Democratic presidential hopeful Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders speaks during the sixth Democratic primary debate of the 2020 presidential campaign season co-hosted by PBS NewsHour & Politico at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, California on December 19, 2019. (Photo: Frederic J. Brown / AFP)
After Telling Moderator Climate Question 'Misses the Mark,' Sanders Says Real Issue Is Will We 'Save the Planet for Our Children and Grandchildren'
"Instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year globally on weapons of destruction," said Sanders, "maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Sen. Bernie Sanders received widespread applause during Thursday night's Democratic Party presidential debate when he challenged what he considered a flimsy question on the issue of the climate crisis and then offered a far-reaching critique about a global system in which trillions are spent on war and destruction but similar investments are not made to address the emergency of global heating.
"The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough." --Sen. Bernie SandersAfter Tim Alberta, Politico's chief political correspondent and one of the debate moderators, asked candidates if they would support federal funding to relocate communities threatened by rising sea levels and flooding rivers, Sanders took issue with the premise of the question.
"With all due respect, Tim, your question misses the mark," Sanders said.
"It is not an issue of relocating people from towns," Sanders continued. "The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren. The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough."
Sanders continued by saying the nation must "declare a national emergency" and touted legislation he has proposed to do exactly that.
"The United States has got to lead the world, and maybe--just maybe--instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year, globally, on weapons of destruction," he continued, "maybe an American president (ie. Bernie Sanders) can lead the world. Instead of spending money to kill eachother, maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Watch:
\u201cRejoining the Paris Agreement ain't enough.\n\nThe issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren.\n\nWe need a Green New Deal. #DemDebate\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1576806256
Climate campaigners applauded the answer as the top moment of the debate up to that point.
\u201c.@BernieSanders redirects the #DemDebate questions on the climate crisis with some perspective:\n\n"The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren."\n\nBiggest applause so far of the night.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576805964
\u201chttps://t.co/Hc31esFaqd\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576808291
"Thank you BernieSanders," tweeted Friends of the Earth, "for continuing to call for the bold solutions that match the scale of crisis we are facing."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sen. Bernie Sanders received widespread applause during Thursday night's Democratic Party presidential debate when he challenged what he considered a flimsy question on the issue of the climate crisis and then offered a far-reaching critique about a global system in which trillions are spent on war and destruction but similar investments are not made to address the emergency of global heating.
"The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough." --Sen. Bernie SandersAfter Tim Alberta, Politico's chief political correspondent and one of the debate moderators, asked candidates if they would support federal funding to relocate communities threatened by rising sea levels and flooding rivers, Sanders took issue with the premise of the question.
"With all due respect, Tim, your question misses the mark," Sanders said.
"It is not an issue of relocating people from towns," Sanders continued. "The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren. The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough."
Sanders continued by saying the nation must "declare a national emergency" and touted legislation he has proposed to do exactly that.
"The United States has got to lead the world, and maybe--just maybe--instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year, globally, on weapons of destruction," he continued, "maybe an American president (ie. Bernie Sanders) can lead the world. Instead of spending money to kill eachother, maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Watch:
\u201cRejoining the Paris Agreement ain't enough.\n\nThe issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren.\n\nWe need a Green New Deal. #DemDebate\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1576806256
Climate campaigners applauded the answer as the top moment of the debate up to that point.
\u201c.@BernieSanders redirects the #DemDebate questions on the climate crisis with some perspective:\n\n"The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren."\n\nBiggest applause so far of the night.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576805964
\u201chttps://t.co/Hc31esFaqd\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576808291
"Thank you BernieSanders," tweeted Friends of the Earth, "for continuing to call for the bold solutions that match the scale of crisis we are facing."
Sen. Bernie Sanders received widespread applause during Thursday night's Democratic Party presidential debate when he challenged what he considered a flimsy question on the issue of the climate crisis and then offered a far-reaching critique about a global system in which trillions are spent on war and destruction but similar investments are not made to address the emergency of global heating.
"The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough." --Sen. Bernie SandersAfter Tim Alberta, Politico's chief political correspondent and one of the debate moderators, asked candidates if they would support federal funding to relocate communities threatened by rising sea levels and flooding rivers, Sanders took issue with the premise of the question.
"With all due respect, Tim, your question misses the mark," Sanders said.
"It is not an issue of relocating people from towns," Sanders continued. "The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren. The issue, as you should know, what the scientists are telling us, is that they have underestimated the threat and severity of climate change. We're talking about the Paris Agreement--that's fine--it ain't enough."
Sanders continued by saying the nation must "declare a national emergency" and touted legislation he has proposed to do exactly that.
"The United States has got to lead the world, and maybe--just maybe--instead of spending $1.8 trillion a year, globally, on weapons of destruction," he continued, "maybe an American president (ie. Bernie Sanders) can lead the world. Instead of spending money to kill eachother, maybe we pool our resources and fight our common enemy which is climate change."
Watch:
\u201cRejoining the Paris Agreement ain't enough.\n\nThe issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren.\n\nWe need a Green New Deal. #DemDebate\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1576806256
Climate campaigners applauded the answer as the top moment of the debate up to that point.
\u201c.@BernieSanders redirects the #DemDebate questions on the climate crisis with some perspective:\n\n"The issue now is whether we save the planet for our children and grandchildren."\n\nBiggest applause so far of the night.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576805964
\u201chttps://t.co/Hc31esFaqd\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1576808291
"Thank you BernieSanders," tweeted Friends of the Earth, "for continuing to call for the bold solutions that match the scale of crisis we are facing."