U.S. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrive at the White House on January 05, 2020 in Washington, DC. The Trumps were returning from spending the holidays at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Bach, Florida after last week's U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian military leader, Major Gen. Qasem Soleimani. (Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Trump Threatens Iraq--Previously Decimated by US Sanctions--With Sanctions 'Like They've Never Seen Before'
"First we invade you, then we break you, and then sanction you."
Progressive anti-war voices expressed fresh condemnation of President Donald Trump overnight after he told reporters late Sunday that the people of Iraq would be sanctioned "like they've never seen before ever" if they follow through with an effort to force all U.S. military forces out of the country.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is." --Jeet Heer, The Nation
Answering questions aboard Air Force One on his way back from a two-week vacation in Florida to the White House, Trump was asked about Sunday's passage of a two-fold resolution in the Iraqi Parliament that called on the government to expel all American troops from the country and file a United Nations complaint against the U.S. for violating Iraq's sovereignty with last week's assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad.
In response, Trump said that the U.S. would not leave on "a friendly basis" and vowed to make the Iraqis pay the U.S. back for military expenditures made in the country during the occupation that followed the 2003 invasion.
"We will charge them sanctions like they've never seen before ever. It'll make Iranian sanctions look somewhat tame," Trump told the pool reporters. "If there's any hostility, that they do anything we think is inappropriate, we are going to put sanctions on Iraq, very big sanctions on Iraq."
The fact is that the people of Iraq have seen devastating sanctions imposed by the U.S. before and the results were catastrophic. A study published in The Lancet in 1995 put the number of child deaths attributable to U.S. sanctions following the first Gulf War as high a 576,000--over a period of less than four years. While other estimates are lower--and vary depending on the time period considered--the numbers remain in the hundreds of thousands of young children who would otherwise have lived if not for the devastating--and predictable--impacts of U.S. economic and trade sanctions.
In his comments about new U.S. sanctions, Trump specifically mentioned "a very extraordinarily expensive air base" the U.S. built in Iraq. "It cost billions of dollars to build. Long before my time," Trump said. "We're not leaving, until they pay us back for it."
Given the standing international call that the U.S. should be made to pay reparations for its destruction of Iraq over the last 17 years, Trump's threats to impose crushing sanctions was met with immediate rebuke by critics.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is," tweeted Jeet Heer, national-affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine.
At Anti-War.com, Jason Ditz writes:
Iraq, of course, was already under heavy US sanctions from 1989 to the 2003 invasion and occupation. The sanctions are estimated to have killed 1.6 million Iraqis, a great many of them children. Those sanctions were to punish Iraq for weapons of mass destruction that they didn't have.
Trump's threat is meant to imply he'll inflict something even worse on Iraq this time. This is perhaps even more galling in that the threat is the result not of anything wrong that Iraq has done, but just because Trump is very cross with them.
Progressive activist Derrick Crowe, meanwhile, described Trump's latest threat "as insane, imperial horseshit."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressive anti-war voices expressed fresh condemnation of President Donald Trump overnight after he told reporters late Sunday that the people of Iraq would be sanctioned "like they've never seen before ever" if they follow through with an effort to force all U.S. military forces out of the country.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is." --Jeet Heer, The Nation
Answering questions aboard Air Force One on his way back from a two-week vacation in Florida to the White House, Trump was asked about Sunday's passage of a two-fold resolution in the Iraqi Parliament that called on the government to expel all American troops from the country and file a United Nations complaint against the U.S. for violating Iraq's sovereignty with last week's assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad.
In response, Trump said that the U.S. would not leave on "a friendly basis" and vowed to make the Iraqis pay the U.S. back for military expenditures made in the country during the occupation that followed the 2003 invasion.
"We will charge them sanctions like they've never seen before ever. It'll make Iranian sanctions look somewhat tame," Trump told the pool reporters. "If there's any hostility, that they do anything we think is inappropriate, we are going to put sanctions on Iraq, very big sanctions on Iraq."
