Iraq over the last 17 years, Trump's threats to impose crushing sanctions was met with immediate rebuke by critics.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is," tweeted Jeet Heer, national-affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine.
\u201cTrump threatens Iraq with harshest sanctions. This debacle is just snowballing.\nFirst we invade you, then we break you & then sanction you. \n#Iraq #SoleimaniAssassination\u201d— Farnaz Fassihi (@Farnaz Fassihi) 1578292032
At Anti-War.com, Jason Ditz writes:
Iraq, of course, was already under heavy US sanctions from 1989 to the 2003 invasion and occupation. The sanctions are estimated to have killed 1.6 million Iraqis, a great many of them children. Those sanctions were to punish Iraq for weapons of mass destruction that they didn't have.
Trump's threat is meant to imply he'll inflict something even worse on Iraq this time. This is perhaps even more galling in that the threat is the result not of anything wrong that Iraq has done, but just because Trump is very cross with them.
Progressive activist Derrick Crowe, meanwhile, described Trump's latest threat "as insane, imperial horseshit."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.