The fact is that the people of Iraq have seen devastating sanctions imposed by the U.S. before and the results were catastrophic. A study published in The Lancet in 1995 put the number of child deaths attributable to U.S. sanctions following the first Gulf War as high a 576,000--over a period of less than four years. While other estimates are lower--and vary depending on the time period considered--the numbers remain in the hundreds of thousands of young children who would otherwise have lived if not for the devastating--and predictable--impacts of U.S. economic and trade sanctions.
In his comments about new U.S. sanctions, Trump specifically mentioned "a very extraordinarily expensive air base" the U.S. built in Iraq. "It cost billions of dollars to build. Long before my time," Trump said. "We're not leaving, until they pay us back for it."
Given the standing international call that the U.S. should be made to pay reparations for its destruction of Iraq over the last 17 years, Trump's threats to impose crushing sanctions was met with immediate rebuke by critics.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is," tweeted Jeet Heer, national-affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine.
At Anti-War.com, Jason Ditz writes:
Iraq, of course, was already under heavy US sanctions from 1989 to the 2003 invasion and occupation. The sanctions are estimated to have killed 1.6 million Iraqis, a great many of them children. Those sanctions were to punish Iraq for weapons of mass destruction that they didn't have.
Trump's threat is meant to imply he'll inflict something even worse on Iraq this time. This is perhaps even more galling in that the threat is the result not of anything wrong that Iraq has done, but just because Trump is very cross with them.
Progressive activist Derrick Crowe, meanwhile, described Trump's latest threat "as insane, imperial horseshit."
Progressive anti-war voices expressed fresh condemnation of President Donald Trump overnight after he told reporters late Sunday that the people of Iraq would be sanctioned "like they've never seen before ever" if they follow through with an effort to force all U.S. military forces out of the country.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is." --Jeet Heer, The Nation
Answering questions aboard Air Force One on his way back from a two-week vacation in Florida to the White House, Trump was asked about Sunday's passage of a two-fold resolution in the Iraqi Parliament that called on the government to expel all American troops from the country and file a United Nations complaint against the U.S. for violating Iraq's sovereignty with last week's assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad.
In response, Trump said that the U.S. would not leave on "a friendly basis" and vowed to make the Iraqis pay the U.S. back for military expenditures made in the country during the occupation that followed the 2003 invasion.
"We will charge them sanctions like they've never seen before ever. It'll make Iranian sanctions look somewhat tame," Trump told the pool reporters. "If there's any hostility, that they do anything we think is inappropriate, we are going to put sanctions on Iraq, very big sanctions on Iraq."
The fact is that the people of Iraq have seen devastating sanctions imposed by the U.S. before and the results were catastrophic. A study published in The Lancet in 1995 put the number of child deaths attributable to U.S. sanctions following the first Gulf War as high a 576,000--over a period of less than four years. While other estimates are lower--and vary depending on the time period considered--the numbers remain in the hundreds of thousands of young children who would otherwise have lived if not for the devastating--and predictable--impacts of U.S. economic and trade sanctions.
In his comments about new U.S. sanctions, Trump specifically mentioned "a very extraordinarily expensive air base" the U.S. built in Iraq. "It cost billions of dollars to build. Long before my time," Trump said. "We're not leaving, until they pay us back for it."
Given the standing international call that the U.S. should be made to pay reparations for its destruction of Iraq over the last 17 years, Trump's threats to impose crushing sanctions was met with immediate rebuke by critics.
"It's hard to overstate how bonkers this is," tweeted Jeet Heer, national-affairs correspondent for The Nation magazine.
At Anti-War.com, Jason Ditz writes:
Iraq, of course, was already under heavy US sanctions from 1989 to the 2003 invasion and occupation. The sanctions are estimated to have killed 1.6 million Iraqis, a great many of them children. Those sanctions were to punish Iraq for weapons of mass destruction that they didn't have.
Trump's threat is meant to imply he'll inflict something even worse on Iraq this time. This is perhaps even more galling in that the threat is the result not of anything wrong that Iraq has done, but just because Trump is very cross with them.
Progressive activist Derrick Crowe, meanwhile, described Trump's latest threat "as insane, imperial horseshit."